Skip to content

cloud-kernel
cloud-kernel

openanolis / cloud-kernel
1 年多 前同步成功

通知 161
Star 36
Fork 7
cloud-kernel
cloud-kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 21 10月, 2015 2 次提交
  3. 13 10月, 2015 1 次提交
    • A
      arm64: add KASAN support · 39d114dd
      由 Andrey Ryabinin 提交于 
      This patch adds arch specific code for kernel address sanitizer
(see Documentation/kasan.txt).

1/8 of kernel addresses reserved for shadow memory. There was no
big enough hole for this, so virtual addresses for shadow were
stolen from vmalloc area.

At early boot stage the whole shadow region populated with just
one physical page (kasan_zero_page). Later, this page reused
as readonly zero shadow for some memory that KASan currently
don't track (vmalloc).
After mapping the physical memory, pages for shadow memory are
allocated and mapped.

Functions like memset/memmove/memcpy do a lot of memory accesses.
If bad pointer passed to one of these function it is important
to catch this. Compiler's instrumentation cannot do this since
these functions are written in assembly.
KASan replaces memory functions with manually instrumented variants.
Original functions declared as weak symbols so strong definitions
in mm/kasan/kasan.c could replace them. Original functions have aliases
with '__' prefix in name, so we could call non-instrumented variant
if needed.
Some files built without kasan instrumentation (e.g. mm/slub.c).
Original mem* function replaced (via #define) with prefixed variants
to disable memory access checks for such files.
Signed-off-by: NAndrey Ryabinin <ryabinin.a.a@gmail.com>
Tested-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
      39d114dd
  5. 09 9月, 2015 1 次提交
  7. 03 8月, 2015 1 次提交
  9. 30 7月, 2015 1 次提交
  11. 27 7月, 2015 8 次提交
  13. 21 7月, 2015 1 次提交
  15. 02 6月, 2015 1 次提交
  17. 28 5月, 2015 1 次提交
  19. 19 5月, 2015 1 次提交
  21. 26 3月, 2015 2 次提交
  23. 25 3月, 2015 4 次提交
  25. 20 3月, 2015 3 次提交
  27. 18 3月, 2015 2 次提交
  29. 24 1月, 2015 1 次提交
  31. 22 1月, 2015 1 次提交
  33. 17 1月, 2015 1 次提交
    • M
      arm64: respect mem= for EFI · 6083fe74
      由 Mark Rutland 提交于 
      When booting with EFI, we acquire the EFI memory map after parsing the
early params. This unfortuantely renders the option useless as we call
memblock_enforce_memory_limit (which uses memblock_remove_range behind
the scenes) before we've added any memblocks. We end up removing
nothing, then adding all of memory later when efi_init calls
reserve_regions.

Instead, we can log the limit and apply this later when we do the rest
of the memblock work in memblock_init, which should work regardless of
the presence of EFI. At the same time we may as well move the early
parameter into arm64's mm/init.c, close to arm64_memblock_init.

Any memory which must be mapped (e.g. for use by EFI runtime services)
must be mapped explicitly reather than relying on the linear mapping,
which may be truncated as a result of a mem= option passed on the kernel
command line.
Signed-off-by: NMark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Acked-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Acked-by: NArd Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Tested-by: NArd Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Cc: Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm@linaro.org>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
      6083fe74
  35. 13 1月, 2015 2 次提交
  37. 08 1月, 2015 1 次提交
    • A
      arm64/efi: add missing call to early_ioremap_reset() · 0e63ea48
      由 Ard Biesheuvel 提交于 
      The early ioremap support introduced by patch bf4b558e
("arm64: add early_ioremap support") failed to add a call to
early_ioremap_reset() at an appropriate time. Without this call,
invocations of early_ioremap etc. that are done too late will go
unnoticed and may cause corruption.

This is exactly what happened when the first user of this feature
was added in patch f84d0275 ("arm64: add EFI runtime services").
The early mapping of the EFI memory map is unmapped during an early
initcall, at which time the early ioremap support is long gone.

Fix by adding the missing call to early_ioremap_reset() to
setup_arch(), and move the offending early_memunmap() to right after
the point where the early mapping of the EFI memory map is last used.

Fixes: f84d0275 ("arm64: add EFI runtime services")
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NLeif Lindholm <leif.lindholm@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NArd Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
      0e63ea48
  39. 04 12月, 2014 1 次提交
    • F
      arm64: Provide a namespace to NCAPS · 06f9eb88
      由 Fabio Estevam 提交于 
      Building arm64.allmodconfig leads to the following warning:

usb/gadget/function/f_ncm.c:203:0: warning: "NCAPS" redefined
 #define NCAPS (USB_CDC_NCM_NCAP_ETH_FILTER | USB_CDC_NCM_NCAP_CRC_MODE)
 ^
In file included from /home/build/work/batch/arch/arm64/include/asm/io.h:32:0,
                 from /home/build/work/batch/include/linux/clocksource.h:19,
                 from /home/build/work/batch/include/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.h:19,
                 from /home/build/work/batch/arch/arm64/include/asm/arch_timer.h:27,
                 from /home/build/work/batch/arch/arm64/include/asm/timex.h:19,
                 from /home/build/work/batch/include/linux/timex.h:65,
                 from /home/build/work/batch/include/linux/sched.h:19,
                 from /home/build/work/batch/arch/arm64/include/asm/compat.h:25,
                 from /home/build/work/batch/arch/arm64/include/asm/stat.h:23,
                 from /home/build/work/batch/include/linux/stat.h:5,
                 from /home/build/work/batch/include/linux/module.h:10,
                 from /home/build/work/batch/drivers/usb/gadget/function/f_ncm.c:19:
arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h:27:0: note: this is the location of the previous definition
 #define NCAPS     2

So add a ARM64 prefix to avoid such problem.
Reported-by: NOlof's autobuilder <build@lixom.net>
Signed-off-by: NFabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@freescale.com>
Signed-off-by: NWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
      06f9eb88
  41. 25 11月, 2014 2 次提交
  43. 17 11月, 2014 1 次提交
  45. 14 11月, 2014 1 次提交
    • M
      arm64: Fix up /proc/cpuinfo · 44b82b77
      由 Mark Rutland 提交于 
      Commit d7a49086 (arm64: cpuinfo: print info for all CPUs)
attempted to clean up /proc/cpuinfo, but due to concerns regarding
further changes was reverted in commit 5e39977e (Revert "arm64:
cpuinfo: print info for all CPUs").

There are two major issues with the arm64 /proc/cpuinfo format
currently:

* The "Features" line describes (only) the 64-bit hwcaps, which is
  problematic for some 32-bit applications which attempt to parse it. As
  the same names are used for analogous ISA features (e.g. aes) despite
  these generally being architecturally unrelated, it is not possible to
  simply append the 64-bit and 32-bit hwcaps in a manner that might not
  be misleading to some applications.

  Various potential solutions have appeared in vendor kernels. Typically
  the format of the Features line varies depending on whether the task
  is 32-bit.

* Information is only printed regarding a single CPU. This does not
  match the ARM format, and does not provide sufficient information in
  big.LITTLE systems where CPUs are heterogeneous. The CPU information
  printed is queried from the current CPU's registers, which is racy
  w.r.t. cross-cpu migration.

This patch attempts to solve these issues. The following changes are
made:

* When a task with a LINUX32 personality attempts to read /proc/cpuinfo,
  the "Features" line contains the decoded 32-bit hwcaps, as with the
  arm port. Otherwise, the decoded 64-bit hwcaps are shown. This aligns
  with the behaviour of COMPAT_UTS_MACHINE and COMPAT_ELF_PLATFORM. In
  the absense of compat support, the Features line is empty.

  The set of hwcaps injected into a task's auxval are unaffected.

* Properties are printed per-cpu, as with the ARM port. The per-cpu
  information is queried from pre-recorded cpu information (as used by
  the sanity checks).

* As with the previous attempt at fixing up /proc/cpuinfo, the hardware
  field is removed. The only users so far are 32-bit applications tied
  to particular boards, so no portable applications should be affected,
  and this should prevent future tying to particular boards.

The following differences remain:

* No model_name is printed, as this cannot be queried from the hardware
  and cannot be provided in a stable fashion. Use of the CPU
  {implementor,variant,part,revision} fields is sufficient to identify a
  CPU and is portable across arm and arm64.

* The following system-wide properties are not provided, as they are not
  possible to provide generally. Programs relying on these are already
  tied to particular (32-bit only) boards:
  - Hardware
  - Revision
  - Serial

No software has yet been identified for which these remaining
differences are problematic.

Cc: Greg Hackmann <ghackmann@google.com>
Cc: Ian Campbell <ijc@hellion.org.uk>
Cc: Serban Constantinescu <serban.constantinescu@arm.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Cc: cross-distro@lists.linaro.org
Cc: linux-api@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Acked-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NMark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
      44b82b77