- 18 10月, 2013 2 次提交
-
-
由 dingtianhong 提交于
The commit 278b2083 (bonding: initial RCU conversion) has convert the roundrobin, active-backup, broadcast and xor xmit path to rcu protection, the performance will be better for these mode, so this time, convert xmit path for alb mode. Signed-off-by: NDing Tianhong <dingtianhong@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: NYang Yingliang <yangyingliang@huawei.com> Cc: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@redhat.com> Cc: Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 dingtianhong 提交于
The commit 278b2083 (bonding: initial RCU conversion) has convert the roundrobin, active-backup, broadcast and xor xmit path to rcu protection, the performance will be better for these mode, so this time, convert xmit path for 3ad mode. Suggested-by: NNikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@redhat.com> Suggested-by: NVeaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDing Tianhong <dingtianhong@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: NWang Yufen <wangyufen@huawei.com> Cc: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@redhat.com> Cc: Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 09 10月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Veaceslav Falico 提交于
Currently, in TLB mode we change mac addresses only by memcpy-ing the to net_device->dev_addr, without actually setting them via dev_set_mac_address(). This permits us to receive all the traffic always on one mac address. However, in case the interface flips, some drivers might enforce the mac filtering for its FW/HW based on current ->dev_addr, and thus we won't be able to receive traffic on that interface, in case it will be selected as active in TLB mode. Fix it by setting the mac address forcefully on every new active slave that we select in TLB mode. CC: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com> CC: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net> CC: Yuval Mintz <yuvalmin@broadcom.com> Reported-by: NYuval Mintz <yuvalmin@broadcom.com> Tested-by: NYuval Mintz <yuvalmin@broadcom.com> Signed-off-by: NVeaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 04 10月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Nikolay Aleksandrov 提交于
This patch adds two new hash policy modes which use skb_flow_dissect: 3 - Encapsulated layer 2+3 4 - Encapsulated layer 3+4 There should be a good improvement for tunnel users in those modes. It also changes the old hash functions to: hash ^= (__force u32)flow.dst ^ (__force u32)flow.src; hash ^= (hash >> 16); hash ^= (hash >> 8); Where hash will be initialized either to L2 hash, that is SRCMAC[5] XOR DSTMAC[5], or to flow->ports which should be extracted from the upper layer. Flow's dst and src are also extracted based on the xmit policy either directly from the buffer or by using skb_flow_dissect, but in both cases if the protocol is IPv6 then dst and src are obtained by ipv6_addr_hash() on the real addresses. In case of a non-dissectable packet, the algorithms fall back to L2 hashing. The bond_set_mode_ops() function is now obsolete and thus deleted because it was used only to set the proper hash policy. Also we trim a pointer from struct bonding because we no longer need to keep the hash function, now there's only a single hash function - bond_xmit_hash that works based on bond->params.xmit_policy. The hash function and skb_flow_dissect were suggested by Eric Dumazet. The layer names were suggested by Andy Gospodarek, because I suck at semantics. Signed-off-by: NNikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@redhat.com> Acked-by: NEric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Acked-by: NVeaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 01 10月, 2013 3 次提交
-
-
由 Veaceslav Falico 提交于
Currently we rely on rtnl locking in bond_set_rx_mode(), however it's not always the case: RTNL: assertion failed at drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c (3391) ... [<ffffffff81651ca5>] dump_stack+0x54/0x74 [<ffffffffa029e717>] bond_set_rx_mode+0xc7/0xd0 [bonding] [<ffffffff81553af7>] __dev_set_rx_mode+0x57/0xa0 [<ffffffff81557ff8>] __dev_mc_add+0x58/0x70 [<ffffffff81558020>] dev_mc_add+0x10/0x20 [<ffffffff8161e26e>] igmp6_group_added+0x18e/0x1d0 [<ffffffff81186f76>] ? kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0x236/0x260 [<ffffffff8161f80f>] ipv6_dev_mc_inc+0x29f/0x320 [<ffffffff8161f9e7>] ipv6_sock_mc_join+0x157/0x260 ... Fix this by using RCU primitives. Reported-by: NJoe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@stratus.com> Tested-by: NJoe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@stratus.com> CC: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com> CC: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net> Signed-off-by: NVeaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Neil Horman 提交于
Recently grabbed this report: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1005567 Of an issue in which the bonding driver, with an attached vlan encountered the following errors when bond0 was taken down and back up: dummy1: promiscuity touches roof, set promiscuity failed. promiscuity feature of device might be broken. The error occurs because, during __bond_release_one, if we release our last slave, we take on a random mac address and issue a NETDEV_CHANGEADDR notification. With an attached vlan, the vlan may see that the vlan and bond mac address were in sync, but no longer are. This triggers a call to dev_uc_add and dev_set_rx_mode, which enables IFF_PROMISC on the bond device. Then, when we complete __bond_release_one, we use the current state of the bond flags to determine if we should decrement the promiscuity of the releasing slave. But since the bond changed promiscuity state during the release operation, we incorrectly decrement the slave promisc count when it wasn't in promiscuous mode to begin with, causing the above error Fix is pretty simple, just cache the bonding flags at the start of the function and use those when determining the need to set promiscuity. This is also needed for the ALLMULTI flag CC: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com> CC: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net> CC: Mark Wu <wudxw@linux.vnet.ibm.com> CC: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net> Reported-by: NMark Wu <wudxw@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Veaceslav Falico 提交于
It's a forgotten function declaration, which was removed some time ago already. CC: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com> CC: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net> Signed-off-by: NVeaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 29 9月, 2013 11 次提交
-
-
由 Veaceslav Falico 提交于
There are no users left, so it's safe to remove. CC: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com> CC: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net> Signed-off-by: NVeaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Veaceslav Falico 提交于
We don't need the circular loop there and it's the only current user of bond_next_slave() - so just use the standard bond_for_each_slave(). CC: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com> CC: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net> Signed-off-by: NVeaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Veaceslav Falico 提交于
It has no users, so it's safe to remove it completely. CC: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com> CC: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net> Signed-off-by: NVeaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Veaceslav Falico 提交于
Convert all instances of for (agg = __get_first_agg(); agg; agg = __get_next_port) to the standard bond_for_each_slave(). CC: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com> CC: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net> Signed-off-by: NVeaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Veaceslav Falico 提交于
Convert all instances of for (agg = __get_first_agg(); agg; agg = __get_next_port) to the standard bond_for_each_slave(). Also, remove the useless checks before calling bond_3ad_set_carrier() - if we have something NULL - it would fire long ago, in __get_first/next_port(), per example. CC: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com> CC: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net> Signed-off-by: NVeaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Veaceslav Falico 提交于
Currently we're relying on suboptimal construct for (; aggregator; aggregator = __get_next_agg(aggregator)) { where aggregator is an argument of __get_active_agg() which is _always_ the first slave's aggregator - judging by all the callers, comments in the ad_agg_selection_logic() and by logic. Convert it to use the standard bond_for_each_slave(). CC: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com> CC: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net> Signed-off-by: NVeaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Veaceslav Falico 提交于
Currently, ad_port_selection_logic() uses for (aggregator = __get_first_agg(port); aggregator; aggregator = __get_next_agg(aggregator)) { construct, however it's suboptimal, difficult to read and understand. Change it to a standard bond_for_each_slave(), so that we won't need __get_first/next_agg() and have it more readable. CC: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com> CC: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net> Signed-off-by: NVeaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Veaceslav Falico 提交于
Currently we have only one user of it, so it's kind of useless and just obfusicates things. Remove it and move the logic to the only user - bond_3ad_state_machine_handler(). CC: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com> CC: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net> Signed-off-by: NVeaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Veaceslav Falico 提交于
Currently this function is only used in constructs like for (port = __get_first_port(bond); port; port = __get_next_port(port)) which is basicly the same as bond_for_each_slave(bond, slave, iter) { port = &(SLAVE_AD_INFO(slave).port); but a more time consuming. Remove the function and convert the users to bond_for_each_slave(). CC: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com> CC: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net> Signed-off-by: NVeaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Veaceslav Falico 提交于
After commit 1f718f0f ("bonding: populate neighbour's private on enslave"), we've moved the unlinking of the slave to the earliest position possible - so that nobody will see an half-uninited slave. However, bond_3ad_unbind_slave() relied that, even while removing the last slave, it is still accessible - via __get_first_agg() (and, eventually, bond_first_slave()). Fix that by verifying if the aggregator return is an actual aggregator, but not NULL. CC: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com> CC: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net> Signed-off-by: NVeaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Veaceslav Falico 提交于
After commit 1f718f0f ("bonding: populate neighbour's private on enslave"), we've moved the actual 'linking' in the end of the function - so that, once linked, the slave is ready to be used, and is not still in the process of enslaving. However, 802.3ad verified if it's the first slave by looking at the if (bond_first_slave(bond) == new_slave) which, because we've moved the linking to the end, became broken - on the first slave bond_first_slave(bond) returns NULL. Fix this by verifying if the prev_slave, that equals bond_last_slave(), is actually populated - if it is - then it's not the first slave, and vice versa. CC: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com> CC: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net> Signed-off-by: NVeaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 27 9月, 2013 20 次提交
-
-
由 Veaceslav Falico 提交于
Also, remove the same functionality from bonding - it will be already done for any device that links to its lower/upper neighbour. The links will be created for dev's kobject, and will look like lower_eth0 for lower device eth0 and upper_bridge0 for upper device bridge0. CC: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com> CC: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net> CC: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net> CC: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> CC: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us> CC: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NVeaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Veaceslav Falico 提交于
Currently, we can have only one master upper neighbour, so it would be useful to create a symlink to it in the sysfs device directory, the way that bonding now does it, for every device. Lower devices from bridge/team/etc will automagically get it, so we could rely on it. Also, remove the same functionality from bonding. CC: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com> CC: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net> CC: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net> CC: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> CC: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us> CC: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NVeaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Veaceslav Falico 提交于
And all the initialization. CC: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com> CC: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net> Signed-off-by: NVeaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Veaceslav Falico 提交于
Use the new function __bond_next_slave(). CC: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com> CC: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net> Signed-off-by: NVeaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Veaceslav Falico 提交于
Add a new function, __bond_next_slave(), which uses neighbours to find the next slave after the slave provided. It will be further used to gradually go start using neighbour netdev_adjacent infrastructure instead of bonding's own lists. CC: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com> CC: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net> CC: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@solarflare.com> Signed-off-by: NVeaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Veaceslav Falico 提交于
We don't really need it, and it's really hard to RCUify the list->prev. CC: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com> CC: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net> Signed-off-by: NVeaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Veaceslav Falico 提交于
For that, use netdev_adjacent_get_private(list_head) on bond's lower neighbour list members. Also, add a small macro - bond_slave_list(bond), which returns the bond list via neighbour list. CC: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com> CC: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net> Signed-off-by: NVeaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Veaceslav Falico 提交于
The same way as it was used for its own slave_list. CC: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com> CC: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net> Signed-off-by: NVeaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Veaceslav Falico 提交于
Currently we verify if we have slaves by checking if bond->slave_list is empty. Create a define bond_has_slaves() and use it, a bit more readable and easier to change in the future. CC: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com> CC: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net> Signed-off-by: NVeaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Veaceslav Falico 提交于
It has no users, so we can remove it. CC: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com> CC: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net> Signed-off-by: NVeaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Veaceslav Falico 提交于
Currently it uses the hard-to-rcuify bond_for_each_slave_from(), and also it doesn't check every slave for disrepencies between the actual IS_UP(slave) and the slave->link == BOND_LINK_UP, but only till we find the next suitable slave. Fix this by using bond_for_each_slave() and storing the first good slave in *before till we find the current_arp_slave, after that we store the first good slave in new_slave. If new_slave is empty - use the slave stored in before, and if it's also empty - then we didn't find any suitable slave. Also, in the meanwhile, check for each slave status. CC: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com> CC: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net> Signed-off-by: NVeaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Veaceslav Falico 提交于
bond_find_best_slave() does not have to be balanced - i.e. return the slave that is *after* some other slave, but rather return the best slave that suits, except of bond->primary_slave - in which case we just return it if it's suitable. After that we just look through all the slaves and return either first up slave or the slave whose link came back earliest. We also don't care about curr_active_slave lock cause we use it in bond_should_change_active() only and there we take it right away - i.e. it won't go away. CC: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com> CC: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net> Signed-off-by: NVeaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Veaceslav Falico 提交于
Currently, we're using bond_for_each_slave_from(), which is really hard to implement under RCU and/or neighbour list. Remove it and use bond_for_each_slave() instead, taking care of the last used slave. Also, rename next_rx_slave to rx_slave and store the current (last) rx_slave. CC: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com> CC: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net> Signed-off-by: NVeaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Veaceslav Falico 提交于
Currently, there are two loops - first we find the first slave in an aggregator after the xmit_hash_policy() returned number, and after that we loop from that slave, over bonding head, and till that slave to find any suitable slave to send the packet through. Replace it by just one bond_for_each_slave() loop, which first loops through the requested number of slaves, saving the first suitable one, and after that we've hit the requested number of slaves to skip - search for any up slave to send the packet through. If we don't find such kind of slave - then just send the packet through the first suitable slave found. Logic remains unchainged, and we skip two loops. Also, refactor it a bit for readability. CC: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com> CC: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net> Signed-off-by: NVeaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Veaceslav Falico 提交于
We're safe agains removal there, cause we use neighbours primitives. CC: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com> CC: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net> Signed-off-by: NVeaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Veaceslav Falico 提交于
It needs a list_head *iter, so add it wherever needed. Use both non-rcu and rcu variants. CC: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com> CC: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net> CC: Dimitris Michailidis <dm@chelsio.com> Signed-off-by: NVeaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Veaceslav Falico 提交于
We only use it in rollback scenarios and can easily use the standart bond_for_each_dev() instead. CC: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com> CC: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net> Signed-off-by: NVeaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Veaceslav Falico 提交于
It should be used under rtnl/bonding lock, so use the non-RCU version. CC: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com> CC: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net> Signed-off-by: NVeaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Veaceslav Falico 提交于
Use the new provided function when attaching the lower slave to populate its ->private with struct slave *new_slave. Also, move it to the end to be able to 'find' it only after it was completely initialized, and deinitialize in the first place on release. CC: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com> CC: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net> Signed-off-by: NVeaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Veaceslav Falico 提交于
Currently, we distinguish neighbours (first-level linked devices) from non-neighbours by the neighbour bool in the netdev_adjacent. This could be quite time-consuming in case we would like to traverse *only* through neighbours - cause we'd have to traverse through all devices and check for this flag, and in a (quite common) scenario where we have lots of vlans on top of bridge, which is on top of a bond - the bonding would have to go through all those vlans to get its upper neighbour linked devices. This situation is really unpleasant, cause there are already a lot of cases when a device with slaves needs to go through them in hot path. To fix this, introduce a new upper/lower device lists structure - adj_list, which contains only the neighbours. It works always in pair with the all_adj_list structure (renamed from upper/lower_dev_list), i.e. both of them contain the same links, only that all_adj_list contains also non-neighbour device links. It's really a small change visible, currently, only for __netdev_adjacent_dev_insert/remove(), and doesn't change the main linked logic at all. Also, add some comments a fix a name collision in netdev_for_each_upper_dev_rcu() and rework the naming by the following rules: netdev_(all_)(upper|lower)_* If "all_" is present, then we work with the whole list of upper/lower devices, otherwise - only with direct neighbours. Uninline functions - to get better stack traces. CC: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net> CC: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> CC: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us> CC: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@intel.com> CC: Cong Wang <amwang@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NVeaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 16 9月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Neil Horman 提交于
running bonding in ALB mode requires that learning packets be sent periodically, so that the switch knows where to send responding traffic. However, depending on switch configuration, there may not be any need to send traffic at the default rate of 3 packets per second, which represents little more than wasted data. Allow the ALB learning packet interval to be made configurable via sysfs Signed-off-by: NNeil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com> Acked-by: NAcked-by: Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com> CC: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com> CC: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net> CC: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net> Signed-off-by: NAndy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 12 9月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 nikolay@redhat.com 提交于
We make bond_arp_rcv global so it can be used in bond_sysfs if the bond interface is up and arp_interval is being changed to a positive value and cleared otherwise as per Jay's suggestion. This also fixes a problem where bond_arp_rcv was set even though arp_validate was disabled while the bond was up by unsetting recv_probe in bond_store_arp_validate and respectively setting it if enabled. Signed-off-by: NNikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NMarcelo Ricardo Leitner <mleitner@redhat.com> Acked-by: NVeaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-