1. 22 3月, 2019 3 次提交
  2. 15 2月, 2019 1 次提交
    • T
      Revert "ext4: use ext4_write_inode() when fsyncing w/o a journal" · 28f49e76
      Theodore Ts'o 提交于
      commit 8fdd60f2ae3682caf2a7258626abc21eb4711892 upstream.
      
      This reverts commit ad211f3e94b314a910d4af03178a0b52a7d1ee0a.
      
      As Jan Kara pointed out, this change was unsafe since it means we lose
      the call to sync_mapping_buffers() in the nojournal case.  The
      original point of the commit was avoid taking the inode mutex (since
      it causes a lockdep warning in generic/113); but we need the mutex in
      order to call sync_mapping_buffers().
      
      The real fix to this problem was discussed here:
      
      https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20181025150540.259281-4-bvanassche@acm.org
      
      The proposed patch was to fix a syzbot complaint, but the problem can
      also demonstrated via "kvm-xfstests -c nojournal generic/113".
      Multiple solutions were discused in the e-mail thread, but none have
      landed in the kernel as of this writing.  Anyway, commit
      ad211f3e94b314 is absolutely the wrong way to suppress the lockdep, so
      revert it.
      
      Fixes: ad211f3e94b314a910d4af03178a0b52a7d1ee0a ("ext4: use ext4_write_inode() when fsyncing w/o a journal")
      Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
      Reported: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
      Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
      28f49e76
  3. 17 1月, 2019 6 次提交
    • T
      ext4: fix special inode number checks in __ext4_iget() · 5dc41af3
      Theodore Ts'o 提交于
      commit 191ce17876c9367819c4b0a25b503c0f6d9054d8 upstream.
      
      The check for special (reserved) inode number checks in __ext4_iget()
      was broken by commit 8a363970d1dc: ("ext4: avoid declaring fs
      inconsistent due to invalid file handles").  This was caused by a
      botched reversal of the sense of the flag now known as
      EXT4_IGET_SPECIAL (when it was previously named EXT4_IGET_NORMAL).
      Fix the logic appropriately.
      
      Fixes: 8a363970d1dc ("ext4: avoid declaring fs inconsistent...")
      Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
      Reported-by: NDan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
      Cc: stable@kernel.org
      Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
      5dc41af3
    • T
      ext4: track writeback errors using the generic tracking infrastructure · bb80ad0d
      Theodore Ts'o 提交于
      commit 95cb67138746451cc84cf8e516e14989746e93b0 upstream.
      
      We already using mapping_set_error() in fs/ext4/page_io.c, so all we
      need to do is to use file_check_and_advance_wb_err() when handling
      fsync() requests in ext4_sync_file().
      Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
      Cc: stable@kernel.org
      Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
      bb80ad0d
    • T
      ext4: use ext4_write_inode() when fsyncing w/o a journal · da38a1b4
      Theodore Ts'o 提交于
      commit ad211f3e94b314a910d4af03178a0b52a7d1ee0a upstream.
      
      In no-journal mode, we previously used __generic_file_fsync() in
      no-journal mode.  This triggers a lockdep warning, and in addition,
      it's not safe to depend on the inode writeback mechanism in the case
      ext4.  We can solve both problems by calling ext4_write_inode()
      directly.
      Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
      Cc: stable@kernel.org
      Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
      da38a1b4
    • T
      ext4: avoid kernel warning when writing the superblock to a dead device · 01db6e5c
      Theodore Ts'o 提交于
      commit e86807862e6880809f191c4cea7f88a489f0ed34 upstream.
      
      The xfstests generic/475 test switches the underlying device with
      dm-error while running a stress test.  This results in a large number
      of file system errors, and since we can't lock the buffer head when
      marking the superblock dirty in the ext4_grp_locked_error() case, it's
      possible the superblock to be !buffer_uptodate() without
      buffer_write_io_error() being true.
      
      We need to set buffer_uptodate() before we call mark_buffer_dirty() or
      this will trigger a WARN_ON.  It's safe to do this since the
      superblock must have been properly read into memory or the mount would
      have been successful.  So if buffer_uptodate() is not set, we can
      safely assume that this happened due to a failed attempt to write the
      superblock.
      Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
      Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
      Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
      01db6e5c
    • T
      ext4: fix a potential fiemap/page fault deadlock w/ inline_data · 926cdac1
      Theodore Ts'o 提交于
      commit 2b08b1f12cd664dc7d5c84ead9ff25ae97ad5491 upstream.
      
      The ext4_inline_data_fiemap() function calls fiemap_fill_next_extent()
      while still holding the xattr semaphore.  This is not necessary and it
      triggers a circular lockdep warning.  This is because
      fiemap_fill_next_extent() could trigger a page fault when it writes
      into page which triggers a page fault.  If that page is mmaped from
      the inline file in question, this could very well result in a
      deadlock.
      
      This problem can be reproduced using generic/519 with a file system
      configuration which has the inline_data feature enabled.
      Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
      Cc: stable@kernel.org
      Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
      926cdac1
    • T
      ext4: make sure enough credits are reserved for dioread_nolock writes · 7c2ea25e
      Theodore Ts'o 提交于
      commit 812c0cab2c0dfad977605dbadf9148490ca5d93f upstream.
      
      There are enough credits reserved for most dioread_nolock writes;
      however, if the extent tree is sufficiently deep, and/or quota is
      enabled, the code was not allowing for all eventualities when
      reserving journal credits for the unwritten extent conversion.
      
      This problem can be seen using xfstests ext4/034:
      
         WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 257 at fs/ext4/ext4_jbd2.c:271 __ext4_handle_dirty_metadata+0x10c/0x180
         Workqueue: ext4-rsv-conversion ext4_end_io_rsv_work
         RIP: 0010:__ext4_handle_dirty_metadata+0x10c/0x180
         	...
         EXT4-fs: ext4_free_blocks:4938: aborting transaction: error 28 in __ext4_handle_dirty_metadata
         EXT4: jbd2_journal_dirty_metadata failed: handle type 11 started at line 4921, credits 4/0, errcode -28
         EXT4-fs error (device dm-1) in ext4_free_blocks:4950: error 28
      Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
      Cc: stable@kernel.org
      Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
      7c2ea25e
  4. 10 1月, 2019 8 次提交
  5. 21 11月, 2018 17 次提交
  6. 14 11月, 2018 5 次提交