Patch to select rs2000 module to compile automatically for TeVii
S421 and S632 cards.
Signed-off-by: NIgor M. Liplianin <liplianin@me.by>
Signed-off-by: NMauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>

Most of *_ops and other structures in vivi.c were already declared const
but some have not. Constify and code/data will take less space:
    $ size drivers/media/platform/vivi.o
              text    data     bss     dec     hex filename
    before:  12569     248       8   12825    3219 drivers/media/platform/vivi.o
    after:   12308      20       8   12336    3030 drivers/media/platform/vivi.o
i.e. vivi.o is now ~500 bytes less.
Signed-off-by: NKirill Smelkov <kirr@navytux.spb.ru>
Signed-off-by: NMauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>

Don't let Masterkit MA901 USB radio be handled by usb hid drivers.
This device will be handled by radio-ma901.c driver.
Signed-off-by: NAlexey Klimov <klimov.linux@gmail.com>
Acked-by: NHans Verkuil <hans.verkuil@cisco.com>
Acked-by: NJiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: NMauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>

This patch creates a new usb-radio driver, radio-ma901.c, that supports
Masterkit MA 901 USB FM radio devices. This device plugs into both the
USB and an analog audio input or headphones, so this thing only deals
with initialization and frequency setting.
Signed-off-by: NAlexey Klimov <klimov.linux@gmail.com>
Acked-by: NHans Verkuil <hans.verkuil@cisco.com>
Signed-off-by: NMauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>

Select is evil as it has issues with dependencies. Better to convert
it to use depends on.

That fixes a breakage with out-of-tree compilation of the media
tree.
Signed-off-by: NMauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>

versioncheck script complains about missing linux/version.h header
file.
Signed-off-by: NSachin Kamat <sachin.kamat@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NMauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>

Smatch complainst that the call to mantis_evmgr_exit() dereferences "ca"
but then we check it for NULL on the next line.  I've moved the NULL
check forward to avoid that.
Signed-off-by: NDan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: NMauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>

One register needs to be changed to TS to work. So we use separate inittab.
Signed-off-by: NIgor M. Liplianin <liplianin@me.by>
Acked-by: NMalcolm Priestley <tvboxspy@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NMauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>

DVB-S chip is Montage m88rs2000, so initial patch is simple.
Signed-off-by: NIgor M. Liplianin <liplianin@me.by>
Signed-off-by: NMauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>

- if kmalloc() returns NULL, we can return immediately without trying
   to kfree() a NULL pointer.
 - if i2c_transfer() fails, error out immediately instead of trying to
   upload the remaining bytes of the firmware.
 - the error code is then properly propagated down to ds3000_initfe().
Signed-off-by: NRémi Cardona <remi.cardona@smartjog.com>
Reviewed-by: NAntti Palosaari <crope@iki.fi>
Signed-off-by: NMauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>

Since we have now 3 modes (auto/isoc/bulk), usb_xfer_mode is more suitable than prefer_bulk.
Signed-off-by: NFrank Schäfer <fschaefer.oss@googlemail.com>
Signed-off-by: NMauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>

drivers/media/dvb-frontends/ts2020.c: In function 'ts2020_set_params':
drivers/media/dvb-frontends/ts2020.c:126:47: warning: variable 'div4' set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
drivers/media/dvb-frontends/ts2020.c: At top level:
drivers/media/dvb-frontends/ts2020.c:262:5: warning: no previous prototype for 'ts2020_get_signal_strength' [-Wmissing-prototypes]

Cc: Konstantin Dimitrov <kosio.dimitrov@gmail.com>
Cc: Igor M. Liplianin <liplianin@me.by>
Signed-off-by: NMauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>

make the other drivers take use of the separate ts2020 driver
Signed-off-by: NKonstantin Dimitrov <kosio.dimitrov@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NMauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>

add separate ts2020 tuner driver
Signed-off-by: NKonstantin Dimitrov <kosio.dimitrov@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NMauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>

remove ts2020 tuner related code from ds3000 driver
prepare ds3000 driver for using external tuner driver
Signed-off-by: NKonstantin Dimitrov <kosio.dimitrov@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NMauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>

Add support for Avermedia A835B and variants.
Signed-off-by: NEddi De Pieri <eddi@depieri.net>
Cc: Malcolm Priestley <tvboxspy@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NMauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>

There is no point in PTR_ERR()ing a NULL pointer, use a real error
instead.
Signed-off-by: NSasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: NMauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>

This kind of memcpy() is error-prone. Its replacement with a struct
assignment is prefered because it's type-safe and much easier to read.
Found by coccinelle. Hand patched and reviewed.
Tested by compilation only.
A simplified version of the semantic match that finds this problem is as
follows: (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
// <smpl>
@@
identifier struct_name;
struct struct_name to;
struct struct_name from;
expression E;
@@
-memcpy(&(to), &(from), E);
+to = from;
// </smpl>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Senna Tschudin <peter.senna@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NEzequiel Garcia <elezegarcia@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NMauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>

This kind of memcpy() is error-prone. Its replacement with a struct
assignment is prefered because it's type-safe and much easier to read.
Found by coccinelle. Hand patched and reviewed.
Tested by compilation only.
A simplified version of the semantic match that finds this problem is as
follows: (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
// <smpl>
@@
identifier struct_name;
struct struct_name to;
struct struct_name from;
expression E;
@@
-memcpy(&(to), &(from), E);
+to = from;
// </smpl>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Senna Tschudin <peter.senna@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NEzequiel Garcia <elezegarcia@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NMauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>

This kind of memcpy() is error-prone. Its replacement with a struct
assignment is prefered because it's type-safe and much easier to read.
Found by coccinelle. Hand patched and reviewed.
Tested by compilation only.
A simplified version of the semantic match that finds this problem is as
follows: (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
// <smpl>
@@
identifier struct_name;
struct struct_name to;
struct struct_name from;
expression E;
@@
-memcpy(&(to), &(from), E);
+to = from;
// </smpl>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Senna Tschudin <peter.senna@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NEzequiel Garcia <elezegarcia@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NMauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>

This kind of memcpy() is error-prone. Its replacement with a struct
assignment is prefered because it's type-safe and much easier to read.
Found by coccinelle. Hand patched and reviewed.
Tested by compilation only.
A simplified version of the semantic match that finds this problem is as
follows: (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
// <smpl>
@@
identifier struct_name;
struct struct_name to;
struct struct_name from;
expression E;
@@
-memcpy(&(to), &(from), E);
+to = from;
// </smpl>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Senna Tschudin <peter.senna@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NEzequiel Garcia <elezegarcia@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NMauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>

This kind of memcpy() is error-prone. Its replacement with a struct
assignment is prefered because it's type-safe and much easier to read.
Found by coccinelle. Hand patched and reviewed.
Tested by compilation only.
A simplified version of the semantic match that finds this problem is as
follows: (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
// <smpl>
@@
identifier struct_name;
struct struct_name to;
struct struct_name from;
expression E;
@@
-memcpy(&(to), &(from), E);
+to = from;
// </smpl>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Senna Tschudin <peter.senna@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NEzequiel Garcia <elezegarcia@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NMauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>

This kind of memcpy() is error-prone. Its replacement with a struct
assignment is prefered because it's type-safe and much easier to read.
Found by coccinelle. Hand patched and reviewed.
Tested by compilation only.
A simplified version of the semantic match that finds this problem is as
follows: (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
// <smpl>
@@
identifier struct_name;
struct struct_name to;
struct struct_name from;
expression E;
@@
-memcpy(&(to), &(from), E);
+to = from;
// </smpl>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Senna Tschudin <peter.senna@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NEzequiel Garcia <elezegarcia@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndy Walls <awalls@md.metrocast.net>
Signed-off-by: NMauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>

This kind of memcpy() is error-prone. Its replacement with a struct
assignment is prefered because it's type-safe and much easier to read.
Found by coccinelle. Hand patched and reviewed.
Tested by compilation only.
A simplified version of the semantic match that finds this problem is as
follows: (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
// <smpl>
@@
identifier struct_name;
struct struct_name to;
struct struct_name from;
expression E;
@@
-memcpy(&(to), &(from), E);
+to = from;
// </smpl>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Senna Tschudin <peter.senna@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NEzequiel Garcia <elezegarcia@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: NAndy Walls <awalls@md.metrocast.net>
Signed-off-by: NAndy Walls <awalls@md.metrocast.net>
Signed-off-by: NMauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>

This kind of memcpy() is error-prone. Its replacement with a struct
assignment is prefered because it's type-safe and much easier to read.
Found by coccinelle. Hand patched and reviewed.
Tested by compilation only.
A simplified version of the semantic match that finds this problem is as
follows: (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
// <smpl>
@@
identifier struct_name;
struct struct_name to;
struct struct_name from;
expression E;
@@
-memcpy(&(to), &(from), E);
+to = from;
// </smpl>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Senna Tschudin <peter.senna@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NEzequiel Garcia <elezegarcia@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NMauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>

This kind of memcpy() is error-prone. Its replacement with a struct
assignment is prefered because it's type-safe and much easier to read.
Found by coccinelle. Hand patched and reviewed.
Tested by compilation only.
A simplified version of the semantic match that finds this problem is as
follows: (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
// <smpl>
@@
identifier struct_name;
struct struct_name to;
struct struct_name from;
expression E;
@@
-memcpy(&(to), &(from), E);
+to = from;
// </smpl>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Senna Tschudin <peter.senna@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NEzequiel Garcia <elezegarcia@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndy Walls <awalls@md.metrocast.net>
Signed-off-by: NMauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>

This kind of memcpy() is error-prone. Its replacement with a struct
assignment is prefered because it's type-safe and much easier to read.
Found by coccinelle. Hand patched and reviewed.
Tested by compilation only.
A simplified version of the semantic match that finds this problem is as
follows: (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
// <smpl>
@@
identifier struct_name;
struct struct_name to;
struct struct_name from;
expression E;
@@
-memcpy(&(to), &(from), E);
+to = from;
// </smpl>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Senna Tschudin <peter.senna@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NEzequiel Garcia <elezegarcia@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NMauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>

This kind of memcpy() is error-prone. Its replacement with a struct
assignment is prefered because it's type-safe and much easier to read.
Found by coccinelle. Hand patched and reviewed.
Tested by compilation only.
A simplified version of the semantic match that finds this problem is as
follows: (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
// <smpl>
@@
identifier struct_name;
struct struct_name to;
struct struct_name from;
expression E;
@@
-memcpy(&(to), &(from), E);
+to = from;
// </smpl>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Senna Tschudin <peter.senna@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NEzequiel Garcia <elezegarcia@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NMauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>

This kind of memcpy() is error-prone. Its replacement with a struct
assignment is prefered because it's type-safe and much easier to read.
Found by coccinelle. Hand patched and reviewed.
Tested by compilation only.
A simplified version of the semantic match that finds this problem is as
follows: (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
// <smpl>
@@
identifier struct_name;
struct struct_name to;
struct struct_name from;
expression E;
@@
-memcpy(&(to), &(from), E);
+to = from;
// </smpl>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Senna Tschudin <peter.senna@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NEzequiel Garcia <elezegarcia@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NMauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>

This kind of memcpy() is error-prone. Its replacement with a struct
assignment is prefered because it's type-safe and much easier to read.
Found by coccinelle. Hand patched and reviewed.
Tested by compilation only.
A simplified version of the semantic match that finds this problem is as
follows: (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
// <smpl>
@@
identifier struct_name;
struct struct_name to;
struct struct_name from;
expression E;
@@
-memcpy(&(to), &(from), E);
+to = from;
// </smpl>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Senna Tschudin <peter.senna@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NEzequiel Garcia <elezegarcia@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NMauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>

This kind of memcpy() is error-prone. Its replacement with a struct
assignment is prefered because it's type-safe and much easier to read.
Found by coccinelle. Hand patched and reviewed.
Tested by compilation only.
A simplified version of the semantic match that finds this problem is as
follows: (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
// <smpl>
@@
identifier struct_name;
struct struct_name to;
struct struct_name from;
expression E;
@@
-memcpy(&(to), &(from), E);
+to = from;
// </smpl>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Senna Tschudin <peter.senna@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NEzequiel Garcia <elezegarcia@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NMauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>

This kind of memcpy() is error-prone. Its replacement with a struct
assignment is prefered because it's type-safe and much easier to read.
Found by coccinelle. Hand patched and reviewed.
Tested by compilation only.
A simplified version of the semantic match that finds this problem is as
follows: (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
// <smpl>
@@
identifier struct_name;
struct struct_name to;
struct struct_name from;
expression E;
@@
-memcpy(&(to), &(from), E);
+to = from;
// </smpl>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Senna Tschudin <peter.senna@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NEzequiel Garcia <elezegarcia@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NMauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>

This kind of memcpy() is error-prone. Its replacement with a struct
assignment is prefered because it's type-safe and much easier to read.
Found by coccinelle. Hand patched and reviewed.
Tested by compilation only.
A simplified version of the semantic match that finds this problem is as
follows: (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
// <smpl>
@@
identifier struct_name;
struct struct_name to;
struct struct_name from;
expression E;
@@
-memcpy(&(to), &(from), E);
+to = from;
// </smpl>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Senna Tschudin <peter.senna@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NEzequiel Garcia <elezegarcia@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndy Walls <awalls@md.metrocast.net>
Signed-off-by: NMauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>

This kind of memcpy() is error-prone. Its replacement with a struct
assignment is prefered because it's type-safe and much easier to read.
Found by coccinelle. Hand patched and reviewed.
Tested by compilation only.
A simplified version of the semantic match that finds this problem is as
follows: (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
// <smpl>
@@
identifier struct_name;
struct struct_name to;
struct struct_name from;
expression E;
@@
-memcpy(&(to), &(from), E);
+to = from;
// </smpl>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Senna Tschudin <peter.senna@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NEzequiel Garcia <elezegarcia@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NMauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>

This kind of memcpy() is error-prone. Its replacement with a struct
assignment is prefered because it's type-safe and much easier to read.
Found by coccinelle. Hand patched and reviewed.
Tested by compilation only.
A simplified version of the semantic match that finds this problem is as
follows: (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
// <smpl>
@@
identifier struct_name;
struct struct_name to;
struct struct_name from;
expression E;
@@
-memcpy(&(to), &(from), E);
+to = from;
// </smpl>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Senna Tschudin <peter.senna@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NEzequiel Garcia <elezegarcia@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NMauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>

This kind of memcpy() is error-prone. Its replacement with a struct
assignment is prefered because it's type-safe and much easier to read.
Found by coccinelle. Hand patched and reviewed.
Tested by compilation only.
A simplified version of the semantic match that finds this problem is as
follows: (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
// <smpl>
@@
identifier struct_name;
struct struct_name to;
struct struct_name from;
expression E;
@@
-memcpy(&(to), &(from), E);
+to = from;
// </smpl>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Senna Tschudin <peter.senna@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NEzequiel Garcia <elezegarcia@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NMauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>

This kind of memcpy() is error-prone. Its replacement with a struct
assignment is prefered because it's type-safe and much easier to read.
Found by coccinelle. Hand patched and reviewed.
Tested by compilation only.
A simplified version of the semantic match that finds this problem is as
follows: (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
// <smpl>
@@
identifier struct_name;
struct struct_name to;
struct struct_name from;
expression E;
@@
-memcpy(&(to), &(from), E);
+to = from;
// </smpl>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Senna Tschudin <peter.senna@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NEzequiel Garcia <elezegarcia@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NMauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>

This kind of memcpy() is error-prone. Its replacement with a struct
assignment is prefered because it's type-safe and much easier to read.
Found by coccinelle. Hand patched and reviewed.
Tested by compilation only.
A simplified version of the semantic match that finds this problem is as
follows: (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
// <smpl>
@@
identifier struct_name;
struct struct_name to;
struct struct_name from;
expression E;
@@
-memcpy(&(to), &(from), E);
+to = from;
// </smpl>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Senna Tschudin <peter.senna@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NEzequiel Garcia <elezegarcia@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NMauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>

This kind of memcpy() is error-prone. Its replacement with a struct
assignment is prefered because it's type-safe and much easier to read.
Found by coccinelle. Hand patched and reviewed.
Tested by compilation only.
A simplified version of the semantic match that finds this problem is as
follows: (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
// <smpl>
@@
identifier struct_name;
struct struct_name to;
struct struct_name from;
expression E;
@@
-memcpy(&(to), &(from), E);
+to = from;
// </smpl>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Senna Tschudin <peter.senna@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NEzequiel Garcia <elezegarcia@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NMauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>

I've always found it very confusing that the "Media ancillary drivers (tuners,
sensors, i2c, frontends)" comment came after the "Autoselect" option. This patch
moves it up and changes the "Autoselect" text to correspond more closely to
the "Media ancillary drivers" comment.
It also fixes two typos.
Signed-off-by: NHans Verkuil <hans.verkuil@cisco.com>
Signed-off-by: NMauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>