- 10 8月, 2017 1 次提交
-
-
由 Viresh Kumar 提交于
CPUFREQ_ENTRY_INVALID is a special symbol which is used to specify that an entry in the cpufreq table is invalid. But using it outside of the scope of the cpufreq table looks a bit incorrect. We can represent an invalid frequency by writing it as 0 instead if we need. Note that it is already done that way for the return value of the ->get() callback. Lets do the same for ->fast_switch() and not use CPUFREQ_ENTRY_INVALID outside of the scope of cpufreq table. Also update the comment over cpufreq_driver_fast_switch() to clearly mention what this returns. None of the drivers return CPUFREQ_ENTRY_INVALID as of now from ->fast_switch() callback and so we don't need to update any of those. Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 27 6月, 2017 1 次提交
-
-
由 Len Brown 提交于
The goal of this change is to give users a uniform and meaningful result when they read /sys/...cpufreq/scaling_cur_freq on modern x86 hardware, as compared to what they get today. Modern x86 processors include the hardware needed to accurately calculate frequency over an interval -- APERF, MPERF, and the TSC. Here we provide an x86 routine to make this calculation on supported hardware, and use it in preference to any driver driver-specific cpufreq_driver.get() routine. MHz is computed like so: MHz = base_MHz * delta_APERF / delta_MPERF MHz is the average frequency of the busy processor over a measurement interval. The interval is defined to be the time between successive invocations of aperfmperf_khz_on_cpu(), which are expected to to happen on-demand when users read sysfs attribute cpufreq/scaling_cur_freq. As with previous methods of calculating MHz, idle time is excluded. base_MHz above is from TSC calibration global "cpu_khz". This x86 native method to calculate MHz returns a meaningful result no matter if P-states are controlled by hardware or firmware and/or if the Linux cpufreq sub-system is or is-not installed. When this routine is invoked more frequently, the measurement interval becomes shorter. However, the code limits re-computation to 10ms intervals so that average frequency remains meaningful. Discerning users are encouraged to take advantage of the turbostat(8) utility, which can gracefully handle concurrent measurement intervals of arbitrary length. Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 30 5月, 2017 1 次提交
-
-
由 David Arcari 提交于
For a driver that does not set the CPUFREQ_STICKY flag, if all of the ->init() calls fail, cpufreq_register_driver() should return an error. This will prevent the driver from loading. Fixes: ce1bcfe9 (cpufreq: check cpufreq_policy_list instead of scanning policies for all CPUs) Cc: 4.0+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 4.0+ Signed-off-by: NDavid Arcari <darcari@redhat.com> Acked-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 26 5月, 2017 1 次提交
-
-
cpufreq holds get_online_cpus() while invoking cpuhp_setup_state_nocalls() to make subsys_interface_register() and the registration of hotplug calls atomic versus cpu hotplug. cpuhp_setup_state_nocalls() invokes get_online_cpus() as well. This is correct, but prevents the conversion of the hotplug locking to a percpu rwsem. Use cpuhp_setup/remove_state_nocalls_cpuslocked() to avoid the nested call. Convert *_online_cpus() to the new interfaces while at it. Signed-off-by: NSebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Tested-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Acked-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Acked-by: N"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Cc: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170524081547.731628408@linutronix.de
-
- 13 4月, 2017 1 次提交
-
-
由 Chen Yu 提交于
There is a report that after commit 27622b06 ("cpufreq: Convert to hotplug state machine"), the normal CPU offline/online cycle fails on some platforms. According to the ftrace result, this problem was triggered on platforms using acpi-cpufreq as the default cpufreq driver, and due to the lack of some ACPI freq method (eg. _PCT), cpufreq_online() failed and returned a negative value, so the CPU hotplug state machine rolled back the CPU online process. Actually, from the user's perspective, the failure of cpufreq_online() should not prevent that CPU from being brought up, although cpufreq might not work on that CPU. BTW, during system startup cpufreq_online() is not invoked via CPU online but by the cpufreq device creation process, so the APs can be brought up even though cpufreq_online() fails in that stage. This patch ignores the return value of cpufreq_online/offline() and lets the cpufreq framework deal with the failure. cpufreq_online() itself will do a proper rollback in that case and if _PCT is missing, the ACPI cpufreq driver will print a warning if the corresponding debug options have been enabled. Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=194581 Fixes: 27622b06 ("cpufreq: Convert to hotplug state machine") Reported-and-tested-by: NTomasz Maciej Nowak <tmn505@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NChen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com> Acked-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Cc: 4.9+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 4.9+ Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 28 3月, 2017 1 次提交
-
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
The cpufreq core only tries to create symbolic links from CPU directories in sysfs to policy directories in cpufreq_add_dev(), either when a given CPU is registered or when the cpufreq driver is registered, whichever happens first. That is not sufficient, however, because cpufreq_add_dev() may be called for an offline CPU whose policy object has not been created yet and, quite obviously, the symbolic cannot be added in that case. Fix that by making cpufreq_online() attempt to add symbolic links to policy objects for the CPUs in the related_cpus mask of every new policy object created by it. The cpufreq_driver_lock locking around the for_each_cpu() loop in cpufreq_online() is dropped, because it is not necessary and the code is somewhat simpler without it. Moreover, failures to create a symbolic link will not be regarded as hard errors any more and the CPUs without those links will not be taken offline automatically, but that should not be problematic in practice. Reported-and-tested-by: NPrashanth Prakash <pprakash@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Cc: 4.9+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 4.9+
-
- 22 3月, 2017 1 次提交
-
-
由 Viresh Kumar 提交于
On CPU online the cpufreq core restores the previous governor (or the previous "policy" setting for ->setpolicy drivers), but it does not restore the min/max limits at the same time, which is confusing, inconsistent and real pain for users who set the limits and then suspend/resume the system (using full suspend), in which case the limits are reset on all CPUs except for the boot one. Fix this by making cpufreq_online() restore the limits when an inactive policy is brought online. The commit log and patch are inspired from Rafael's earlier work. Reported-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Cc: 4.3+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 4.3+ Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 16 3月, 2017 1 次提交
-
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
There is a missing newline in show_cpuinfo_cur_freq(), so add it, but while at it clean that function up somewhat too. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Cc: All applicable <stable@vger.kernel.org>
-
- 06 3月, 2017 1 次提交
-
-
由 Len Brown 提交于
Add the "cpufreq.off=1" cmdline option. At boot-time, this allows a user to request CONFIG_CPU_FREQ=n behavior from a kernel built with CONFIG_CPU_FREQ=y. This is analogous to the existing "cpuidle.off=1" option and CONFIG_CPU_IDLE=y This capability is valuable when we need to debug end-user issues in the BIOS or in Linux. It is also convenient for enabling comparisons, which may otherwise require a new kernel, or help from BIOS SETUP, which may be buggy or unavailable. Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 16 2月, 2017 1 次提交
-
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
If new_policy is set in cpufreq_online(), the policy object has just been created and its real_cpus mask has been zeroed on allocation, and the driver's ->init() callback should not touch it. It doesn't need to be cleared again, so don't do that. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
-
- 04 2月, 2017 2 次提交
-
-
由 Viresh Kumar 提交于
Its not used anymore, remove it. Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Viresh Kumar 提交于
Those were added by: commit fcd7af91 ("cpufreq: stats: handle cpufreq_unregister_driver() and suspend/resume properly") but aren't used anymore since: commit 1aefc75b ("cpufreq: stats: Make the stats code non-modular"). Remove them. Also remove the redundant parameter to the respective routines. Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 01 2月, 2017 1 次提交
-
-
由 Frederic Weisbecker 提交于
Kernel CPU stats are stored in cputime_t which is an architecture defined type, and hence a bit opaque and requiring accessors and mutators for any operation. Converting them to nsecs simplifies the code and is one step toward the removal of cputime_t in the core code. Signed-off-by: NFrederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com> Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> Cc: Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@redhat.com> Cc: Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@hotmail.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1485832191-26889-4-git-send-email-fweisbec@gmail.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
- 21 11月, 2016 2 次提交
-
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
The return value of cpufreq_update_policy() is never used, so make it void. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
There are two places in the cpufreq core in which low-level driver callbacks may be invoked for an inactive cpufreq policy, which isn't guaranteed to work in general. Both are due to possible races with CPU offline. First, in cpufreq_get(), the policy may become inactive after the check against policy->cpus in cpufreq_cpu_get() and before policy->rwsem is acquired, in which case using it going forward may not be correct. Second, an analogous situation is possible in cpufreq_update_policy(). Avoid using inactive policies by adding policy_is_inactive() checks to the code in the above places. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
-
- 20 9月, 2016 2 次提交
-
-
The function cpufreq_register_driver() returns zero on success and since commit 27622b06 ("cpufreq: Convert to hotplug state machine") erroneously a positive number. Due to the "if (x) assume_error" construct all callers assumed an error and as a consequence the cpu freq kworker crashes with a NULL pointer dereference. Reset the return value back to zero in the success case. Fixes: 27622b06 ("cpufreq: Convert to hotplug state machine") Reported-by: NBorislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Reported-and-tested-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NSebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> Cc: peterz@infradead.org Cc: rjw@rjwysocki.net Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160920145628.lp2bmq72ip3oiash@linutronix.deSigned-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
-
Install the callbacks via the state machine. Signed-off-by: NSebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> Acked-by: N"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> Cc: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.or Cc: rt@linutronix.de Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160906170457.32393-13-bigeasy@linutronix.deSigned-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
-
- 13 9月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Viresh Kumar 提交于
If a cpufreq driver is registered very early in the boot stage (e.g. registered from postcore_initcall()), then cpufreq core may generate kernel warnings for it. In this case, the CPUs are brought online, then the cpufreq driver is registered, and then the CPU topology devices are registered. However, by the time cpufreq_add_dev() gets called, the cpu device isn't stored in the per-cpu variable (cpu_sys_devices,) which is read by get_cpu_device(). So the cpufreq core fails to get device for the CPU, for which cpufreq_add_dev() was called in the first place and we will hit a WARN_ON(!cpu_dev). Even if we reuse the 'dev' parameter passed to cpufreq_add_dev() to avoid that warning, there might be other CPUs online that share the policy with the cpu for which cpufreq_add_dev() is called. Eventually get_cpu_device() will return NULL for them as well, and we will hit the same WARN_ON() again. In order to fix these issues, change cpufreq core to create links to the policy for a cpu only when cpufreq_add_dev() is called for that CPU. Reuse the 'real_cpus' mask to track that as well. Note that cpufreq_remove_dev() already handles removal of the links for individual CPUs and cpufreq_add_dev() has aligned with that now. Reported-by: NRussell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk> Tested-by: NRussell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 01 9月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
Since cpufreq_policy_alloc() doesn't use its dev variable for anything useful, drop that variable from there along with the NULL check against it. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
-
- 22 7月, 2016 2 次提交
-
-
由 Steve Muckle 提交于
Export cpufreq_driver_resolve_freq() since governors may be compiled as modules. Reported-by: NStephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Signed-off-by: NSteve Muckle <smuckle@linaro.org> Acked-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Viresh Kumar 提交于
The handlers provided by cpufreq core are sufficient for resolving the frequency for drivers providing ->target_index(), as the core already has the frequency table and so ->resolve_freq() isn't required for such platforms. This patch disallows drivers with ->target_index() callback to use the ->resolve_freq() callback. Also, it fixes a potential kernel crash for drivers providing ->target() but no ->resolve_freq(). Fixes: e3c06236 "cpufreq: add cpufreq_driver_resolve_freq()" Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 21 7月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Steve Muckle 提交于
Cpufreq governors may need to know what a particular target frequency maps to in the driver without necessarily wanting to set the frequency. Support this operation via a new cpufreq API, cpufreq_driver_resolve_freq(). This API returns the lowest driver frequency equal or greater than the target frequency (CPUFREQ_RELATION_L), subject to any policy (min/max) or driver limitations. The mapping is also cached in the policy so that a subsequent fast_switch operation can avoid repeating the same lookup. The API will call a new cpufreq driver callback, resolve_freq(), if it has been registered by the driver. Otherwise the frequency is resolved via cpufreq_frequency_table_target(). Rather than require ->target() style drivers to provide a resolve_freq() callback it is left to the caller to ensure that the driver implements this callback if necessary to use cpufreq_driver_resolve_freq(). Suggested-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NSteve Muckle <smuckle@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 04 7月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
Both callers of cpufreq_update_current_freq(), cpufreq_update_policy() and cpufreq_start_governor(), check cpufreq_suspended before calling that function, so drop the redundant cpufreq_suspended check from it. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
-
- 28 6月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
CPU notifications from the firmware coming in when cpufreq is suspended cause cpufreq_update_current_freq() to return 0 which triggers the WARN_ON() in cpufreq_update_policy() for no reason. Avoid that by checking cpufreq_suspended before calling cpufreq_update_current_freq(). Fixes: c9d9c929 (cpufreq: Abort cpufreq_update_current_freq() for cpufreq_suspended set) Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Cc: 4.6+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 4.6+
-
- 09 6月, 2016 4 次提交
-
-
由 Viresh Kumar 提交于
This routine can't fail unless the frequency table is invalid and doesn't contain any valid entries. Make it return the index and WARN() in case it is used for an invalid table. Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Viresh Kumar 提交于
It is already present as part of the policy and so no need to pass it from the caller. Also, 'freq_table' is guaranteed to be valid in this function and so no need to check it. Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Viresh Kumar 提交于
The policy already has this pointer set, use it instead. Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Viresh Kumar 提交于
Most of the callers of cpufreq_frequency_get_table() already have the pointer to a valid 'policy' structure and they don't really need to go through the per-cpu variable first and then a check to validate the frequency, in order to find the freq-table for the policy. Directly use the policy->freq_table field instead for them. Only one user of that API is left after above changes, cpu_cooling.c and it accesses the freq_table in a racy way as the policy can get freed in between. Fix it by using cpufreq_cpu_get() properly. Since there are no more users of cpufreq_frequency_get_table() left, get rid of it. Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Acked-by: Javi Merino <javi.merino@arm.com> (cpu_cooling.c) Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 03 6月, 2016 5 次提交
-
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
The modularity of cpufreq_stats is quite problematic. First off, the usage of policy notifiers for the initialization and cleanup in the cpufreq_stats module is inherently racy with respect to CPU offline/online and the initialization and cleanup of the cpufreq driver. Second, fast frequency switching (used by the schedutil governor) cannot be enabled if any transition notifiers are registered, so if the cpufreq_stats module (that registers a transition notifier for updating transition statistics) is loaded, the schedutil governor cannot use fast frequency switching. On the other hand, allowing cpufreq_stats to be built as a module doesn't really add much value. Arguably, there's not much reason for that code to be modular at all. For the above reasons, make the cpufreq stats code non-modular, modify the core to invoke functions provided by that code directly and drop the notifiers from it. Make the stats sysfs attributes appear empty if fast frequency switching is enabled as the statistics will not be updated in that case anyway (and returning -EBUSY from those attributes breaks powertop). While at it, clean up Kconfig help for the CPU_FREQ_STAT and CPU_FREQ_STAT_DETAILS options. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
-
由 Viresh Kumar 提交于
Use clamp_val() instead of open coding it. Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Viresh Kumar 提交于
The sequence got a bit wrong as we are sending CPUFREQ_START notifications even before we have sent CPUFREQ_CREATE_POLICY. Fix it. Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
The 'initialized' field in struct cpufreq_governor is only used by the conservative governor (as a usage counter) and the way that happens is far from straightforward and arguably incorrect. Namely, the value of 'initialized' is checked by cpufreq_dbs_governor_init() and cpufreq_dbs_governor_exit() and the results of those checks are passed (as the second argument) to the ->init() and ->exit() callbacks in struct dbs_governor. Those callbacks are only implemented by the ondemand and conservative governors and ondemand doesn't use their second argument at all. In turn, the conservative governor uses it to decide whether or not to either register or unregister a transition notifier. That whole mechanism is not only unnecessarily convoluted, but also racy, because the 'initialized' field of struct cpufreq_governor is updated in cpufreq_init_governor() and cpufreq_exit_governor() under policy->rwsem which doesn't help if one of these functions is run twice in parallel for different policies (which isn't impossible in principle), for example. Instead of it, add a proper usage counter to the conservative governor and update it from cs_init() and cs_exit() which is guaranteed to be non-racy, as those functions are only called under gov_dbs_data_mutex which is global. With that in place, drop the 'initialized' field from struct cpufreq_governor as it is not used any more. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
The design of the cpufreq governor API is not very straightforward, as struct cpufreq_governor provides only one callback to be invoked from different code paths for different purposes. The purpose it is invoked for is determined by its second "event" argument, causing it to act as a "callback multiplexer" of sorts. Unfortunately, that leads to extra complexity in governors, some of which implement the ->governor() callback as a switch statement that simply checks the event argument and invokes a separate function to handle that specific event. That extra complexity can be eliminated by replacing the all-purpose ->governor() callback with a family of callbacks to carry out specific governor operations: initialization and exit, start and stop and policy limits updates. That also turns out to reduce the code size too, so do it. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
-
- 02 6月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
The return value of clamp_val() has to be stored actually. Fixes: b7898fda (cpufreq: Support for fast frequency switching) Reported-by: NSteve Muckle <steve.muckle@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
-
- 30 5月, 2016 3 次提交
-
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
The cpufreq_governor() routine is used by the cpufreq core to invoke the current governor's ->governor() callback with appropriate arguments and do some housekeeping related to that. Unfortunately, the way it mixes different governor events in one code path makes it rather hard to follow the code. For this reason, split cpufreq_governor() into five simpler functions that each will handle just one specific governor event and put all of the code related to the given event into its own function. This change is a prerequisite for a redesign of the cpufreq governor API that will be done subsequently. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
It is not necessary to check the governor's max_transition_latency attribute every time cpufreq_governor() runs, so check it only if the event argument is CPUFREQ_GOV_POLICY_INIT. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
None of the cpufreq governors currently in the tree will ever fail an invocation of the ->governor() callback with the event argument equal to CPUFREQ_GOV_LIMITS (unless invoked with incorrect arguments which doesn't matter anyway) and had it ever failed, the result of it wouldn't have been very clean. For this reason, rearrange the code in the core to ignore the return value of cpufreq_governor() when called with event equal to CPUFREQ_GOV_LIMITS. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
-
- 18 5月, 2016 3 次提交
-
-
由 Pankaj Gupta 提交于
simplified goto out in cpufreq_register_driver for increasing code readability Signed-off-by: NPankaj Gupta <pankaj.gupta@spreadtrum.com> Signed-off-by: NSanjeev Yadav <sanjeev.yadav@spreadtrum.com> Acked-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
None of the cpufreq governors currently in the tree will ever fail an invocation of the ->governor() callback with the event argument equal to CPUFREQ_GOV_STOP (unless invoked with incorrect arguments which doesn't matter anyway) and it is rather difficult to imagine a valid reason for such a failure. Accordingly, rearrange the code in the core to make it clear that this call never fails. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
None of the cpufreq governors currently in the tree will ever fail an invocation of the ->governor() callback with the event argument equal to CPUFREQ_GOV_POLICY_EXIT (unless invoked with incorrect arguments which doesn't matter anyway) and it wouldn't really make sense to fail it, because the caller won't be able to handle that failure in a meaningful way. Accordingly, rearrange the code in the core to make it clear that this call never fails. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
-