- 06 4月, 2017 20 次提交
-
-
由 Adam Borowski 提交于
The code attempts to enable them, but hits an undefined behaviour by shifting by the entire register's width: int lines = 32; u32 mask = (1 << lines) - 1; // 00000000 on x86 u32 mask = (1 << lines) - 1; // ffffffff on arm (32) u32 mask = (1 << lines) - 1; // 00000000 on arm64 u32 mask = (1ULL << lines) - 1; // ffffffff everywhere Signed-off-by: NAdam Borowski <kilobyte@angband.pl> Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
由 Ben Skeggs 提交于
Forked from GP106 implementation. Differences: - 1 PPC/GPC - Slightly different grctx magics Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
由 Alexandre Courbot 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAlexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
由 Alexandre Courbot 提交于
GP10B's power is managed by generic PM domains, so it does not require a VDD regulator. Add this option into the chip function structure. Signed-off-by: NAlexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
由 Alexandre Courbot 提交于
GR is similar to GP100, with a few unavailable registers. Signed-off-by: NAlexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
由 Alexandre Courbot 提交于
GP10B requires a specific initialization sequence due to the absence of devinit. Signed-off-by: NAlexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
由 Alexandre Courbot 提交于
GP10B's MC is compatible with GP100's, but engines need to be explicitly put out of ELPG during init. Signed-off-by: NAlexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
由 Alexandre Courbot 提交于
GP10B's FB is largely compatible with the GP100 implementation. Signed-off-by: NAlexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
由 Alexandre Courbot 提交于
GP10B's FIFO is similar to GP100's, but only allows 512 channels. Signed-off-by: NAlexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
由 Alexandre Courbot 提交于
The GP10B firmware is very close to GM20B's. The only difference is that it supports booting multiple falcons. In order to avoid having too much functions and structures shared, implement its support in the same source file as GM20B firmware. Signed-off-by: NAlexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
由 Alexandre Courbot 提交于
GP10B's secboot is largely similar to GM20B's. Only differences are MC base address and the fact that GPCCS is also securely managed. Signed-off-by: NAlexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
由 Alexandre Courbot 提交于
Allow the MC base address to be specified as an argument for the WPR region reading function. GP10B uses a different address layout as GM20B, so this is necessary. Also export the function to be used by GP10B. Signed-off-by: NAlexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
由 Alexandre Courbot 提交于
The LS firmware post-run hook is the right place to start said LS firmware. Moving it here also allows to remove special handling in the ACR code. Signed-off-by: NAlexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
由 Alexandre Courbot 提交于
A LS post-run hook can meet an error meaning the failure of secure boot. Make sure this can be reported. Signed-off-by: NAlexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
由 Alexandre Courbot 提交于
Having access to the secboot instance loading a LS firmware can be useful to LS firmware handlers. At least more useful than just having an out-of-context subdev pointer. GP10B's firmware will also need to know the WPR address, which can be obtained from the secboot instance. Signed-off-by: NAlexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
由 Alexandre Courbot 提交于
Change the secboot and msgqueue interfaces to take a mask of falcons to reset instead of a single falcon. The GP10B firmware interface requires FECS and GPCCS to be booted in a single firmware command. For firmwares that only support single falcon boot, it is trivial to loop over the mask and boot each falcons individually. Signed-off-by: NAlexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
由 Thierry Reding 提交于
The gk20a implementation of instance memory uses vmap()/vunmap() to map memory regions into the kernel's virtual address space. These functions may sleep, so protecting them by a spin lock is not safe. This triggers a warning if the DEBUG_ATOMIC_SLEEP Kconfig option is enabled. Fix this by using a mutex instead. Signed-off-by: NThierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com> Reviewed-by: NAlexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com> Tested-by: NAlexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
由 Ben Skeggs 提交于
Forked from GP106 implementation. Split out from commit enabling secboot/gr support so that it can be added to earlier kernels. Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org [4.10+] Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
由 Ilia Mirkin 提交于
The NV4A (aka NV44A) is an oddity in the family. It only comes in AGP and PCI varieties, rather than a core PCIE chip with a bridge for AGP/PCI as necessary. As a result, it appears that the MMU is also non-functional. For AGP cards, the vast majority of the NV4A lineup, this worked out since we force AGP cards to use the nv04 mmu. However for PCI variants, this did not work. Switching to the NV04 MMU makes it work like a charm. Thanks to mwk for the suggestion. This should be a no-op for NV4A AGP boards, as they were using it already. Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70388Signed-off-by: NIlia Mirkin <imirkin@alum.mit.edu> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
由 Ilia Mirkin 提交于
Signed-off-by: NIlia Mirkin <imirkin@alum.mit.edu> Fixes: 590801c1 ("drm/nouveau/mpeg: remove dependence on namedb/engctx lookup") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v4.3+ Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
- 17 3月, 2017 2 次提交
-
-
由 Alexandre Courbot 提交于
The msgqueue pointer validity should be checked by its owner, not by the msgqueue code itself to avoid this situation. Signed-off-by: NAlexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com> Reported-by: NJulia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr> Signed-off-by: NDave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
-
由 Alexandre Courbot 提交于
We were returning PTR_ERR() on a NULL pointer, which obviously won't work. nvkm_engine_ref() will return an error in case something went wrong. Signed-off-by: NAlexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com> Reported-by: NDan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NDave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
-
- 07 3月, 2017 18 次提交
-
-
由 Ben Skeggs 提交于
This commit reworks the RAM detection algorithm, using RAM-per-LTC to determine whether a board has a mixed-memory configuration instead of using RAM-per-FBPA. I'm not certain the algorithm is perfect, but it should handle all currently known configurations in the very least. This should fix GTX 970 boards with 4GiB of RAM where the last 512MiB isn't fully accessible, as well as only detecting half the VRAM on GF108 boards. As a nice side-effect, GP10x memory detection now reuses the majority of the code from earlier chipsets. Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
由 Ben Skeggs 提交于
Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
由 Ben Skeggs 提交于
Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
由 Ben Skeggs 提交于
GF108/GM107 implementations will want slightly different functions for the upcoming RAM detection improvements. Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
由 Ben Skeggs 提交于
This value represents the actual number of bytes recieved on the AUX channel as the result of a read transaction. Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
由 Ben Skeggs 提交于
Apparently sinks are allows to respond with ACK even if they didn't fully complete a transaction... It seems like a missed opportunity for DEFER to me, but what do I know :) Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
由 Alexandre Courbot 提交于
All the bricks are in place for secure boot to be enabled. This in turn makes GR usable so enable them all. Signed-off-by: NAlexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
由 Ben Skeggs 提交于
Differences from GP100: - 3 PPCs/GPC. - Another random reg to calculate/write. - Attrib CB setup a little different. - PascalB - PascalComputeB Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
由 Alexandre Courbot 提交于
Add support for the msgqueue firmware used to process SEC2 commands for gp10x chips. Signed-off-by: NAlexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
由 Alexandre Courbot 提交于
These gp10x chips are supporting using (roughly) the same firmware. Compared to previous secure chips, ACR runs on SEC2 and so does the low-secure msgqueue. ACR for these chips is based on r367. Signed-off-by: NAlexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
由 Alexandre Courbot 提交于
We will also need to load HS blobs outside of acr_r352 (for instance, to run the NVDEC VPR scrubber), so make this code reusable. Signed-off-by: NAlexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
由 Alexandre Courbot 提交于
r375 ACR uses a unified bootloader descriptor for the GR and PMU firmwares. Signed-off-by: NAlexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
由 Alexandre Courbot 提交于
r367 uses a different hsflcn_desc layout and LS firmware signature format, requiring a rewrite of some functions. It also makes use of the shadow region, and uses SEC as the boot falcon. Signed-off-by: NAlexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
由 Alexandre Courbot 提交于
r364 is similar to r361, but uses a different hsflcn_desc structure to introduce the shadow region address (even though it is not yet used by this version). Signed-off-by: NAlexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
由 Alexandre Courbot 提交于
For some unknown reason the LS SEC2 firmware needs to be started twice to operate. Detect and address that condition. Signed-off-by: NAlexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
由 Alexandre Courbot 提交于
I had the brilliant idea to "improve" the binary format by removing a useless indirection in the HS binary files. In the end it just makes things more complicated than they ought to be as NVIDIA-provided files need to be adapted. Since the format used can be identified by the header, support both. Signed-off-by: NAlexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
由 Alexandre Courbot 提交于
If the load and unload falcons are different, then a different bootloader must also be used. Support this case. Signed-off-by: NAlexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
由 Alexandre Courbot 提交于
Since the HS blobs are provided and signed by NVIDIA, we cannot expect always-consistent behavior. In this case, on GP10x the unload blob may return 0x1d even though things have run perfectly well. This behavior has been confirmed by NVIDIA. So let the callers of the run_blob() hook receive the blob return's value (a positive integer) and decide what it means. This allows us to workaround the 0x1d code instead of issuing an error. Signed-off-by: NAlexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-