提交 36628731 编写于 作者: E Ezequiel Garcia 提交者: Mauro Carvalho Chehab

[media] tuners/xc4000: Replace memcpy with struct assignment

This kind of memcpy() is error-prone. Its replacement with a struct
assignment is prefered because it's type-safe and much easier to read.
Found by coccinelle. Hand patched and reviewed.
Tested by compilation only.
A simplified version of the semantic match that finds this problem is as
follows: (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
// <smpl>
@@
identifier struct_name;
struct struct_name to;
struct struct_name from;
expression E;
@@
-memcpy(&(to), &(from), E);
+to = from;
// </smpl>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Senna Tschudin <peter.senna@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NEzequiel Garcia <elezegarcia@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NMauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
上级 f01e0ffd
......@@ -1066,7 +1066,7 @@ static int check_firmware(struct dvb_frontend *fe, unsigned int type,
goto fail;
}
memcpy(&priv->cur_fw, &new_fw, sizeof(priv->cur_fw));
priv->cur_fw = new_fw;
/*
* By setting BASE in cur_fw.type only after successfully loading all
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册