Skip to content

cloud-kernel
cloud-kernel

openanolis / cloud-kernel
1 年多 前同步成功

通知 160
Star 36
Fork 7
cloud-kernel
cloud-kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 09 8月, 2014 1 次提交
  3. 06 8月, 2014 1 次提交
    • T
      x86: MCE: Add raw_lock conversion again · ed5c41d3
      由 Thomas Gleixner 提交于 
      Commit ea431643 ("x86/mce: Fix CMCI preemption bugs") breaks RT by
the completely unrelated conversion of the cmci_discover_lock to a
regular (non raw) spinlock.  This lock was annotated in commit
59d958d2 ("locking, x86: mce: Annotate cmci_discover_lock as raw")
with a proper explanation why.

The argument for converting the lock back to a regular spinlock was:

 - it does percpu ops without disabling preemption. Preemption is not
   disabled due to the mistaken use of a raw spinlock.

Which is complete nonsense.  The raw_spinlock is disabling preemption in
the same way as a regular spinlock.  In mainline spinlock maps to
raw_spinlock, in RT spinlock becomes a "sleeping" lock.

raw_spinlock has on RT exactly the same semantics as in mainline.  And
because this lock is taken in non preemptible context it must be raw on
RT.

Undo the locking brainfart.
Reported-by: NClark Williams <williams@redhat.com>
Reported-by: NSteven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      ed5c41d3
  5. 22 7月, 2014 1 次提交
  7. 24 6月, 2014 1 次提交
  9. 23 6月, 2014 1 次提交
  11. 05 6月, 2014 1 次提交
  13. 31 5月, 2014 2 次提交
  15. 06 5月, 2014 1 次提交
  17. 17 4月, 2014 1 次提交
  19. 29 3月, 2014 1 次提交
    • C
      x86, CMCI: Add proper detection of end of CMCI storms · 27f6c573
      由 Chen, Gong 提交于 
      When CMCI storm persists for a long time(at least beyond predefined
threshold. It's 30 seconds for now), we can watch CMCI storm is
detected immediately after it subsides.

...
Dec 10 22:04:29 kernel: CMCI storm detected: switching to poll mode
Dec 10 22:04:59 kernel: CMCI storm subsided: switching to interrupt mode
Dec 10 22:04:59 kernel: CMCI storm detected: switching to poll mode
Dec 10 22:05:29 kernel: CMCI storm subsided: switching to interrupt mode
...

The problem is that our logic that determines that the storm has
ended is incorrect. We announce the end, re-enable interrupts and
realize that the storm is still going on, so we switch back to
polling mode. Rinse, repeat.

When a storm happens we disable signaling of errors via CMCI and begin
polling machine check banks instead. If we find any logged errors,
then we need to set a per-cpu flag so that our per-cpu tests that
check whether the storm is ongoing will see that errors are still
being logged independently of whether mce_notify_irq() says that the
error has been fully processed.

cmci_clear() is not the right tool to disable a bank. It disables the
interrupt for the bank as desired, but it also clears the bit for
this bank in "mce_banks_owned" so we will skip the bank when polling
(so we fail to see that the storm continues because we stop looking).
New cmci_storm_disable_banks() just disables the interrupt while
allowing polling to continue.
Reported-by: NWilliam Dauchy <wdauchy@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NChen, Gong <gong.chen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NTony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
      27f6c573
  21. 20 3月, 2014 3 次提交
    • S
      x86, therm_throt.c: Remove unused therm_cpu_lock · 7b7139d4
      由 Srivatsa S. Bhat 提交于 
      After fixing the CPU hotplug callback registration code, the callbacks
invoked for each online CPU, during the initialization phase in
thermal_throttle_init_device(), can no longer race with the actual CPU
hotplug notifier callbacks (in thermal_throttle_cpu_callback). Hence the
therm_cpu_lock is unnecessary now. Remove it.

Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Suggested-by: NOleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NSrivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
      7b7139d4
    • S
      x86, therm_throt.c: Fix CPU hotplug callback registration · 4e6192bb
      由 Srivatsa S. Bhat 提交于 
      Subsystems that want to register CPU hotplug callbacks, as well as perform
initialization for the CPUs that are already online, often do it as shown
below:

	get_online_cpus();

	for_each_online_cpu(cpu)
		init_cpu(cpu);

	register_cpu_notifier(&foobar_cpu_notifier);

	put_online_cpus();

This is wrong, since it is prone to ABBA deadlocks involving the
cpu_add_remove_lock and the cpu_hotplug.lock (when running concurrently
with CPU hotplug operations).

Instead, the correct and race-free way of performing the callback
registration is:

	cpu_notifier_register_begin();

	for_each_online_cpu(cpu)
		init_cpu(cpu);

	/* Note the use of the double underscored version of the API */
	__register_cpu_notifier(&foobar_cpu_notifier);

	cpu_notifier_register_done();

Fix the thermal throttle code in x86 by using this latter form of callback
registration.

Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Signed-off-by: NSrivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
      4e6192bb
    • S
      x86, mce: Fix CPU hotplug callback registration · 82a8f131
      由 Srivatsa S. Bhat 提交于 
      Subsystems that want to register CPU hotplug callbacks, as well as perform
initialization for the CPUs that are already online, often do it as shown
below:

	get_online_cpus();

	for_each_online_cpu(cpu)
		init_cpu(cpu);

	register_cpu_notifier(&foobar_cpu_notifier);

	put_online_cpus();

This is wrong, since it is prone to ABBA deadlocks involving the
cpu_add_remove_lock and the cpu_hotplug.lock (when running concurrently
with CPU hotplug operations).

Instead, the correct and race-free way of performing the callback
registration is:

	cpu_notifier_register_begin();

	for_each_online_cpu(cpu)
		init_cpu(cpu);

	/* Note the use of the double underscored version of the API */
	__register_cpu_notifier(&foobar_cpu_notifier);

	cpu_notifier_register_done();

Fix the mce code in x86 by using this latter form of callback registration.

Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Signed-off-by: NSrivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
      82a8f131
  23. 12 1月, 2014 1 次提交
    • B
      x86, mce: Fix mce_start_timer semantics · 4f75d841
      由 Borislav Petkov 提交于 
      So mce_start_timer() has a 'cpu' argument which is supposed to mean to
start a timer on that cpu. However, the code currently starts a timer on
the *current* cpu the function runs on and causes the sanity-check in
mce_timer_fn to fire:

	WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 0 at arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c:1286 mce_timer_fn

because it is running on the wrong cpu.

This was triggered by Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com> by offlining
all the cpus in succession.

Then, we were fiddling with the CMCI storm settings when starting the
timer whereas there's no need for that - if there's storm happening
on this newly restarted cpu, we're going to be in normal CMCI mode
initially and then when the CMCI interrupt starts firing, we're going to
go to the polling mode with the timer real soon.
Signed-off-by: NBorislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Tested-by: NPrarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com>
Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NChen, Gong <gong.chen@linux.intel.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1387722156-5511-1-git-send-email-prarit@redhat.com
      4f75d841
  25. 07 1月, 2014 1 次提交
  27. 21 12月, 2013 1 次提交
  29. 30 11月, 2013 1 次提交
  31. 24 10月, 2013 1 次提交
  33. 30 7月, 2013 1 次提交
  35. 15 7月, 2013 1 次提交
    • P
      x86: delete __cpuinit usage from all x86 files · 148f9bb8
      由 Paul Gortmaker 提交于 
      The __cpuinit type of throwaway sections might have made sense
some time ago when RAM was more constrained, but now the savings
do not offset the cost and complications.  For example, the fix in
commit 5e427ec2 ("x86: Fix bit corruption at CPU resume time")
is a good example of the nasty type of bugs that can be created
with improper use of the various __init prefixes.

After a discussion on LKML[1] it was decided that cpuinit should go
the way of devinit and be phased out.  Once all the users are gone,
we can then finally remove the macros themselves from linux/init.h.

Note that some harmless section mismatch warnings may result, since
notify_cpu_starting() and cpu_up() are arch independent (kernel/cpu.c)
are flagged as __cpuinit  -- so if we remove the __cpuinit from
arch specific callers, we will also get section mismatch warnings.
As an intermediate step, we intend to turn the linux/init.h cpuinit
content into no-ops as early as possible, since that will get rid
of these warnings.  In any case, they are temporary and harmless.

This removes all the arch/x86 uses of the __cpuinit macros from
all C files.  x86 only had the one __CPUINIT used in assembly files,
and it wasn't paired off with a .previous or a __FINIT, so we can
delete it directly w/o any corresponding additional change there.

[1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/5/20/589

Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: x86@kernel.org
Acked-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Acked-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Acked-by: NH. Peter Anvin <hpa@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NPaul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
      148f9bb8
  37. 09 7月, 2013 1 次提交
    • N
      mce: acpi/apei: Honour Firmware First for MCA banks listed in APEI HEST CMC · c3d1fb56
      由 Naveen N. Rao 提交于 
      The Corrected Machine Check structure (CMC) in HEST has a flag which can be
set by the firmware to indicate to the OS that it prefers to process the
corrected error events first. In this scenario, the OS is expected to not
monitor for corrected errors (through CMCI/polling). Instead, the firmware
notifies the OS on corrected error events through GHES.

Linux already has support for GHES. This patch adds support for parsing CMC
structure and to disable CMCI/polling if the firmware first flag is set.

Further, the list of machine check bank structures at the end of CMC is used
to determine which MCA banks function in FF mode, so that we continue to
monitor error events on the other banks.
Signed-off-by: NNaveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Acked-by: NBorislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: NTony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
      c3d1fb56
  39. 28 6月, 2013 1 次提交
  41. 26 6月, 2013 1 次提交
  43. 21 6月, 2013 2 次提交
    • S
      x86, trace: Add irq vector tracepoints · cf910e83
      由 Seiji Aguchi 提交于 
      [Purpose of this patch]

As Vaibhav explained in the thread below, tracepoints for irq vectors
are useful.

http://www.spinics.net/lists/mm-commits/msg85707.html

<snip>
The current interrupt traces from irq_handler_entry and irq_handler_exit
provide when an interrupt is handled.  They provide good data about when
the system has switched to kernel space and how it affects the currently
running processes.

There are some IRQ vectors which trigger the system into kernel space,
which are not handled in generic IRQ handlers.  Tracing such events gives
us the information about IRQ interaction with other system events.

The trace also tells where the system is spending its time.  We want to
know which cores are handling interrupts and how they are affecting other
processes in the system.  Also, the trace provides information about when
the cores are idle and which interrupts are changing that state.
<snip>

On the other hand, my usecase is tracing just local timer event and
getting a value of instruction pointer.

I suggested to add an argument local timer event to get instruction pointer before.
But there is another way to get it with external module like systemtap.
So, I don't need to add any argument to irq vector tracepoints now.

[Patch Description]

Vaibhav's patch shared a trace point ,irq_vector_entry/irq_vector_exit, in all events.
But there is an above use case to trace specific irq_vector rather than tracing all events.
In this case, we are concerned about overhead due to unwanted events.

So, add following tracepoints instead of introducing irq_vector_entry/exit.
so that we can enable them independently.
   - local_timer_vector
   - reschedule_vector
   - call_function_vector
   - call_function_single_vector
   - irq_work_entry_vector
   - error_apic_vector
   - thermal_apic_vector
   - threshold_apic_vector
   - spurious_apic_vector
   - x86_platform_ipi_vector

Also, introduce a logic switching IDT at enabling/disabling time so that a time penalty
makes a zero when tracepoints are disabled. Detailed explanations are as follows.
 - Create trace irq handlers with entering_irq()/exiting_irq().
 - Create a new IDT, trace_idt_table, at boot time by adding a logic to
   _set_gate(). It is just a copy of original idt table.
 - Register the new handlers for tracpoints to the new IDT by introducing
   macros to alloc_intr_gate() called at registering time of irq_vector handlers.
 - Add checking, whether irq vector tracing is on/off, into load_current_idt().
   This has to be done below debug checking for these reasons.
   - Switching to debug IDT may be kicked while tracing is enabled.
   - On the other hands, switching to trace IDT is kicked only when debugging
     is disabled.

In addition, the new IDT is created only when CONFIG_TRACING is enabled to avoid being
used for other purposes.
Signed-off-by: NSeiji Aguchi <seiji.aguchi@hds.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/51C323ED.5050708@hds.comSigned-off-by: NH. Peter Anvin <hpa@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
      cf910e83
    • S
      x86, trace: Introduce entering/exiting_irq() · eddc0e92
      由 Seiji Aguchi 提交于 
      When implementing tracepoints in interrupt handers, if the tracepoints are
simply added in the performance sensitive path of interrupt handers,
it may cause potential performance problem due to the time penalty.

To solve the problem, an idea is to prepare non-trace/trace irq handers and
switch their IDTs at the enabling/disabling time.

So, let's introduce entering_irq()/exiting_irq() for pre/post-
processing of each irq handler.

A way to use them is as follows.

Non-trace irq handler:
smp_irq_handler()
{
	entering_irq();		/* pre-processing of this handler */
	__smp_irq_handler();	/*
				 * common logic between non-trace and trace handlers
				 * in a vector.
				 */
	exiting_irq();		/* post-processing of this handler */

}

Trace irq_handler:
smp_trace_irq_handler()
{
	entering_irq();		/* pre-processing of this handler */
	trace_irq_entry();	/* tracepoint for irq entry */
	__smp_irq_handler();	/*
				 * common logic between non-trace and trace handlers
				 * in a vector.
				 */
	trace_irq_exit();	/* tracepoint for irq exit */
	exiting_irq();		/* post-processing of this handler */

}

If tracepoints can place outside entering_irq()/exiting_irq() as follows,
it looks cleaner.

smp_trace_irq_handler()
{
	trace_irq_entry();
	smp_irq_handler();
	trace_irq_exit();
}

But it doesn't work.
The problem is with irq_enter/exit() being called. They must be called before
trace_irq_enter/exit(),  because of the rcu_irq_enter() must be called before
any tracepoints are used, as tracepoints use  rcu to synchronize.

As a possible alternative, we may be able to call irq_enter() first as follows
if irq_enter() can nest.

smp_trace_irq_hander()
{
	irq_entry();
	trace_irq_entry();
	smp_irq_handler();
	trace_irq_exit();
	irq_exit();
}

But it doesn't work, either.
If irq_enter() is nested, it may have a time penalty because it has to check if it
was already called or not. The time penalty is not desired in performance sensitive
paths even if it is tiny.
Signed-off-by: NSeiji Aguchi <seiji.aguchi@hds.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/51C3238D.9040706@hds.comSigned-off-by: NH. Peter Anvin <hpa@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
      eddc0e92
  45. 15 6月, 2013 2 次提交
  47. 13 6月, 2013 1 次提交
  49. 05 6月, 2013 1 次提交
  51. 03 4月, 2013 1 次提交
    • S
      x86/mce: Rework cmci_rediscover() to play well with CPU hotplug · 7a0c819d
      由 Srivatsa S. Bhat 提交于 
      Dave Jones reports that offlining a CPU leads to this trace:

numa_remove_cpu cpu 1 node 0: mask now 0,2-3
smpboot: CPU 1 is now offline
BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [00000000] code:
cpu-offline.sh/10591
caller is cmci_rediscover+0x6a/0xe0
Pid: 10591, comm: cpu-offline.sh Not tainted 3.9.0-rc3+ #2
Call Trace:
 [<ffffffff81333bbd>] debug_smp_processor_id+0xdd/0x100
 [<ffffffff8101edba>] cmci_rediscover+0x6a/0xe0
 [<ffffffff815f5b9f>] mce_cpu_callback+0x19d/0x1ae
 [<ffffffff8160ea66>] notifier_call_chain+0x66/0x150
 [<ffffffff8107ad7e>] __raw_notifier_call_chain+0xe/0x10
 [<ffffffff8104c2e3>] cpu_notify+0x23/0x50
 [<ffffffff8104c31e>] cpu_notify_nofail+0xe/0x20
 [<ffffffff815ef082>] _cpu_down+0x302/0x350
 [<ffffffff815ef106>] cpu_down+0x36/0x50
 [<ffffffff815f1c9d>] store_online+0x8d/0xd0
 [<ffffffff813edc48>] dev_attr_store+0x18/0x30
 [<ffffffff81226eeb>] sysfs_write_file+0xdb/0x150
 [<ffffffff811adfb2>] vfs_write+0xa2/0x170
 [<ffffffff811ae16c>] sys_write+0x4c/0xa0
 [<ffffffff81613019>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b

However, a look at cmci_rediscover shows that it can be simplified quite
a bit, apart from solving the above issue. It invokes functions that
take spin locks with interrupts disabled, and hence it can run in atomic
context. Also, it is run in the CPU_POST_DEAD phase, so the dying CPU
is already dead and out of the cpu_online_mask. So take these points into
account and simplify the code, and thereby also fix the above issue.
Reported-by: NDave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NSrivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: NTony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
      7a0c819d
  53. 22 3月, 2013 2 次提交
  55. 21 1月, 2013 1 次提交
  57. 29 12月, 2012 1 次提交
    • T
      x86/mce: don't use [delayed_]work_pending() · 4d899be5
      由 Tejun Heo 提交于 
      There's no need to test whether a (delayed) work item in pending
before queueing, flushing or cancelling it.  Most uses are unnecessary
and quite a few of them are buggy.

Remove unnecessary pending tests from x86/mce.  Only compile tested.

v2: Local var work removed from mce_schedule_work() as suggested by
    Borislav.
Signed-off-by: NTejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Acked-by: NBorislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Cc: linux-edac@vger.kernel.org
      4d899be5
  59. 31 10月, 2012 1 次提交
    • T
      x86/mce: Do not change worker's running cpu in cmci_rediscover(). · 85b97637
      由 Tang Chen 提交于 
      cmci_rediscover() used set_cpus_allowed_ptr() to change the current process's
running cpu, and migrate itself to the dest cpu. But worker processes are not
allowed to be migrated. If current is a worker, the worker will be migrated to
another cpu, but the corresponding  worker_pool is still on the original cpu.

In this case, the following BUG_ON in try_to_wake_up_local() will be triggered:
BUG_ON(rq != this_rq());

This will cause the kernel panic. The call trace is like the following:

[ 6155.451107] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[ 6155.452019] kernel BUG at kernel/sched/core.c:1654!
......
[ 6155.452019] RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff810add15>]  [<ffffffff810add15>] try_to_wake_up_local+0x115/0x130
......
[ 6155.452019] Call Trace:
[ 6155.452019]  [<ffffffff8166fc14>] __schedule+0x764/0x880
[ 6155.452019]  [<ffffffff81670059>] schedule+0x29/0x70
[ 6155.452019]  [<ffffffff8166de65>] schedule_timeout+0x235/0x2d0
[ 6155.452019]  [<ffffffff810db57d>] ? mark_held_locks+0x8d/0x140
[ 6155.452019]  [<ffffffff810dd463>] ? __lock_release+0x133/0x1a0
[ 6155.452019]  [<ffffffff81671c50>] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x30/0x50
[ 6155.452019]  [<ffffffff810db8f5>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0x105/0x190
[ 6155.452019]  [<ffffffff8166fefb>] wait_for_common+0x12b/0x180
[ 6155.452019]  [<ffffffff810b0b30>] ? try_to_wake_up+0x2f0/0x2f0
[ 6155.452019]  [<ffffffff8167002d>] wait_for_completion+0x1d/0x20
[ 6155.452019]  [<ffffffff8110008a>] stop_one_cpu+0x8a/0xc0
[ 6155.452019]  [<ffffffff810abd40>] ? __migrate_task+0x1a0/0x1a0
[ 6155.452019]  [<ffffffff810a6ab8>] ? complete+0x28/0x60
[ 6155.452019]  [<ffffffff810b0fd8>] set_cpus_allowed_ptr+0x128/0x130
[ 6155.452019]  [<ffffffff81036785>] cmci_rediscover+0xf5/0x140
[ 6155.452019]  [<ffffffff816643c0>] mce_cpu_callback+0x18d/0x19d
[ 6155.452019]  [<ffffffff81676187>] notifier_call_chain+0x67/0x150
[ 6155.452019]  [<ffffffff810a03de>] __raw_notifier_call_chain+0xe/0x10
[ 6155.452019]  [<ffffffff81070470>] __cpu_notify+0x20/0x40
[ 6155.452019]  [<ffffffff810704a5>] cpu_notify_nofail+0x15/0x30
[ 6155.452019]  [<ffffffff81655182>] _cpu_down+0x262/0x2e0
[ 6155.452019]  [<ffffffff81655236>] cpu_down+0x36/0x50
[ 6155.452019]  [<ffffffff813d3eaa>] acpi_processor_remove+0x50/0x11e
[ 6155.452019]  [<ffffffff813a6978>] acpi_device_remove+0x90/0xb2
[ 6155.452019]  [<ffffffff8143cbec>] __device_release_driver+0x7c/0xf0
[ 6155.452019]  [<ffffffff8143cd6f>] device_release_driver+0x2f/0x50
[ 6155.452019]  [<ffffffff813a7870>] acpi_bus_remove+0x32/0x6d
[ 6155.452019]  [<ffffffff813a7932>] acpi_bus_trim+0x87/0xee
[ 6155.452019]  [<ffffffff813a7a21>] acpi_bus_hot_remove_device+0x88/0x16b
[ 6155.452019]  [<ffffffff813a33ee>] acpi_os_execute_deferred+0x27/0x34
[ 6155.452019]  [<ffffffff81090589>] process_one_work+0x219/0x680
[ 6155.452019]  [<ffffffff81090528>] ? process_one_work+0x1b8/0x680
[ 6155.452019]  [<ffffffff813a33c7>] ? acpi_os_wait_events_complete+0x23/0x23
[ 6155.452019]  [<ffffffff810923be>] worker_thread+0x12e/0x320
[ 6155.452019]  [<ffffffff81092290>] ? manage_workers+0x110/0x110
[ 6155.452019]  [<ffffffff81098396>] kthread+0xc6/0xd0
[ 6155.452019]  [<ffffffff8167c4c4>] kernel_thread_helper+0x4/0x10
[ 6155.452019]  [<ffffffff81671f30>] ? retint_restore_args+0x13/0x13
[ 6155.452019]  [<ffffffff810982d0>] ? __init_kthread_worker+0x70/0x70
[ 6155.452019]  [<ffffffff8167c4c0>] ? gs_change+0x13/0x13

This patch removes the set_cpus_allowed_ptr() call, and put the cmci rediscover
jobs onto all the other cpus using system_wq. This could bring some delay for
the jobs.
Signed-off-by: NTang Chen <tangchen@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: NTony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
      85b97637
  61. 30 10月, 2012 1 次提交
  63. 26 10月, 2012 3 次提交