- 24 8月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jiang Liu 提交于
Use PCI Express Capability access functions to simplify portdrv. Signed-off-by: NJiang Liu <jiang.liu@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: NYijing Wang <wangyijing@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> Reviewed-by: NKenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com>
-
- 23 8月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Yijing Wang 提交于
Introduce an inline function pci_pcie_type(dev) to extract PCIe device type from pci_dev->pcie_flags_reg field, and prepare for removing pci_dev->pcie_type. Signed-off-by: NYijing Wang <wangyijing@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: NJiang Liu <jiang.liu@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
-
- 24 6月, 2012 2 次提交
-
-
由 Huang Ying 提交于
This patch adds runtime D3cold support and corresponding ACPI platform support. This patch only enables runtime D3cold support; it does not enable D3cold support during system suspend/hibernate. D3cold is the deepest power saving state for a PCIe device, where its main power is removed. While it is in D3cold, you can't access the device at all, not even its configuration space (which is still accessible in D3hot). Therefore the PCI PM registers can not be used to transition into/out of the D3cold state; that must be done by platform logic such as ACPI _PR3. To support wakeup from D3cold, a system may provide auxiliary power, which allows a device to request wakeup using a Beacon or the sideband WAKE# signal. WAKE# is usually connected to platform logic such as ACPI GPE. This is quite different from other power saving states, where devices request wakeup via a PME message on the PCIe link. Some devices, such as those in plug-in slots, have no direct platform logic. For example, there is usually no ACPI _PR3 for them. D3cold support for these devices can be done via the PCIe Downstream Port leading to the device. When the PCIe port is powered on/off, the device is powered on/off too. Wakeup events from the device will be notified to the corresponding PCIe port. For more information about PCIe D3cold and corresponding ACPI support, please refer to: - PCI Express Base Specification Revision 2.0 - Advanced Configuration and Power Interface Specification Revision 5.0 [bhelgaas: changelog] Reviewed-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Originally-by: NZheng Yan <zheng.z.yan@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NHuang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
-
由 Zheng Yan 提交于
This patch adds runtime PM support to PCIe port. This is needed by PCIe D3cold support, where PCIe device without ACPI node may be powered on/off by PCIe port. Because runtime suspend is broken for some chipsets, a black list is used to disable runtime PM support for these chipsets. Reviewed-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Signed-off-by: NZheng Yan <zheng.z.yan@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NHuang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
-
- 12 6月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Bjorn Helgaas 提交于
Use pci_is_pcie() instead of looking at obsolete is_pcie field in struct pci_dev. CC: Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com> CC: Kenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
-
- 07 5月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Chunhe Lan 提交于
Get rid of these: drivers/pci/pcie/portdrv_core.c: In function 'pcie_port_device_register': drivers/pci/pcie/portdrv_core.c:275:16: warning: 'cap_mask' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wuninitialized] drivers/pci/pcie/portdrv_core.c:240:6: note: 'cap_mask' was declared here In some cases, 'cap_mask' may be not set in pcie_port_platform_notify, holding a garbage value. Signed-off-by: NChunhe Lan <Chunhe.Lan@freescale.com> Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
-
- 01 4月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Matthew Garrett 提交于
Since 3.2.12 and 3.3, some systems are failing to boot with a BUG_ON. Some other systems using the pata_jmicron driver fail to boot because no disks are detected. Passing pcie_aspm=force on the kernel command line works around it. The cause: commit 4949be16 ("PCI: ignore pre-1.1 ASPM quirking when ASPM is disabled") changed the behaviour of pcie_aspm_sanity_check() to always return 0 if aspm is disabled, in order to avoid cases where we changed ASPM state on pre-PCIe 1.1 devices. This skipped the secondary function of pcie_aspm_sanity_check which was to avoid us enabling ASPM on devices that had non-PCIe children, causing trouble later on. Move the aspm_disabled check so we continue to honour that scenario. Addresses https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42979 and http://bugs.debian.org/665420 Reported-by: Romain Francoise <romain@orebokech.com> # kernel panic Reported-by: Chris Holland <bandidoirlandes@gmail.com> # disk detection trouble Signed-off-by: NMatthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Tested-by: Hatem Masmoudi <hatem.masmoudi@gmail.com> # Dell Latitude E5520 Tested-by: janek <jan0x6c@gmail.com> # pata_jmicron with JMB362/JMB363 [jn: with more symptoms in log message] Signed-off-by: NJonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 08 3月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Matthew Garrett 提交于
Right now we won't touch ASPM state if ASPM is disabled, except in the case where we find a device that appears to be too old to reliably support ASPM. Right now we'll clear it in that case, which is almost certainly the wrong thing to do. The easiest way around this is just to disable the blacklisting when ASPM is disabled. Signed-off-by: NMatthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
-
- 24 2月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 MUNEDA Takahiro 提交于
Add a parameter to avoid using MSI/MSI-X for PCIe native hotplug; it's known to be buggy on some platforms. In my environment, while shutting down, following stack trace is shown sometimes. irq 16: nobody cared (try booting with the "irqpoll" option) Pid: 1081, comm: reboot Not tainted 3.2.0 #1 Call Trace: <IRQ> [<ffffffff810cec1d>] __report_bad_irq+0x3d/0xe0 [<ffffffff810cee1c>] note_interrupt+0x15c/0x210 [<ffffffff810cc485>] handle_irq_event_percpu+0xb5/0x210 [<ffffffff810cc621>] handle_irq_event+0x41/0x70 [<ffffffff810cf675>] handle_fasteoi_irq+0x55/0xc0 [<ffffffff81015356>] handle_irq+0x46/0xb0 [<ffffffff814fbe9d>] do_IRQ+0x5d/0xe0 [<ffffffff814f146e>] common_interrupt+0x6e/0x6e [<ffffffff8106b040>] ? __do_softirq+0x60/0x210 [<ffffffff8108aeb1>] ? hrtimer_interrupt+0x151/0x240 [<ffffffff814fb5ec>] call_softirq+0x1c/0x30 [<ffffffff810152d5>] do_softirq+0x65/0xa0 [<ffffffff8106ae9d>] irq_exit+0xbd/0xe0 [<ffffffff814fbf8e>] smp_apic_timer_interrupt+0x6e/0x99 [<ffffffff814f9e5e>] apic_timer_interrupt+0x6e/0x80 <EOI> [<ffffffff814f0fb1>] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x11/0x20 [<ffffffff812629fc>] pci_bus_write_config_word+0x6c/0x80 [<ffffffff81266fc2>] pci_intx+0x52/0xa0 [<ffffffff8127de3d>] pci_intx_for_msi+0x1d/0x30 [<ffffffff8127e4fb>] pci_msi_shutdown+0x7b/0x110 [<ffffffff81269d34>] pci_device_shutdown+0x34/0x50 [<ffffffff81326c4f>] device_shutdown+0x2f/0x140 [<ffffffff8107b981>] kernel_restart_prepare+0x31/0x40 [<ffffffff8107b9e6>] kernel_restart+0x16/0x60 [<ffffffff8107bbfd>] sys_reboot+0x1ad/0x220 [<ffffffff814f4b90>] ? do_page_fault+0x1e0/0x460 [<ffffffff811942d0>] ? __sync_filesystem+0x90/0x90 [<ffffffff8105c9aa>] ? __cond_resched+0x2a/0x40 [<ffffffff814ef090>] ? _cond_resched+0x30/0x40 [<ffffffff81169e17>] ? iterate_supers+0xb7/0xd0 [<ffffffff814f9382>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b handlers: [<ffffffff8138a0f0>] usb_hcd_irq [<ffffffff8138a0f0>] usb_hcd_irq [<ffffffff8138a0f0>] usb_hcd_irq Disabling IRQ #16 An un-wanted interrupt is generated when PCI driver switches from MSI/MSI-X to INTx while shutting down the device. The interrupt does not happen if MSI/MSI-X is not used on the device. I confirmed that this problem does not happen if pcie_hp=nomsi was specified and hotplug operation worked fine as usual. v2: Automatically disable MSI/MSI-X against following device: PCI bridge: Integrated Device Technology, Inc. Device 807f (rev 02) v3: Based on the review comment, combile the if statements. v4: Removed module parameter. Move some code to build pciehp as a module. Move device specific code to driver/pci/quirks.c. v5: Drop a device specific code until getting a vendor statement. Reviewed-by: NKenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NMUNEDA Takahiro <muneda.takahiro@jp.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
-
- 18 2月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Matthew Garrett 提交于
Distributions may wish to provide different defaults for PCIE ASPM depending on their target audience. Provide a configuration option for choosing the default policy. Signed-off-by: NMatthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
-
- 13 1月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Rusty Russell 提交于
module_param(bool) used to counter-intuitively take an int. In fddd5201 (mid-2009) we allowed bool or int/unsigned int using a messy trick. It's time to remove the int/unsigned int option. For this version it'll simply give a warning, but it'll break next kernel version. Acked-by: NMauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NRusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
-
- 07 1月, 2012 2 次提交
-
-
由 P. Christeas 提交于
Just fix this help text. Signed-off-by: NP. Christeas <xrg@linux.gr> Signed-off-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
-
由 Matthew Garrett 提交于
Right now we forcibly clear ASPM state on all devices if the BIOS indicates that the feature isn't supported. Based on the Microsoft presentation "PCI Express In Depth for Windows Vista and Beyond", I'm starting to think that this may be an error. The implication is that unless the platform grants full control via _OSC, Windows will not touch any PCIe features - including ASPM. In that case clearing ASPM state would be an error unless the platform has granted us that control. This patch reworks the ASPM disabling code such that the actual clearing of state is triggered by a successful handoff of PCIe control to the OS. The general ASPM code undergoes some changes in order to ensure that the ability to clear the bits isn't overridden by ASPM having already been disabled. Further, this theoretically now allows for situations where only a subset of PCIe roots hand over control, leaving the others in the BIOS state. It's difficult to know for sure that this is the right thing to do - there's zero public documentation on the interaction between all of these components. But enough vendors enable ASPM on platforms and then set this bit that it seems likely that they're expecting the OS to leave them alone. Measured to save around 5W on an idle Thinkpad X220. Signed-off-by: NMatthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
-
- 06 12月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Matthew Garrett 提交于
Right now we forcibly clear ASPM state on all devices if the BIOS indicates that the feature isn't supported. Based on the Microsoft presentation "PCI Express In Depth for Windows Vista and Beyond", I'm starting to think that this may be an error. The implication is that unless the platform grants full control via _OSC, Windows will not touch any PCIe features - including ASPM. In that case clearing ASPM state would be an error unless the platform has granted us that control. This patch reworks the ASPM disabling code such that the actual clearing of state is triggered by a successful handoff of PCIe control to the OS. The general ASPM code undergoes some changes in order to ensure that the ability to clear the bits isn't overridden by ASPM having already been disabled. Further, this theoretically now allows for situations where only a subset of PCIe roots hand over control, leaving the others in the BIOS state. It's difficult to know for sure that this is the right thing to do - there's zero public documentation on the interaction between all of these components. But enough vendors enable ASPM on platforms and then set this bit that it seems likely that they're expecting the OS to leave them alone. Measured to save around 5W on an idle Thinkpad X220. Signed-off-by: NMatthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
-
- 15 10月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
The land of PCI power management is a land of sorrow and ugliness, especially in the area of signaling events by devices. There are devices that set their PME Status bits, but don't really bother to send a PME message or assert PME#. There are hardware vendors who don't connect PME# lines to the system core logic (they know who they are). There are PCI Express Root Ports that don't bother to trigger interrupts when they receive PME messages from the devices below. There are ACPI BIOSes that forget to provide _PRW methods for devices capable of signaling wakeup. Finally, there are BIOSes that do provide _PRW methods for such devices, but then don't bother to call Notify() for those devices from the corresponding _Lxx/_Exx GPE-handling methods. In all of these cases the kernel doesn't have a chance to receive a proper notification that it should wake up a device, so devices stay in low-power states forever. Worse yet, in some cases they continuously send PME Messages that are silently ignored, because the kernel simply doesn't know that it should clear the device's PME Status bit. This problem was first observed for "parallel" (non-Express) PCI devices on add-on cards and Matthew Garrett addressed it by adding code that polls PME Status bits of such devices, if they are enabled to signal PME, to the kernel. Recently, however, it has turned out that PCI Express devices are also affected by this issue and that it is not limited to add-on devices, so it seems necessary to extend the PME polling to all PCI devices, including PCI Express and planar ones. Still, it would be wasteful to poll the PME Status bits of devices that are known to receive proper PME notifications, so make the kernel (1) poll the PME Status bits of all PCI and PCIe devices enabled to signal PME and (2) disable the PME Status polling for devices for which correct PME notifications are received. Tested-by: NSarah Sharp <sarah.a.sharp@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Signed-off-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
-
- 22 7月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Huang Ying 提交于
In addition to native PCIe AER, now APEI (ACPI Platform Error Interface) GHES (Generic Hardware Error Source) can be used to report PCIe AER errors too. To add support to APEI GHES PCIe AER recovery, aer_recover_queue is added to export the recovery function in native PCIe AER driver. Recoverable PCIe AER errors are reported via NMI in APEI GHES. Then APEI GHES uses irq_work to delay the error processing into an IRQ handler. But PCIe AER recovery can be very time-consuming, so aer_recover_queue, which can be used in IRQ handler, delays the real recovery action into the process context, that is, work queue. Signed-off-by: NHuang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
-
- 29 6月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Michael Witten 提交于
Merriam-Webster tells us that the word exists. However ... * Google suggests `forcibly' because it doesn't recognize `forcedly'. * Google lists 494 thousand results for `forcedly'. * Google lists 13.7 million results for `forcibly'. * Linus's repo contains 1 occurrence of `forcedly' ( 0 after my change). * Linus's repo contains 60 occurrences of `forcibly' (61 after my change). Signed-off-by: NMichael Witten <mfwitten@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
-
- 22 5月, 2011 2 次提交
-
-
由 Chen Gong 提交于
In the commit 28eb5f27, aer_osc_setup is removed but corresponding definiton information in the aerdrv.h is missed. Acked-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Signed-off-by: NChen Gong <gong.chen@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
-
由 Yinghai Lu 提交于
Need to use it in _e1000e_disable_aspm. This routine is used for error recovery, where the pci_bus_sem is already held, and we don't want pci_disable_link_state to try to take it again. So add a locked variant for use in cases like this. Found lock up: [ 2374.654557] kworker/32:1 D ffff881027f6b0f0 0 6075 2 0x00000000 [ 2374.654816] ffff88503f099a68 0000000000000046 ffff88503f098000 0000000000004000 [ 2374.654837] 00000000001d1ec0 ffff88503f099fd8 00000000001d1ec0 ffff88503f099fd8 [ 2374.654860] 0000000000004000 00000000001d1ec0 ffff88503dcc8000 ffff88503f090000 [ 2374.654880] Call Trace: [ 2374.654898] [<ffffffff810b1302>] ? __lock_acquired+0x3a/0x224 [ 2374.654914] [<ffffffff81c2b59c>] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x30/0x36 [ 2374.654925] [<ffffffff810b069d>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0x1f/0x178 [ 2374.654936] [<ffffffff81c2ab24>] rwsem_down_failed_common+0xd3/0x103 [ 2374.654945] [<ffffffff810b158f>] ? __lock_contended+0x3a/0x2a2 [ 2374.654955] [<ffffffff81c2ab7b>] rwsem_down_read_failed+0x12/0x14 [ 2374.654967] [<ffffffff813371e4>] call_rwsem_down_read_failed+0x14/0x30 [ 2374.654981] [<ffffffff8135df20>] ? pci_disable_link_state+0x5f/0xf5 [ 2374.654990] [<ffffffff81c2a0e6>] ? down_read+0x7e/0x91 [ 2374.654999] [<ffffffff8135df20>] ? pci_disable_link_state+0x5f/0xf5 [ 2374.655008] [<ffffffff8135df20>] pci_disable_link_state+0x5f/0xf5 [ 2374.655024] [<ffffffff81661796>] e1000e_disable_aspm+0x55/0x5a [ 2374.655037] [<ffffffff816677eb>] e1000_io_slot_reset+0x59/0xea [ 2374.655048] [<ffffffff8135fe0d>] ? report_mmio_enabled+0x5d/0x5d [ 2374.655057] [<ffffffff8135fe3b>] report_slot_reset+0x2e/0x5d [ 2374.655072] [<ffffffff8135369e>] pci_walk_bus+0x8a/0xb7 [ 2374.655081] [<ffffffff8135fe0d>] ? report_mmio_enabled+0x5d/0x5d [ 2374.655091] [<ffffffff813603be>] broadcast_error_message+0xa4/0xb2 [ 2374.655101] [<ffffffff81352c71>] ? pci_bus_read_config_dword+0x72/0x80 [ 2374.655110] [<ffffffff813606df>] do_recovery+0x9e/0xf9 [ 2374.655120] [<ffffffff81360786>] handle_error_source+0x4c/0x51 [ 2374.655129] [<ffffffff81360974>] aer_isr_one_error+0x1e9/0x21a [ 2374.655138] [<ffffffff81360a6c>] aer_isr+0xc7/0xcc [ 2374.655147] [<ffffffff813609a5>] ? aer_isr_one_error+0x21a/0x21a [ 2374.655159] [<ffffffff81096d9f>] process_one_work+0x237/0x3ec [ 2374.655168] [<ffffffff81096d10>] ? process_one_work+0x1a8/0x3ec [ 2374.655178] [<ffffffff8109728d>] worker_thread+0x17c/0x240 [ 2374.655186] [<ffffffff810b0803>] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xd/0xf [ 2374.655196] [<ffffffff81097111>] ? manage_workers+0xab/0xab [ 2374.655209] [<ffffffff8109c8ed>] kthread+0xa0/0xa8 [ 2374.655223] [<ffffffff81c332d4>] kernel_thread_helper+0x4/0x10 [ 2374.655232] [<ffffffff81c2b880>] ? retint_restore_args+0xe/0xe [ 2374.655243] [<ffffffff8109c84d>] ? __init_kthread_worker+0x5b/0x5b [ 2374.655252] [<ffffffff81c332d0>] ? gs_change+0xb/0xb when aer happens, pci_walk_bus already have down_read(&pci_bus_sem)... then report_slot_reset ==> e1000_io_slot_reset ==> e1000e_disable_aspm ==> pci_disable_link_state... We can not use pci_disable_link_state, and it will try to hold pci_bus_sem again. Try to have __pci_disable_link_state that will not need to hold pci_bus_sem. -v2: change name to pci_disable_link_state_locked() according to Jesse. [jbarnes: make sure new function is exported for modules] Signed-off-by: NYinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
-
- 11 5月, 2011 2 次提交
-
-
由 Wanlong Gao 提交于
If it was preempted, and the variable aer_mask_override is changed after the spin_unlock_irqrestore it will write an uninitialized variable by the pci_write_config_dword() function. Signed-off-by: NWanlong Gao <wanlong.gao@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
-
由 Alex Williamson 提交于
Commit 2f671e2d allowed us to clear ASPM state when the FADT tells us it isn't supported, but we don't put this into effect if the aspm_policy is set to POLICY_POWERSAVE. Enable the state to be cleared regardless of policy. Signed-off-by: NAlex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
-
- 22 3月, 2011 6 次提交
-
-
由 Huang Ying 提交于
The AER error information printing support is implemented in drivers/pci/pcie/aer/aer_print.c. So some string constants, functions and macros definitions can be re-used without being exported. The original PCIe AER error information printing function is not re-used directly because the overall format is quite different. And changing the original printing format may make some original users' scripts broken. Signed-off-by: NHuang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com> CC: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org> CC: Zhang Yanmin <yanmin.zhang@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
-
由 Huang Ying 提交于
When printing PCIe AER error information, each line is prefixed with PCIe device and driver information. In original implementation, the prefix is generated when each line is printed. In fact, all lines share the same prefix. So this patch pre-generated the prefix, and use that one when each line is printed. In addition to common prefix can be pre-generated, the trailing white spaces in string constants and NULLs in char * array constants can be removed too. These can reduce the object file size further. The size of object file before and after changing is as follow: text data bss dec before: 3038 0 0 3038 after: 2118 0 0 2118 Signed-off-by: NHuang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com> CC: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org> CC: Zhang Yanmin <yanmin.zhang@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
-
由 Naga Chumbalkar 提交于
v3 -> v2: Added text to describe the problem v2 -> v1: Split this patch from v1 v1 : Part of: http://marc.info/?l=linux-pci&m=130042212003242&w=2 Disable ASPM when no _OSC control for PCIe services is granted by the BIOS. This is to protect systems with a buggy BIOS that did not set the ACPI FADT "ASPM Controls" bit even though the underlying HW can't do ASPM. To turn "on" ASPM the minimum the BIOS needs to do: 1. Clear the ACPI FADT "ASPM Controls" bit. 2. Support _OSC appropriately There is no _OSC Control bit for ASPM. However, we expect the BIOS to support _OSC for a Root Bridge that originates a PCIe hierarchy. If this is not the case - we are better off not enabling ASPM on that server. Commit 852972ac (ACPI: Disable ASPM if the Platform won't provide _OSC control for PCIe) describes the above scenario. To quote verbatim from there: [The PCI SIG documentation for the _OSC OS/firmware handshaking interface states: "If the _OSC control method is absent from the scope of a host bridge device, then the operating system must not enable or attempt to use any features defined in this section for the hierarchy originated by the host bridge." The obvious interpretation of this is that the OS should not attempt to use PCIe hotplug, PME or AER - however, the specification also notes that an _OSC method is *required* for PCIe hierarchies, and experimental validation with An Alternative OS indicates that it doesn't use any PCIe functionality if the _OSC method is missing. That arguably means we shouldn't be using MSI or extended config space, but right now our problems seem to be limited to vendors being surprised when ASPM gets enabled on machines when other OSs refuse to do so. So, for now, let's just disable ASPM if the _OSC method doesn't exist or refuses to hand over PCIe capability control.] Signed-off-by: NNaga Chumbalkar <nagananda.chumbalkar@hp.com> Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Cc: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org> Signed-off-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
-
由 Naga Chumbalkar 提交于
v3 -> v2: Modified the text that describes the problem v2 -> v1: Returned -EPERM v1 : http://marc.info/?l=linux-pci&m=130013194803727&w=2 For servers whose hardware cannot handle ASPM the BIOS ought to set the FADT bit shown below: In Sec 5.2.9.3 (IA-PC Boot Arch. Flags) of ACPI4.0a Specification, please see Table 5-11: PCIe ASPM Controls: If set, indicates to OSPM that it must not enable OPSM ASPM control on this platform. However there are shipping servers whose BIOS did not set this bit. (An example is the HP ProLiant DL385 G6. A Maintenance BIOS will fix that). For such servers even if a call is made via pci_no_aspm(), based on _OSC support in the BIOS, it may be too late because the ASPM code may have already allocated and filled its "link_list". So if a user sets the ASPM "policy" to "powersave" via /sys then pcie_aspm_set_policy() will run through the "link_list" and re-configure ASPM policy on devices that advertise ASPM L0s/L1 capability: # echo powersave > /sys/module/pcie_aspm/parameters/policy # cat /sys/module/pcie_aspm/parameters/policy default performance [powersave] That can cause NMIs since the hardware doesn't play well with ASPM: [ 1651.906015] NMI: PCI system error (SERR) for reason b1 on CPU 0. [ 1651.906015] Dazed and confused, but trying to continue Ideally, the BIOS should have set that FADT bit in the first place but we could be more robust - especially given the fact that Windows doesn't cause NMIs in the above scenario. There should be a sanity check to not allow a user to modify ASPM policy when aspm_disabled is set. Signed-off-by: NNaga Chumbalkar <nagananda.chumbalkar@hp.com> Acked-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Cc: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org> Signed-off-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
-
由 Naga Chumbalkar 提交于
v3 -> v2: Moved ASPM enabling logic to pci_set_power_state() v2 -> v1: Preserved the logic in pci_raw_set_power_state() : Added ASPM enabling logic after scanning Root Bridge : http://marc.info/?l=linux-pci&m=130046996216391&w=2 v1 : http://marc.info/?l=linux-pci&m=130013164703283&w=2 The assumption made in commit 41cd766b (PCI: Don't enable aspm before drivers have had a chance to veto it) that pci_enable_device() will result in re-configuring ASPM when aspm_policy is POWERSAVE is no longer valid. This is due to commit 97c145f7 (PCI: read current power state at enable time) which resets dev->current_state to D0. Due to this the call to pcie_aspm_pm_state_change() is never made. Note the equality check (below) that returns early: ./drivers/pci/pci.c: pci_raw_set_pci_power_state() 546 /* Check if we're already there */ 547 if (dev->current_state == state) 548 return 0; Therefore OSPM never configures the PCIe links for ASPM to turn them "on". Fix it by configuring ASPM from the pci_enable_device() code path. This also allows a driver such as the e1000e networking driver a chance to disable ASPM (L0s, L1), if need be, prior to enabling the device. A driver may perform this action if the device is known to mis-behave wrt ASPM. Signed-off-by: NNaga Chumbalkar <nagananda.chumbalkar@hp.com> Acked-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Cc: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org> Signed-off-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
We need to distinguish the situation in which ASPM support is disabled from the command line or through .config from the situation in which it is disabled, because the hardware or BIOS can't handle it. In the former case we should not report ASPM support to the BIOS through ACPI _OSC, but in the latter case we should do that. Introduce pcie_aspm_support_enabled() that can be used by acpi_pci_root_add() to determine whether or not it should report ASPM support to the BIOS through _OSC. Cc: stable@kernel.org References: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=29722 References: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20232Reported-and-tested-by: NOrtwin Glück <odi@odi.ch> Reviewed-by: NKenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: NKenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Signed-off-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
-
- 05 3月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Prarit Bhargava 提交于
I have several systems which have the same problem: The PCIe AER corrected and uncorrected masks have all the error bits set. This results in the inablility to test with the aer_inject module & utility on those systems. Add the 'aer_mask_override' module parameter which will override the corrected or uncorrected masks for a PCI device. The mask will have the bit corresponding to the status passed into the aer_inject() function. After this patch it is possible to successfully use the aer_inject utility on those PCI slots. Successfully tested by me on a Dell and Intel whitebox which exhibited the mask problem. Signed-off-by: NPrarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
-
- 21 1月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 David Rientjes 提交于
The meaning of CONFIG_EMBEDDED has long since been obsoleted; the option is used to configure any non-standard kernel with a much larger scope than only small devices. This patch renames the option to CONFIG_EXPERT in init/Kconfig and fixes references to the option throughout the kernel. A new CONFIG_EMBEDDED option is added that automatically selects CONFIG_EXPERT when enabled and can be used in the future to isolate options that should only be considered for embedded systems (RISC architectures, SLOB, etc). Calling the option "EXPERT" more accurately represents its intention: only expert users who understand the impact of the configuration changes they are making should enable it. Reviewed-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Acked-by: NDavid Woodhouse <david.woodhouse@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de> Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Cc: Robin Holt <holt@sgi.com> Cc: <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 15 1月, 2011 2 次提交
-
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
Make wakeup events be reported by the PCI subsystem before attempting to resume devices or queuing up runtime resume requests for them, because wakeup events should be reported as soon as they have been detected. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Signed-off-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
Move the evaluation of acpi_pci_osc_control_set() (to request control of PCI Express native features) into acpi_pci_root_add() to avoid calling it many times for the same root complex with the same arguments. Additionally, check if all of the requisite _OSC support bits are set before calling acpi_pci_osc_control_set() for a given root complex. References: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20232Reported-by: NOzan Caglayan <ozan@pardus.org.tr> Tested-by: NOzan Caglayan <ozan@pardus.org.tr> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Signed-off-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
-
- 24 12月, 2010 2 次提交
-
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
I noticed that PCI Express PMEs don't work on my Toshiba Portege R500 after the system has been woken up from a sleep state by a PME (through Wake-on-LAN). After some investigation it turned out that the BIOS didn't clear the Root PME Status bit in the root port that received the wakeup PME and since the Requester ID was also set in the port's Root Status register, any subsequent PMEs didn't trigger interrupts. This problem can be avoided by clearing the Root PME Status bits in all PCI Express root ports during early resume. For this purpose, add an early resume routine to the PCIe port driver and make this driver be always registered, even if pci_ports_disable is set (in which case the driver's only function is to provide the early resume callback). Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Signed-off-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
-
由 Matthew Garrett 提交于
We currently refuse to touch the ASPM registers if the BIOS tells us that ASPM isn't supported. This can cause problems if the BIOS has (for any reason) enabled ASPM on some devices anyway. Change the code such that we explicitly clear ASPM if the FADT indicates that ASPM isn't supported, and make sure we tidy up appropriately on device removal in order to deal with the hotplug case. If ASPM is disabled because the BIOS doesn't hand over control then we won't touch the registers. Signed-off-by: NMatthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
-
- 16 10月, 2010 2 次提交
-
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
There is a design issue related to PCIe AER and _OSC that the BIOS may be asked to grant control of the AER service even if some Hardware Error Source Table (HEST) entries contain information meaning that the BIOS really should control it. Namely, pcie_port_acpi_setup() calls pcie_aer_get_firmware_first() that determines whether or not the AER service should be controlled by the BIOS on the basis of the HEST information for the given PCIe port. The BIOS is asked to grant control of the AER service for a PCIe Root Complex if pcie_aer_get_firmware_first() returns 'false' for at least one root port in that complex, even if all of the other root ports' HEST entries have the FIRMWARE_FIRST flag set (and none of them has the GLOBAL flag set). However, if the AER service is controlled by the kernel, that may interfere with the BIOS' handling of the error sources having the FIRMWARE_FIRST flag. Moreover, there may be PCIe endpoints that have the FIRMWARE_FIRST flag set in HEST and are attached to the root ports in question, in which case it also may be unsafe to ask the BIOS for control of the AER service. For this reason, introduce a function checking if there's at least one PCIe-related HEST entry with the FIRMWARE_FIRST flag set and disable the native AER service altogether if this function returns 'true'. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Signed-off-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
-
由 Bill Pemberton 提交于
quiet the warning about use of uninitialized e_src in aer_isr() e_src is initialized by get_e_source() Signed-off-by: NBill Pemberton <wfp5p@virginia.edu> Signed-off-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
-
- 15 10月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 Arnd Bergmann 提交于
All file_operations should get a .llseek operation so we can make nonseekable_open the default for future file operations without a .llseek pointer. The three cases that we can automatically detect are no_llseek, seq_lseek and default_llseek. For cases where we can we can automatically prove that the file offset is always ignored, we use noop_llseek, which maintains the current behavior of not returning an error from a seek. New drivers should normally not use noop_llseek but instead use no_llseek and call nonseekable_open at open time. Existing drivers can be converted to do the same when the maintainer knows for certain that no user code relies on calling seek on the device file. The generated code is often incorrectly indented and right now contains comments that clarify for each added line why a specific variant was chosen. In the version that gets submitted upstream, the comments will be gone and I will manually fix the indentation, because there does not seem to be a way to do that using coccinelle. Some amount of new code is currently sitting in linux-next that should get the same modifications, which I will do at the end of the merge window. Many thanks to Julia Lawall for helping me learn to write a semantic patch that does all this. ===== begin semantic patch ===== // This adds an llseek= method to all file operations, // as a preparation for making no_llseek the default. // // The rules are // - use no_llseek explicitly if we do nonseekable_open // - use seq_lseek for sequential files // - use default_llseek if we know we access f_pos // - use noop_llseek if we know we don't access f_pos, // but we still want to allow users to call lseek // @ open1 exists @ identifier nested_open; @@ nested_open(...) { <+... nonseekable_open(...) ...+> } @ open exists@ identifier open_f; identifier i, f; identifier open1.nested_open; @@ int open_f(struct inode *i, struct file *f) { <+... ( nonseekable_open(...) | nested_open(...) ) ...+> } @ read disable optional_qualifier exists @ identifier read_f; identifier f, p, s, off; type ssize_t, size_t, loff_t; expression E; identifier func; @@ ssize_t read_f(struct file *f, char *p, size_t s, loff_t *off) { <+... ( *off = E | *off += E | func(..., off, ...) | E = *off ) ...+> } @ read_no_fpos disable optional_qualifier exists @ identifier read_f; identifier f, p, s, off; type ssize_t, size_t, loff_t; @@ ssize_t read_f(struct file *f, char *p, size_t s, loff_t *off) { ... when != off } @ write @ identifier write_f; identifier f, p, s, off; type ssize_t, size_t, loff_t; expression E; identifier func; @@ ssize_t write_f(struct file *f, const char *p, size_t s, loff_t *off) { <+... ( *off = E | *off += E | func(..., off, ...) | E = *off ) ...+> } @ write_no_fpos @ identifier write_f; identifier f, p, s, off; type ssize_t, size_t, loff_t; @@ ssize_t write_f(struct file *f, const char *p, size_t s, loff_t *off) { ... when != off } @ fops0 @ identifier fops; @@ struct file_operations fops = { ... }; @ has_llseek depends on fops0 @ identifier fops0.fops; identifier llseek_f; @@ struct file_operations fops = { ... .llseek = llseek_f, ... }; @ has_read depends on fops0 @ identifier fops0.fops; identifier read_f; @@ struct file_operations fops = { ... .read = read_f, ... }; @ has_write depends on fops0 @ identifier fops0.fops; identifier write_f; @@ struct file_operations fops = { ... .write = write_f, ... }; @ has_open depends on fops0 @ identifier fops0.fops; identifier open_f; @@ struct file_operations fops = { ... .open = open_f, ... }; // use no_llseek if we call nonseekable_open //////////////////////////////////////////// @ nonseekable1 depends on !has_llseek && has_open @ identifier fops0.fops; identifier nso ~= "nonseekable_open"; @@ struct file_operations fops = { ... .open = nso, ... +.llseek = no_llseek, /* nonseekable */ }; @ nonseekable2 depends on !has_llseek @ identifier fops0.fops; identifier open.open_f; @@ struct file_operations fops = { ... .open = open_f, ... +.llseek = no_llseek, /* open uses nonseekable */ }; // use seq_lseek for sequential files ///////////////////////////////////// @ seq depends on !has_llseek @ identifier fops0.fops; identifier sr ~= "seq_read"; @@ struct file_operations fops = { ... .read = sr, ... +.llseek = seq_lseek, /* we have seq_read */ }; // use default_llseek if there is a readdir /////////////////////////////////////////// @ fops1 depends on !has_llseek && !nonseekable1 && !nonseekable2 && !seq @ identifier fops0.fops; identifier readdir_e; @@ // any other fop is used that changes pos struct file_operations fops = { ... .readdir = readdir_e, ... +.llseek = default_llseek, /* readdir is present */ }; // use default_llseek if at least one of read/write touches f_pos ///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// @ fops2 depends on !fops1 && !has_llseek && !nonseekable1 && !nonseekable2 && !seq @ identifier fops0.fops; identifier read.read_f; @@ // read fops use offset struct file_operations fops = { ... .read = read_f, ... +.llseek = default_llseek, /* read accesses f_pos */ }; @ fops3 depends on !fops1 && !fops2 && !has_llseek && !nonseekable1 && !nonseekable2 && !seq @ identifier fops0.fops; identifier write.write_f; @@ // write fops use offset struct file_operations fops = { ... .write = write_f, ... + .llseek = default_llseek, /* write accesses f_pos */ }; // Use noop_llseek if neither read nor write accesses f_pos /////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// @ fops4 depends on !fops1 && !fops2 && !fops3 && !has_llseek && !nonseekable1 && !nonseekable2 && !seq @ identifier fops0.fops; identifier read_no_fpos.read_f; identifier write_no_fpos.write_f; @@ // write fops use offset struct file_operations fops = { ... .write = write_f, .read = read_f, ... +.llseek = noop_llseek, /* read and write both use no f_pos */ }; @ depends on has_write && !has_read && !fops1 && !fops2 && !has_llseek && !nonseekable1 && !nonseekable2 && !seq @ identifier fops0.fops; identifier write_no_fpos.write_f; @@ struct file_operations fops = { ... .write = write_f, ... +.llseek = noop_llseek, /* write uses no f_pos */ }; @ depends on has_read && !has_write && !fops1 && !fops2 && !has_llseek && !nonseekable1 && !nonseekable2 && !seq @ identifier fops0.fops; identifier read_no_fpos.read_f; @@ struct file_operations fops = { ... .read = read_f, ... +.llseek = noop_llseek, /* read uses no f_pos */ }; @ depends on !has_read && !has_write && !fops1 && !fops2 && !has_llseek && !nonseekable1 && !nonseekable2 && !seq @ identifier fops0.fops; @@ struct file_operations fops = { ... +.llseek = noop_llseek, /* no read or write fn */ }; ===== End semantic patch ===== Signed-off-by: NArnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Cc: Julia Lawall <julia@diku.dk> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
-
- 25 8月, 2010 4 次提交
-
-
由 Kenji Kaneshige 提交于
The PCIe port driver's module exit routine is never used, so drop it. Signed-off-by: NKenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Reviewed-by: NHidetoshi Seto <seto.hidetoshi@jp.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
The PCIe PME code only consists of one file, so it doesn't need to occupy its own directory. Move it to drivers/pci/pcie/pme.c and remove the contents of drivers/pci/pcie/pme . Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Signed-off-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
In principle PCIe port services may be enabled by the BIOS, so it's better to disable them during port initialization to avoid spurious events from being generated. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Reviewed-by: NHidetoshi Seto <seto.hidetoshi@jp.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
After commit 852972ac (ACPI: Disable ASPM if the platform won't provide _OSC control for PCIe) control of the PCIe Capability Structure is unconditionally requested by acpi_pci_root_add(), which in principle may cause problems to happen in two ways. First, the BIOS may refuse to give control of the PCIe Capability Structure if it is not asked for any of the _OSC features depending on it at the same time. Second, the BIOS may assume that control of the _OSC features depending on the PCIe Capability Structure will be requested in the future and may behave incorrectly if that doesn't happen. For this reason, control of the PCIe Capability Structure should always be requested along with control of any other _OSC features that may depend on it (ie. PCIe native PME, PCIe native hot-plug, PCIe AER). Rework the PCIe port driver so that (1) it checks which native PCIe port services can be enabled, according to the BIOS, and (2) it requests control of all these services simultaneously. In particular, this causes pcie_portdrv_probe() to fail if the BIOS refuses to grant control of the PCIe Capability Structure, which means that no native PCIe port services can be enabled for the PCIe Root Complex the given port belongs to. If that happens, ASPM is disabled to avoid problems with mishandling it by the part of the PCIe hierarchy for which control of the PCIe Capability Structure has not been received. Make it possible to override this behavior using 'pcie_ports=native' (use the PCIe native services regardless of the BIOS response to the control request), or 'pcie_ports=compat' (do not use the PCIe native services at all). Accordingly, rework the existing PCIe port service drivers so that they don't request control of the services directly. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Signed-off-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
-