1. 25 8月, 2011 11 次提交
    • R
      PM / Domains: Use power.sybsys_data to reduce overhead · 4605ab65
      Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
      Currently pm_genpd_runtime_resume() has to walk the list of devices
      from the device's PM domain to find the corresponding device list
      object containing the need_restore field to check if the driver's
      .runtime_resume() callback should be executed for the device.
      This is suboptimal and can be simplified by using power.sybsys_data
      to store device information used by the generic PM domains code.
      Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
      4605ab65
    • R
      PM: Reference counting of power.subsys_data · ef27bed1
      Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
      Since the power.subsys_data device field will be used by multiple
      filesystems, introduce a reference counting mechanism for it to avoid
      freeing it prematurely or changing its value at a wrong time.
      
      Make the PM clocks management code that currently is the only user of
      power.subsys_data use the new reference counting.
      Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
      ef27bed1
    • R
      PM: Introduce struct pm_subsys_data · 5c095a0e
      Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
      Introduce struct pm_subsys_data that may be subclassed by subsystems
      to store subsystem-specific information related to the device.  Move
      the clock management fields accessed through the power.subsys_data
      pointer in struct device to the new strucutre.
      Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
      5c095a0e
    • R
      PM / Domains: Rename argument of pm_genpd_add_subdomain() · bc0403ff
      Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
      Change the name of the second argument of pm_genpd_add_subdomain()
      so that it is (a) shorter and (b) in agreement with the name of
      the second argument of pm_genpd_add_subdomain().
      Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
      bc0403ff
    • R
      PM / Domains: Rename GPD_STATE_WAIT_PARENT to GPD_STATE_WAIT_MASTER · 17877eb5
      Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
      Since it is now possible for a PM domain to have multiple masters
      instead of one parent, rename the "wait for parent" status to reflect
      the new situation.
      Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
      17877eb5
    • R
      PM / Domains: Allow generic PM domains to have multiple masters · 5063ce15
      Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
      Currently, for a given generic PM domain there may be only one parent
      domain (i.e. a PM domain it depends on).  However, there is at least
      one real-life case in which there should be two parents (masters) for
      one PM domain (the A3RV domain on SH7372 turns out to depend on the
      A4LC domain and it depends on the A4R domain and the same time). For
      this reason, allow a PM domain to have multiple parents (masters) by
      introducing objects representing links between PM domains.
      
      The (logical) links between PM domains represent relationships in
      which one domain is a master (i.e. it is depended on) and another
      domain is a slave (i.e. it depends on the master) with the rule that
      the slave cannot be powered on if the master is not powered on and
      the master cannot be powered off if the slave is not powered off.
      Each struct generic_pm_domain object representing a PM domain has
      two lists of links, a list of links in which it is a master and
      a list of links in which it is a slave.  The first of these lists
      replaces the list of subdomains and the second one is used in place
      of the parent pointer.
      
      Each link is represented by struct gpd_link object containing
      pointers to the master and the slave and two struct list_head
      members allowing it to hook into two lists (the master's list
      of "master" links and the slave's list of "slave" links).  This
      allows the code to get to the link from each side (either from
      the master or from the slave) and follow it in each direction.
      Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
      5063ce15
    • R
      PM / Domains: Add "wait for parent" status for generic PM domains · 3f241775
      Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
      The next patch will make it possible for a generic PM domain to have
      multiple parents (i.e. multiple PM domains it depends on).  To
      prepare for that change it is necessary to change pm_genpd_poweron()
      so that it doesn't jump to the start label after running itself
      recursively for the parent domain.  For this purpose, introduce a new
      PM domain status value GPD_STATE_WAIT_PARENT that will be set by
      pm_genpd_poweron() before calling itself recursively for the parent
      domain and modify the code in drivers/base/power/domain.c so that
      the GPD_STATE_WAIT_PARENT status is guaranteed to be preserved during
      the execution of pm_genpd_poweron() for the parent.
      
      This change also causes pm_genpd_add_subdomain() and
      pm_genpd_remove_subdomain() to wait for started pm_genpd_poweron() to
      complete and allows pm_genpd_runtime_resume() to avoid dropping the
      lock after powering on the PM domain.
      Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
      3f241775
    • R
      PM / Domains: Make pm_genpd_poweron() always survive parent removal · 9e08cf42
      Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
      If pm_genpd_remove_subdomain() is called to remove a PM domain's
      subdomain and pm_genpd_poweron() is called for that subdomain at
      the same time, and the pm_genpd_poweron() called by it recursively
      for the parent returns an error, the first pm_genpd_poweron()'s
      error code path will attempt to decrement the subdomain counter of
      a PM domain that it's not a subdomain of any more.
      
      Rearrange the code in pm_genpd_poweron() to prevent this from
      happening.
      Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
      9e08cf42
    • R
      PM / Domains: Do not take parent locks to modify subdomain counters · 3c07cbc4
      Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
      After the subdomain counter in struct generic_pm_domain has been
      changed into an atomic_t field, it is possible to modify
      pm_genpd_poweron() and pm_genpd_poweroff() so that they don't take
      the parents locks.  This requires pm_genpd_poweron() to increment
      the parent's subdomain counter before calling itself recursively
      for the parent and to decrement it if an error is to be returned.
      Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
      3c07cbc4
    • R
      PM / Domains: Implement subdomain counters as atomic fields · c4bb3160
      Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
      Currently, pm_genpd_poweron() and pm_genpd_poweroff() need to take
      the parent PM domain's lock in order to modify the parent's counter
      of active subdomains in a nonracy way.  This causes the locking to be
      considerably complex and in fact is not necessary, because the
      subdomain counters may be implemented as atomic fields and they
      won't have to be modified under a lock.
      
      Replace the unsigned in sd_count field in struct generic_pm_domain
      by an atomic_t one and modify the code in drivers/base/power/domain.c
      to take this change into account.
      
      This patch doesn't change the locking yet, that is going to be done
      in a separate subsequent patch.
      Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
      c4bb3160
    • R
      PM: Use spinlock instead of mutex in clock management functions · b7ab83ed
      Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
      The lock member of struct pm_clk_data is of type struct mutex,
      which is a problem, because the suspend and resume routines
      defined in drivers/base/power/clock_ops.c cannot be executed
      with interrupts disabled for this reason.  Modify
      struct pm_clk_data so that its lock member is a spinlock.
      Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
      Acked-by: NMagnus Damm <damm@opensource.se>
      b7ab83ed
  2. 16 8月, 2011 1 次提交
  3. 14 8月, 2011 1 次提交
  4. 12 8月, 2011 1 次提交
  5. 06 8月, 2011 2 次提交
    • K
      PM / Runtime: Allow _put_sync() from interrupts-disabled context · 02b26774
      Kevin Hilman 提交于
      Currently the use of pm_runtime_put_sync() is not safe from
      interrupts-disabled context because rpm_idle() will release the
      spinlock and enable interrupts for the idle callbacks.  This enables
      interrupts during a time where interrupts were expected to be
      disabled, and can have strange side effects on drivers that expected
      interrupts to be disabled.
      
      This is not a bug since the documentation clearly states that only
      _put_sync_suspend() is safe in IRQ-safe mode.
      
      However, pm_runtime_put_sync() could be made safe when in IRQ-safe
      mode by releasing the spinlock but not re-enabling interrupts, which
      is what this patch aims to do.
      
      Problem was found when using some buggy drivers that set
      pm_runtime_irq_safe() and used _put_sync() in interrupts-disabled
      context.
      Reported-by: NColin Cross <ccross@google.com>
      Tested-by: NNishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
      Signed-off-by: NKevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
      Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
      02b26774
    • R
      PM / Domains: Fix pm_genpd_poweron() · fe202fde
      Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
      The local variable ret is defined twice in pm_genpd_poweron(), which
      causes this function to always return 0, even if the PM domain's
      .power_on() callback fails, in which case an error code should be
      returned.
      
      Remove the wrong second definition of ret and additionally remove an
      unnecessary definition of wait from pm_genpd_poweron().
      Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
      fe202fde
  6. 28 7月, 2011 1 次提交
    • A
      devtmpfs: missing initialialization in never-hit case · 9d108d25
      Al Viro 提交于
      create_path() on something without a single / in it will return err
      without initializing it.  It actually can't happen (we call that thing
      only if create on the same path returns -ENOENT, which won't happen
      happen for single-component path), but in this case initializing err
      to 0 is more than making compiler to STFU - would be the right thing
      to return on such paths; the function creates a parent directory of
      given pathname and in that case it has no work to do...
      Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
      9d108d25
  7. 27 7月, 2011 2 次提交
  8. 26 7月, 2011 1 次提交
    • A
      fix devtmpfs race · e13889ba
      Al Viro 提交于
      After we's done complete(&req->done), there's nothing to prevent the
      scope containing *req from being gone and *req overwritten by any
      kind of junk.  So we must read req->next before that...
      Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
      e13889ba
  9. 25 7月, 2011 1 次提交
  10. 23 7月, 2011 3 次提交
  11. 20 7月, 2011 3 次提交
  12. 16 7月, 2011 2 次提交
  13. 15 7月, 2011 2 次提交
  14. 13 7月, 2011 1 次提交
  15. 12 7月, 2011 8 次提交
    • B
      mm: Move definition of MIN_MEMORY_BLOCK_SIZE to a header · a63fdc51
      Benjamin Herrenschmidt 提交于
      The macro MIN_MEMORY_BLOCK_SIZE is currently defined twice in two .c
      files, and I need it in a third one to fix a powerpc bug, so let's
      first move it into a header
      Signed-off-by: NBenjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
      Acked-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
      a63fdc51
    • R
      PM / Domains: Queue up power off work only if it is not pending · 56375fd4
      Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
      In theory it is possible that pm_genpd_poweroff() for two different
      subdomains of the same parent domain will attempt to queue up the
      execution of pm_genpd_poweroff() for the parent twice in a row.  This
      would lead to unpleasant consequences, so prevent it from happening
      by checking if genpd->power_off_work is pending before attempting to
      queue it up.
      Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
      56375fd4
    • R
      PM / Domains: Improve handling of wakeup devices during system suspend · 4ecd6e65
      Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
      Kevin points out that if there's a device that can wake up the system
      from sleep states, but it doesn't generate wakeup signals by itself
      (they are generated on its behalf by other parts of the system) and
      it currently is not enabled to wake up the system (that is,
      device_may_wakeup() returns "false" for it), we may need to change
      its wakeup settings during system suspend (for example, the device
      might have been configured to signal remote wakeup from the system's
      working state, as needed by runtime PM).  Therefore the generic PM
      domains code should invoke the system suspend callbacks provided by
      the device's driver, which it doesn't do if the PM domain is powered
      off during the system suspend's "prepare" stage.  This is a valid
      point.  Moreover, this code also should make sure that system wakeup
      devices that are enabled to wake up the system from sleep states and
      have to remain active for this purpose are not suspended while the
      system is in a sleep state.
      
      To avoid the above issues, make the generic PM domains' .prepare()
      routine, pm_genpd_prepare(), force runtime resume of devices whose
      system wakeup settings may need to be changed during system suspend
      or that should remain active while the system is in a sleep state to
      be able to wake it up from that state.
      Reported-by: NKevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
      Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
      4ecd6e65
    • R
      PM / Domains: Do not restore all devices on power off error · 697a7f37
      Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
      Since every device in a PM domain has its own need_restore
      flag, which is set by __pm_genpd_save_device(), there's no need to
      walk the domain's device list and restore all devices on an error
      from one of the drivers' .runtime_suspend() callbacks.
      Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
      697a7f37
    • R
      PM / Domains: Allow callbacks to execute all runtime PM helpers · c6d22b37
      Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
      A deadlock may occur if one of the PM domains' .start_device() or
      .stop_device() callbacks or a device driver's .runtime_suspend() or
      .runtime_resume() callback executed by the core generic PM domain
      code uses a "wrong" runtime PM helper function.  This happens, for
      example, if .runtime_resume() from one device's driver calls
      pm_runtime_resume() for another device in the same PM domain.
      A similar situation may take place if a device's parent is in the
      same PM domain, in which case the runtime PM framework may execute
      pm_genpd_runtime_resume() automatically for the parent (if it is
      suspended at the moment).  This, of course, is undesirable, so
      the generic PM domains code should be modified to prevent it from
      happening.
      
      The runtime PM framework guarantees that pm_genpd_runtime_suspend()
      and pm_genpd_runtime_resume() won't be executed in parallel for
      the same device, so the generic PM domains code need not worry
      about those cases.  Still, it needs to prevent the other possible
      race conditions between pm_genpd_runtime_suspend(),
      pm_genpd_runtime_resume(), pm_genpd_poweron() and pm_genpd_poweroff()
      from happening and it needs to avoid deadlocks at the same time.
      To this end, modify the generic PM domains code to relax
      synchronization rules so that:
      
      * pm_genpd_poweron() doesn't wait for the PM domain status to
        change from GPD_STATE_BUSY.  If it finds that the status is
        not GPD_STATE_POWER_OFF, it returns without powering the domain on
        (it may modify the status depending on the circumstances).
      
      * pm_genpd_poweroff() returns as soon as it finds that the PM
        domain's status changed from GPD_STATE_BUSY after it's released
        the PM domain's lock.
      
      * pm_genpd_runtime_suspend() doesn't wait for the PM domain status
        to change from GPD_STATE_BUSY after executing the domain's
        .stop_device() callback and executes pm_genpd_poweroff() only
        if pm_genpd_runtime_resume() is not executed in parallel.
      
      * pm_genpd_runtime_resume() doesn't wait for the PM domain status
        to change from GPD_STATE_BUSY after executing pm_genpd_poweron()
        and sets the domain's status to GPD_STATE_BUSY and increments its
        counter of resuming devices (introduced by this change) immediately
        after acquiring the lock.  The counter of resuming devices is then
        decremented after executing __pm_genpd_runtime_resume() for the
        device and the domain's status is reset to GPD_STATE_ACTIVE (unless
        there are more resuming devices in the domain, in which case the
        status remains GPD_STATE_BUSY).
      
      This way, for example, if a device driver's .runtime_resume()
      callback executes pm_runtime_resume() for another device in the same
      PM domain, pm_genpd_poweron() called by pm_genpd_runtime_resume()
      invoked by the runtime PM framework will not block and it will see
      that there's nothing to do for it.  Next, the PM domain's lock will
      be acquired without waiting for its status to change from
      GPD_STATE_BUSY and the device driver's .runtime_resume() callback
      will be executed.  In turn, if pm_runtime_suspend() is executed by
      one device driver's .runtime_resume() callback for another device in
      the same PM domain, pm_genpd_poweroff() executed by
      pm_genpd_runtime_suspend() invoked by the runtime PM framework as a
      result will notice that one of the devices in the domain is being
      resumed, so it will return immediately.
      Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
      c6d22b37
    • R
      PM / Domains: Do not execute device callbacks under locks · 17b75eca
      Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
      Currently, the .start_device() and .stop_device() callbacks from
      struct generic_pm_domain() as well as the device drivers' runtime PM
      callbacks used by the generic PM domains code are executed under
      the generic PM domain lock.  This, unfortunately, is prone to
      deadlocks, for example if a device and its parent are boths members
      of the same PM domain.  For this reason, it would be better if the
      PM domains code didn't execute device callbacks under the lock.
      
      Rework the locking in the generic PM domains code so that the lock
      is dropped for the execution of device callbacks.  To this end,
      introduce PM domains states reflecting the current status of a PM
      domain and such that the PM domain lock cannot be acquired if the
      status is GPD_STATE_BUSY.  Make threads attempting to acquire a PM
      domain's lock wait until the status changes to either
      GPD_STATE_ACTIVE or GPD_STATE_POWER_OFF.
      
      This change by itself doesn't fix the deadlock problem mentioned
      above, but the mechanism introduced by it will be used for for this
      purpose by a subsequent patch.
      Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
      17b75eca
    • R
      PM / Domains: Make failing pm_genpd_prepare() clean up properly · b6c10c84
      Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
      If pm_generic_prepare() in pm_genpd_prepare() returns error code,
      the PM domains counter of "prepared" devices should be decremented
      and its suspend_power_off flag should be reset if this counter drops
      down to zero.  Otherwise, the PM domain runtime PM code will not
      handle the domain correctly (it will permanently think that system
      suspend is in progress).
      Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
      b6c10c84
    • R
      PM / Domains: Set device state to "active" during system resume · 6f00ff78
      Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
      The runtime PM status of devices in a power domain that is not
      powered off in pm_genpd_complete() should be set to "active", because
      those devices are operational at this point.  Some of them may not be
      in use, though, so make pm_genpd_complete() call pm_runtime_idle()
      in addition to pm_runtime_set_active() for each of them.
      Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
      6f00ff78