- 13 6月, 2016 2 次提交
-
-
由 Jon Hunter 提交于
For some devices the IRQ trigger type for a device is read from firmware, such as device-tree. The IRQ trigger type is typically read when the mapping for IRQ is created, which is before the IRQ is requested. Hence, the IRQ trigger type is programmed when mapping the IRQ and not when requesting the IRQ. Although this works for most cases, in order to support IRQ chips which require runtime power management, which may not be accessible prior to requesting the IRQ, it is desirable to look-up the IRQ trigger type when it is requested. Therefore, if the IRQ trigger type is not specified when __setup_irq() is called, look-up the saved IRQ trigger type. This will allow us to defer the programming of the trigger type from when the IRQ is mapped to when it is actually requested. Signed-off-by: NJon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com> Reviewed-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
-
由 Jon Hunter 提交于
When mapping an IRQ, it is possible that a mapping for the IRQ already exists. If mapping does exist then there are the following issues with regard to the handling of the IRQ type settings ... 1. If the domain is part of a hierarchy, then: a. We do not check that the type settings for the existing mapping match those of the new mapping. b. We do not check to see if the type settings have been programmed yet (and they might not have been) and so we may never set the type. 2. If the domain is NOT part of a hierarchy, we will overwrite the current type settings programmed if they are different from the previous mapping. Please note that irq_create_mapping() calls irq_find_mapping() to check if a mapping already exists. Although, it may be unlikely that the type settings for a shared interrupt would not match, nonetheless we should check for this. Therefore, to fix this check if a mapping exists (regardless of whether the domain is part of a hierarchy or not) and if it does then: 1. Return the IRQ number if the type settings match or are not specified. 2. Program the type settings and return the IRQ number if the type settings have not been programmed yet. 3. Otherwise if the type setting do not match, then print a warning and don't return the IRQ number. Furthermore, add a warning if the type return by irq_domain_translate() has bits outside the sense mask set and then clear these bits. If these bits are not cleared then this will cause the comparision of the type settings for an existing mapping to fail with that of the new mapping even if the sense bit themselves match. The reason being is that the existing type settings are read by calling irq_get_trigger_type() which will clear any bits outside the sense mask. This will allow us to detect irqchips that are not correctly clearing these bits and fix them. Signed-off-by: NJon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com> Reviewed-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
-
- 24 5月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Matt Redfearn 提交于
Commit 7cec18a3 changed the return type of irq_destroy_ipi to int, but missed adding a value to one return statement. Fix this to silence the resulting compiler warning: kernel/irq/ipi.c In function ‘irq_destroy_ipi’: kernel/irq/ipi.c:128:3: warning: ‘return’ with no value, in function returning non-void [-Wreturn-type] Fixes: 7cec18a3 "genirq: Add error code reporting to irq_{reserve,destroy}_ipi" Signed-off-by: NMatt Redfearn <matt.redfearn@imgtec.com> Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1464086550-24734-1-git-send-email-matt.redfearn@imgtec.comSigned-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
-
- 21 5月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Matthew Wilcox 提交于
Commit e6145236 ("radix_tree: add support for multi-order entries") left the impression that the support for multiorder radix tree entries was functional. As soon as Ross tried to use it, it became apparent that my testing was completely inadequate, and it didn't even work a little bit for orders that were not a multiple of shift. This series of patches is the result of about 6 weeks of redesign, reimplementation, testing, arguing and hair-pulling. The great news is that the test-suite is now far better than it was. That's reflected in the diffstat for the test-suite alone: 12 files changed, 436 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-) The highlight for users of the tree is that the restriction on the order of inserted entries being >= RADIX_TREE_MAP_SHIFT is now gone; the radix tree now supports any order between 0 and 64. For those who are interested in how the tree works, patch 9 is probably the most interesting one as it introduces the new machinery for handling sibling entries. I've tried to be fair in attributing authorship to the person who contributed the majority of the code in each patch; Ross has been an invaluable partner in the development of this support and it's fair to say that each of us has code in every commit. I should also express my appreciation of the 0day testing. It prompted me that I was bloating the tinyconfig in an unacceptable way, and it bisected to a commit which contained a rather nasty memory-corruption bug. This patch (of 29): The irqdomain code was checking for 0 or 1 entries, not 0 entries like the comment said they were. Introduce a new helper that will actually check for an empty tree. Signed-off-by: NMatthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: NRoss Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Cc: Konstantin Khlebnikov <koct9i@gmail.com> Cc: Kirill Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 11 5月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jon Hunter 提交于
In the function, setup_irq(), we don't check that the descriptor returned from irq_to_desc() is valid before we start using it. For example chip_bus_lock() called from setup_irq(), assumes that the descriptor pointer is valid and doesn't check before dereferencing it. In many other functions including setup/free_percpu_irq() we do check that the descriptor returned is not NULL and therefore add the same test to setup_irq() to ensure the descriptor returned is valid. Signed-off-by: NJon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
-
- 02 5月, 2016 4 次提交
-
-
由 Marc Zyngier 提交于
In order to prepare the genirq layer for the concept of partitionned percpu interrupts, let's allow an affinity to be associated with such an interrupt. We introduce: - irq_set_percpu_devid_partition: flag an interrupt as a percpu-devid interrupt, and associate it with an affinity - irq_get_percpu_devid_partition: allow the affinity of that interrupt to be retrieved. This will allow a driver to discover which CPUs the per-cpu interrupt can actually fire on. Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org Cc: Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1460365075-7316-3-git-send-email-marc.zyngier@arm.comSigned-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
-
由 Marc Zyngier 提交于
When iterating over the irq domain list, we try to match a domain either by calling a match() function or by comparing a number of fields passed as parameters. Both approaches are a bit restrictive: - match() is DT specific and only takes a device node - the fallback case only deals with the fwnode_handle It would be useful if we had a per-domain function that would actually perform the matching check on the whole of the irq_fwspec structure. This would allow for a domain to triage matching attempts that need to extend beyond the fwnode. Let's introduce irq_find_matching_fwspec(), which takes a full blown irq_fwspec structure, and call into a select() function implemented by the irqdomain. irq_find_matching_fwnode() is made a wrapper around irq_find_matching_fwspec in order to preserve compatibility. Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org Cc: Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1460365075-7316-2-git-send-email-marc.zyngier@arm.comSigned-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
-
由 Matt Redfearn 提交于
Make these functions return appropriate error codes when something goes wrong. Previously irq_destroy_ipi returned void making it impossible to notify the caller if the request could not be fulfilled. Patch 1 in the series added another condition in which this could fail in addition to the existing ones. irq_reserve_ipi returned an unsigned int meaning it could only return 0 on failure and give the caller no indication as to why the request failed. As time goes on there are likely to be further conditions added in which these functions can fail. These APIs and the IPI IRQ domain are new in 4.6 and the number of existing call sites are low, changing the API now has little impact on the code, while making it easier for these functions to grow over time. Signed-off-by: NMatt Redfearn <matt.redfearn@imgtec.com> Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Cc: jason@lakedaemon.net Cc: marc.zyngier@arm.com Cc: ralf@linux-mips.org Cc: Qais Yousef <qsyousef@gmail.com> Cc: lisa.parratt@imgtec.com Cc: jiang.liu@linux.intel.com Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1461568464-31701-2-git-send-email-matt.redfearn@imgtec.comSigned-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
-
由 Matt Redfearn 提交于
Previously irq_destroy_ipi() would destroy IPIs to all CPUs that were configured by irq_reserve_ipi(). This change makes it possible to destroy just a subset of the IPIs. This may be useful to remove IPIs to CPUs that have been hot removed so that the IRQ numbers allocated within the IPI domain can be re-used. The original behaviour is restored by passing the complete mask that the IPI was created with. There are currently no users of this function that would break from the API change. Signed-off-by: NMatt Redfearn <matt.redfearn@imgtec.com> Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Cc: jason@lakedaemon.net Cc: marc.zyngier@arm.com Cc: ralf@linux-mips.org Cc: Qais Yousef <qsyousef@gmail.com> Cc: lisa.parratt@imgtec.com Cc: jiang.liu@linux.intel.com Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1461568464-31701-1-git-send-email-matt.redfearn@imgtec.comSigned-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
-
- 21 4月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Matt Redfearn 提交于
The IPI domain re-purposes the IRQ affinity to signify the mask of CPUs that this IPI will deliver to. This must not be modified before the IPI is destroyed again, so set the IRQ_NO_BALANCING flag to prevent the affinity being overwritten by setup_affinity(). Without this, if an IPI is reserved for a single target CPU, then allocated using __setup_irq(), the affinity is overwritten with cpu_online_mask. When ipi_destroy() is subsequently called on a multi-cpu system, it will attempt to free cpumask_weight() IRQs that were never allocated, and crash. Fixes: d17bf24e ("genirq: Add a new generic IPI reservation code to irq core") Signed-off-by: NMatt Redfearn <matt.redfearn@imgtec.com> Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Cc: jason@lakedaemon.net Cc: marc.zyngier@arm.com Cc: ralf@linux-mips.org Cc: Qais Yousef <qsyousef@gmail.com> Cc: lisa.parratt@imgtec.com Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1461229712-13057-1-git-send-email-matt.redfearn@imgtec.comSigned-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
-
- 31 3月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Axel Lin 提交于
Export irq_domain_free_irqs_common so it can be used by modules. Signed-off-by: NAxel Lin <axel.lin@ingics.com> Acked-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Acked-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
-
- 23 3月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Joe Perches 提交于
Use the more common logging method with the eventual goal of removing pr_warning altogether. Miscellanea: - Realign arguments - Coalesce formats - Add missing space between a few coalesced formats Signed-off-by: NJoe Perches <joe@perches.com> Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> [kernel/power/suspend.c] Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 10 3月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Quan Nguyen 提交于
Export irq_chip_*_parent(), irq_domain_create_hierarchy(), irq_domain_set_hwirq_and_chip(), irq_domain_reset_irq_data(), irq_domain_alloc/free_irqs_parent() So gpio drivers can be built as modules. First user: gpio-xgene-sb Signed-off-by: NQuan Nguyen <qnguyen@apm.com> Acked-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Cc: Phong Vo <pvo@apm.com> Cc: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> Cc: patches@apm.com Cc: Loc Ho <lho@apm.com> Cc: Keyur Chudgar <kchudgar@apm.com> Cc: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com> Link: https://lists.01.org/pipermail/kbuild-all/2016-February/017914.html Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1457017012-10628-1-git-send-email-qnguyen@apm.comSigned-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
-
- 09 3月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Chen Fan 提交于
Per the x86-specific footnote to PCI spec r3.0, sec 6.2.4, the value 255 in the Interrupt Line register means "unknown" or "no connection." Previously, when we couldn't derive an IRQ from the _PRT, we fell back to using the value from Interrupt Line as an IRQ. It's questionable whether we should do that at all, but the spec clearly suggests we shouldn't do it for the value 255 on x86. Calling request_irq() with IRQ 255 may succeed, but the driver won't receive any interrupts. Or, if IRQ 255 is shared with another device, it may succeed, and the driver's ISR will be called at random times when the *other* device interrupts. Or it may fail if another device is using IRQ 255 with incompatible flags. What we *want* is for request_irq() to fail predictably so the driver can fall back to polling. On x86, assume 255 in the Interrupt Line means the INTx line is not connected. In that case, set dev->irq to IRQ_NOTCONNECTED so request_irq() will fail gracefully with -ENOTCONN. We found this problem on a system where Secure Boot firmware assigned Interrupt Line 255 to an i801_smbus device and another device was already using MSI-X IRQ 255. This was in v3.10, where i801_probe() fails if request_irq() fails: i801_smbus 0000:00:1f.3: enabling device (0140 -> 0143) i801_smbus 0000:00:1f.3: can't derive routing for PCI INT C i801_smbus 0000:00:1f.3: PCI INT C: no GSI genirq: Flags mismatch irq 255. 00000080 (i801_smbus) vs. 00000000 (megasa) CPU: 0 PID: 2487 Comm: kworker/0:1 Not tainted 3.10.0-229.el7.x86_64 #1 Hardware name: FUJITSU PRIMEQUEST 2800E2/D3736, BIOS PRIMEQUEST 2000 Serie5 Call Trace: dump_stack+0x19/0x1b __setup_irq+0x54a/0x570 request_threaded_irq+0xcc/0x170 i801_probe+0x32f/0x508 [i2c_i801] local_pci_probe+0x45/0xa0 i801_smbus 0000:00:1f.3: Failed to allocate irq 255: -16 i801_smbus: probe of 0000:00:1f.3 failed with error -16 After aeb8a3d1 ("i2c: i801: Check if interrupts are disabled"), i801_probe() will fall back to polling if request_irq() fails. But we still need this patch because request_irq() may succeed or fail depending on other devices in the system. If request_irq() fails, i801_smbus will work by falling back to polling, but if it succeeds, i801_smbus won't work because it expects interrupts that it may not receive. Signed-off-by: NChen Fan <chen.fan.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> Acked-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Acked-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 25 2月, 2016 5 次提交
-
-
由 Qais Yousef 提交于
Add APIs to send IPIs from driver and arch code. We have different functions because we allow architecture code to cache the irq descriptor to avoid lookups. Driver code has to use the irq number and is subject to more restrictive checks. [ tglx: Polish the implementation ] Signed-off-by: NQais Yousef <qais.yousef@imgtec.com> Cc: <jason@lakedaemon.net> Cc: <marc.zyngier@arm.com> Cc: <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com> Cc: <ralf@linux-mips.org> Cc: <linux-mips@linux-mips.org> Cc: <lisa.parratt@imgtec.com> Cc: Qais Yousef <qsyousef@gmail.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1449580830-23652-12-git-send-email-qais.yousef@imgtec.comSigned-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
-
由 Qais Yousef 提交于
When dealing with coprocessors we need to find out the actual hwirqs values to pass on to the firmware so that it knows what it needs to use to receive IPIs from and send IPIs to Linux cpus. [ tglx: Fixed the single hwirq IPI case. The hardware irq number does not change due to the cpu number ] Signed-off-by: NQais Yousef <qais.yousef@imgtec.com> Cc: <jason@lakedaemon.net> Cc: <marc.zyngier@arm.com> Cc: <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com> Cc: <ralf@linux-mips.org> Cc: <linux-mips@linux-mips.org> Cc: <lisa.parratt@imgtec.com> Cc: Qais Yousef <qsyousef@gmail.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1449580830-23652-10-git-send-email-qais.yousef@imgtec.comSigned-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
-
由 Qais Yousef 提交于
Add a generic mechanism to dynamically allocate an IPI. Depending on the underlying implementation this creates either a single Linux irq or a consective range of Linux irqs. The Linux irq is used later to send IPIs to other CPUs. [ tglx: Massaged the code and removed the 'consecutive mask' restriction for the single IRQ case ] Signed-off-by: NQais Yousef <qais.yousef@imgtec.com> Cc: <jason@lakedaemon.net> Cc: <marc.zyngier@arm.com> Cc: <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com> Cc: <ralf@linux-mips.org> Cc: <linux-mips@linux-mips.org> Cc: <lisa.parratt@imgtec.com> Cc: Qais Yousef <qsyousef@gmail.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1449580830-23652-9-git-send-email-qais.yousef@imgtec.comSigned-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
-
由 Qais Yousef 提交于
We will need to use this function to implement irq_reserve_ipi() later. So make it non static and move the prototype to irqdomain.h to allow using it outside irqdomain.c Signed-off-by: NQais Yousef <qais.yousef@imgtec.com> Cc: <jason@lakedaemon.net> Cc: <marc.zyngier@arm.com> Cc: <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com> Cc: <ralf@linux-mips.org> Cc: <linux-mips@linux-mips.org> Cc: <lisa.parratt@imgtec.com> Cc: Qais Yousef <qsyousef@gmail.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1449580830-23652-8-git-send-email-qais.yousef@imgtec.comSigned-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
-
由 Qais Yousef 提交于
Select this to enable the generic IPI domain support Signed-off-by: NQais Yousef <qais.yousef@imgtec.com> Cc: <jason@lakedaemon.net> Cc: <marc.zyngier@arm.com> Cc: <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com> Cc: <ralf@linux-mips.org> Cc: <linux-mips@linux-mips.org> Cc: <lisa.parratt@imgtec.com> Cc: Qais Yousef <qsyousef@gmail.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1449580830-23652-4-git-send-email-qais.yousef@imgtec.comSigned-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
-
- 24 2月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Boqun Feng 提交于
irq_common_data::state_use_accessors is not designed for public use. Therefore make it private so that people who write code accessing it directly will get blamed by sparse. Also #undef the macro __irqd_to_state after used in header files, so that the macro can't be misused. Signed-off-by: NBoqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
-
- 15 2月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Daniel Lezcano 提交于
The irq code browses the list of actions differently to inspect the element one by one. Even if it is not a problem, for the sake of consistent code, provide a macro similar to for_each_irq_desc in order to have the same loop to go through the actions list and use it in the code. [ tglx: Renamed the macro ] Signed-off-by: NDaniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1452765253-31148-1-git-send-email-daniel.lezcano@linaro.orgSigned-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
-
- 08 2月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Thomas Gleixner 提交于
If we isolate CPUs, then we don't want random device interrupts on them. Even w/o the user space irq balancer enabled we can end up with irqs on non boot cpus and chasing newly requested interrupts is a tedious task. Allow to restrict the default irq affinity mask. Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> Cc: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@ezchip.com> Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com> Cc: Sebastian Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/alpine.DEB.2.11.1602031948190.25254@nanosSigned-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
-
- 26 1月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Marc Zyngier 提交于
Let's take the (outlandish) example of an interrupt controller capable of handling both wired interrupts and PCI MSIs. With the current code, the PCI MSI domain is going to be tagged with DOMAIN_BUS_PCI_MSI, and the wired domain with DOMAIN_BUS_ANY. Things get hairy when we start looking up the domain for a wired interrupt (typically when creating it based on some firmware information - DT or ACPI). In irq_create_fwspec_mapping(), we perform the lookup using DOMAIN_BUS_ANY, which is actually used as a wildcard. This gives us one chance out of two to end up with the wrong domain, and we try to configure a wired interrupt with the MSI domain. Everything grinds to a halt pretty quickly. What we really need to do is to start looking for a domain that would uniquely identify a wired interrupt domain, and only use DOMAIN_BUS_ANY as a fallback. In order to solve this, let's introduce a new DOMAIN_BUS_WIRED token, which is going to be used exactly as described above. Of course, this depends on the irqchip to setup the domain bus_token, and nobody had to implement this so far. Only so far. Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org> Cc: Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com> Cc: Grant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org> Cc: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com> Cc: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1453816347-32720-2-git-send-email-marc.zyngier@arm.comSigned-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
-
- 16 1月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Keith Busch 提交于
Export irq_domain_set_info() for module use. It will be used by the Volume Management Device driver. [bhelgaas: changelog] Signed-off-by: NKeith Busch <keith.busch@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> Acked-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
-
- 15 1月, 2016 2 次提交
-
-
由 Liu Jiang 提交于
Previously msi_domain_alloc() assumed MSI irqdomains always had parent irqdomains, but that's not true for the new Intel VMD devices. Relax msi_domain_alloc() to support parentless MSI irqdomains. Signed-off-by: NJiang Liu <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NKeith Busch <keith.busch@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> Acked-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
-
由 Thomas Gleixner 提交于
commit 71f64340 changed the handling of irq_desc->action from CPU 0 CPU 1 free_irq() lock(desc) lock(desc) handle_edge_irq() if (desc->action) { handle_irq_event() action = desc->action unlock(desc) desc->action = NULL handle_irq_event_percpu(desc, action) action->xxx to CPU 0 CPU 1 free_irq() lock(desc) lock(desc) handle_edge_irq() if (desc->action) { handle_irq_event() unlock(desc) desc->action = NULL handle_irq_event_percpu(desc, action) action = desc->action action->xxx So if free_irq manages to set the action to NULL between the unlock and before the readout, we happily dereference a null pointer. We could simply revert 71f64340, but we want to preserve the better code generation. A simple solution is to change the action loop from a do {} while to a while {} loop. This is safe because we either see a valid desc->action or NULL. If the action is about to be removed it is still valid as free_irq() is blocked on synchronize_irq(). CPU 0 CPU 1 free_irq() lock(desc) lock(desc) handle_edge_irq() handle_irq_event(desc) set(INPROGRESS) unlock(desc) handle_irq_event_percpu(desc) action = desc->action desc->action = NULL while (action) { action->xxx ... action = action->next; sychronize_irq() while(INPROGRESS); lock(desc) clr(INPROGRESS) free(action) That's basically the same mechanism as we have for shared interrupts. action->next can become NULL while handle_irq_event_percpu() runs. Either it sees the action or NULL. It does not matter, because action itself cannot go away before the interrupt in progress flag has been cleared. Fixes: commit 71f64340 "genirq: Remove the second parameter from handle_irq_event_percpu()" Reported-by: zyjzyj2000@gmail.com Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Huang Shijie <shijie.huang@arm.com> Cc: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/alpine.DEB.2.11.1601131224190.3575@nanos
-
- 21 12月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Suravee Suthikulpanit 提交于
Since there will be several places checking if fwnode.type is equal FWNODE_IRQCHIP, this patch adds a convenient function for this purpose. Acked-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> Signed-off-by: NSuravee Suthikulpanit <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com> Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
-
- 20 12月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jake Oshins 提交于
The Linux kernel already has the concept of IRQ domain, wherein a component can expose a set of IRQs which are managed by a particular interrupt controller chip or other subsystem. The PCI driver exposes the notion of an IRQ domain for Message-Signaled Interrupts (MSI) from PCI Express devices. This patch exposes the functions which are necessary for creating a MSI IRQ domain within a module. [ tglx: Split it into x86 and core irq parts ] Signed-off-by: NJake Oshins <jakeo@microsoft.com> Cc: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org Cc: kys@microsoft.com Cc: devel@linuxdriverproject.org Cc: olaf@aepfle.de Cc: apw@canonical.com Cc: vkuznets@redhat.com Cc: haiyangz@microsoft.com Cc: marc.zyngier@arm.com Cc: bhelgaas@google.com Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1449769983-12948-4-git-send-email-jakeo@microsoft.comSigned-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
-
- 16 12月, 2015 3 次提交
-
-
由 Marc Zyngier 提交于
To be able to allocate interrupts from the MSI layer down, add a new msi_domain_populate_irqs entry point. Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
-
由 Marc Zyngier 提交于
The .prepare callbacks are so far only called from msi_domain_alloc_irqs. In order to reuse that code, split that code and create a msi_domain_prepare_irqs function that the existing code can call into. Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
-
由 Marc Zyngier 提交于
We are soon going to need the MSI layer to call into the domain allocators. Instead of open coding this, make the standard irq_domain_alloc_irqs_recursive function available to the MSI layer. Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
-
- 14 12月, 2015 2 次提交
-
-
由 Thomas Gleixner 提交于
The new VMD device driver needs to iterate over a list of "demultiplexing" interrupts. Protecting that list with a lock is not possible because the list is also required in code pathes which hold irq descriptor lock. Therefor the demultiplexing interrupt handler would create a lock inversion scenario if it calls a demux handler with the list protection lock held. A solution for this is to free the irq descriptor via RCU, so the list can be walked with rcu read lock held. Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Keith Busch <keith.busch@intel.com>
-
由 Thomas Gleixner 提交于
If a interrupt chip utilizes chip->buslock then free_irq() can deadlock in the following way: CPU0 CPU1 interrupt(X) (Shared or spurious) free_irq(X) interrupt_thread(X) chip_bus_lock(X) irq_finalize_oneshot(X) chip_bus_lock(X) synchronize_irq(X) synchronize_irq() waits for the interrupt thread to complete, i.e. forever. Solution is simple: Drop chip_bus_lock() before calling synchronize_irq() as we do with the irq_desc lock. There is nothing to be protected after the point where irq_desc lock has been released. This adds chip_bus_lock/unlock() to the remove_irq() code path, but that's actually correct in the case where remove_irq() is called on such an interrupt. The current users of remove_irq() are not affected as none of those interrupts is on a chip which requires buslock. Reported-by: NFredrik Markström <fredrik.markstrom@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
-
- 08 12月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Thomas Petazzoni 提交于
Certain interrupt controller drivers have a register set that does not make it easy to save/restore the mask of enabled/disabled interrupts at suspend/resume time. At resume time, such drivers rely on the core kernel irq subsystem to tell whether such or such interrupt is enabled or not, in order to restore the proper state in the interrupt controller register. While the irqd_irq_disabled() provides the relevant information for global interrupts, there is no similar function to query the enabled/disabled state of a per-CPU interrupt. Therefore, this commit complements the percpu_irq API with an irq_percpu_is_enabled() function. [ tglx: Simplified the implementation and added kerneldoc ] Signed-off-by: NThomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Cc: Tawfik Bayouk <tawfik@marvell.com> Cc: Nadav Haklai <nadavh@marvell.com> Cc: Lior Amsalem <alior@marvell.com> Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> Cc: Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com> Cc: Gregory Clement <gregory.clement@free-electrons.com> Cc: Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net> Cc: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1445347435-2333-2-git-send-email-thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.comSigned-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
-
- 17 11月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Sudeep Holla 提交于
In case of a wakeup interrupt, irq_pm_check_wakeup disables the interrupt and marks it pending and suspended, disables it and notifies the pm core about the wake event. The interrupt gets handled later once the system is resumed. However the irq stats is updated twice: once when it's disabled waiting for the system to resume and later when it's handled, resulting in wrong counting of the wakeup interrupt when waking up the system. This patch updates the interrupt count so that it's updated only when the interrupt gets handled. It's already handled correctly in handle_edge_irq and handle_edge_eoi_irq. Reported-by: NManoil Claudiu <claudiu.manoil@freescale.com> Signed-off-by: NSudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> Cc: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1446661957-1019-1-git-send-email-sudeep.holla@arm.comSigned-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
-
- 10 11月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Grygorii Strashko 提交于
Commit e509bd7d ("genirq: Allow migration of chained interrupts by installing default action") breaks PCS wake up IRQ behaviour on TI OMAP based platforms (dra7-evm). TI OMAP IRQ wake up configuration: GIC-irqchip->PCM_IRQ |- omap_prcm_register_chain_handler |- PRCM-irqchip -> PRCM_IO_IRQ |- pcs_irq_chain_handler |- pinctrl-irqchip -> PCS_uart1_wakeup_irq This happens because IRQ PM code (irq/pm.c) is expected to ignore chained interrupts by default: static bool suspend_device_irq(struct irq_desc *desc) { if (!desc->action || desc->no_suspend_depth) return false; - it's expected !desc->action = true for chained interrupts; but, after above change, all chained interrupt descriptors will have default action handler installed - chained_action. As result, chained interrupts will be silently disabled during system suspend. Hence, fix it by introducing helper function irq_desc_is_chained() and use it in suspend_device_irq() for chained interrupts identification and skip them, once detected. Fixes: e509bd7d ("genirq: Allow migration of chained interrupts..") Signed-off-by: NGrygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com> Reviewed-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Cc: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> Cc: <nsekhar@ti.com> Cc: <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org> Cc: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1447149492-20699-1-git-send-email-grygorii.strashko@ti.comSigned-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
-
- 22 10月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Thomas Gleixner 提交于
The original arm code has a pr_debug() statement for the case where the irq chip has no set_affinity() callback. That's sufficient for debugging and we really don't want to spam dmesg with useless warnings for the normal case. Fixes: f1e0bb0a: "genirq: Introduce generic irq migration for cpu hotunplug" Reported-by: NGeert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Requested-by: NRussell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Yang Yingliang <yangyingliang@huawei.com> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Cc: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Cc: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org> Cc: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com>
-
- 16 10月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Marc Zyngier 提交于
When we create a generic MSI domain, that MSI_FLAG_USE_DEF_CHIP_OPS is set, and that any of .mask or .unmask are NULL in the irq_chip structure, we set them to pci_msi_[un]mask_irq. This is a bad idea for at least two reasons: - PCI_MSI might not be selected, kernel fails to build (yes, this is legitimate, at least on arm64!) - This may not be a PCI/MSI domain at all (platform MSI, for example) Either way, this looks wrong. Move the overriding of mask/unmask to the PCI counterpart, and panic is any of these two methods is not set in the core code (they really should be present). Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> Cc: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com> Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1444760085-27857-1-git-send-email-marc.zyngier@arm.comSigned-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
-
- 14 10月, 2015 2 次提交
-
-
由 Marc Zyngier 提交于
As we continue to push of_node towards the outskirts of irq domains, let's start tackling the case of msi_create_irq_domain and its little friends. This has limited impact in both PCI/MSI, platform MSI, and a few drivers. Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> Tested-by: NHanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org> Tested-by: NLorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com> Cc: <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org> Cc: Tomasz Nowicki <tomasz.nowicki@linaro.org> Cc: Suravee Suthikulpanit <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com> Cc: Graeme Gregory <graeme@xora.org.uk> Cc: Jake Oshins <jakeo@microsoft.com> Cc: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com> Cc: Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net> Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1444737105-31573-17-git-send-email-marc.zyngier@arm.comSigned-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
-
由 Marc Zyngier 提交于
As we're about to start converting the various MSI layers to use fwnode_handle instead of device_node, add irq_domain_create_hierarchy as a directly equivalent of irq_domain_add_hierarchy (which still exists as a compatibility interface). Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> Tested-by: NHanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org> Tested-by: NLorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com> Cc: <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org> Cc: Tomasz Nowicki <tomasz.nowicki@linaro.org> Cc: Suravee Suthikulpanit <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com> Cc: Graeme Gregory <graeme@xora.org.uk> Cc: Jake Oshins <jakeo@microsoft.com> Cc: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com> Cc: Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net> Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1444737105-31573-16-git-send-email-marc.zyngier@arm.comSigned-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
-