- 11 7月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jaegeuk Kim 提交于
This patch removes the most parts of internal crypto codes. And then, it modifies and adds some ext4-specific crypt codes to use the generic facility. Signed-off-by: NJaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 06 7月, 2016 3 次提交
-
-
由 Wang Shilong 提交于
We should always transfer quota accounting, regardless of whether quota limits are enabled. Steps to reproduce: # mkfs.ext4 /dev/sda4 -O quota,project # mount /dev/sda4 /mnt/test # cp /bin/bash /mnt/test # chattr -p 123 /mnt/test/bash # quota -v -P 123 Signed-off-by: NWang Shilong <wshilong@ddn.com> Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
If s_reserved_gdt_blocks is extremely large, it's possible for ext4_init_block_bitmap(), which is called when ext4 sets up an uninitialized block bitmap, to corrupt random kernel memory. Add the same checks which e2fsck has --- it must never be larger than blocksize / sizeof(__u32) --- and then add a backup check in ext4_init_block_bitmap() in case the superblock gets modified after the file system is mounted. Reported-by: NVegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
-
由 yalin wang 提交于
Signed-off-by: Nyalin wang <yalin.wang2010@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Reviewed-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.com>
-
- 04 7月, 2016 5 次提交
-
-
由 Vegard Nossum 提交于
If ext4_fill_super() fails early, it's possible for ext4_evict_inode() to call ext4_should_journal_data() before superblock options and flags are fully set up. In that case, the iput() on the journal inode can end up causing a BUG(). Work around this problem by reordering the tests so we only call ext4_should_journal_data() after we know it's not the journal inode. Fixes: 2d859db3 ("ext4: fix data corruption in inodes with journalled data") Fixes: 2b405bfa ("ext4: fix data=journal fast mount/umount hang") Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: NVegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Reviewed-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
-
由 Pranay Kr. Srivastava 提交于
If there are racing calls to ext4_commit_super() it's possible for another writeback of the superblock to result in the buffer being marked with an error after we check if the buffer is marked as having a write error and the buffer up-to-date flag is set again. If that happens mark_buffer_dirty() can end up throwing a WARN_ON_ONCE. Fix this by moving this check to write before we call write_buffer_dirty(), and keeping the buffer locked during this whole sequence. Signed-off-by: NPranay Kr. Srivastava <pranjas@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Jan Kara 提交于
Commit 06bd3c36 (ext4: fix data exposure after a crash) uncovered a deadlock in ext4_writepages() which was previously much harder to hit. After this commit xfstest generic/130 reproduces the deadlock on small filesystems. The problem happens when ext4_do_update_inode() sets LARGE_FILE feature and marks current inode handle as synchronous. That subsequently results in ext4_journal_stop() called from ext4_writepages() to block waiting for transaction commit while still holding page locks, reference to io_end, and some prepared bio in mpd structure each of which can possibly block transaction commit from completing and thus results in deadlock. Fix the problem by releasing page locks, io_end reference, and submitting prepared bio before calling ext4_journal_stop(). [ Changed to defer the call to ext4_journal_stop() only if the handle is synchronous. --tytso ] Reported-and-tested-by: NEryu Guan <eguan@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> CC: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
-
由 Daeho Jeong 提交于
ext4_dx_csum_verify() returns the success return value in two checksum verification failure cases. We need to set the return values to zero as failure like ext4_dirent_csum_verify() returning zero when failing to find a checksum dirent at the tail. Signed-off-by: NDaeho Jeong <daeho.jeong@samsung.com> Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Reviewed-by: NDarrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
-
由 Daeho Jeong 提交于
We temporally change checksum fields in buffers of some types of metadata into '0' for verifying the checksum values. By doing this without locking the buffer, some metadata's checksums, which are being committed or written back to the storage, could be damaged. In our test, several metadata blocks were found with damaged metadata checksum value during recovery process. When we only verify the checksum value, we have to avoid modifying checksum fields directly. Signed-off-by: NDaeho Jeong <daeho.jeong@samsung.com> Signed-off-by: NYoungjin Gil <youngjin.gil@samsung.com> Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Reviewed-by: NDarrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
-
- 30 6月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Vegard Nossum 提交于
An extent with lblock = 4294967295 and len = 1 will pass the ext4_valid_extent() test: ext4_lblk_t last = lblock + len - 1; if (len == 0 || lblock > last) return 0; since last = 4294967295 + 1 - 1 = 4294967295. This would later trigger the BUG_ON(es->es_lblk + es->es_len < es->es_lblk) in ext4_es_end(). We can simplify it by removing the - 1 altogether and changing the test to use lblock + len <= lblock, since now if len = 0, then lblock + 0 == lblock and it fails, and if len > 0 then lblock + len > lblock in order to pass (i.e. it doesn't overflow). Fixes: 5946d089 ("ext4: check for overlapping extents in ext4_valid_extent_entries()") Fixes: 2f974865 ("ext4: check for zero length extent explicitly") Cc: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: NPhil Turnbull <phil.turnbull@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NVegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 27 6月, 2016 2 次提交
-
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
Also, if we are going to issue the barrier, we should do this after we write out the parent directories if necessary. Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Reviewed-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
If there are no pending blocks to be released after a commit, forcing a journal commit has no hope of helping. It's possible that a commit had just completed, so if there are now free blocks available for allocation, it's worth retrying the commit. Reported-by: NChao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 28 5月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
preparation for similar switch in ->setxattr() (see the next commit for rationale). Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
- 21 5月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Andy Shevchenko 提交于
Let's gather the UUID related functions under one hood. Signed-off-by: NAndy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: NMatt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk> Cc: Dmitry Kasatkin <dmitry.kasatkin@gmail.com> Cc: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Cc: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 17 5月, 2016 2 次提交
-
-
由 Toshi Kani 提交于
When a partition is not aligned by 4KB, mount -o dax succeeds, but any read/write access to the filesystem fails, except for metadata update. Call bdev_dax_supported() to perform proper precondition checks which includes this partition alignment check. Reported-by: NMicah Parrish <micah.parrish@hpe.com> Signed-off-by: NToshi Kani <toshi.kani@hpe.com> Reviewed-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Cc: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> Cc: Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@dilger.ca> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> Cc: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> Cc: Boaz Harrosh <boaz@plexistor.com> Signed-off-by: NVishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>
-
由 Jan Kara 提交于
Fault handlers currently take complete_unwritten argument to convert unwritten extents after PTEs are updated. However no filesystem uses this anymore as the code is racy. Remove the unused argument. Reviewed-by: NRoss Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: NVishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>
-
- 13 5月, 2016 5 次提交
-
-
由 Jan Kara 提交于
Currently ext4 treats DAX IO the same way as direct IO. I.e., it allocates unwritten extents before IO is done and converts unwritten extents afterwards. However this way DAX IO can race with page fault to the same area: ext4_ext_direct_IO() dax_fault() dax_io() get_block() - allocates unwritten extent copy_from_iter_pmem() get_block() - converts unwritten block to written and zeroes it out ext4_convert_unwritten_extents() So data written with DAX IO gets lost. Similarly dax_new_buf() called from dax_io() can overwrite data that has been already written to the block via mmap. Fix the problem by using pre-zeroed blocks for DAX IO the same way as we use them for DAX mmap. The downside of this solution is that every allocating write writes each block twice (once zeros, once data). Fixing the race with locking is possible as well however we would need to lock-out faults for the whole range written to by DAX IO. And that is not easy to do without locking-out faults for the whole file which seems too aggressive. Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Jan Kara 提交于
Currently ext4 direct IO handling is split between ext4_ext_direct_IO() and ext4_ind_direct_IO(). However the extent based function calls into the indirect based one for some cases and for example it is not able to handle file extending. Previously it was not also properly handling retries in case of ENOSPC errors. With DAX things would get even more contrieved so just refactor the direct IO code and instead of indirect / extent split do the split to read vs writes. Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Jan Kara 提交于
When there are blocks to free in the running transaction, block allocator can return ENOSPC although the filesystem has some blocks to free. We use ext4_should_retry_alloc() to force commit of the current transaction and return whether anything was committed so that it makes sense to retry the allocation. However the transaction may get committed after block allocation fails but before we call ext4_should_retry_alloc(). So ext4_should_retry_alloc() returns false because there is nothing to commit and we wrongly return ENOSPC. Fix the race by unconditionally returning 1 from ext4_should_retry_alloc() when we tried to commit a transaction. This should not add any unnecessary retries since we had a transaction running a while ago when trying to allocate blocks and we want to retry the allocation once that transaction has committed anyway. Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Jan Kara 提交于
ext4_dax_get_blocks() was accidentally omitted fixing get blocks handlers to properly handle transient ENOSPC errors. Fix it now to use ext4_get_blocks_trans() helper which takes care of these errors. Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Note that we need relax_dir() equivalent for directories locked shared. Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
- 06 5月, 2016 4 次提交
-
-
由 Nicolai Stange 提交于
ext4_find_extent(), stripped down to the parts relevant to this patch, reads as ppos = 0; i = depth; while (i) { --i; ++ppos; if (unlikely(ppos > depth)) { ... ret = -EFSCORRUPTED; goto err; } } Due to the loop's bounds, the condition ppos > depth can never be met. Remove this dead code. Signed-off-by: NNicolai Stange <nicstange@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Jens Axboe 提交于
ext4_io_submit() used to check for EOPNOTSUPP after bio submission, which is why it had to get an extra reference to the bio before submitting it. But since we no longer touch the bio after submission, get rid of the redundant get/put of the bio. If we do get the extra reference, we enter the slower path of having to flag this bio as now having external references. Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@fb.com> Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Nicolai Stange 提交于
Currently, in ext4_mb_init(), there's a loop like the following: do { ... offset += 1 << (sb->s_blocksize_bits - i); i++; } while (i <= sb->s_blocksize_bits + 1); Note that the updated offset is used in the loop's next iteration only. However, at the last iteration, that is at i == sb->s_blocksize_bits + 1, the shift count becomes equal to (unsigned)-1 > 31 (c.f. C99 6.5.7(3)) and UBSAN reports UBSAN: Undefined behaviour in fs/ext4/mballoc.c:2621:15 shift exponent 4294967295 is too large for 32-bit type 'int' [...] Call Trace: [<ffffffff818c4d25>] dump_stack+0xbc/0x117 [<ffffffff818c4c69>] ? _atomic_dec_and_lock+0x169/0x169 [<ffffffff819411ab>] ubsan_epilogue+0xd/0x4e [<ffffffff81941cac>] __ubsan_handle_shift_out_of_bounds+0x1fb/0x254 [<ffffffff81941ab1>] ? __ubsan_handle_load_invalid_value+0x158/0x158 [<ffffffff814b6dc1>] ? kmem_cache_alloc+0x101/0x390 [<ffffffff816fc13b>] ? ext4_mb_init+0x13b/0xfd0 [<ffffffff814293c7>] ? create_cache+0x57/0x1f0 [<ffffffff8142948a>] ? create_cache+0x11a/0x1f0 [<ffffffff821c2168>] ? mutex_lock+0x38/0x60 [<ffffffff821c23ab>] ? mutex_unlock+0x1b/0x50 [<ffffffff814c26ab>] ? put_online_mems+0x5b/0xc0 [<ffffffff81429677>] ? kmem_cache_create+0x117/0x2c0 [<ffffffff816fcc49>] ext4_mb_init+0xc49/0xfd0 [...] Observe that the mentioned shift exponent, 4294967295, equals (unsigned)-1. Unless compilers start to do some fancy transformations (which at least GCC 6.0.0 doesn't currently do), the issue is of cosmetic nature only: the such calculated value of offset is never used again. Silence UBSAN by introducing another variable, offset_incr, holding the next increment to apply to offset and adjust that one by right shifting it by one position per loop iteration. Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=114701 Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=112161 Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: NNicolai Stange <nicstange@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Nicolai Stange 提交于
Currently, in mb_find_order_for_block(), there's a loop like the following: while (order <= e4b->bd_blkbits + 1) { ... bb += 1 << (e4b->bd_blkbits - order); } Note that the updated bb is used in the loop's next iteration only. However, at the last iteration, that is at order == e4b->bd_blkbits + 1, the shift count becomes negative (c.f. C99 6.5.7(3)) and UBSAN reports UBSAN: Undefined behaviour in fs/ext4/mballoc.c:1281:11 shift exponent -1 is negative [...] Call Trace: [<ffffffff818c4d35>] dump_stack+0xbc/0x117 [<ffffffff818c4c79>] ? _atomic_dec_and_lock+0x169/0x169 [<ffffffff819411bb>] ubsan_epilogue+0xd/0x4e [<ffffffff81941cbc>] __ubsan_handle_shift_out_of_bounds+0x1fb/0x254 [<ffffffff81941ac1>] ? __ubsan_handle_load_invalid_value+0x158/0x158 [<ffffffff816e93a0>] ? ext4_mb_generate_from_pa+0x590/0x590 [<ffffffff816502c8>] ? ext4_read_block_bitmap_nowait+0x598/0xe80 [<ffffffff816e7b7e>] mb_find_order_for_block+0x1ce/0x240 [...] Unless compilers start to do some fancy transformations (which at least GCC 6.0.0 doesn't currently do), the issue is of cosmetic nature only: the such calculated value of bb is never used again. Silence UBSAN by introducing another variable, bb_incr, holding the next increment to apply to bb and adjust that one by right shifting it by one position per loop iteration. Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=114701 Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=112161 Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: NNicolai Stange <nicstange@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 05 5月, 2016 2 次提交
-
-
由 Jan Kara 提交于
When filesystem is corrupted in the right way, it can happen ext4_mark_iloc_dirty() in ext4_orphan_add() returns error and we subsequently remove inode from the in-memory orphan list. However this deletion is done with list_del(&EXT4_I(inode)->i_orphan) and thus we leave i_orphan list_head with a stale content. Later we can look at this content causing list corruption, oops, or other issues. The reported trace looked like: WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 46 at lib/list_debug.c:53 __list_del_entry+0x6b/0x100() list_del corruption, 0000000061c1d6e0->next is LIST_POISON1 0000000000100100) CPU: 0 PID: 46 Comm: ext4.exe Not tainted 4.1.0-rc4+ #250 Stack: 60462947 62219960 602ede24 62219960 602ede24 603ca293 622198f0 602f02eb 62219950 6002c12c 62219900 601b4d6b Call Trace: [<6005769c>] ? vprintk_emit+0x2dc/0x5c0 [<602ede24>] ? printk+0x0/0x94 [<600190bc>] show_stack+0xdc/0x1a0 [<602ede24>] ? printk+0x0/0x94 [<602ede24>] ? printk+0x0/0x94 [<602f02eb>] dump_stack+0x2a/0x2c [<6002c12c>] warn_slowpath_common+0x9c/0xf0 [<601b4d6b>] ? __list_del_entry+0x6b/0x100 [<6002c254>] warn_slowpath_fmt+0x94/0xa0 [<602f4d09>] ? __mutex_lock_slowpath+0x239/0x3a0 [<6002c1c0>] ? warn_slowpath_fmt+0x0/0xa0 [<60023ebf>] ? set_signals+0x3f/0x50 [<600a205a>] ? kmem_cache_free+0x10a/0x180 [<602f4e88>] ? mutex_lock+0x18/0x30 [<601b4d6b>] __list_del_entry+0x6b/0x100 [<601177ec>] ext4_orphan_del+0x22c/0x2f0 [<6012f27c>] ? __ext4_journal_start_sb+0x2c/0xa0 [<6010b973>] ? ext4_truncate+0x383/0x390 [<6010bc8b>] ext4_write_begin+0x30b/0x4b0 [<6001bb50>] ? copy_from_user+0x0/0xb0 [<601aa840>] ? iov_iter_fault_in_readable+0xa0/0xc0 [<60072c4f>] generic_perform_write+0xaf/0x1e0 [<600c4166>] ? file_update_time+0x46/0x110 [<60072f0f>] __generic_file_write_iter+0x18f/0x1b0 [<6010030f>] ext4_file_write_iter+0x15f/0x470 [<60094e10>] ? unlink_file_vma+0x0/0x70 [<6009b180>] ? unlink_anon_vmas+0x0/0x260 [<6008f169>] ? free_pgtables+0xb9/0x100 [<600a6030>] __vfs_write+0xb0/0x130 [<600a61d5>] vfs_write+0xa5/0x170 [<600a63d6>] SyS_write+0x56/0xe0 [<6029fcb0>] ? __libc_waitpid+0x0/0xa0 [<6001b698>] handle_syscall+0x68/0x90 [<6002633d>] userspace+0x4fd/0x600 [<6002274f>] ? save_registers+0x1f/0x40 [<60028bd7>] ? arch_prctl+0x177/0x1b0 [<60017bd5>] fork_handler+0x85/0x90 Fix the problem by using list_del_init() as we always should with i_orphan list. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org Reported-by: NVegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Seth Forshee 提交于
A failed call to dqget() returns an ERR_PTR() and not null. Fix the check in ext4_ioctl_setproject() to handle this correctly. Fixes: 9b7365fc ("ext4: add FS_IOC_FSSETXATTR/FS_IOC_FSGETXATTR interface support") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v4.5 Signed-off-by: NSeth Forshee <seth.forshee@canonical.com> Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Reviewed-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
-
- 02 5月, 2016 3 次提交
-
-
由 Christoph Hellwig 提交于
The kiocb already has the new position, so use that. The only interesting case is AIO, where we currently don't bother updating ki_pos. We're about to free the kiocb after we're done, so we might as well update it to make everyone's life simpler. While we're at it also return the bytes written argument passed in if we were successful so that the boilerplate error switch code in the callers can go away. Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Christoph Hellwig 提交于
This will allow us to do per-I/O sync file writes, as required by a lot of fileservers or storage targets. XXX: Will need a few additional audits for O_DSYNC Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Christoph Hellwig 提交于
Including blkdev_direct_IO and dax_do_io. It has to be ki_pos to actually work, so eliminate the superflous argument. Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
- 30 4月, 2016 2 次提交
-
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
Instead of just printing warning messages, if the orphan list is corrupted, declare the file system is corrupted. If there are any reserved inodes in the orphaned inode list, declare the file system corrupted and stop right away to avoid doing more potential damage to the file system. Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
If the orphaned inode list contains inode #5, ext4_iget() returns a bad inode (since the bootloader inode should never be referenced directly). Because of the bad inode, we end up processing the inode repeatedly and this hangs the machine. This can be reproduced via: mke2fs -t ext4 /tmp/foo.img 100 debugfs -w -R "ssv last_orphan 5" /tmp/foo.img mount -o loop /tmp/foo.img /mnt (But don't do this if you are using an unpatched kernel if you care about the system staying functional. :-) This bug was found by the port of American Fuzzy Lop into the kernel to find file system problems[1]. (Since it *only* happens if inode #5 shows up on the orphan list --- 3, 7, 8, etc. won't do it, it's not surprising that AFL needed two hours before it found it.) [1] http://events.linuxfoundation.org/sites/events/files/slides/AFL%20filesystem%20fuzzing%2C%20Vault%202016_0.pdf Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Reported by: Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 27 4月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jakub Wilk 提交于
Messages passed to ext4_warning() or ext4_error() don't need trailing newlines, because these function add the newlines themselves. Signed-off-by: NJakub Wilk <jwilk@jwilk.net>
-
- 26 4月, 2016 3 次提交
-
-
由 Daeho Jeong 提交于
In ext4, there is a race condition between changing inode journal mode and ext4_writepages(). While ext4_writepages() is executed on a non-journalled mode inode, the inode's journal mode could be enabled by ioctl() and then, some pages dirtied after switching the journal mode will be still exposed to ext4_writepages() in non-journaled mode. To resolve this problem, we use fs-wide per-cpu rw semaphore by Jan Kara's suggestion because we don't want to waste ext4_inode_info's space for this extra rare case. Signed-off-by: NDaeho Jeong <daeho.jeong@samsung.com> Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Reviewed-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
-
由 Daeho Jeong 提交于
We already allocate delalloc blocks before changing the inode mode into "per-file data journal" mode to prevent delalloc blocks from remaining not allocated, but another issue concerned with "BH_Unwritten" status still exists. For example, by fallocate(), several buffers' status change into "BH_Unwritten", but these buffers cannot be processed by ext4_alloc_da_blocks(). So, they still remain in unwritten status after per-file data journaling is enabled and they cannot be changed into written status any more and, if they are journaled and eventually checkpointed, these unwritten buffer will cause a kernel panic by the below BUG_ON() function of submit_bh_wbc() when they are submitted during checkpointing. static int submit_bh_wbc(int rw, struct buffer_head *bh,... { ... BUG_ON(buffer_unwritten(bh)); Moreover, when "dioread_nolock" option is enabled, the status of a buffer is changed into "BH_Unwritten" after write_begin() completes and the "BH_Unwritten" status will be cleared after I/O is done. Therefore, if a buffer's status is changed into unwrutten but the buffer's I/O is not submitted and completed, it can cause the same problem after enabling per-file data journaling. You can easily generate this bug by executing the following command. ./kvm-xfstests -C 10000 -m nodelalloc,dioread_nolock generic/269 To resolve these problems and define a boundary between the previous mode and per-file data journaling mode, we need to flush and wait all the I/O of buffers of a file before enabling per-file data journaling of the file. Signed-off-by: NDaeho Jeong <daeho.jeong@samsung.com> Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Reviewed-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
The function jbd2_journal_extend() takes as its argument the number of new credits to be added to the handle. We weren't taking into account the currently unused handle credits; worse, we would try to extend the handle by N credits when it had N credits available. In the case where jbd2_journal_extend() fails because the transaction is too large, when jbd2_journal_restart() gets called, the N credits owned by the handle gets returned to the transaction, and the transaction commit is asynchronously requested, and then start_this_handle() will be able to successfully attach the handle to the current transaction since the required credits are now available. This is mostly harmless, but since ext4_ext_truncate_extend_restart() returns EAGAIN, the truncate machinery will once again try to call ext4_ext_truncate_extend_restart(), which will do the above sequence over and over again until the transaction has committed. This was found while I was debugging a lockup in caused by running xfstests generic/074 in the data=journal case. I'm still not sure why we ended up looping forever, which suggests there may still be another bug hiding in the transaction accounting machinery, but this commit prevents us from looping in the first place. Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 24 4月, 2016 4 次提交
-
-
由 Jan Kara 提交于
Currently we ask jbd2 to write all dirty allocated buffers before committing a transaction when doing writeback of delay allocated blocks. However this is unnecessary since we move all pages to writeback state before dropping a transaction handle and then submit all the necessary IO. We still need the transaction commit to wait for all the outstanding writeback before flushing disk caches during transaction commit to avoid data exposure issues though. Use the new jbd2 capability and ask it to only wait for outstanding writeback during transaction commit when writing back data in ext4_writepages(). Tested-by: N"HUANG Weller (CM/ESW12-CN)" <Weller.Huang@cn.bosch.com> Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Jan Kara 提交于
Currently when filesystem needs to make sure data is on permanent storage before committing a transaction it adds inode to transaction's inode list. During transaction commit, jbd2 writes back all dirty buffers that have allocated underlying blocks and waits for the IO to finish. However when doing writeback for delayed allocated data, we allocate blocks and immediately submit the data. Thus asking jbd2 to write dirty pages just unnecessarily adds more work to jbd2 possibly writing back other redirtied blocks. Add support to jbd2 to allow filesystem to ask jbd2 to only wait for outstanding data writes before committing a transaction and thus avoid unnecessary writes. Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Jan Kara 提交于
This flag is just duplicating what ext4_should_order_data() tells you and is used in a single place. Furthermore it doesn't reflect changes to inode data journalling flag so it may be possibly misleading. Just remove it. Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Jan Kara 提交于
Huang has reported that in his powerfail testing he is seeing stale block contents in some of recently allocated blocks although he mounts ext4 in data=ordered mode. After some investigation I have found out that indeed when delayed allocation is used, we don't add inode to transaction's list of inodes needing flushing before commit. Originally we were doing that but commit f3b59291 removed the logic with a flawed argument that it is not needed. The problem is that although for delayed allocated blocks we write their contents immediately after allocating them, there is no guarantee that the IO scheduler or device doesn't reorder things and thus transaction allocating blocks and attaching them to inode can reach stable storage before actual block contents. Actually whenever we attach freshly allocated blocks to inode using a written extent, we should add inode to transaction's ordered inode list to make sure we properly wait for block contents to be written before committing the transaction. So that is what we do in this patch. This also handles other cases where stale data exposure was possible - like filling hole via mmap in data=ordered,nodelalloc mode. The only exception to the above rule are extending direct IO writes where blkdev_direct_IO() waits for IO to complete before increasing i_size and thus stale data exposure is not possible. For now we don't complicate the code with optimizing this special case since the overhead is pretty low. In case this is observed to be a performance problem we can always handle it using a special flag to ext4_map_blocks(). CC: stable@vger.kernel.org Fixes: f3b59291Reported-by: N"HUANG Weller (CM/ESW12-CN)" <Weller.Huang@cn.bosch.com> Tested-by: N"HUANG Weller (CM/ESW12-CN)" <Weller.Huang@cn.bosch.com> Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
-