Skip to content

cloud-kernel
cloud-kernel

openanolis / cloud-kernel
接近 2 年 前同步成功

通知 170
Star 36
Fork 7
cloud-kernel
cloud-kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 30 1月, 2012 3 次提交
    • R
      PM / Domains: Run late/early device suspend callbacks at the right time · 0496c8ae
      由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于 
      After the introduction of the late/early phases of device
suspend/resume during system-wide power transitions it is possible
to make the generic PM domains code execute its default late/early
device suspend/resume callbacks during those phases instead of the
corresponding _noirq phases.  The _noirq device suspend/resume
phases were only used for executing those callbacks, because this
was the only way it could be done, but now we can do better.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
      0496c8ae
    • R
      PM / Sleep: Introduce generic callbacks for new device PM phases · e470d066
      由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于 
      Introduce generic subsystem callbacks for the new phases of device
suspend/resume during system power transitions: "late suspend",
"early resume", "late freeze", "early thaw", "late poweroff",
"early restore".
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
      e470d066
    • R
      PM / Sleep: Introduce "late suspend" and "early resume" of devices · cf579dfb
      由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于 
      The current device suspend/resume phases during system-wide power
transitions appear to be insufficient for some platforms that want
to use the same callback routines for saving device states and
related operations during runtime suspend/resume as well as during
system suspend/resume.  In principle, they could point their
.suspend_noirq() and .resume_noirq() to the same callback routines
as their .runtime_suspend() and .runtime_resume(), respectively,
but at least some of them require device interrupts to be enabled
while the code in those routines is running.

It also makes sense to have device suspend-resume callbacks that will
be executed with runtime PM disabled and with device interrupts
enabled in case someone needs to run some special code in that
context during system-wide power transitions.

Apart from this, .suspend_noirq() and .resume_noirq() were introduced
as a workaround for drivers using shared interrupts and failing to
prevent their interrupt handlers from accessing suspended hardware.
It appears to be better not to use them for other porposes, or we may
have to deal with some serious confusion (which seems to be happening
already).

For the above reasons, introduce new device suspend/resume phases,
"late suspend" and "early resume" (and analogously for hibernation)
whose callback will be executed with runtime PM disabled and with
device interrupts enabled and whose callback pointers generally may
point to runtime suspend/resume routines.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Reviewed-by: NMark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Reviewed-by: NKevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
      cf579dfb
  3. 28 1月, 2012 3 次提交
  5. 27 1月, 2012 18 次提交
  7. 26 1月, 2012 2 次提交
    • B
      drm/ttm: fix two regressions since move_notify changes · 9f1feed2
      由 Ben Skeggs 提交于 
      Both changes in dc97b340 cause serious
regressions in the nouveau driver.

move_notify() was originally able to presume that bo->mem is the old node,
and new_mem is the new node.  The above commit moves the call to
move_notify() to after move() has been done, which means that now, sometimes,
new_mem isn't the new node at all, bo->mem is, and new_mem points at a
stale, possibly-just-been-killed-by-move node.

This is clearly not a good situation.  This patch reverts this change, and
replaces it with a cleanup in the move() failure path instead.

The second issue is that the call to move_notify() from cleanup_memtype_use()
causes the TTM ghost objects to get passed into the driver.  This is clearly
bad as the driver knows nothing about these "fake" TTM BOs, and ends up
accessing uninitialised memory.

I worked around this in nouveau's move_notify() hook by ensuring the BO
destructor was nouveau's.  I don't particularly like this solution, and
would rather TTM never pass the driver these objects.  However, I don't
clearly understand the reason why we're calling move_notify() here anyway
and am happy to work around the problem in nouveau instead of breaking the
behaviour expected by other drivers.
Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: NThomas Hellstrom <thellstrom@vmware.com>
Cc: Jerome Glisse <j.glisse@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NDave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
      9f1feed2
    • D
      drm/i915: fixup forcewake spinlock fallout in drpc debugfs function · 93b525dc
      由 Daniel Vetter 提交于 
      My forcewake spinlock patches have a functional conflict with Ben
Widawsky's gen6 drpc support for debugfs. Result was a benign warning
about trying to read an non-atomic variabla with atomic_read.

Note that the entire check is racy anyway and purely informational.
Also update it to reflect the forcewake voodoo changes, the kernel can
now also hold onto a forcewake reference for longer times.
Signed-Off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Reviewed-by: NBen Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
Signed-off-by: NKeith Packard <keithp@keithp.com>
      93b525dc
  9. 25 1月, 2012 14 次提交