Skip to content

cloud-kernel
cloud-kernel

openanolis / cloud-kernel
1 年多 前同步成功

通知 161
Star 36
Fork 7
cloud-kernel
cloud-kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 04 8月, 2016 1 次提交
    • K
      dma-mapping: use unsigned long for dma_attrs · 00085f1e
      由 Krzysztof Kozlowski 提交于 
      The dma-mapping core and the implementations do not change the DMA
attributes passed by pointer.  Thus the pointer can point to const data.
However the attributes do not have to be a bitfield.  Instead unsigned
long will do fine:

1. This is just simpler.  Both in terms of reading the code and setting
   attributes.  Instead of initializing local attributes on the stack
   and passing pointer to it to dma_set_attr(), just set the bits.

2. It brings safeness and checking for const correctness because the
   attributes are passed by value.

Semantic patches for this change (at least most of them):

    virtual patch
    virtual context

    @r@
    identifier f, attrs;

    @@
    f(...,
    - struct dma_attrs *attrs
    + unsigned long attrs
    , ...)
    {
    ...
    }

    @@
    identifier r.f;
    @@
    f(...,
    - NULL
    + 0
     )

and

    // Options: --all-includes
    virtual patch
    virtual context

    @r@
    identifier f, attrs;
    type t;

    @@
    t f(..., struct dma_attrs *attrs);

    @@
    identifier r.f;
    @@
    f(...,
    - NULL
    + 0
     )

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1468399300-5399-2-git-send-email-k.kozlowski@samsung.comSigned-off-by: NKrzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>
Acked-by: NVineet Gupta <vgupta@synopsys.com>
Acked-by: NRobin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Acked-by: NHans-Christian Noren Egtvedt <egtvedt@samfundet.no>
Acked-by: Mark Salter <msalter@redhat.com> [c6x]
Acked-by: Jesper Nilsson <jesper.nilsson@axis.com> [cris]
Acked-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> [drm]
Reviewed-by: NBart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@sandisk.com>
Acked-by: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de> [iommu]
Acked-by: Fabien Dessenne <fabien.dessenne@st.com> [bdisp]
Reviewed-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com> [vb2-core]
Acked-by: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com> [xen]
Acked-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com> [xen swiotlb]
Acked-by: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de> [iommu]
Acked-by: Richard Kuo <rkuo@codeaurora.org> [hexagon]
Acked-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> [m68k]
Acked-by: Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@de.ibm.com> [s390]
Acked-by: NBjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Hans-Christian Noren Egtvedt <egtvedt@samfundet.no> [avr32]
Acked-by: Vineet Gupta <vgupta@synopsys.com> [arc]
Acked-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com> [arm64 and dma-iommu]
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      00085f1e
  3. 03 8月, 2016 1 次提交
  5. 27 7月, 2016 4 次提交
  7. 19 7月, 2016 2 次提交
  9. 13 7月, 2016 1 次提交
  11. 07 7月, 2016 1 次提交
  13. 06 7月, 2016 3 次提交
  15. 04 7月, 2016 8 次提交
  17. 02 7月, 2016 2 次提交
  19. 29 6月, 2016 4 次提交
  21. 27 6月, 2016 1 次提交
    • A
      efi: Convert efi_call_virt() to efi_call_virt_pointer() · 80e75596
      由 Alex Thorlton 提交于 
      This commit makes a few slight modifications to the efi_call_virt() macro
to get it to work with function pointers that are stored in locations
other than efi.systab->runtime, and renames the macro to
efi_call_virt_pointer().  The majority of the changes here are to pull
these macros up into header files so that they can be accessed from
outside of drivers/firmware/efi/runtime-wrappers.c.

The most significant change not directly related to the code move is to
add an extra "p" argument into the appropriate efi_call macros, and use
that new argument in place of the, formerly hard-coded,
efi.systab->runtime pointer.

The last piece of the puzzle was to add an efi_call_virt() macro back into
drivers/firmware/efi/runtime-wrappers.c to wrap around the new
efi_call_virt_pointer() macro - this was mainly to keep the code from
looking too cluttered by adding a bunch of extra references to
efi.systab->runtime everywhere.

Note that I also broke up the code in the efi_call_virt_pointer() macro a
bit in the process of moving it.
Signed-off-by: NAlex Thorlton <athorlton@sgi.com>
Signed-off-by: NMatt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk>
Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Dimitri Sivanich <sivanich@sgi.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Roy Franz <roy.franz@linaro.org>
Cc: Russ Anderson <rja@sgi.com>
Cc: Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-efi@vger.kernel.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1466839230-12781-5-git-send-email-matt@codeblueprint.co.ukSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
      80e75596
  23. 25 6月, 2016 1 次提交
    • M
      tree wide: get rid of __GFP_REPEAT for order-0 allocations part I · 32d6bd90
      由 Michal Hocko 提交于 
      This is the third version of the patchset previously sent [1].  I have
basically only rebased it on top of 4.7-rc1 tree and dropped "dm: get
rid of superfluous gfp flags" which went through dm tree.  I am sending
it now because it is tree wide and chances for conflicts are reduced
considerably when we want to target rc2.  I plan to send the next step
and rename the flag and move to a better semantic later during this
release cycle so we will have a new semantic ready for 4.8 merge window
hopefully.

Motivation:

While working on something unrelated I've checked the current usage of
__GFP_REPEAT in the tree.  It seems that a majority of the usage is and
always has been bogus because __GFP_REPEAT has always been about costly
high order allocations while we are using it for order-0 or very small
orders very often.  It seems that a big pile of them is just a
copy&paste when a code has been adopted from one arch to another.

I think it makes some sense to get rid of them because they are just
making the semantic more unclear.  Please note that GFP_REPEAT is
documented as

* __GFP_REPEAT: Try hard to allocate the memory, but the allocation attempt

* _might_ fail.  This depends upon the particular VM implementation.
  while !costly requests have basically nofail semantic.  So one could
  reasonably expect that order-0 request with __GFP_REPEAT will not loop
  for ever.  This is not implemented right now though.

I would like to move on with __GFP_REPEAT and define a better semantic
for it.

  $ git grep __GFP_REPEAT origin/master | wc -l
  111
  $ git grep __GFP_REPEAT | wc -l
  36

So we are down to the third after this patch series.  The remaining
places really seem to be relying on __GFP_REPEAT due to large allocation
requests.  This still needs some double checking which I will do later
after all the simple ones are sorted out.

I am touching a lot of arch specific code here and I hope I got it right
but as a matter of fact I even didn't compile test for some archs as I
do not have cross compiler for them.  Patches should be quite trivial to
review for stupid compile mistakes though.  The tricky parts are usually
hidden by macro definitions and thats where I would appreciate help from
arch maintainers.

[1] http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1461849846-27209-1-git-send-email-mhocko@kernel.org

This patch (of 19):

__GFP_REPEAT has a rather weak semantic but since it has been introduced
around 2.6.12 it has been ignored for low order allocations.  Yet we
have the full kernel tree with its usage for apparently order-0
allocations.  This is really confusing because __GFP_REPEAT is
explicitly documented to allow allocation failures which is a weaker
semantic than the current order-0 has (basically nofail).

Let's simply drop __GFP_REPEAT from those places.  This would allow to
identify place which really need allocator to retry harder and formulate
a more specific semantic for what the flag is supposed to do actually.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1464599699-30131-2-git-send-email-mhocko@kernel.orgSigned-off-by: NMichal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: "James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@parisc-linux.org>
Cc: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Chen Liqin <liqin.linux@gmail.com>
Cc: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@mellanox.com> [for tile]
Cc: Guan Xuetao <gxt@mprc.pku.edu.cn>
Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
Cc: Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: John Crispin <blogic@openwrt.org>
Cc: Lennox Wu <lennox.wu@gmail.com>
Cc: Ley Foon Tan <lftan@altera.com>
Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
Cc: Matt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk>
Cc: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
Cc: Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org>
Cc: Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Vineet Gupta <vgupta@synopsys.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Cc: Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      32d6bd90
  25. 23 6月, 2016 6 次提交
  27. 22 6月, 2016 1 次提交
  29. 21 6月, 2016 3 次提交
  31. 16 6月, 2016 1 次提交