提交 4903c091 编写于 作者: V Vasily Averin 提交者: Greg Kroah-Hartman

ext4: missing !bh check in ext4_xattr_inode_write()

commit eb6984fa4ce2837dcb1f66720a600f31b0bb3739 upstream.

According to Ted Ts'o ext4_getblk() called in ext4_xattr_inode_write()
should not return bh = NULL

The only time that bh could be NULL, then, would be in the case of
something really going wrong; a programming error elsewhere (perhaps a
wild pointer dereference) or I/O error causing on-disk file system
corruption (although that would be highly unlikely given that we had
*just* allocated the blocks and so the metadata blocks in question
probably would still be in the cache).

Fixes: e50e5129 ("ext4: xattr-in-inode support")
Signed-off-by: NVasily Averin <vvs@virtuozzo.com>
Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: stable@kernel.org # 4.13
Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
上级 20dd2c4e
......@@ -1388,6 +1388,12 @@ static int ext4_xattr_inode_write(handle_t *handle, struct inode *ea_inode,
bh = ext4_getblk(handle, ea_inode, block, 0);
if (IS_ERR(bh))
return PTR_ERR(bh);
if (!bh) {
WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
EXT4_ERROR_INODE(ea_inode,
"ext4_getblk() return bh = NULL");
return -EFSCORRUPTED;
}
ret = ext4_journal_get_write_access(handle, bh);
if (ret)
goto out;
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册