- 28 8月, 2015 2 次提交
-
-
由 Alexandre Courbot 提交于
GK20A's initialization was based on GK104, but differences exist in the way the initial context is built and the initialization process itself. This patch follows the same initialization sequence as nvgpu performs to avoid bad surprises. Since the register bundles initialization also differ considerably from GK104, the register packs are now loaded from firmware files, again similarly to what is done with nvgpu. Signed-off-by: NAlexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
由 Alexandre Courbot 提交于
NVIDIA will officially start providing GR firmwares through linux-firmware for GPUs that require it. Change the GR firmware lookup function to use these files. Signed-off-by: NAlexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
- 27 7月, 2015 2 次提交
-
-
由 Alexandre Courbot 提交于
After submitting a GO_IDLE bundle, one must wait for GR to effectively be idle before submitting the next bundle. Failure to do so may result in undefined behavior in some rare cases. Signed-off-by: NAlexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com> Reported-by: NKary Jin <karyj@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
由 Alexandre Courbot 提交于
When emitting the ICMD bundle, wait on the bottom half (bit 3 of the GR_STATUS register) instead of upper half (bit 2) to make sure methods are effectively emitted. Signed-off-by: NAlexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
- 29 5月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Ben Skeggs 提交于
Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
- 14 4月, 2015 13 次提交
-
-
由 Ben Skeggs 提交于
Uncertain whether the GPC pack change is due to a newer driver version, or a legitimate difference from GM204. My GM204 has broken vram, so can't currently try a newer binary driver on it to confirm. Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
由 Ben Skeggs 提交于
Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
由 Ben Skeggs 提交于
Under certain circumstances the trapped address will contain subc 7, which GK104 GR doesn't have anymore. Notice this case to avoid causing additional priv ring faults. Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
由 Ben Skeggs 提交于
No idea if "3" is a constant or derived from something else, but the value is unchanged in the limited traces of gm107/gm204 I have here. Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
由 Ben Skeggs 提交于
Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
由 Ben Skeggs 提交于
Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
由 Ben Skeggs 提交于
Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
由 Ben Skeggs 提交于
Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
由 Ben Skeggs 提交于
On some of these chipsets, reading NV_PGRAPH_GPC_GPM_PD_PES_TPC_ID_MASK can trigger a PRI fault and return an error code instead of a TPC mask, unless PGOB has been disabled first. Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
由 Ben Skeggs 提交于
Before we moved gk110's implementation of this to pmu, the functions were identical. This commit just switches GK208 to use the new (more complete) implementation of the power-up sequence. Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
由 Ben Skeggs 提交于
Turns out the PTHERM part of this dance is bracketed by the same PMU fiddling that occurs on GK104/6, let's assume it's also PGOB. Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
由 Lauri Peltonen 提交于
Notify interrupt is only used for cyclestats. We can just clear it and avoid an "unknown stat" error that gets printed to dmesg otherwise. Signed-off-by: NLauri Peltonen <lpeltonen@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NAlexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
由 Lauri Peltonen 提交于
Other methods in this file suggest this is the correct way to retrieve the engine pointer. Signed-off-by: NLauri Peltonen <lpeltonen@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NAlexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
- 17 3月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Ben Skeggs 提交于
fdo#83992 Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
- 22 1月, 2015 7 次提交
-
-
由 Ben Skeggs 提交于
The namespace of NVKM is being changed to nvkm_ instead of nouveau_, which will be used for the DRM part of the driver. This is being done in order to make it very clear as to what part of the driver a given symbol belongs to, and as a minor step towards splitting the DRM driver out to be able to stand on its own (for virt). Because there's already a large amount of churn here anyway, this is as good a time as any to also switch to NVIDIA's device and chipset naming to ease collaboration with them. A comparison of objdump disassemblies proves no code changes. Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
由 Ben Skeggs 提交于
The namespace of NVKM is being changed to nvkm_ instead of nouveau_, which will be used for the DRM part of the driver. This is being done in order to make it very clear as to what part of the driver a given symbol belongs to, and as a minor step towards splitting the DRM driver out to be able to stand on its own (for virt). Because there's already a large amount of churn here anyway, this is as good a time as any to also switch to NVIDIA's device and chipset naming to ease collaboration with them. A comparison of objdump disassemblies proves no code changes. Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
由 Ben Skeggs 提交于
The namespace of NVKM is being changed to nvkm_ instead of nouveau_, which will be used for the DRM part of the driver. This is being done in order to make it very clear as to what part of the driver a given symbol belongs to, and as a minor step towards splitting the DRM driver out to be able to stand on its own (for virt). Because there's already a large amount of churn here anyway, this is as good a time as any to also switch to NVIDIA's device and chipset naming to ease collaboration with them. A comparison of objdump disassemblies proves no code changes. Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
由 Ben Skeggs 提交于
The namespace of NVKM is being changed to nvkm_ instead of nouveau_, which will be used for the DRM part of the driver. This is being done in order to make it very clear as to what part of the driver a given symbol belongs to, and as a minor step towards splitting the DRM driver out to be able to stand on its own (for virt). Because there's already a large amount of churn here anyway, this is as good a time as any to also switch to NVIDIA's device and chipset naming to ease collaboration with them. A comparison of objdump disassemblies proves no code changes. Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
由 Ben Skeggs 提交于
The namespace of NVKM is being changed to nvkm_ instead of nouveau_, which will be used for the DRM part of the driver. This is being done in order to make it very clear as to what part of the driver a given symbol belongs to, and as a minor step towards splitting the DRM driver out to be able to stand on its own (for virt). Because there's already a large amount of churn here anyway, this is as good a time as any to also switch to NVIDIA's device and chipset naming to ease collaboration with them. A comparison of objdump disassemblies proves no code changes. Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
由 Ben Skeggs 提交于
The namespace of NVKM is being changed to nvkm_ instead of nouveau_, which will be used for the DRM part of the driver. This is being done in order to make it very clear as to what part of the driver a given symbol belongs to, and as a minor step towards splitting the DRM driver out to be able to stand on its own (for virt). Because there's already a large amount of churn here anyway, this is as good a time as any to also switch to NVIDIA's device and chipset naming to ease collaboration with them. A comparison of objdump disassemblies proves no code changes. Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
由 Ben Skeggs 提交于
Shorter device name, match Tegra and our existing enums. The namespace of NVKM is being changed to nvkm_ instead of nouveau_, which will be used for the DRM part of the driver. This is being done in order to make it very clear as to what part of the driver a given symbol belongs to, and as a minor step towards splitting the DRM driver out to be able to stand on its own (for virt). Because there's already a large amount of churn here anyway, this is as good a time as any to also switch to NVIDIA's device and chipset naming to ease collaboration with them. A comparison of objdump disassemblies proves no code changes. Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-