bcache: use (REQ_META|REQ_PRIO) to indicate bio for metadata
commit dc7292a5bcb4c878b076fca2ac3fc22f81b8f8df upstream. In 'commit 752f66a75aba ("bcache: use REQ_PRIO to indicate bio for metadata")' REQ_META is replaced by REQ_PRIO to indicate metadata bio. This assumption is not always correct, e.g. XFS uses REQ_META to mark metadata bio other than REQ_PRIO. This is why Nix noticed that bcache does not cache metadata for XFS after the above commit. Thanks to Dave Chinner, he explains the difference between REQ_META and REQ_PRIO from view of file system developer. Here I quote part of his explanation from mailing list, REQ_META is used for metadata. REQ_PRIO is used to communicate to the lower layers that the submitter considers this IO to be more important that non REQ_PRIO IO and so dispatch should be expedited. IOWs, if the filesystem considers metadata IO to be more important that user data IO, then it will use REQ_PRIO | REQ_META rather than just REQ_META. Then it seems bios with REQ_META or REQ_PRIO should both be cached for performance optimation, because they are all probably low I/O latency demand by upper layer (e.g. file system). So in this patch, when we want to decide whether to bypass the cache, REQ_META and REQ_PRIO are both checked. Then both metadata and high priority I/O requests will be handled properly. Reported-by: NNix <nix@esperi.org.uk> Signed-off-by: NColy Li <colyli@suse.de> Reviewed-by: NAndre Noll <maan@tuebingen.mpg.de> Tested-by: NNix <nix@esperi.org.uk> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Showing
想要评论请 注册 或 登录