- 15 5月, 2017 1 次提交
-
-
由 Vincent Guittot 提交于
In the current implementation of load/util_avg, we assume that the ongoing time segment has fully elapsed, and util/load_sum is divided by LOAD_AVG_MAX, even if part of the time segment still remains to run. As a consequence, this remaining part is considered as idle time and generates unexpected variations of util_avg of a busy CPU in the range [1002..1024[ whereas util_avg should stay at 1023. In order to keep the metric stable, we should not consider the ongoing time segment when computing load/util_avg but only the segments that have already fully elapsed. But to not consider the current time segment adds unwanted latency in the load/util_avg responsivness especially when the time is scaled instead of the contribution. Instead of waiting for the current time segment to have fully elapsed before accounting it in load/util_avg, we can already account the elapsed part but change the range used to compute load/util_avg accordingly. At the very beginning of a new time segment, the past segments have been decayed and the max value is LOAD_AVG_MAX*y. At the very end of the current time segment, the max value becomes: LOAD_AVG_MAX*y + 1024(us) (== LOAD_AVG_MAX) In fact, the max value is: LOAD_AVG_MAX*y + sa->period_contrib at any time in the time segment. Taking advantage of the fact that: LOAD_AVG_MAX*y == LOAD_AVG_MAX-1024 the range becomes [0..LOAD_AVG_MAX-1024+sa->period_contrib]. As the elapsed part is already accounted in load/util_sum, we update the max value according to the current position in the time segment instead of removing its contribution. Suggested-by: NPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: NVincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> Cc: Morten.Rasmussen@arm.com Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: bsegall@google.com Cc: dietmar.eggemann@arm.com Cc: pjt@google.com Cc: yuyang.du@intel.com Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1493188076-2767-1-git-send-email-vincent.guittot@linaro.orgSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
- 14 4月, 2017 4 次提交
-
-
由 Peter Zijlstra 提交于
Now that we have a tool to generate the PELT constants in C form, use its output as a separate header. Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
由 Peter Zijlstra 提交于
We truncate (and loose) the lower 10 bits of runtime in ___update_load_avg(), this means there's a consistent bias to under-account tasks. This is esp. significant for small tasks. Cure this by only forwarding last_update_time to the point we've actually accounted for, leaving the remainder for the next time. Reported-by: NMorten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@arm.com> Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Acked-by: NMorten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@arm.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
由 Peter Zijlstra 提交于
Historically our periods (or p) argument in PELT denoted the number of full periods (what is now d2). However recent patches have changed this to the total decay (previously p+1), leading to a confusing discrepancy between comments and code. Try and clarify things by making periods (in code) and p (in comments) be the same thing (again). Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
由 Peter Zijlstra 提交于
Paul noticed that in the (periods >= LOAD_AVG_MAX_N) case in __accumulate_sum(), the returned contribution value (LOAD_AVG_MAX) is incorrect. This is because at this point, the decay_load() on the old state -- the first step in accumulate_sum() -- will not have resulted in 0, and will therefore result in a sum larger than the maximum value of our series. Obviously broken. Note that: decay_load(LOAD_AVG_MAX, LOAD_AVG_MAX_N) = 1 (345 / 32) 47742 * - ^ = ~27 2 Not to mention that any further contribution from the d3 segment (our new period) would also push it over the maximum. Solve this by noting that we can write our c2 term: p c2 = 1024 \Sum y^n n=1 In terms of our maximum value: inf inf p max = 1024 \Sum y^n = 1024 ( \Sum y^n + \Sum y^n + y^0 ) n=0 n=p+1 n=1 Further note that: inf inf inf ( \Sum y^n ) y^p = \Sum y^(n+p) = \Sum y^n n=0 n=0 n=p Combined that gives us: p c2 = 1024 \Sum y^n n=1 inf inf = 1024 ( \Sum y^n - \Sum y^n - y^0 ) n=0 n=p+1 = max - (max y^(p+1)) - 1024 Further simplify things by dealing with p=0 early on. Reported-by: NPaul Turner <pjt@google.com> Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Yuyang Du <yuyang.du@intel.com> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Fixes: a481db34 ("sched/fair: Optimize ___update_sched_avg()") Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
- 30 3月, 2017 2 次提交
-
-
由 Yuyang Du 提交于
The main PELT function ___update_load_avg(), which implements the accumulation and progression of the geometric average series, is implemented along the following lines for the scenario where the time delta spans all 3 possible sections (see figure below): 1. add the remainder of the last incomplete period 2. decay old sum 3. accumulate new sum in full periods since last_update_time 4. accumulate the current incomplete period 5. update averages Or: d1 d2 d3 ^ ^ ^ | | | |<->|<----------------->|<--->| ... |---x---|------| ... |------|-----x (now) load_sum' = (load_sum + weight * scale * d1) * y^(p+1) + (1,2) p weight * scale * 1024 * \Sum y^n + (3) n=1 weight * scale * d3 * y^0 (4) load_avg' = load_sum' / LOAD_AVG_MAX (5) Where: d1 - is the delta part completing the remainder of the last incomplete period, d2 - is the delta part spannind complete periods, and d3 - is the delta part starting the current incomplete period. We can simplify the code in two steps; the first step is to separate the first term into new and old parts like: (load_sum + weight * scale * d1) * y^(p+1) = load_sum * y^(p+1) + weight * scale * d1 * y^(p+1) Once we've done that, its easy to see that all new terms carry the common factors: weight * scale If we factor those out, we arrive at the form: load_sum' = load_sum * y^(p+1) + weight * scale * (d1 * y^(p+1) + p 1024 * \Sum y^n + n=1 d3 * y^0) Which results in a simpler, smaller and faster implementation. Signed-off-by: NYuyang Du <yuyang.du@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: bsegall@google.com Cc: dietmar.eggemann@arm.com Cc: matt@codeblueprint.co.uk Cc: morten.rasmussen@arm.com Cc: pjt@google.com Cc: umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com Cc: vincent.guittot@linaro.org Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1486935863-25251-3-git-send-email-yuyang.du@intel.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
由 Peter Zijlstra 提交于
The __update_load_avg() function is an __always_inline because its used with constant propagation to generate different variants of the code without having to duplicate it (which would be prone to bugs). Explicitly instantiate the 3 variants. Note that most of this is called from rather hot paths, so reducing branches is good. Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
- 27 3月, 2017 1 次提交
-
-
由 Srikar Dronamraju 提交于
If the child domain prefers tasks to go siblings, the local group could end up pulling tasks to itself even if the local group is almost equally loaded as the source group. Lets assume a 4 core,smt==2 machine running 5 thread ebizzy workload. Everytime, local group has capacity and source group has atleast 2 threads, local group tries to pull the task. This causes the threads to constantly move between different cores. This is even more profound if the cores have more threads, like in Power 8, smt 8 mode. Fix this by only allowing local group to pull a task, if the source group has more number of tasks than the local group. Here are the relevant perf stat numbers of a 22 core,smt 8 Power 8 machine. Without patch: Performance counter stats for 'ebizzy -t 22 -S 100' (5 runs): 1,440 context-switches # 0.001 K/sec ( +- 1.26% ) 366 cpu-migrations # 0.000 K/sec ( +- 5.58% ) 3,933 page-faults # 0.002 K/sec ( +- 11.08% ) Performance counter stats for 'ebizzy -t 48 -S 100' (5 runs): 6,287 context-switches # 0.001 K/sec ( +- 3.65% ) 3,776 cpu-migrations # 0.001 K/sec ( +- 4.84% ) 5,702 page-faults # 0.001 K/sec ( +- 9.36% ) Performance counter stats for 'ebizzy -t 96 -S 100' (5 runs): 8,776 context-switches # 0.001 K/sec ( +- 0.73% ) 2,790 cpu-migrations # 0.000 K/sec ( +- 0.98% ) 10,540 page-faults # 0.001 K/sec ( +- 3.12% ) With patch: Performance counter stats for 'ebizzy -t 22 -S 100' (5 runs): 1,133 context-switches # 0.001 K/sec ( +- 4.72% ) 123 cpu-migrations # 0.000 K/sec ( +- 3.42% ) 3,858 page-faults # 0.002 K/sec ( +- 8.52% ) Performance counter stats for 'ebizzy -t 48 -S 100' (5 runs): 2,169 context-switches # 0.000 K/sec ( +- 6.19% ) 189 cpu-migrations # 0.000 K/sec ( +- 12.75% ) 5,917 page-faults # 0.001 K/sec ( +- 8.09% ) Performance counter stats for 'ebizzy -t 96 -S 100' (5 runs): 5,333 context-switches # 0.001 K/sec ( +- 5.91% ) 506 cpu-migrations # 0.000 K/sec ( +- 3.35% ) 10,792 page-faults # 0.001 K/sec ( +- 7.75% ) Which show that in these workloads CPU migrations get reduced significantly. Signed-off-by: NSrikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1490205470-10249-1-git-send-email-srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
- 24 3月, 2017 1 次提交
-
-
由 Masanari Iida 提交于
This patch fix spelling typos found in Documentation/output/xml/driver-api/basics.xml. It is because the xml file was generated from comments in source, so I had to fix the comments. Signed-off-by: NMasanari Iida <standby24x7@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
-
- 23 3月, 2017 1 次提交
-
-
由 Vincent Guittot 提交于
A regression of the FTQ noise has been reported by Ying Huang, on the following hardware: 8 threads Intel(R) Core(TM)i7-4770 CPU @ 3.40GHz with 8G memory ... which was caused by this commit: commit 4e516076 ("sched/fair: Propagate asynchrous detach") The only part of the patch that can increase the noise is the update of blocked load of group entity in update_blocked_averages(). We can optimize this call and skip the update of group entity if its load and utilization are already null and there is no pending propagation of load in the task group. This optimization partly restores the noise score. A more agressive optimization has been tried but has shown worse score. Reported-by: ying.huang@linux.intel.com Signed-off-by: NVincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: dietmar.eggemann@arm.com Cc: ying.huang@intel.com Fixes: 4e516076 ("sched/fair: Propagate asynchrous detach") Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1489758442-2877-1-git-send-email-vincent.guittot@linaro.org [ Fixed typos, improved layout. ] Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
- 16 3月, 2017 2 次提交
-
-
由 Peter Zijlstra 提交于
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
由 Peter Zijlstra 提交于
The missing update_rq_clock() check can work with partial rq->lock wrappery, since a missing wrapper can cause the warning to not be emitted when it should have, but cannot cause the warning to trigger when it should not have. The duplicate update_rq_clock() check however can cause false warnings to trigger. Therefore add more comprehensive rq->lock wrappery. Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
- 02 3月, 2017 4 次提交
-
-
由 Peter Zijlstra 提交于
Kitsunyan reported desktop latency issues on his Celeron 887 because of commit: 1b568f0a ("sched/core: Optimize SCHED_SMT") ... even though his CPU doesn't do SMT. The effect of running the SMT code on a !SMT part is basically a more aggressive select_idle_cpu(). Removing the avg condition fixed things for him. I also know FB likes this test gone, even though other workloads like having it. For now, take it out by default, until we get a better idea. Reported-by: Nkitsunyan <kitsunyan@inbox.ru> Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> Cc: Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
由 Ingo Molnar 提交于
Update code that relied on sched.h including various MM types for them. This will allow us to remove the <linux/mm_types.h> include from <linux/sched.h>. Acked-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
由 Ingo Molnar 提交于
We are going to split <linux/sched/topology.h> out of <linux/sched.h>, which will have to be picked up from other headers and a couple of .c files. Create a trivial placeholder <linux/sched/topology.h> file that just maps to <linux/sched.h> to make this patch obviously correct and bisectable. Include the new header in the files that are going to need it. Acked-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
由 Ingo Molnar 提交于
So the original intention of tsk_cpus_allowed() was to 'future-proof' the field - but it's pretty ineffectual at that, because half of the code uses ->cpus_allowed directly ... Also, the wrapper makes the code longer than the original expression! So just get rid of it. This also shrinks <linux/sched.h> a bit. Acked-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
- 14 1月, 2017 6 次提交
-
-
由 Dietmar Eggemann 提交于
Signed-off-by: NDietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com> Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> Cc: Paul Turner <pjt@kernel.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@ens-lyon.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/e9a4d858-bcf3-36b9-e3a9-449953e34569@arm.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
由 Vincent Guittot 提交于
The update of the share of a cfs_rq is done when its load_avg is updated but before the group_entity's load_avg has been updated for the past time slot. This generates wrong load_avg accounting which can be significant when small tasks are involved in the scheduling. Let take the example of a task a that is dequeued of its task group A: root (cfs_rq) \ (se) A (cfs_rq) \ (se) a Task "a" was the only task in task group A which becomes idle when a is dequeued. We have the sequence: - dequeue_entity a->se - update_load_avg(a->se) - dequeue_entity_load_avg(A->cfs_rq, a->se) - update_cfs_shares(A->cfs_rq) A->cfs_rq->load.weight == 0 A->se->load.weight is updated with the new share (0 in this case) - dequeue_entity A->se - update_load_avg(A->se) but its weight is now null so the last time slot (up to a tick) will be accounted with a weight of 0 instead of its real weight during the time slot. The last time slot will be accounted as an idle one whereas it was a running one. If the running time of task a is short enough that no tick happens when it runs, all running time of group entity A->se will be accounted as idle time. Instead, we should update the share of a cfs_rq (in fact the weight of its group entity) only after having updated the load_avg of the group_entity. update_cfs_shares() now takes the sched_entity as a parameter instead of the cfs_rq, and the weight of the group_entity is updated only once its load_avg has been synced with current time. Signed-off-by: NVincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: pjt@google.com Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1482335426-7664-1-git-send-email-vincent.guittot@linaro.orgSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
由 Peter Zijlstra 提交于
Add the update_rq_clock() call at the top of the callstack instead of at the bottom where we find it missing, this to aid later effort to minimize the number of update_rq_lock() calls. WARNING: CPU: 30 PID: 194 at ../kernel/sched/sched.h:797 assert_clock_updated() rq->clock_update_flags < RQCF_ACT_SKIP Call Trace: dump_stack() __warn() warn_slowpath_fmt() assert_clock_updated.isra.63.part.64() can_migrate_task() load_balance() pick_next_task_fair() __schedule() schedule() worker_thread() kthread() Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
由 Peter Zijlstra 提交于
Address this rq-clock update bug: WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 0 at ../kernel/sched/sched.h:797 post_init_entity_util_avg() rq->clock_update_flags < RQCF_ACT_SKIP Call Trace: __warn() post_init_entity_util_avg() wake_up_new_task() _do_fork() kernel_thread() rest_init() start_kernel() Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
由 Matt Fleming 提交于
Future patches will emit warnings if rq_clock() is called before update_rq_clock() inside a rq_pin_lock()/rq_unpin_lock() pair. Since there is only one caller of idle_balance() we can push the unpin/repin there. Signed-off-by: NMatt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk> Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com> Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Luca Abeni <luca.abeni@unitn.it> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net> Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> Cc: Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com> Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@hotmail.com> Cc: Yuyang Du <yuyang.du@intel.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160921133813.31976-7-matt@codeblueprint.co.ukSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
由 Matt Fleming 提交于
In preparation for adding diagnostic checks to catch missing calls to update_rq_clock(), provide wrappers for (re)pinning and unpinning rq->lock. Because the pending diagnostic checks allow state to be maintained in rq_flags across pin contexts, swap the 'struct pin_cookie' arguments for 'struct rq_flags *'. Signed-off-by: NMatt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk> Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com> Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Luca Abeni <luca.abeni@unitn.it> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net> Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> Cc: Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com> Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@hotmail.com> Cc: Yuyang Du <yuyang.du@intel.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160921133813.31976-5-matt@codeblueprint.co.ukSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
- 11 12月, 2016 2 次提交
-
-
由 Vincent Guittot 提交于
find_idlest_group() only compares the runnable_load_avg when looking for the least loaded group. But on fork intensive use case like hackbench where tasks blocked quickly after the fork, this can lead to selecting the same CPU instead of other CPUs, which have similar runnable load but a lower load_avg. When the runnable_load_avg of 2 CPUs are close, we now take into account the amount of blocked load as a 2nd selection factor. There is now 3 zones for the runnable_load of the rq: - [0 .. (runnable_load - imbalance)]: Select the new rq which has significantly less runnable_load - [(runnable_load - imbalance) .. (runnable_load + imbalance)]: The runnable loads are close so we use load_avg to chose between the 2 rq - [(runnable_load + imbalance) .. ULONG_MAX]: Keep the current rq which has significantly less runnable_load The scale factor that is currently used for comparing runnable_load, doesn't work well with small value. As an example, the use of a scaling factor fails as soon as this_runnable_load == 0 because we always select local rq even if min_runnable_load is only 1, which doesn't really make sense because they are just the same. So instead of scaling factor, we use an absolute margin for runnable_load to detect CPUs with similar runnable_load and we keep using scaling factor for blocked load. For use case like hackbench, this enable the scheduler to select different CPUs during the fork sequence and to spread tasks across the system. Tests have been done on a Hikey board (ARM based octo cores) for several kernel. The result below gives min, max, avg and stdev values of 18 runs with each configuration. The patches depend on the "no missing update_rq_clock()" work. hackbench -P -g 1 ea86cb4b 7dc603c9 v4.8 v4.8+patches min 0.049 0.050 0.051 0,048 avg 0.057 0.057(0%) 0.057(0%) 0,055(+5%) max 0.066 0.068 0.070 0,063 stdev +/-9% +/-9% +/-8% +/-9% More performance numbers here: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20161203214707.GI20785@codeblueprint.co.ukTested-by: NMatt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk> Signed-off-by: NVincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: NMatt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Morten.Rasmussen@arm.com Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: dietmar.eggemann@arm.com Cc: kernellwp@gmail.com Cc: umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com Cc: yuyang.du@intel.comc Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1481216215-24651-3-git-send-email-vincent.guittot@linaro.orgSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
由 Vincent Guittot 提交于
During fork, the utilization of a task is init once the rq has been selected because the current utilization level of the rq is used to set the utilization of the fork task. As the task's utilization is still 0 at this step of the fork sequence, it doesn't make sense to look for some spare capacity that can fit the task's utilization. Furthermore, I can see perf regressions for the test: hackbench -P -g 1 because the least loaded policy is always bypassed and tasks are not spread during fork. With this patch and the fix below, we are back to same performances as for v4.8. The fix below is only a temporary one used for the test until a smarter solution is found because we can't simply remove the test which is useful for others benchmarks | @@ -5708,13 +5708,6 @@ static int select_idle_cpu(struct task_struct *p, struct sched_domain *sd, int t | | avg_cost = this_sd->avg_scan_cost; | | - /* | - * Due to large variance we need a large fuzz factor; hackbench in | - * particularly is sensitive here. | - */ | - if ((avg_idle / 512) < avg_cost) | - return -1; | - | time = local_clock(); | | for_each_cpu_wrap(cpu, sched_domain_span(sd), target, wrap) { Tested-by: NMatt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk> Signed-off-by: NVincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: NMatt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk> Acked-by: NMorten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@arm.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: dietmar.eggemann@arm.com Cc: kernellwp@gmail.com Cc: umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com Cc: yuyang.du@intel.comc Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1481216215-24651-2-git-send-email-vincent.guittot@linaro.orgSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
- 24 11月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Tim Chen 提交于
We generalize the scheduler's asym packing to provide an ordering of the cpu beyond just the cpu number. This allows the use of the ASYM_PACKING scheduler machinery to move loads to preferred CPU in a sched domain. The preference is defined with the cpu priority given by arch_asym_cpu_priority(cpu). We also record the most preferred cpu in a sched group when we build the cpu's capacity for fast lookup of preferred cpu during load balancing. Co-developed-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: NTim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org Cc: jolsa@redhat.com Cc: rjw@rjwysocki.net Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org Cc: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com> Cc: bp@suse.de Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/0e73ae12737dfaafa46c07066cc7c5d3f1675e46.1479844244.git.tim.c.chen@linux.intel.comSigned-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
-
- 23 11月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Ingo Molnar 提交于
No change in functionality: - align the default values vertically to make them easier to scan - standardize the 'default:' lines - fix minor whitespace typos Acked-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
- 16 11月, 2016 11 次提交
-
-
由 Vincent Guittot 提交于
The moves of tasks are now propagated down to root and the utilization of cfs_rq reflects reality so it doesn't need to be estimated at init. Signed-off-by: NVincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Acked-by: NDietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Morten.Rasmussen@arm.com Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: bsegall@google.com Cc: kernellwp@gmail.com Cc: pjt@google.com Cc: yuyang.du@intel.com Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1478598827-32372-7-git-send-email-vincent.guittot@linaro.orgSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
由 Vincent Guittot 提交于
A task can be asynchronously detached from cfs_rq when migrating between CPUs. The load of the migrated task is then removed from source cfs_rq during its next update. We use this event to set propagation flag. During the load balance, we take advantage of the update of blocked load to propagate any pending changes. The propagation relies on patch: "sched: Fix hierarchical order in rq->leaf_cfs_rq_list" ... which orders children and parents, to ensure that it's done in one pass. Signed-off-by: NVincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Acked-by: NDietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Morten.Rasmussen@arm.com Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: bsegall@google.com Cc: kernellwp@gmail.com Cc: pjt@google.com Cc: yuyang.du@intel.com Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1478598827-32372-6-git-send-email-vincent.guittot@linaro.orgSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
由 Vincent Guittot 提交于
When a task moves from/to a cfs_rq, we set a flag which is then used to propagate the change at parent level (sched_entity and cfs_rq) during next update. If the cfs_rq is throttled, the flag will stay pending until the cfs_rq is unthrottled. For propagating the utilization, we copy the utilization of group cfs_rq to the sched_entity. For propagating the load, we have to take into account the load of the whole task group in order to evaluate the load of the sched_entity. Similarly to what was done before the rewrite of PELT, we add a correction factor in case the task group's load is greater than its share so it will contribute the same load of a task of equal weight. Signed-off-by: NVincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Acked-by: NDietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Morten.Rasmussen@arm.com Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: bsegall@google.com Cc: kernellwp@gmail.com Cc: pjt@google.com Cc: yuyang.du@intel.com Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1478598827-32372-5-git-send-email-vincent.guittot@linaro.orgSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
由 Vincent Guittot 提交于
Every time we modify load/utilization of sched_entity, we start to sync it with its cfs_rq. This update is done in different ways: - when attaching/detaching a sched_entity, we update cfs_rq and then we sync the entity with the cfs_rq. - when enqueueing/dequeuing the sched_entity, we update both sched_entity and cfs_rq metrics to now. Use update_load_avg() everytime we have to update and sync cfs_rq and sched_entity before changing the state of a sched_enity. Signed-off-by: NVincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Acked-by: NDietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Morten.Rasmussen@arm.com Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: bsegall@google.com Cc: kernellwp@gmail.com Cc: pjt@google.com Cc: yuyang.du@intel.com Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1478598827-32372-4-git-send-email-vincent.guittot@linaro.orgSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
由 Vincent Guittot 提交于
Fix the insertion of cfs_rq in rq->leaf_cfs_rq_list to ensure that a child will always be called before its parent. The hierarchical order in shares update list has been introduced by commit: 67e86250 ("sched: Introduce hierarchal order on shares update list") With the current implementation a child can be still put after its parent. Lets take the example of: root \ b /\ c d* | e* with root -> b -> c already enqueued but not d -> e so the leaf_cfs_rq_list looks like: head -> c -> b -> root -> tail The branch d -> e will be added the first time that they are enqueued, starting with e then d. When e is added, its parents is not already on the list so e is put at the tail : head -> c -> b -> root -> e -> tail Then, d is added at the head because its parent is already on the list: head -> d -> c -> b -> root -> e -> tail e is not placed at the right position and will be called the last whereas it should be called at the beginning. Because it follows the bottom-up enqueue sequence, we are sure that we will finished to add either a cfs_rq without parent or a cfs_rq with a parent that is already on the list. We can use this event to detect when we have finished to add a new branch. For the others, whose parents are not already added, we have to ensure that they will be added after their children that have just been inserted the steps before, and after any potential parents that are already in the list. The easiest way is to put the cfs_rq just after the last inserted one and to keep track of it untl the branch is fully added. Signed-off-by: NVincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Acked-by: NDietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Morten.Rasmussen@arm.com Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: bsegall@google.com Cc: kernellwp@gmail.com Cc: pjt@google.com Cc: yuyang.du@intel.com Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1478598827-32372-3-git-send-email-vincent.guittot@linaro.orgSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
由 Vincent Guittot 提交于
Factorize post_init_entity_util_avg() and part of attach_task_cfs_rq() in one function attach_entity_cfs_rq(). Create symmetric detach_entity_cfs_rq() function. Signed-off-by: NVincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Acked-by: NDietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Morten.Rasmussen@arm.com Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: bsegall@google.com Cc: kernellwp@gmail.com Cc: pjt@google.com Cc: yuyang.du@intel.com Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1478598827-32372-2-git-send-email-vincent.guittot@linaro.orgSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
由 Morten Rasmussen 提交于
The comment for capacity_margin introduced in: 3273163c ("sched/fair: Let asymmetric CPU configurations balance at wake-up") ... got its usage the wrong way round - fix it. Signed-off-by: NMorten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@arm.com> Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: dietmar.eggemann@arm.com Cc: freedom.tan@mediatek.com Cc: keita.kobayashi.ym@renesas.com Cc: mgalbraith@suse.de Cc: sgurrappadi@nvidia.com Cc: vincent.guittot@linaro.org Cc: yuyang.du@intel.com Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1476452472-24740-7-git-send-email-morten.rasmussen@arm.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
由 Morten Rasmussen 提交于
For asymmetric CPU capacity systems it is counter-productive for throughput if low capacity CPUs are pulling tasks from non-overloaded CPUs with higher capacity. The assumption is that higher CPU capacity is preferred over running alone in a group with lower CPU capacity. This patch rejects higher CPU capacity groups with one or less task per CPU as potential busiest group which could otherwise lead to a series of failing load-balancing attempts leading to a force-migration. Signed-off-by: NMorten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@arm.com> Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: dietmar.eggemann@arm.com Cc: freedom.tan@mediatek.com Cc: keita.kobayashi.ym@renesas.com Cc: mgalbraith@suse.de Cc: sgurrappadi@nvidia.com Cc: vincent.guittot@linaro.org Cc: yuyang.du@intel.com Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1476452472-24740-5-git-send-email-morten.rasmussen@arm.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
由 Morten Rasmussen 提交于
struct sched_group_capacity currently represents the compute capacity sum of all CPUs in the sched_group. Unless it is divided by the group_weight to get the average capacity per CPU, it hides differences in CPU capacity for mixed capacity systems (e.g. high RT/IRQ utilization or ARM big.LITTLE). But even the average may not be sufficient if the group covers CPUs of different capacities. Instead, by extending struct sched_group_capacity to indicate min per-CPU capacity in the group a suitable group for a given task utilization can more easily be found such that CPUs with reduced capacity can be avoided for tasks with high utilization (not implemented by this patch). Signed-off-by: NMorten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@arm.com> Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: dietmar.eggemann@arm.com Cc: freedom.tan@mediatek.com Cc: keita.kobayashi.ym@renesas.com Cc: mgalbraith@suse.de Cc: sgurrappadi@nvidia.com Cc: vincent.guittot@linaro.org Cc: yuyang.du@intel.com Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1476452472-24740-4-git-send-email-morten.rasmussen@arm.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
由 Morten Rasmussen 提交于
In low-utilization scenarios comparing relative loads in find_idlest_group() doesn't always lead to the most optimum choice. Systems with groups containing different numbers of cpus and/or cpus of different compute capacity are significantly better off when considering spare capacity rather than relative load in those scenarios. In addition to existing load based search an alternative spare capacity based candidate sched_group is found and selected instead if sufficient spare capacity exists. If not, existing behaviour is preserved. Signed-off-by: NMorten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@arm.com> Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: dietmar.eggemann@arm.com Cc: freedom.tan@mediatek.com Cc: keita.kobayashi.ym@renesas.com Cc: mgalbraith@suse.de Cc: sgurrappadi@nvidia.com Cc: vincent.guittot@linaro.org Cc: yuyang.du@intel.com Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1476452472-24740-3-git-send-email-morten.rasmussen@arm.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
由 Morten Rasmussen 提交于
At task wake-up load-tracking isn't updated until the task is enqueued. The task's own view of its utilization contribution may therefore not be aligned with its contribution to the cfs_rq load-tracking which may have been updated in the meantime. Basically, the task's own utilization hasn't yet accounted for the sleep decay, while the cfs_rq may have (partially). Estimating the cfs_rq utilization in case the task is migrated at wake-up as task_rq(p)->cfs.avg.util_avg - p->se.avg.util_avg is therefore incorrect as the two load-tracking signals aren't time synchronized (different last update). To solve this problem, this patch synchronizes the task utilization with its previous rq before the task utilization is used in the wake-up path. Currently the update/synchronization is done _after_ the task has been placed by select_task_rq_fair(). The synchronization is done without having to take the rq lock using the existing mechanism used in remove_entity_load_avg(). Signed-off-by: NMorten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@arm.com> Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: dietmar.eggemann@arm.com Cc: freedom.tan@mediatek.com Cc: keita.kobayashi.ym@renesas.com Cc: mgalbraith@suse.de Cc: sgurrappadi@nvidia.com Cc: vincent.guittot@linaro.org Cc: yuyang.du@intel.com Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1476452472-24740-2-git-send-email-morten.rasmussen@arm.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
- 27 10月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Tobias Klauser 提交于
Since commit: 8663e24d ("sched/fair: Reorder cgroup creation code") ... the variable 'rq' in alloc_fair_sched_group() is set but no longer used. Remove it to fix the following GCC warning when building with 'W=1': kernel/sched/fair.c:8842:13: warning: variable ‘rq’ set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable] Signed-off-by: NTobias Klauser <tklauser@distanz.ch> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20161026113704.8981-1-tklauser@distanz.chSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
- 20 10月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Matt Fleming 提交于
The last user of this tunable was removed in 2012 in commit: 82958366 ("sched: Replace update_shares weight distribution with per-entity computation") Delete it since its very existence confuses people. Signed-off-by: NMatt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk> Cc: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com> Cc: Paul Turner <pjt@google.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20161019141059.26408-1-matt@codeblueprint.co.ukSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
- 19 10月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Vincent Guittot 提交于
A scheduler performance regression has been reported by Joseph Salisbury, which he bisected back to: 3d30544f ("sched/fair: Apply more PELT fixes) The regression triggers when several levels of task groups are involved (read: SystemD) and cpu_possible_mask != cpu_present_mask. The root cause is that group entity's load (tg_child->se[i]->avg.load_avg) is initialized to scale_load_down(se->load.weight). During the creation of a child task group, its group entities on possible CPUs are attached to parent's cfs_rq (tg_parent) and their loads are added to the parent's load (tg_parent->load_avg) with update_tg_load_avg(). But only the load on online CPUs will then be updated to reflect real load, whereas load on other CPUs will stay at the initial value. The result is a tg_parent->load_avg that is higher than the real load, the weight of group entities (tg_parent->se[i]->load.weight) on online CPUs is smaller than it should be, and the task group gets a less running time than what it could expect. ( This situation can be detected with /proc/sched_debug. The ".tg_load_avg" of the task group will be much higher than sum of ".tg_load_avg_contrib" of online cfs_rqs of the task group. ) The load of group entities don't have to be intialized to something else than 0 because their load will increase when an entity is attached. Reported-by: NJoseph Salisbury <joseph.salisbury@canonical.com> Tested-by: NDietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com> Signed-off-by: NVincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org> Acked-by: NPeter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 4.8.x Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: joonwoop@codeaurora.org Fixes: 3d30544f ("sched/fair: Apply more PELT fixes) Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1476881123-10159-1-git-send-email-vincent.guittot@linaro.orgSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-