1. 17 10月, 2017 4 次提交
    • A
      xfs: move two more RT specific functions into CONFIG_XFS_RT · 785545c8
      Arnd Bergmann 提交于
      The last cleanup introduced two harmless warnings:
      
      fs/xfs/xfs_fsmap.c:480:1: warning: '__xfs_getfsmap_rtdev' defined but not used
      fs/xfs/xfs_fsmap.c:372:1: warning: 'xfs_getfsmap_rtdev_rtbitmap_helper' defined but not used
      
      This moves those two functions as well.
      
      Fixes: bb9c2e54 ("xfs: move more RT specific code under CONFIG_XFS_RT")
      Signed-off-by: NArnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
      Reviewed-by: NBrian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
      Acked-by: NGeert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
      Reviewed-by: NDarrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDarrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
      785545c8
    • B
      xfs: trim writepage mapping to within eof · 40214d12
      Brian Foster 提交于
      The writeback rework in commit fbcc0256 ("xfs: Introduce
      writeback context for writepages") introduced a subtle change in
      behavior with regard to the block mapping used across the
      ->writepages() sequence. The previous xfs_cluster_write() code would
      only flush pages up to EOF at the time of the writepage, thus
      ensuring that any pages due to file-extending writes would be
      handled on a separate cycle and with a new, updated block mapping.
      
      The updated code establishes a block mapping in xfs_writepage_map()
      that could extend beyond EOF if the file has post-eof preallocation.
      Because we now use the generic writeback infrastructure and pass the
      cached mapping to each writepage call, there is no implicit EOF
      limit in place. If eofblocks trimming occurs during ->writepages(),
      any post-eof portion of the cached mapping becomes invalid. The
      eofblocks code has no means to serialize against writeback because
      there are no pages associated with post-eof blocks. Therefore if an
      eofblocks trim occurs and is followed by a file-extending buffered
      write, not only has the mapping become invalid, but we could end up
      writing a page to disk based on the invalid mapping.
      
      Consider the following sequence of events:
      
      - A buffered write creates a delalloc extent and post-eof
        speculative preallocation.
      - Writeback starts and on the first writepage cycle, the delalloc
        extent is converted to real blocks (including the post-eof blocks)
        and the mapping is cached.
      - The file is closed and xfs_release() trims post-eof blocks. The
        cached writeback mapping is now invalid.
      - Another buffered write appends the file with a delalloc extent.
      - The concurrent writeback cycle picks up the just written page
        because the writeback range end is LLONG_MAX. xfs_writepage_map()
        attributes it to the (now invalid) cached mapping and writes the
        data to an incorrect location on disk (and where the file offset is
        still backed by a delalloc extent).
      
      This problem is reproduced by xfstests test generic/464, which
      triggers racing writes, appends, open/closes and writeback requests.
      
      To address this problem, trim the mapping used during writeback to
      within EOF when the mapping is validated. This ensures the mapping
      is revalidated for any pages encountered beyond EOF as of the time
      the current mapping was cached or last validated.
      Reported-by: NEryu Guan <eguan@redhat.com>
      Diagnosed-by: NEryu Guan <eguan@redhat.com>
      Signed-off-by: NBrian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
      Reviewed-by: NDave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
      Reviewed-by: NDarrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDarrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
      40214d12
    • E
      fs: invalidate page cache after end_io() in dio completion · 5e25c269
      Eryu Guan 提交于
      Commit 332391a9 ("fs: Fix page cache inconsistency when mixing
      buffered and AIO DIO") moved page cache invalidation from
      iomap_dio_rw() to iomap_dio_complete() for iomap based direct write
      path, but before the dio->end_io() call, and it re-introdued the bug
      fixed by commit c771c14b ("iomap: invalidate page caches should
      be after iomap_dio_complete() in direct write").
      
      I found this because fstests generic/418 started failing on XFS with
      v4.14-rc3 kernel, which is the regression test for this specific
      bug.
      
      So similarly, fix it by moving dio->end_io() (which does the
      unwritten extent conversion) before page cache invalidation, to make
      sure next buffer read reads the final real allocations not unwritten
      extents. I also add some comments about why should end_io() go first
      in case we get it wrong again in the future.
      
      Note that, there's no such problem in the non-iomap based direct
      write path, because we didn't remove the page cache invalidation
      after the ->direct_IO() in generic_file_direct_write() call, but I
      decided to fix dio_complete() too so we don't leave a landmine
      there, also be consistent with iomap_dio_complete().
      
      Fixes: 332391a9 ("fs: Fix page cache inconsistency when mixing buffered and AIO DIO")
      Signed-off-by: NEryu Guan <eguan@redhat.com>
      Reviewed-by: NDarrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDarrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
      Reviewed-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
      Reviewed-by: NLukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com>
      5e25c269
    • D
      xfs: cancel dirty pages on invalidation · 793d7dbe
      Dave Chinner 提交于
      Recently we've had warnings arise from the vm handing us pages
      without bufferheads attached to them. This should not ever occur
      in XFS, but we don't defend against it properly if it does. The only
      place where we remove bufferheads from a page is in
      xfs_vm_releasepage(), but we can't tell the difference here between
      "page is dirty so don't release" and "page is dirty but is being
      invalidated so release it".
      
      In some places that are invalidating pages ask for pages to be
      released and follow up afterward calling ->releasepage by checking
      whether the page was dirty and then aborting the invalidation. This
      is a possible vector for releasing buffers from a page but then
      leaving it in the mapping, so we really do need to avoid dirty pages
      in xfs_vm_releasepage().
      
      To differentiate between invalidated pages and normal pages, we need
      to clear the page dirty flag when invalidating the pages. This can
      be done through xfs_vm_invalidatepage(), and will result
      xfs_vm_releasepage() seeing the page as clean which matches the
      bufferhead state on the page after calling block_invalidatepage().
      
      Hence we can re-add the page dirty check in xfs_vm_releasepage to
      catch the case where we might be releasing a page that is actually
      dirty and so should not have the bufferheads on it removed. This
      will remove one possible vector of "dirty page with no bufferheads"
      and so help narrow down the search for the root cause of that
      problem.
      Signed-Off-By: NDave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
      Reviewed-by: NDarrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDarrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
      793d7dbe
  2. 16 10月, 2017 1 次提交
  3. 15 10月, 2017 10 次提交
  4. 14 10月, 2017 25 次提交