- 18 10月, 2017 1 次提交
-
-
由 David Howells 提交于
Make AF_RXRPC accept MSG_WAITALL as a flag to sendmsg() to tell it to ignore signals whilst loading up the message queue, provided progress is being made in emptying the queue at the other side. Progress is defined as the base of the transmit window having being advanced within 2 RTT periods. If the period is exceeded with no progress, sendmsg() will return anyway, indicating how much data has been copied, if any. Once the supplied buffer is entirely decanted, the sendmsg() will return. Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
-
- 29 8月, 2017 3 次提交
-
-
由 David Howells 提交于
Allow a client call that failed on network error to be retried, provided that the Tx queue still holds DATA packet 1. This allows an operation to be submitted to another server or another address for the same server without having to repackage and re-encrypt the data so far processed. Two new functions are provided: (1) rxrpc_kernel_check_call() - This is used to find out the completion state of a call to guess whether it can be retried and whether it should be retried. (2) rxrpc_kernel_retry_call() - Disconnect the call from its current connection, reset the state and submit it as a new client call to a new address. The new address need not match the previous address. A call may be retried even if all the data hasn't been loaded into it yet; a partially constructed will be retained at the same point it was at when an error condition was detected. msg_data_left() can be used to find out how much data was packaged before the error occurred. Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
-
由 David Howells 提交于
Add a callback to rxrpc_kernel_send_data() so that a kernel service can get a notification that the AF_RXRPC call has transitioned out the Tx phase and is now waiting for a reply or a final ACK. This is called from AF_RXRPC with the call state lock held so the notification is guaranteed to come before any reply is passed back. Further, modify the AFS filesystem to make use of this so that we don't have to change the afs_call state before sending the last bit of data. Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
-
由 David Howells 提交于
call->error is stored as 0 or a negative error code. Don't negate this value (ie. make it positive) before returning it from a kernel function (though it should still be negated before passing to userspace through a control message). Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
-
- 16 6月, 2017 1 次提交
-
-
由 Johannes Berg 提交于
There were many places that my previous spatch didn't find, as pointed out by yuan linyu in various patches. The following spatch found many more and also removes the now unnecessary casts: @@ identifier p, p2; expression len; expression skb; type t, t2; @@ ( -p = skb_put(skb, len); +p = skb_put_zero(skb, len); | -p = (t)skb_put(skb, len); +p = skb_put_zero(skb, len); ) ... when != p ( p2 = (t2)p; -memset(p2, 0, len); | -memset(p, 0, len); ) @@ type t, t2; identifier p, p2; expression skb; @@ t *p; ... ( -p = skb_put(skb, sizeof(t)); +p = skb_put_zero(skb, sizeof(t)); | -p = (t *)skb_put(skb, sizeof(t)); +p = skb_put_zero(skb, sizeof(t)); ) ... when != p ( p2 = (t2)p; -memset(p2, 0, sizeof(*p)); | -memset(p, 0, sizeof(*p)); ) @@ expression skb, len; @@ -memset(skb_put(skb, len), 0, len); +skb_put_zero(skb, len); Apply it to the tree (with one manual fixup to keep the comment in vxlan.c, which spatch removed.) Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 08 6月, 2017 2 次提交
-
-
由 David Howells 提交于
Provide a control message that can be specified on the first sendmsg() of a client call or the first sendmsg() of a service response to indicate the total length of the data to be transmitted for that call. Currently, because the length of the payload of an encrypted DATA packet is encrypted in front of the data, the packet cannot be encrypted until we know how much data it will hold. By specifying the length at the beginning of the transmit phase, each DATA packet length can be set before we start loading data from userspace (where several sendmsg() calls may contribute to a particular packet). An error will be returned if too little or too much data is presented in the Tx phase. Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
-
由 David Howells 提交于
Consolidate the sendmsg control message parameters into a struct rather than passing them individually through the argument list of rxrpc_sendmsg_cmsg(). This makes it easier to add more parameters. Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
-
- 05 6月, 2017 1 次提交
-
-
由 David Howells 提交于
Make it possible for a client to use AuriStor's service upgrade facility. The client does this by adding an RXRPC_UPGRADE_SERVICE control message to the first sendmsg() of a call. This takes no parameters. When recvmsg() starts returning data from the call, the service ID field in the returned msg_name will reflect the result of the upgrade attempt. If the upgrade was ignored, srx_service will match what was set in the sendmsg(); if the upgrade happened the srx_service will be altered to indicate the service the server upgraded to. Note that: (1) The choice of upgrade service is up to the server (2) Further client calls to the same server that would share a connection are blocked if an upgrade probe is in progress. (3) This should only be used to probe the service. Clients should then use the returned service ID in all subsequent communications with that server (and not set the upgrade). Note that the kernel will not retain this information should the connection expire from its cache. (4) If a server that supports upgrading is replaced by one that doesn't, whilst a connection is live, and if the replacement is running, say, OpenAFS 1.6.4 or older or an older IBM AFS, then the replacement server will not respond to packets sent to the upgraded connection. At this point, calls will time out and the server must be reprobed. Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
-
- 06 4月, 2017 3 次提交
-
-
由 David Howells 提交于
Add a tracepoint (rxrpc_rx_proto) to record protocol errors in received packets. The following changes are made: (1) Add a function, __rxrpc_abort_eproto(), to note a protocol error on a call and mark the call aborted. This is wrapped by rxrpc_abort_eproto() that makes the why string usable in trace. (2) Add trace_rxrpc_rx_proto() or rxrpc_abort_eproto() to protocol error generation points, replacing rxrpc_abort_call() with the latter. (3) Only send an abort packet in rxkad_verify_packet*() if we actually managed to abort the call. Note that a trace event is also emitted if a kernel user (e.g. afs) tries to send data through a call when it's not in the transmission phase, though it's not technically a receive event. Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
-
由 David Howells 提交于
Make rxrpc_kernel_abort_call() return an indication as to whether it actually aborted the operation or not so that kafs can trace the failure of the operation. Note that 'success' in this context means changing the state of the call, not necessarily successfully transmitting an ABORT packet. Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
-
由 David Howells 提交于
Use negative error codes in struct rxrpc_call::error because that's what the kernel normally deals with and to make the code consistent. We only turn them positive when transcribing into a cmsg for userspace recvmsg. Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
-
- 10 3月, 2017 1 次提交
-
-
由 David Howells 提交于
If rxrpc_kernel_send_data() is asked to send data through a call that has already failed (due to a remote abort, received protocol error or network error), then return the associated error code saved in the call rather than ESHUTDOWN. This allows the caller to work out whether to ask for the abort code or not based on this. Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 08 3月, 2017 1 次提交
-
-
由 David Howells 提交于
The call state may be changed at any time by the data-ready routine in response to received packets, so if the call state is to be read and acted upon several times in a function, READ_ONCE() must be used unless the call state lock is held. Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 04 3月, 2017 1 次提交
-
-
由 David Howells 提交于
Fix a potential NULL-pointer exception in rxrpc_do_sendmsg(). The call state check that I added should have gone into the else-body of the if-statement where we actually have a call to check. Found by CoverityScan CID#1414316 ("Dereference after null check"). Fixes: 540b1c48 ("rxrpc: Fix deadlock between call creation and sendmsg/recvmsg") Reported-by: NColin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 02 3月, 2017 2 次提交
-
-
由 Ingo Molnar 提交于
sched/headers: Prepare to move signal wakeup & sigpending methods from <linux/sched.h> into <linux/sched/signal.h> Fix up affected files that include this signal functionality via sched.h. Acked-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
由 David Howells 提交于
All the routines by which rxrpc is accessed from the outside are serialised by means of the socket lock (sendmsg, recvmsg, bind, rxrpc_kernel_begin_call(), ...) and this presents a problem: (1) If a number of calls on the same socket are in the process of connection to the same peer, a maximum of four concurrent live calls are permitted before further calls need to wait for a slot. (2) If a call is waiting for a slot, it is deep inside sendmsg() or rxrpc_kernel_begin_call() and the entry function is holding the socket lock. (3) sendmsg() and recvmsg() or the in-kernel equivalents are prevented from servicing the other calls as they need to take the socket lock to do so. (4) The socket is stuck until a call is aborted and makes its slot available to the waiter. Fix this by: (1) Provide each call with a mutex ('user_mutex') that arbitrates access by the users of rxrpc separately for each specific call. (2) Make rxrpc_sendmsg() and rxrpc_recvmsg() unlock the socket as soon as they've got a call and taken its mutex. Note that I'm returning EWOULDBLOCK from recvmsg() if MSG_DONTWAIT is set but someone else has the lock. Should I instead only return EWOULDBLOCK if there's nothing currently to be done on a socket, and sleep in this particular instance because there is something to be done, but we appear to be blocked by the interrupt handler doing its ping? (3) Make rxrpc_new_client_call() unlock the socket after allocating a new call, locking its user mutex and adding it to the socket's call tree. The call is returned locked so that sendmsg() can add data to it immediately. From the moment the call is in the socket tree, it is subject to access by sendmsg() and recvmsg() - even if it isn't connected yet. (4) Lock new service calls in the UDP data_ready handler (in rxrpc_new_incoming_call()) because they may already be in the socket's tree and the data_ready handler makes them live immediately if a user ID has already been preassigned. Note that the new call is locked before any notifications are sent that it is live, so doing mutex_trylock() *ought* to always succeed. Userspace is prevented from doing sendmsg() on calls that are in a too-early state in rxrpc_do_sendmsg(). (5) Make rxrpc_new_incoming_call() return the call with the user mutex held so that a ping can be scheduled immediately under it. Note that it might be worth moving the ping call into rxrpc_new_incoming_call() and then we can drop the mutex there. (6) Make rxrpc_accept_call() take the lock on the call it is accepting and release the socket after adding the call to the socket's tree. This is slightly tricky as we've dequeued the call by that point and have to requeue it. Note that requeuing emits a trace event. (7) Make rxrpc_kernel_send_data() and rxrpc_kernel_recv_data() take the new mutex immediately and don't bother with the socket mutex at all. This patch has the nice bonus that calls on the same socket are now to some extent parallelisable. Note that we might want to move rxrpc_service_prealloc() calls out from the socket lock and give it its own lock, so that we don't hang progress in other calls because we're waiting for the allocator. We probably also want to avoid calling rxrpc_notify_socket() from within the socket lock (rxrpc_accept_call()). Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Tested-by: NMarc Dionne <marc.c.dionne@auristor.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 05 1月, 2017 1 次提交
-
-
由 yuan linyu 提交于
sizeof(struct cmsghdr) and sizeof(struct compat_cmsghdr) already aligned. remove use CMSG_ALIGN(sizeof(struct cmsghdr)) and CMSG_COMPAT_ALIGN(sizeof(struct compat_cmsghdr)) keep code consistent. Signed-off-by: Nyuan linyu <Linyu.Yuan@alcatel-sbell.com.cn> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 06 10月, 2016 3 次提交
-
-
由 David Howells 提交于
We need to generate a DELAY ACK from the service end of an operation if we start doing the actual operation work and it takes longer than expected. This will hard-ACK the request data and allow the client to release its resources. To make this work: (1) We have to set the ack timer and propose an ACK when the call moves to the RXRPC_CALL_SERVER_ACK_REQUEST and clear the pending ACK and cancel the timer when we start transmitting the reply (the first DATA packet of the reply implicitly ACKs the request phase). (2) It must be possible to set the timer when the caller is holding call->state_lock, so split the lock-getting part of the timer function out. (3) Add trace notes for the ACK we're requesting and the timer we clear. Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
-
由 David Howells 提交于
Separate the output of PING ACKs from the output of other sorts of ACK so that if we receive a PING ACK and schedule transmission of a PING RESPONSE ACK, the response doesn't get cancelled by a PING ACK we happen to be scheduling transmission of at the same time. If a PING RESPONSE gets lost, the other side might just sit there waiting for it and refuse to proceed otherwise. Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
-
由 David Howells 提交于
Split rxrpc_send_data_packet() to separate ACK generation (which is more complicated) from ABORT generation. This simplifies the code a bit and fixes the following warning: In file included from ../net/rxrpc/output.c:20:0: net/rxrpc/output.c: In function 'rxrpc_send_call_packet': net/rxrpc/ar-internal.h:1187:27: error: 'top' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized] net/rxrpc/output.c:103:24: note: 'top' was declared here net/rxrpc/output.c:225:25: error: 'hard_ack' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized] Reported-by: NArnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
-
- 30 9月, 2016 2 次提交
-
-
由 David Howells 提交于
Keep that call timeouts as ktimes rather than jiffies so that they can be expressed as functions of RTT. Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
-
由 David Howells 提交于
In rxrpc_send_data_packet() make the loss-injection path return through the same code as the transmission path so that the RTT determination is initiated and any future timer shuffling will be done, despite the packet having been binned. Whilst we're at it: (1) Add to the tx_data tracepoint an indication of whether or not we're retransmitting a data packet. (2) When we're deciding whether or not to request an ACK, rather than checking if we're in fast-retransmit mode check instead if we're retransmitting. (3) Don't invoke the lose_skb tracepoint when losing a Tx packet as we're not altering the sk_buff refcount nor are we just seeing it after getting it off the Tx list. (4) The rxrpc_skb_tx_lost note is then no longer used so remove it. (5) rxrpc_lose_skb() no longer needs to deal with rxrpc_skb_tx_lost. Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
-
- 25 9月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 David Howells 提交于
Implement RxRPC slow-start, which is similar to RFC 5681 for TCP. A tracepoint is added to log the state of the congestion management algorithm and the decisions it makes. Notes: (1) Since we send fixed-size DATA packets (apart from the final packet in each phase), counters and calculations are in terms of packets rather than bytes. (2) The ACK packet carries the equivalent of TCP SACK. (3) The FLIGHT_SIZE calculation in RFC 5681 doesn't seem particularly suited to SACK of a small number of packets. It seems that, almost inevitably, by the time three 'duplicate' ACKs have been seen, we have narrowed the loss down to one or two missing packets, and the FLIGHT_SIZE calculation ends up as 2. (4) In rxrpc_resend(), if there was no data that apparently needed retransmission, we transmit a PING ACK to ask the peer to tell us what its Rx window state is. Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
-
- 23 9月, 2016 4 次提交
-
-
由 David Howells 提交于
Add a tracepoint to log call timer initiation, setting and expiry. Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
-
由 David Howells 提交于
When the last packet of data to be transmitted on a call is queued, tx_top is set and then the RXRPC_CALL_TX_LAST flag is set. Unfortunately, this leaves a race in the ACK processing side of things because the flag affects the interpretation of tx_top and also allows us to start receiving reply data before we've finished transmitting. To fix this, make the following changes: (1) rxrpc_queue_packet() now sets a marker in the annotation buffer instead of setting the RXRPC_CALL_TX_LAST flag. (2) rxrpc_rotate_tx_window() detects the marker and sets the flag in the same context as the routines that use it. (3) rxrpc_end_tx_phase() is simplified to just shift the call state. The Tx window must have been rotated before calling to discard the last packet. (4) rxrpc_receiving_reply() is added to handle the arrival of the first DATA packet of a reply to a client call (which is an implicit ACK of the Tx phase). (5) The last part of rxrpc_input_ack() is reordered to perform Tx rotation, then soft-ACK application and then to end the phase if we've rotated the last packet. In the event of a terminal ACK, the soft-ACK application will be skipped as nAcks should be 0. (6) rxrpc_input_ackall() now has to rotate as well as ending the phase. In addition: (7) Alter the transmit tracepoint to log the rotation of the last packet. (8) Remove the no-longer relevant queue_reqack tracepoint note. The ACK-REQUESTED packet header flag is now set as needed when we actually transmit the packet and may vary by retransmission. Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
-
由 David Howells 提交于
When a DATA packet has its initial transmission, we may need to start or adjust the resend timer. Without this we end up relying on being sent a NACK to initiate the resend. Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
-
由 David Howells 提交于
Set the timestamp on sk_buffs holding packets to be transmitted before queueing them because the moment the packet is on the queue it can be seen by the retransmission algorithm - which may see a completely random timestamp. If the retransmission algorithm sees such a timestamp, it may retransmit the packet and, in future, tell the congestion management algorithm that the retransmit timer expired. Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
-
- 22 9月, 2016 4 次提交
-
-
由 David Howells 提交于
Reduce the number of ACK-Requests we set on DATA packets that we're sending to reduce network traffic. We set the flag on odd-numbered DATA packets to start off the RTT cache until we have at least three entries in it and then probe once per second thereafter to keep it topped up. This could be made tunable in future. Note that from this point, the RXRPC_REQUEST_ACK flag is set on DATA packets as we transmit them and not stored statically in the sk_buff. Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
-
由 David Howells 提交于
In addition to sending a PING ACK to gain RTT data, we can set the RXRPC_REQUEST_ACK flag on a DATA packet and get a REQUESTED-ACK ACK. The ACK packet contains the serial number of the packet it is in response to, so we can look through the Tx buffer for a matching DATA packet. This requires that the data packets be stamped with the time of transmission as a ktime rather than having the resend_at time in jiffies. This further requires the resend code to do the resend determination in ktimes and convert to jiffies to set the timer. Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
-
由 David Howells 提交于
Expedite the transmission of a response to a PING ACK by sending it from sendmsg if one is pending. We're most likely to see a PING ACK during the client call Tx phase as the other side may use it to determine a number of parameters, such as the client's receive window size, the RTT and whether the client is doing slow start (similar to RFC5681). If we don't expedite it, it's left to the background processing thread to transmit. Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
-
由 David Howells 提交于
Don't store the rxrpc protocol header in sk_buffs on the transmit queue, but rather generate it on the fly and pass it to kernel_sendmsg() as a separate iov. This reduces the amount of storage required. Note that the security header is still stored in the sk_buff as it may get encrypted along with the data (and doesn't change with each transmission). Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
-
- 17 9月, 2016 3 次提交
-
-
由 David Howells 提交于
Improve sk_buff tracing within AF_RXRPC by the following means: (1) Use an enum to note the event type rather than plain integers and use an array of event names rather than a big multi ?: list. (2) Distinguish Rx from Tx packets and account them separately. This requires the call phase to be tracked so that we know what we might find in rxtx_buffer[]. (3) Add a parameter to rxrpc_{new,see,get,free}_skb() to indicate the event type. (4) A pair of 'rotate' events are added to indicate packets that are about to be rotated out of the Rx and Tx windows. (5) A pair of 'lost' events are added, along with rxrpc_lose_skb() for packet loss injection recording. Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
-
由 David Howells 提交于
Add a tracepoint to follow the insertion of a packet into the transmit buffer, its transmission and its rotation out of the buffer. Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
-
由 David Howells 提交于
Fix the basic transmit DATA packet content size at 1412 bytes so that they can be arbitrarily assembled into jumbo packets. In the future, I'm thinking of moving to keeping a jumbo packet header at the beginning of each packet in the Tx queue and creating the packet header on the spot when kernel_sendmsg() is invoked. That way, jumbo packets can be assembled on the spur of the moment for (re-)transmission. Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
-
- 08 9月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 David Howells 提交于
Rewrite the data and ack handling code such that: (1) Parsing of received ACK and ABORT packets and the distribution and the filing of DATA packets happens entirely within the data_ready context called from the UDP socket. This allows us to process and discard ACK and ABORT packets much more quickly (they're no longer stashed on a queue for a background thread to process). (2) We avoid calling skb_clone(), pskb_pull() and pskb_trim(). We instead keep track of the offset and length of the content of each packet in the sk_buff metadata. This means we don't do any allocation in the receive path. (3) Jumbo DATA packet parsing is now done in data_ready context. Rather than cloning the packet once for each subpacket and pulling/trimming it, we file the packet multiple times with an annotation for each indicating which subpacket is there. From that we can directly calculate the offset and length. (4) A call's receive queue can be accessed without taking locks (memory barriers do have to be used, though). (5) Incoming calls are set up from preallocated resources and immediately made live. They can than have packets queued upon them and ACKs generated. If insufficient resources exist, DATA packet #1 is given a BUSY reply and other DATA packets are discarded). (6) sk_buffs no longer take a ref on their parent call. To make this work, the following changes are made: (1) Each call's receive buffer is now a circular buffer of sk_buff pointers (rxtx_buffer) rather than a number of sk_buff_heads spread between the call and the socket. This permits each sk_buff to be in the buffer multiple times. The receive buffer is reused for the transmit buffer. (2) A circular buffer of annotations (rxtx_annotations) is kept parallel to the data buffer. Transmission phase annotations indicate whether a buffered packet has been ACK'd or not and whether it needs retransmission. Receive phase annotations indicate whether a slot holds a whole packet or a jumbo subpacket and, if the latter, which subpacket. They also note whether the packet has been decrypted in place. (3) DATA packet window tracking is much simplified. Each phase has just two numbers representing the window (rx_hard_ack/rx_top and tx_hard_ack/tx_top). The hard_ack number is the sequence number before base of the window, representing the last packet the other side says it has consumed. hard_ack starts from 0 and the first packet is sequence number 1. The top number is the sequence number of the highest-numbered packet residing in the buffer. Packets between hard_ack+1 and top are soft-ACK'd to indicate they've been received, but not yet consumed. Four macros, before(), before_eq(), after() and after_eq() are added to compare sequence numbers within the window. This allows for the top of the window to wrap when the hard-ack sequence number gets close to the limit. Two flags, RXRPC_CALL_RX_LAST and RXRPC_CALL_TX_LAST, are added also to indicate when rx_top and tx_top point at the packets with the LAST_PACKET bit set, indicating the end of the phase. (4) Calls are queued on the socket 'receive queue' rather than packets. This means that we don't need have to invent dummy packets to queue to indicate abnormal/terminal states and we don't have to keep metadata packets (such as ABORTs) around (5) The offset and length of a (sub)packet's content are now passed to the verify_packet security op. This is currently expected to decrypt the packet in place and validate it. However, there's now nowhere to store the revised offset and length of the actual data within the decrypted blob (there may be a header and padding to skip) because an sk_buff may represent multiple packets, so a locate_data security op is added to retrieve these details from the sk_buff content when needed. (6) recvmsg() now has to handle jumbo subpackets, where each subpacket is individually secured and needs to be individually decrypted. The code to do this is broken out into rxrpc_recvmsg_data() and shared with the kernel API. It now iterates over the call's receive buffer rather than walking the socket receive queue. Additional changes: (1) The timers are condensed to a single timer that is set for the soonest of three timeouts (delayed ACK generation, DATA retransmission and call lifespan). (2) Transmission of ACK and ABORT packets is effected immediately from process-context socket ops/kernel API calls that cause them instead of them being punted off to a background work item. The data_ready handler still has to defer to the background, though. (3) A shutdown op is added to the AF_RXRPC socket so that the AFS filesystem can shut down the socket and flush its own work items before closing the socket to deal with any in-progress service calls. Future additional changes that will need to be considered: (1) Make sure that a call doesn't hog the front of the queue by receiving data from the network as fast as userspace is consuming it to the exclusion of other calls. (2) Transmit delayed ACKs from within recvmsg() when we've consumed sufficiently more packets to avoid the background work item needing to run. Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
-
- 07 9月, 2016 3 次提交
-
-
由 David Howells 提交于
Add a tracepoint for working out where local aborts happen. Each tracepoint call is labelled with a 3-letter code so that they can be distinguished - and the DATA sequence number is added too where available. rxrpc_kernel_abort_call() also takes a 3-letter code so that AFS can indicate the circumstances when it aborts a call. Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
-
由 David Howells 提交于
Cache the security index in the rxrpc_call struct so that we can get at it even when the call has been disconnected and the connection pointer cleared. Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
-
由 David Howells 提交于
Improve the call tracking tracepoint by showing more differentiation between some of the put and get events, including: (1) Getting and putting refs for the socket call user ID tree. (2) Getting and putting refs for queueing and failing to queue the call processor work item. Note that these aren't necessarily used in this patch, but will be taken advantage of in future patches. An enum is added for the event subtype numbers rather than coding them directly as decimal numbers and a table of 3-letter strings is provided rather than a sequence of ?: operators. Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
-
- 05 9月, 2016 2 次提交
-
-
由 David Howells 提交于
Move enum rxrpc_command to sendmsg.c as it's now only used in that file. Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
-
由 David Howells 提交于
Rearrange net/rxrpc/sendmsg.c to be in a more logical order. This makes it easier to follow and eliminates forward declarations. Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
-