Skip to content

cloud-kernel
cloud-kernel

openanolis / cloud-kernel
1 年多 前同步成功

通知 160
Star 36
Fork 7
cloud-kernel
cloud-kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 28 1月, 2014 4 次提交
  3. 25 1月, 2014 2 次提交
    • S
      i915: remove pm_qos request on error · 22accca0
      由 Stanislaw Gruszka 提交于 
      Not removing pm qos request and free memory for it can cause crash,
when some other driver use pm qos. For example, this oops:

BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at fffffffffffffff8
IP: [<ffffffff81307a6b>] plist_add+0x5b/0xd0
Call Trace:
 [<ffffffff810acf25>] pm_qos_update_target+0x125/0x1e0
 [<ffffffff810ad071>] pm_qos_add_request+0x91/0x100
 [<ffffffffa053ec14>] e1000_open+0xe4/0x5b0 [e1000e]

was caused by earlier i915 probe failure:

[drm:i915_report_and_clear_eir] *ERROR* EIR stuck: 0x00000010, masking
[drm:init_ring_common] *ERROR* render ring initialization failed ctl 0001f001 head 00003004 tail 00000000 start 00003000
[drm:i915_driver_load] *ERROR* failed to init modeset
i915: probe of 0000:00:02.0 failed with error -5

Bug report:
http://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1057533Reported-by: NGiandomenico De Tullio <ghisha@gmail.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: NStanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@redhat.com>
[danvet: Drop unnecessary code movement.]
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
      22accca0
    • D
      Revert "drm/i915: Mask reserved bits in display/sprite address registers" · 85ba7b7d
      由 Daniel Vetter 提交于 
      This reverts commit 446f2545.

I've left the masking in the pageflip code since that seems to be some
useful piece of preemptive robustness.

Iirc I've merged this patch under the assumption that the BIOS leaves
some random gunk in the lower bits and gets unhappy if we trample on
them. We have quite a few case like this, so this made sense.

Now I've just learned that there's actual hardware features bits in
the low 12 bits, and the kernel needs to preserve them to allow a
userspace blob to do its job. Given Dave Airlie's clear stance on
userspace blob drivers I've quickly chatted with him and he doesn't
seem too happy. So let's revert this.

If there are indeed bits that we must preserve in this range then we
can ressurrect this patch, but with proper documentation for those
bits supplied. And we probably also need to think a bit about
interactions with our driver.

Cc: Armin Reese <armin.c.reese@intel.com>
Cc: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
Cc: Dave Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>
Reviewed-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
      85ba7b7d
  5. 23 1月, 2014 34 次提交