- 01 3月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Lokesh Vutla 提交于
Add restart hook so that AM4372 builds can restart the platform. Signed-off-by: NLokesh Vutla <lokeshvutla@ti.com> Signed-off-by: NPaul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>
-
- 23 8月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Rajendra Nayak 提交于
The omap44xx_restart used on omap4 and omap5 devices can be reused on dra7 devices as well. The device instance however is different across omap5 and dra7 as compared to omap4. So fix this for omap5 as well as dra7. Signed-off-by: NRajendra Nayak <rnayak@ti.com> Signed-off-by: NR Sricharan <r.sricharan@ti.com> Signed-off-by: NPaul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>
-
- 08 5月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 R Sricharan 提交于
Instead of statically defining seperate arrays for every OMAP4+ archs, have a generic init function to populate the arrays. This avoids the need for creating new array for every arch added in the future that reuses the prm and cm registers read/write code. Cc: Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com> Signed-off-by: NR Sricharan <r.sricharan@ti.com> Signed-off-by: NSantosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com> Signed-off-by: NPaul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>
-
- 25 2月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Tony Lindgren 提交于
There's no need to have these defines in plat/io.h. Note that we now need to ifdef omap_read/write calls as they will be available for omap1 only. While at it, clean up the includes to group them like they typically are grouped. Signed-off-by: NTony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
-
- 18 11月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Tony Lindgren 提交于
As suggested by Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>, there's no need to keep local prototypes in non-local headers. Add mach-omap1/common.h and mach-omap2/common.h and move the local prototypes there from plat/common.h and mach/omap4-common.h. Signed-off-by: NTony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> Signed-off-by: NRussell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
-
- 10 7月, 2011 2 次提交
-
-
由 Benoit Cousson 提交于
The warm reset function was still using the obsolete API. Replace it by the new one and move the file to the proper c file. Change the function names to stick to the file convention as suggested by Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>: prm_xxx -> prminst_xxx Signed-off-by: NBenoit Cousson <b-cousson@ti.com> Cc: Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com> Cc: Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@ti.com> Signed-off-by: NPaul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>
-
由 Benoit Cousson 提交于
The RSTCTRL register was accessed using an absolute address. The usage of hardcoded macros to calculate virtual address from physical one should be avoided as much as possible. The usage of an offset will allow future improvement like migration from the current architecture code toward a module driver. Update prm_xxx accessors, move definition to the proper header file and update copyrights. Change the s16 register offset parameter to u16. Signed-off-by: NBenoit Cousson <b-cousson@ti.com> Cc: Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com> Cc: Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@ti.com> [paul@pwsan.com: use '_prminst_' in function names that are part of the prminst44xx.c file] Signed-off-by: NPaul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>
-
- 22 12月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 Paul Walmsley 提交于
In some ways, the OMAP4 PRCM register layout is quite different than the OMAP2/3 PRCM register layout. For example, on OMAP2/3, from a register layout point of view, all CM instances were located in the CM subsystem, and all PRM instances were located in the PRM subsystem. OMAP4 changes this. Now, for example, some CM instances, such as WKUP_CM and EMU_CM, are located in the system PRM subsystem. And a "local PRCM" exists for the MPU - this PRCM combines registers that would normally appear in both CM and PRM instances, but uses its own register layout which matches neither the OMAP2/3 PRCM layout nor the OMAP4 PRCM layout. To try to deal with this, introduce some new functions, omap4_cminst* and omap4_prminst*. The former is to be used when writing to a CM instance register (no matter what subsystem or hardware module it exists in), and the latter, similarly, with PRM instance registers. To determine which "PRCM partition" to write to, the functions take a PRCM instance ID argument. Subsequent patches add these partition IDs to the OMAP4 powerdomain and clockdomain definitions. As far as I can see, there's really no good way to handle these types of register access inconsistencies. This patch seemed like the least bad approach. Moving forward, the long-term goal is to remove all direct PRCM register access from the PM code. PRCM register access should go through layers such as the powerdomain and clockdomain code that can hide the details of how to interact with the specific hardware variant. While here, rename cm4xxx.c to cm44xx.c to match the naming convention of the other OMAP4 PRCM files. Thanks to Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>, Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@ti.com>, and Benoît Cousson <b-cousson@ti.com> for some comments. Signed-off-by: NPaul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com> Cc: Benoît Cousson <b-cousson@ti.com> Cc: Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@ti.com> Cc: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
-