Skip to content

cloud-kernel
cloud-kernel

openanolis / cloud-kernel
1 年多 前同步成功

通知 160
Star 36
Fork 7
cloud-kernel
cloud-kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 10 7月, 2014 1 次提交
  3. 09 7月, 2014 3 次提交
  5. 23 6月, 2014 3 次提交
  7. 31 5月, 2014 3 次提交
  9. 23 5月, 2014 1 次提交
    • N
      nfsd: Only set PF_LESS_THROTTLE when really needed. · 8658452e
      由 NeilBrown 提交于 
      PF_LESS_THROTTLE has a very specific use case: to avoid deadlocks
and live-locks while writing to the page cache in a loop-back
NFS mount situation.

It therefore makes sense to *only* set PF_LESS_THROTTLE in this
situation.
We now know when a request came from the local-host so it could be a
loop-back mount.  We already know when we are handling write requests,
and when we are doing anything else.

So combine those two to allow nfsd to still be throttled (like any
other process) in every situation except when it is known to be
problematic.
Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
      8658452e
  11. 22 5月, 2014 1 次提交
    • K
      NFSD: Don't clear SUID/SGID after root writing data · 368fe39b
      由 Kinglong Mee 提交于 
      We're clearing the SUID/SGID bits on write by hand in nfsd_vfs_write,
even though the subsequent vfs_writev() call will end up doing this for
us (through file system write methods eventually calling
file_remove_suid(), e.g., from __generic_file_aio_write).

So, remove the redundant nfsd code.

The only change in behavior is when the write is by root, in which case
we previously cleared SUID/SGID, but will now leave it alone.  The new
behavior is the behavior of every filesystem we've checked.

It seems better to be consistent with local filesystem behavior.  And
the security advantage seems limited as root could always restore these
bits by hand if it wanted.

SUID/SGID is not cleared after writing data with (root, local ext4),
   File: ‘test’
   Size: 0               Blocks: 0          IO Block: 4096   regular
empty file
Device: 803h/2051d      Inode: 1200137     Links: 1
Access: (4777/-rwsrwxrwx)  Uid: (    0/    root)   Gid: (    0/    root)
Context: unconfined_u:object_r:admin_home_t:s0
Access: 2014-04-18 21:36:31.016029014 +0800
Modify: 2014-04-18 21:36:31.016029014 +0800
Change: 2014-04-18 21:36:31.026030285 +0800
  Birth: -
   File: ‘test’
   Size: 5               Blocks: 8          IO Block: 4096   regular file
Device: 803h/2051d      Inode: 1200137     Links: 1
Access: (4777/-rwsrwxrwx)  Uid: (    0/    root)   Gid: (    0/    root)
Context: unconfined_u:object_r:admin_home_t:s0
Access: 2014-04-18 21:36:31.016029014 +0800
Modify: 2014-04-18 21:36:31.040032065 +0800
Change: 2014-04-18 21:36:31.040032065 +0800
  Birth: -

With no_root_squash, (root, remote ext4), SUID/SGID are cleared,
   File: ‘test’
   Size: 0               Blocks: 0          IO Block: 262144 regular
empty file
Device: 24h/36d Inode: 786439      Links: 1
Access: (4777/-rwsrwxrwx)  Uid: ( 1000/    test)   Gid: ( 1000/    test)
Context: system_u:object_r:nfs_t:s0
Access: 2014-04-18 21:45:32.155805097 +0800
Modify: 2014-04-18 21:45:32.155805097 +0800
Change: 2014-04-18 21:45:32.168806749 +0800
  Birth: -
   File: ‘test’
   Size: 5               Blocks: 8          IO Block: 262144 regular file
Device: 24h/36d Inode: 786439      Links: 1
Access: (0777/-rwxrwxrwx)  Uid: ( 1000/    test)   Gid: ( 1000/    test)
Context: system_u:object_r:nfs_t:s0
Access: 2014-04-18 21:45:32.155805097 +0800
Modify: 2014-04-18 21:45:32.184808783 +0800
Change: 2014-04-18 21:45:32.184808783 +0800
  Birth: -
Signed-off-by: NKinglong Mee <kinglongmee@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
      368fe39b
  13. 01 4月, 2014 1 次提交
  15. 29 3月, 2014 1 次提交
  17. 28 3月, 2014 1 次提交
  19. 19 2月, 2014 1 次提交
  21. 28 1月, 2014 1 次提交
    • J
      nfsd4: fix delegation-unlink/rename race · 4335723e
      由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于 
      If a file is unlinked or renamed between the time when we do the local
open and the time when we get the delegation, then we will return to the
client indicating that it holds a delegation even though the file no
longer exists under the name it was open under.

But a client performing an open-by-name, when it is returned a
delegation, must be able to assume that the file is still linked at the
name it was opened under.

So, hold the parent i_mutex for longer to prevent concurrent renames or
unlinks.
Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
      4335723e
  23. 26 1月, 2014 1 次提交
  25. 08 1月, 2014 1 次提交
    • J
      nfsd4: break only delegations when appropriate · 208d0acc
      由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于 
      As a temporary fix, nfsd was breaking all leases on unlink, link,
rename, and setattr.

Now that we can distinguish between leases and delegations, we can be
nicer and break only the delegations, and not bother lease-holders with
operations they don't care about.

And we get to delete some code while we're at it.

Note that in the presence of delegations the vfs calls here all return
-EWOULDBLOCK instead of blocking, so nfsd threads will not get stuck
waiting for delegation returns.
Acked-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
      208d0acc
  27. 13 12月, 2013 1 次提交
    • S
      nfsd: revoking of suid/sgid bits after chown() in a consistent way · c4fa6d7c
      由 Stanislav Kholmanskikh 提交于 
      There is an inconsistency in the handling of SUID/SGID file
bits after chown() between NFS and other local file systems.

Local file systems (for example, ext3, ext4, xfs, btrfs) revoke
SUID/SGID bits after chown() on a regular file even if
the owner/group of the file has not been changed:

~# touch file; chmod ug+s file; chmod u+x file
~# ls -l file
-rwsr-Sr-- 1 root root 0 Dec  6 04:49 file
~# chown root file; ls -l file
-rwxr-Sr-- 1 root root 0 Dec  6 04:49 file

but NFS doesn't do that:

~# touch file; chmod ug+s file; chmod u+x file
~# ls -l file
-rwsr-Sr-- 1 root root 0 Dec  6 04:49 file
~# chown root file; ls -l file
-rwsr-Sr-- 1 root root 0 Dec  6 04:49 file

NFS does that only if the owner/group has been changed:

~# touch file; chmod ug+s file; chmod u+x file
~# ls -l file
-rwsr-Sr-- 1 root root 0 Dec  6 05:02 file
~# chown bin file; ls -l file
-rwxr-Sr-- 1 bin root 0 Dec  6 05:02 file

See: http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/functions/chown.html

 "If the specified file is a regular file, one or more of
 the S_IXUSR, S_IXGRP, or S_IXOTH bits of the file mode are set,
 and the process has appropriate privileges, it is
 implementation-defined whether the set-user-ID and set-group-ID
 bits are altered."

So both variants are acceptable by POSIX.

This patch makes NFS to behave like local file systems.
Signed-off-by: NStanislav Kholmanskikh <stanislav.kholmanskikh@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
      c4fa6d7c
  29. 19 11月, 2013 2 次提交
  31. 09 11月, 2013 4 次提交
  33. 25 10月, 2013 1 次提交
  35. 03 10月, 2013 1 次提交
  37. 24 7月, 2013 1 次提交
    • H
      nfsd: nfsd_open: when dentry_open returns an error do not propagate as struct file · e4daf1ff
      由 Harshula Jayasuriya 提交于 
      The following call chain:
------------------------------------------------------------
nfs4_get_vfs_file
- nfsd_open
  - dentry_open
    - do_dentry_open
      - __get_file_write_access
        - get_write_access
          - return atomic_inc_unless_negative(&inode->i_writecount) ? 0 : -ETXTBSY;
------------------------------------------------------------

can result in the following state:
------------------------------------------------------------
struct nfs4_file {
...
  fi_fds = {0xffff880c1fa65c80, 0xffffffffffffffe6, 0x0},
  fi_access = {{
      counter = 0x1
    }, {
      counter = 0x0
    }},
...
------------------------------------------------------------

1) First time around, in nfs4_get_vfs_file() fp->fi_fds[O_WRONLY] is
NULL, hence nfsd_open() is called where we get status set to an error
and fp->fi_fds[O_WRONLY] to -ETXTBSY. Thus we do not reach
nfs4_file_get_access() and fi_access[O_WRONLY] is not incremented.

2) Second time around, in nfs4_get_vfs_file() fp->fi_fds[O_WRONLY] is
NOT NULL (-ETXTBSY), so nfsd_open() is NOT called, but
nfs4_file_get_access() IS called and fi_access[O_WRONLY] is incremented.
Thus we leave a landmine in the form of the nfs4_file data structure in
an incorrect state.

3) Eventually, when __nfs4_file_put_access() is called it finds
fi_access[O_WRONLY] being non-zero, it decrements it and calls
nfs4_file_put_fd() which tries to fput -ETXTBSY.
------------------------------------------------------------
...
     [exception RIP: fput+0x9]
     RIP: ffffffff81177fa9  RSP: ffff88062e365c90  RFLAGS: 00010282
     RAX: ffff880c2b3d99cc  RBX: ffff880c2b3d9978  RCX: 0000000000000002
     RDX: dead000000100101  RSI: 0000000000000001  RDI: ffffffffffffffe6
     RBP: ffff88062e365c90   R8: ffff88041fe797d8   R9: ffff88062e365d58
     R10: 0000000000000008  R11: 0000000000000000  R12: 0000000000000001
     R13: 0000000000000007  R14: 0000000000000000  R15: 0000000000000000
     ORIG_RAX: ffffffffffffffff  CS: 0010  SS: 0018
  #9 [ffff88062e365c98] __nfs4_file_put_access at ffffffffa0562334 [nfsd]
 #10 [ffff88062e365cc8] nfs4_file_put_access at ffffffffa05623ab [nfsd]
 #11 [ffff88062e365ce8] free_generic_stateid at ffffffffa056634d [nfsd]
 #12 [ffff88062e365d18] release_open_stateid at ffffffffa0566e4b [nfsd]
 #13 [ffff88062e365d38] nfsd4_close at ffffffffa0567401 [nfsd]
 #14 [ffff88062e365d88] nfsd4_proc_compound at ffffffffa0557f28 [nfsd]
 #15 [ffff88062e365dd8] nfsd_dispatch at ffffffffa054543e [nfsd]
 #16 [ffff88062e365e18] svc_process_common at ffffffffa04ba5a4 [sunrpc]
 #17 [ffff88062e365e98] svc_process at ffffffffa04babe0 [sunrpc]
 #18 [ffff88062e365eb8] nfsd at ffffffffa0545b62 [nfsd]
 #19 [ffff88062e365ee8] kthread at ffffffff81090886
 #20 [ffff88062e365f48] kernel_thread at ffffffff8100c14a
------------------------------------------------------------

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: NHarshula Jayasuriya <harshula@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
      e4daf1ff
  39. 29 6月, 2013 2 次提交
  41. 15 5月, 2013 1 次提交
  43. 27 4月, 2013 1 次提交
    • J
      nfsd: fix EXDEV checking in rename · aa387d6c
      由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于 
      We again check for the EXDEV a little later on, so the first check is
redundant.  This check is also slightly racier, since a badly timed
eviction from the export cache could leave us with the two fh_export
pointers pointing to two different cache entries which each refer to the
same underlying export.

It's better to compare vfsmounts as the later check does, but that
leaves a minor security hole in the case where the two exports refer to
two different directories especially if (for example) they have
different root-squashing options.

So, compare ex_path.dentry too.
Reported-by: NJoe Habermann <joe.habermann@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
      aa387d6c
  45. 23 3月, 2013 1 次提交
  47. 23 2月, 2013 1 次提交
  49. 13 2月, 2013 1 次提交
    • E
      nfsd: Properly compare and initialize kuids and kgids · 6fab8779
      由 Eric W. Biederman 提交于 
      Use uid_eq(uid, GLOBAL_ROOT_UID) instead of !uid.
Use gid_eq(gid, GLOBAL_ROOT_GID) instead of !gid.
Use uid_eq(uid, INVALID_UID) instead of uid == -1
Use gid_eq(uid, INVALID_GID) instead of gid == -1
Use uid = GLOBAL_ROOT_UID instead of uid = 0;
Use gid = GLOBAL_ROOT_GID instead of gid = 0;
Use !uid_eq(uid1, uid2) instead of uid1 != uid2.
Use !gid_eq(gid1, gid2) instead of gid1 != gid2.
Use uid_eq(uid1, uid2) instead of uid1 == uid2.

Cc: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
Cc: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
Signed-off-by: N"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
      6fab8779
  51. 22 12月, 2012 1 次提交
  53. 18 12月, 2012 2 次提交
  55. 11 12月, 2012 1 次提交
    • N
      nfsd: avoid permission checks on EXCLUSIVE_CREATE replay · 7007c90f
      由 Neil Brown 提交于 
      With NFSv4, if we create a file then open it we explicit avoid checking
the permissions on the file during the open because the fact that we
created it ensures we should be allow to open it (the create and the
open should appear to be a single operation).

However if the reply to an EXCLUSIVE create gets lots and the client
resends the create, the current code will perform the permission check -
because it doesn't realise that it did the open already..

This patch should fix this.

Note that I haven't actually seen this cause a problem.  I was just
looking at the code trying to figure out a different EXCLUSIVE open
related issue, and this looked wrong.

(Fix confirmed with pynfs 4.0 test OPEN4--bfields)

Cc: stable@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
[bfields: use OWNER_OVERRIDE and update for 4.1]
Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
      7007c90f