Skip to content

cloud-kernel
cloud-kernel

openanolis / cloud-kernel
接近 2 年 前同步成功

通知 170
Star 36
Fork 7
cloud-kernel
cloud-kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 31 5月, 2019 2 次提交
    • C
      bcache: return error immediately in bch_journal_replay() · 29b166da
      由 Coly Li 提交于 
      [ Upstream commit 68d10e6979a3b59e3cd2e90bfcafed79c4cf180a ]

When failure happens inside bch_journal_replay(), calling
cache_set_err_on() and handling the failure in async way is not a good
idea. Because after bch_journal_replay() returns, registering code will
continue to execute following steps, and unregistering code triggered
by cache_set_err_on() is running in same time. First it is unnecessary
to handle failure and unregister cache set in an async way, second there
might be potential race condition to run register and unregister code
for same cache set.

So in this patch, if failure happens in bch_journal_replay(), we don't
call cache_set_err_on(), and just print out the same error message to
kernel message buffer, then return -EIO immediately caller. Then caller
can detect such failure and handle it in synchrnozied way.
Signed-off-by: NColy Li <colyli@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: NHannes Reinecke <hare@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Signed-off-by: NSasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
      29b166da
    • S
      bcache: avoid potential memleak of list of journal_replay(s) in the CACHE_SYNC... · 8034a6b8
      由 Shenghui Wang 提交于 
      bcache: avoid potential memleak of list of journal_replay(s) in the CACHE_SYNC branch of run_cache_set

[ Upstream commit 95f18c9d1310730d075499a75aaf13bcd60405a7 ]

In the CACHE_SYNC branch of run_cache_set(), LIST_HEAD(journal) is used
to collect journal_replay(s) and filled by bch_journal_read().

If all goes well, bch_journal_replay() will release the list of
jounal_replay(s) at the end of the branch.

If something goes wrong, code flow will jump to the label "err:" and leave
the list unreleased.

This patch will release the list of journal_replay(s) in the case of
error detected.

v1 -> v2:
* Move the release code to the location after label 'err:' to
  simply the change.
Signed-off-by: NShenghui Wang <shhuiw@foxmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NColy Li <colyli@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Signed-off-by: NSasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
      8034a6b8
  3. 22 5月, 2019 2 次提交
    • C
      bcache: never set KEY_PTRS of journal key to 0 in journal_reclaim() · 88681649
      由 Coly Li 提交于 
      commit 1bee2addc0c8470c8aaa65ef0599eeae96dd88bc upstream.

In journal_reclaim() ja->cur_idx of each cache will be update to
reclaim available journal buckets. Variable 'int n' is used to count how
many cache is successfully reclaimed, then n is set to c->journal.key
by SET_KEY_PTRS(). Later in journal_write_unlocked(), a for_each_cache()
loop will write the jset data onto each cache.

The problem is, if all jouranl buckets on each cache is full, the
following code in journal_reclaim(),

529 for_each_cache(ca, c, iter) {
530       struct journal_device *ja = &ca->journal;
531       unsigned int next = (ja->cur_idx + 1) % ca->sb.njournal_buckets;
532
533       /* No space available on this device */
534       if (next == ja->discard_idx)
535               continue;
536
537       ja->cur_idx = next;
538       k->ptr[n++] = MAKE_PTR(0,
539                         bucket_to_sector(c, ca->sb.d[ja->cur_idx]),
540                         ca->sb.nr_this_dev);
541 }
542
543 bkey_init(k);
544 SET_KEY_PTRS(k, n);

If there is no available bucket to reclaim, the if() condition at line
534 will always true, and n remains 0. Then at line 544, SET_KEY_PTRS()
will set KEY_PTRS field of c->journal.key to 0.

Setting KEY_PTRS field of c->journal.key to 0 is wrong. Because in
journal_write_unlocked() the journal data is written in following loop,

649	for (i = 0; i < KEY_PTRS(k); i++) {
650-671		submit journal data to cache device
672	}

If KEY_PTRS field is set to 0 in jouranl_reclaim(), the journal data
won't be written to cache device here. If system crahed or rebooted
before bkeys of the lost journal entries written into btree nodes, data
corruption will be reported during bcache reload after rebooting the
system.

Indeed there is only one cache in a cache set, there is no need to set
KEY_PTRS field in journal_reclaim() at all. But in order to keep the
for_each_cache() logic consistent for now, this patch fixes the above
problem by not setting 0 KEY_PTRS of journal key, if there is no bucket
available to reclaim.
Signed-off-by: NColy Li <colyli@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: NHannes Reinecke <hare@suse.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
      88681649
    • L
      bcache: fix a race between cache register and cacheset unregister · ecfc882f
      由 Liang Chen 提交于 
      commit a4b732a248d12cbdb46999daf0bf288c011335eb upstream.

There is a race between cache device register and cache set unregister.
For an already registered cache device, register_bcache will call
bch_is_open to iterate through all cachesets and check every cache
there. The race occurs if cache_set_free executes at the same time and
clears the caches right before ca is dereferenced in bch_is_open_cache.
To close the race, let's make sure the clean up work is protected by
the bch_register_lock as well.

This issue can be reproduced as follows,
while true; do echo /dev/XXX> /sys/fs/bcache/register ; done&
while true; do echo 1> /sys/block/XXX/bcache/set/unregister ; done &

and results in the following oops,

[  +0.000053] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000998
[  +0.000457] #PF error: [normal kernel read fault]
[  +0.000464] PGD 800000003ca9d067 P4D 800000003ca9d067 PUD 3ca9c067 PMD 0
[  +0.000388] Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP PTI
[  +0.000269] CPU: 1 PID: 3266 Comm: bash Not tainted 5.0.0+ #6
[  +0.000346] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.11.0-2.fc28 04/01/2014
[  +0.000472] RIP: 0010:register_bcache+0x1829/0x1990 [bcache]
[  +0.000344] Code: b0 48 83 e8 50 48 81 fa e0 e1 10 c0 0f 84 a9 00 00 00 48 89 c6 48 89 ca 0f b7 ba 54 04 00 00 4c 8b 82 60 0c 00 00 85 ff 74 2f <49> 3b a8 98 09 00 00 74 4e 44 8d 47 ff 31 ff 49 c1 e0 03 eb 0d
[  +0.000839] RSP: 0018:ffff92ee804cbd88 EFLAGS: 00010202
[  +0.000328] RAX: ffffffffc010e190 RBX: ffff918b5c6b5000 RCX: ffff918b7d8e0000
[  +0.000399] RDX: ffff918b7d8e0000 RSI: ffffffffc010e190 RDI: 0000000000000001
[  +0.000398] RBP: ffff918b7d318340 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: ffffffffb9bd2d7a
[  +0.000385] R10: ffff918b7eb253c0 R11: ffffb95980f51200 R12: ffffffffc010e1a0
[  +0.000411] R13: fffffffffffffff2 R14: 000000000000000b R15: ffff918b7e232620
[  +0.000384] FS:  00007f955bec2740(0000) GS:ffff918b7eb00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
[  +0.000420] CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
[  +0.000801] CR2: 0000000000000998 CR3: 000000003cad6000 CR4: 00000000001406e0
[  +0.000837] Call Trace:
[  +0.000682]  ? _cond_resched+0x10/0x20
[  +0.000691]  ? __kmalloc+0x131/0x1b0
[  +0.000710]  kernfs_fop_write+0xfa/0x170
[  +0.000733]  __vfs_write+0x2e/0x190
[  +0.000688]  ? inode_security+0x10/0x30
[  +0.000698]  ? selinux_file_permission+0xd2/0x120
[  +0.000752]  ? security_file_permission+0x2b/0x100
[  +0.000753]  vfs_write+0xa8/0x1a0
[  +0.000676]  ksys_write+0x4d/0xb0
[  +0.000699]  do_syscall_64+0x3a/0xf0
[  +0.000692]  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
Signed-off-by: NLiang Chen <liangchen.linux@gmail.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: NColy Li <colyli@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
      ecfc882f
  5. 06 4月, 2019 5 次提交
    • C
      bcache: fix potential div-zero error of writeback_rate_p_term_inverse · e7d26616
      由 Coly Li 提交于 
      [ Upstream commit 5b5fd3c94eef69dcfaa8648198e54c92e5687d6d ]

Current code already uses d_strtoul_nonzero() to convert input string
to an unsigned integer, to make sure writeback_rate_p_term_inverse
won't be zero value. But overflow may happen when converting input
string to an unsigned integer value by d_strtoul_nonzero(), then
dc->writeback_rate_p_term_inverse can still be set to 0 even if the
sysfs file input value is not zero, e.g. 4294967296 (a.k.a UINT_MAX+1).

If dc->writeback_rate_p_term_inverse is set to 0, it might cause a
dev-zero error in following code from __update_writeback_rate(),
	int64_t proportional_scaled =
		div_s64(error, dc->writeback_rate_p_term_inverse);

This patch replaces d_strtoul_nonzero() by sysfs_strtoul_clamp() and
limit the value range in [1, UINT_MAX]. Then the unsigned integer
overflow and dev-zero error can be avoided.
Signed-off-by: NColy Li <colyli@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Signed-off-by: NSasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
      e7d26616
    • C
      bcache: improve sysfs_strtoul_clamp() · 98eddc19
      由 Coly Li 提交于 
      [ Upstream commit 596b5a5dd1bc2fa019fdaaae522ef331deef927f ]

Currently sysfs_strtoul_clamp() is defined as,
 82 #define sysfs_strtoul_clamp(file, var, min, max)                   \
 83 do {                                                               \
 84         if (attr == &sysfs_ ## file)                               \
 85                 return strtoul_safe_clamp(buf, var, min, max)      \
 86                         ?: (ssize_t) size;                         \
 87 } while (0)

The problem is, if bit width of var is less then unsigned long, min and
max may not protect var from integer overflow, because overflow happens
in strtoul_safe_clamp() before checking min and max.

To fix such overflow in sysfs_strtoul_clamp(), to make min and max take
effect, this patch adds an unsigned long variable, and uses it to macro
strtoul_safe_clamp() to convert an unsigned long value in range defined
by [min, max]. Then assign this value to var. By this method, if bit
width of var is less than unsigned long, integer overflow won't happen
before min and max are checking.

Now sysfs_strtoul_clamp() can properly handle smaller data type like
unsigned int, of cause min and max should be defined in range of
unsigned int too.
Signed-off-by: NColy Li <colyli@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Signed-off-by: NSasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
      98eddc19
    • C
      bcache: fix potential div-zero error of writeback_rate_i_term_inverse · b468e000
      由 Coly Li 提交于 
      [ Upstream commit c3b75a2199cdbfc1c335155fe143d842604b1baa ]

dc->writeback_rate_i_term_inverse can be set via sysfs interface. It is
in type unsigned int, and convert from input string by d_strtoul(). The
problem is d_strtoul() does not check valid range of the input, if
4294967296 is written into sysfs file writeback_rate_i_term_inverse,
an overflow of unsigned integer will happen and value 0 is set to
dc->writeback_rate_i_term_inverse.

In writeback.c:__update_writeback_rate(), there are following lines of
code,
      integral_scaled = div_s64(dc->writeback_rate_integral,
                      dc->writeback_rate_i_term_inverse);
If dc->writeback_rate_i_term_inverse is set to 0 via sysfs interface,
a div-zero error might be triggered in the above code.

Therefore we need to add a range limitation in the sysfs interface,
this is what this patch does, use sysfs_stroul_clamp() to replace
d_strtoul() and restrict the input range in [1, UINT_MAX].
Signed-off-by: NColy Li <colyli@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Signed-off-by: NSasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
      b468e000
    • C
      bcache: fix input overflow to sequential_cutoff · c7b687eb
      由 Coly Li 提交于 
      [ Upstream commit 8c27a3953e92eb0b22dbb03d599f543a05f9574e ]

People may set sequential_cutoff of a cached device via sysfs file,
but current code does not check input value overflow. E.g. if value
4294967295 (UINT_MAX) is written to file sequential_cutoff, its value
is 4GB, but if 4294967296 (UINT_MAX + 1) is written into, its value
will be 0. This is an unexpected behavior.

This patch replaces d_strtoi_h() by sysfs_strtoul_clamp() to convert
input string to unsigned integer value, and limit its range in
[0, UINT_MAX]. Then the input overflow can be fixed.
Signed-off-by: NColy Li <colyli@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Signed-off-by: NSasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
      c7b687eb
    • C
      bcache: fix input overflow to cache set sysfs file io_error_halflife · 16975f04
      由 Coly Li 提交于 
      [ Upstream commit a91fbda49f746119828f7e8ad0f0aa2ab0578f65 ]

Cache set sysfs entry io_error_halflife is used to set c->error_decay.
c->error_decay is in type unsigned int, and it is converted by
strtoul_or_return(), therefore overflow to c->error_decay is possible
for a large input value.

This patch fixes the overflow by using strtoul_safe_clamp() to convert
input string to an unsigned long value in range [0, UINT_MAX], then
divides by 88 and set it to c->error_decay.
Signed-off-by: NColy Li <colyli@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Signed-off-by: NSasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
      16975f04
  7. 24 3月, 2019 2 次提交
    • C
      bcache: use (REQ_META|REQ_PRIO) to indicate bio for metadata · e578f90d
      由 Coly Li 提交于 
      commit dc7292a5bcb4c878b076fca2ac3fc22f81b8f8df upstream.

In 'commit 752f66a75aba ("bcache: use REQ_PRIO to indicate bio for
metadata")' REQ_META is replaced by REQ_PRIO to indicate metadata bio.
This assumption is not always correct, e.g. XFS uses REQ_META to mark
metadata bio other than REQ_PRIO. This is why Nix noticed that bcache
does not cache metadata for XFS after the above commit.

Thanks to Dave Chinner, he explains the difference between REQ_META and
REQ_PRIO from view of file system developer. Here I quote part of his
explanation from mailing list,
   REQ_META is used for metadata. REQ_PRIO is used to communicate to
   the lower layers that the submitter considers this IO to be more
   important that non REQ_PRIO IO and so dispatch should be expedited.

   IOWs, if the filesystem considers metadata IO to be more important
   that user data IO, then it will use REQ_PRIO | REQ_META rather than
   just REQ_META.

Then it seems bios with REQ_META or REQ_PRIO should both be cached for
performance optimation, because they are all probably low I/O latency
demand by upper layer (e.g. file system).

So in this patch, when we want to decide whether to bypass the cache,
REQ_META and REQ_PRIO are both checked. Then both metadata and
high priority I/O requests will be handled properly.
Reported-by: NNix <nix@esperi.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: NColy Li <colyli@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: NAndre Noll <maan@tuebingen.mpg.de>
Tested-by: NNix <nix@esperi.org.uk>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
      e578f90d
    • D
      bcache: never writeback a discard operation · 622afe5c
      由 Daniel Axtens 提交于 
      commit 9951379b0ca88c95876ad9778b9099e19a95d566 upstream.

Some users see panics like the following when performing fstrim on a
bcached volume:

[  529.803060] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000008
[  530.183928] #PF error: [normal kernel read fault]
[  530.412392] PGD 8000001f42163067 P4D 8000001f42163067 PUD 1f42168067 PMD 0
[  530.750887] Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP PTI
[  530.920869] CPU: 10 PID: 4167 Comm: fstrim Kdump: loaded Not tainted 5.0.0-rc1+ #3
[  531.290204] Hardware name: HP ProLiant DL360 Gen9/ProLiant DL360 Gen9, BIOS P89 12/27/2015
[  531.693137] RIP: 0010:blk_queue_split+0x148/0x620
[  531.922205] Code: 60 38 89 55 a0 45 31 db 45 31 f6 45 31 c9 31 ff 89 4d 98 85 db 0f 84 7f 04 00 00 44 8b 6d 98 4c 89 ee 48 c1 e6 04 49 03 70 78 <8b> 46 08 44 8b 56 0c 48
8b 16 44 29 e0 39 d8 48 89 55 a8 0f 47 c3
[  532.838634] RSP: 0018:ffffb9b708df39b0 EFLAGS: 00010246
[  533.093571] RAX: 00000000ffffffff RBX: 0000000000046000 RCX: 0000000000000000
[  533.441865] RDX: 0000000000000200 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000000000000000
[  533.789922] RBP: ffffb9b708df3a48 R08: ffff940d3b3fdd20 R09: 0000000000000000
[  534.137512] R10: ffffb9b708df3958 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 0000000000000000
[  534.485329] R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: ffff940d39212020
[  534.833319] FS:  00007efec26e3840(0000) GS:ffff940d1f480000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
[  535.224098] CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
[  535.504318] CR2: 0000000000000008 CR3: 0000001f4e256004 CR4: 00000000001606e0
[  535.851759] Call Trace:
[  535.970308]  ? mempool_alloc_slab+0x15/0x20
[  536.174152]  ? bch_data_insert+0x42/0xd0 [bcache]
[  536.403399]  blk_mq_make_request+0x97/0x4f0
[  536.607036]  generic_make_request+0x1e2/0x410
[  536.819164]  submit_bio+0x73/0x150
[  536.980168]  ? submit_bio+0x73/0x150
[  537.149731]  ? bio_associate_blkg_from_css+0x3b/0x60
[  537.391595]  ? _cond_resched+0x1a/0x50
[  537.573774]  submit_bio_wait+0x59/0x90
[  537.756105]  blkdev_issue_discard+0x80/0xd0
[  537.959590]  ext4_trim_fs+0x4a9/0x9e0
[  538.137636]  ? ext4_trim_fs+0x4a9/0x9e0
[  538.324087]  ext4_ioctl+0xea4/0x1530
[  538.497712]  ? _copy_to_user+0x2a/0x40
[  538.679632]  do_vfs_ioctl+0xa6/0x600
[  538.853127]  ? __do_sys_newfstat+0x44/0x70
[  539.051951]  ksys_ioctl+0x6d/0x80
[  539.212785]  __x64_sys_ioctl+0x1a/0x20
[  539.394918]  do_syscall_64+0x5a/0x110
[  539.568674]  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9

We have observed it where both:
1) LVM/devmapper is involved (bcache backing device is LVM volume) and
2) writeback cache is involved (bcache cache_mode is writeback)

On one machine, we can reliably reproduce it with:

 # echo writeback > /sys/block/bcache0/bcache/cache_mode
   (not sure whether above line is required)
 # mount /dev/bcache0 /test
 # for i in {0..10}; do
	file="$(mktemp /test/zero.XXX)"
	dd if=/dev/zero of="$file" bs=1M count=256
	sync
	rm $file
    done
  # fstrim -v /test

Observing this with tracepoints on, we see the following writes:

fstrim-18019 [022] .... 91107.302026: bcache_write: 73f95583-561c-408f-a93a-4cbd2498f5c8 inode 0  DS 4260112 + 196352 hit 0 bypass 1
fstrim-18019 [022] .... 91107.302050: bcache_write: 73f95583-561c-408f-a93a-4cbd2498f5c8 inode 0  DS 4456464 + 262144 hit 0 bypass 1
fstrim-18019 [022] .... 91107.302075: bcache_write: 73f95583-561c-408f-a93a-4cbd2498f5c8 inode 0  DS 4718608 + 81920 hit 0 bypass 1
fstrim-18019 [022] .... 91107.302094: bcache_write: 73f95583-561c-408f-a93a-4cbd2498f5c8 inode 0  DS 5324816 + 180224 hit 0 bypass 1
fstrim-18019 [022] .... 91107.302121: bcache_write: 73f95583-561c-408f-a93a-4cbd2498f5c8 inode 0  DS 5505040 + 262144 hit 0 bypass 1
fstrim-18019 [022] .... 91107.302145: bcache_write: 73f95583-561c-408f-a93a-4cbd2498f5c8 inode 0  DS 5767184 + 81920 hit 0 bypass 1
fstrim-18019 [022] .... 91107.308777: bcache_write: 73f95583-561c-408f-a93a-4cbd2498f5c8 inode 0  DS 6373392 + 180224 hit 1 bypass 0
<crash>

Note the final one has different hit/bypass flags.

This is because in should_writeback(), we were hitting a case where
the partial stripe condition was returning true and so
should_writeback() was returning true early.

If that hadn't been the case, it would have hit the would_skip test, and
as would_skip == s->iop.bypass == true, should_writeback() would have
returned false.

Looking at the git history from 'commit 72c27061 ("bcache: Write out
full stripes")', it looks like the idea was to optimise for raid5/6:

       * If a stripe is already dirty, force writes to that stripe to
	 writeback mode - to help build up full stripes of dirty data

To fix this issue, make sure that should_writeback() on a discard op
never returns true.

More details of debugging:
https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-bcache/msg06996.html

Previous reports:
 - https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=201051
 - https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=196103
 - https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-bcache/msg06885.html

(Coly Li: minor modification to follow maximum 75 chars per line rule)

Cc: Kent Overstreet <koverstreet@google.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: 72c27061 ("bcache: Write out full stripes")
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Axtens <dja@axtens.net>
Signed-off-by: NColy Li <colyli@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
      622afe5c
  9. 14 11月, 2018 5 次提交
  11. 27 9月, 2018 1 次提交
    • G
      bcache: add separate workqueue for journal_write to avoid deadlock · 0f843e65
      由 Guoju Fang 提交于 
      After write SSD completed, bcache schedules journal_write work to
system_wq, which is a public workqueue in system, without WQ_MEM_RECLAIM
flag. system_wq is also a bound wq, and there may be no idle kworker on
current processor. Creating a new kworker may unfortunately need to
reclaim memory first, by shrinking cache and slab used by vfs, which
depends on bcache device. That's a deadlock.

This patch create a new workqueue for journal_write with WQ_MEM_RECLAIM
flag. It's rescuer thread will work to avoid the deadlock.
Signed-off-by: NGuoju Fang <fangguoju@gmail.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: NColy Li <colyli@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
      0f843e65
  13. 23 8月, 2018 2 次提交
  15. 12 8月, 2018 17 次提交
  17. 11 8月, 2018 1 次提交
    • C
      bcache: fix error setting writeback_rate through sysfs interface · 46451874
      由 Coly Li 提交于 
      Commit ea8c5356 ("bcache: set max writeback rate when I/O request
is idle") changes struct bch_ratelimit member rate from uint32_t to
atomic_long_t and uses atomic_long_set() in drivers/md/bcache/sysfs.c
to set new writeback rate, after the input is converted from memory
buf to long int by sysfs_strtoul_clamp().

The above change has a problem because there is an implicit return
inside sysfs_strtoul_clamp() so the following atomic_long_set()
won't be called. This error is detected by 0day system with following
snipped smatch warnings:

drivers/md/bcache/sysfs.c:271 __cached_dev_store() error: uninitialized
symbol 'v'.
270  sysfs_strtoul_clamp(writeback_rate, v, 1, INT_MAX);
     ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
@271 atomic_long_set(&dc->writeback_rate.rate, v);

This patch fixes the above error by using strtoul_safe_clamp() to
convert the input buffer into a long int type result.

Fixes: ea8c5356 ("bcache: set max writeback rate when I/O request is idle")
Cc: Kai Krakow <kai@kaishome.de>
Cc: Stefan Priebe <s.priebe@profihost.ag>
Signed-off-by: NColy Li <colyli@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
      46451874
  19. 09 8月, 2018 3 次提交
    • S
      bcache: trivial - remove tailing backslash in macro BTREE_FLAG · cbb751c0
      由 Shenghui Wang 提交于 
      Remove the tailing backslash in macro BTREE_FLAG in btree.h
Signed-off-by: NShenghui Wang <shhuiw@foxmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NColy Li <colyli@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
      cbb751c0
    • S
      bcache: make the pr_err statement used for ENOENT only in sysfs_attatch section · e921efeb
      由 Shenghui Wang 提交于 
      The pr_err statement in the code for sysfs_attatch section would run
for various error codes, which maybe confusing.

E.g,

Run the command twice:
   echo 796b5c05-b03c-4bc7-9cbd-a8df5e8be891 > \
				/sys/block/bcache0/bcache/attach
   [the backing dev got attached on the first run]
   echo 796b5c05-b03c-4bc7-9cbd-a8df5e8be891 > \
				/sys/block/bcache0/bcache/attach

In dmesg, after the command run twice, we can get:
	bcache: bch_cached_dev_attach() Can't attach sda6: already attached
	bcache: __cached_dev_store() Can't attach 796b5c05-b03c-4bc7-9cbd-\
a8df5e8be891
               : cache set not found
The first statement in the message was right, but the second was
confusing.

bch_cached_dev_attach has various pr_ statements for various error
codes, except ENOENT.

After the change, rerun above command twice:
	echo 796b5c05-b03c-4bc7-9cbd-a8df5e8be891 > \
			/sys/block/bcache0/bcache/attach
	echo 796b5c05-b03c-4bc7-9cbd-a8df5e8be891 > \
			/sys/block/bcache0/bcache/attach

In dmesg we only got:
	bcache: bch_cached_dev_attach() Can't attach sda6: already attached
No confusing "cache set not found" message anymore.

And for some not exist SET-UUID:
	echo 796b5c05-b03c-4bc7-9cbd-a8df5e8be898 > \
			/sys/block/bcache0/bcache/attach
In dmesg we can get:
	bcache: __cached_dev_store() Can't attach 796b5c05-b03c-4bc7-9cbd-\
a8df5e8be898
	               : cache set not found
Signed-off-by: NShenghui Wang <shhuiw@foxmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NColy Li <colyli@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
      e921efeb
    • C
      bcache: set max writeback rate when I/O request is idle · ea8c5356
      由 Coly Li 提交于 
      Commit b1092c9a ("bcache: allow quick writeback when backing idle")
allows the writeback rate to be faster if there is no I/O request on a
bcache device. It works well if there is only one bcache device attached
to the cache set. If there are many bcache devices attached to a cache
set, it may introduce performance regression because multiple faster
writeback threads of the idle bcache devices will compete the btree level
locks with the bcache device who have I/O requests coming.

This patch fixes the above issue by only permitting fast writebac when
all bcache devices attached on the cache set are idle. And if one of the
bcache devices has new I/O request coming, minimized all writeback
throughput immediately and let PI controller __update_writeback_rate()
to decide the upcoming writeback rate for each bcache device.

Also when all bcache devices are idle, limited wrieback rate to a small
number is wast of thoughput, especially when backing devices are slower
non-rotation devices (e.g. SATA SSD). This patch sets a max writeback
rate for each backing device if the whole cache set is idle. A faster
writeback rate in idle time means new I/Os may have more available space
for dirty data, and people may observe a better write performance then.

Please note bcache may change its cache mode in run time, and this patch
still works if the cache mode is switched from writeback mode and there
is still dirty data on cache.

Fixes: Commit b1092c9a ("bcache: allow quick writeback when backing idle")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org #4.16+
Signed-off-by: NColy Li <colyli@suse.de>
Tested-by: NKai Krakow <kai@kaishome.de>
Tested-by: NStefan Priebe <s.priebe@profihost.ag>
Cc: Michael Lyle <mlyle@lyle.org>
Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
      ea8c5356