1. 15 2月, 2017 1 次提交
  2. 10 2月, 2017 1 次提交
  3. 08 2月, 2017 1 次提交
  4. 06 2月, 2017 1 次提交
  5. 05 2月, 2017 3 次提交
  6. 12 1月, 2017 1 次提交
  7. 08 1月, 2017 1 次提交
  8. 25 12月, 2016 1 次提交
  9. 11 12月, 2016 1 次提交
    • S
      ext4: do not perform data journaling when data is encrypted · 73b92a2a
      Sergey Karamov 提交于
      Currently data journalling is incompatible with encryption: enabling both
      at the same time has never been supported by design, and would result in
      unpredictable behavior. However, users are not precluded from turning on
      both features simultaneously. This change programmatically replaces data
      journaling for encrypted regular files with ordered data journaling mode.
      
      Background:
      Journaling encrypted data has not been supported because it operates on
      buffer heads of the page in the page cache. Namely, when the commit
      happens, which could be up to five seconds after caching, the commit
      thread uses the buffer heads attached to the page to copy the contents of
      the page to the journal. With encryption, it would have been required to
      keep the bounce buffer with ciphertext for up to the aforementioned five
      seconds, since the page cache can only hold plaintext and could not be
      used for journaling. Alternatively, it would be required to setup the
      journal to initiate a callback at the commit time to perform deferred
      encryption - in this case, not only would the data have to be written
      twice, but it would also have to be encrypted twice. This level of
      complexity was not justified for a mode that in practice is very rarely
      used because of the overhead from the data journalling.
      
      Solution:
      If data=journaled has been set as a mount option for a filesystem, or if
      journaling is enabled on a regular file, do not perform journaling if the
      file is also encrypted, instead fall back to the data=ordered mode for the
      file.
      
      Rationale:
      The intent is to allow seamless and proper filesystem operation when
      journaling and encryption have both been enabled, and have these two
      conflicting features gracefully resolved by the filesystem.
      
      Fixes: 44614711Signed-off-by: NSergey Karamov <skaramov@google.com>
      Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
      Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
      73b92a2a
  10. 06 12月, 2016 1 次提交
  11. 04 12月, 2016 1 次提交
  12. 02 12月, 2016 1 次提交
    • E
      ext4: validate s_first_meta_bg at mount time · 3a4b77cd
      Eryu Guan 提交于
      Ralf Spenneberg reported that he hit a kernel crash when mounting a
      modified ext4 image. And it turns out that kernel crashed when
      calculating fs overhead (ext4_calculate_overhead()), this is because
      the image has very large s_first_meta_bg (debug code shows it's
      842150400), and ext4 overruns the memory in count_overhead() when
      setting bitmap buffer, which is PAGE_SIZE.
      
      ext4_calculate_overhead():
        buf = get_zeroed_page(GFP_NOFS);  <=== PAGE_SIZE buffer
        blks = count_overhead(sb, i, buf);
      
      count_overhead():
        for (j = ext4_bg_num_gdb(sb, grp); j > 0; j--) { <=== j = 842150400
                ext4_set_bit(EXT4_B2C(sbi, s++), buf);   <=== buffer overrun
                count++;
        }
      
      This can be reproduced easily for me by this script:
      
        #!/bin/bash
        rm -f fs.img
        mkdir -p /mnt/ext4
        fallocate -l 16M fs.img
        mke2fs -t ext4 -O bigalloc,meta_bg,^resize_inode -F fs.img
        debugfs -w -R "ssv first_meta_bg 842150400" fs.img
        mount -o loop fs.img /mnt/ext4
      
      Fix it by validating s_first_meta_bg first at mount time, and
      refusing to mount if its value exceeds the largest possible meta_bg
      number.
      Reported-by: NRalf Spenneberg <ralf@os-t.de>
      Signed-off-by: NEryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
      Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
      Reviewed-by: NAndreas Dilger <adilger@dilger.ca>
      3a4b77cd
  13. 27 11月, 2016 1 次提交
  14. 22 11月, 2016 1 次提交
    • E
      ext4: avoid lockdep warning when inheriting encryption context · 2f8f5e76
      Eric Biggers 提交于
      On a lockdep-enabled kernel, xfstests generic/027 fails due to a lockdep
      warning when run on ext4 mounted with -o test_dummy_encryption:
      
          xfs_io/4594 is trying to acquire lock:
           (jbd2_handle
          ){++++.+}, at:
          [<ffffffff813096ef>] jbd2_log_wait_commit+0x5/0x11b
      
          but task is already holding lock:
           (jbd2_handle
          ){++++.+}, at:
          [<ffffffff813000de>] start_this_handle+0x354/0x3d8
      
      The abbreviated call stack is:
      
       [<ffffffff813096ef>] ? jbd2_log_wait_commit+0x5/0x11b
       [<ffffffff8130972a>] jbd2_log_wait_commit+0x40/0x11b
       [<ffffffff813096ef>] ? jbd2_log_wait_commit+0x5/0x11b
       [<ffffffff8130987b>] ? __jbd2_journal_force_commit+0x76/0xa6
       [<ffffffff81309896>] __jbd2_journal_force_commit+0x91/0xa6
       [<ffffffff813098b9>] jbd2_journal_force_commit_nested+0xe/0x18
       [<ffffffff812a6049>] ext4_should_retry_alloc+0x72/0x79
       [<ffffffff812f0c1f>] ext4_xattr_set+0xef/0x11f
       [<ffffffff812cc35b>] ext4_set_context+0x3a/0x16b
       [<ffffffff81258123>] fscrypt_inherit_context+0xe3/0x103
       [<ffffffff812ab611>] __ext4_new_inode+0x12dc/0x153a
       [<ffffffff812bd371>] ext4_create+0xb7/0x161
      
      When a file is created in an encrypted directory, ext4_set_context() is
      called to set an encryption context on the new file.  This calls
      ext4_xattr_set(), which contains a retry loop where the journal is
      forced to commit if an ENOSPC error is encountered.
      
      If the task actually were to wait for the journal to commit in this
      case, then it would deadlock because a handle remains open from
      __ext4_new_inode(), so the running transaction can't be committed yet.
      Fortunately, __jbd2_journal_force_commit() avoids the deadlock by not
      allowing the running transaction to be committed while the current task
      has it open.  However, the above lockdep warning is still triggered.
      
      This was a false positive which was introduced by: 1eaa566d: jbd2:
      track more dependencies on transaction commit
      
      Fix the problem by passing the handle through the 'fs_data' argument to
      ext4_set_context(), then using ext4_xattr_set_handle() instead of
      ext4_xattr_set().  And in the case where no journal handle is specified
      and ext4_set_context() has to open one, add an ENOSPC retry loop since
      in that case it is the outermost transaction.
      Signed-off-by: NEric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
      2f8f5e76
  15. 21 11月, 2016 1 次提交
  16. 20 11月, 2016 1 次提交
  17. 19 11月, 2016 4 次提交
  18. 15 11月, 2016 1 次提交
    • D
      ext4: use current_time() for inode timestamps · eeca7ea1
      Deepa Dinamani 提交于
      CURRENT_TIME_SEC and CURRENT_TIME are not y2038 safe.
      current_time() will be transitioned to be y2038 safe
      along with vfs.
      
      current_time() returns timestamps according to the
      granularities set in the super_block.
      The granularity check in ext4_current_time() to call
      current_time() or CURRENT_TIME_SEC is not required.
      Use current_time() directly to obtain timestamps
      unconditionally, and remove ext4_current_time().
      
      Quota files are assumed to be on the same filesystem.
      Hence, use current_time() for these files as well.
      Signed-off-by: NDeepa Dinamani <deepa.kernel@gmail.com>
      Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
      Reviewed-by: NArnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
      eeca7ea1
  19. 14 11月, 2016 2 次提交
    • T
      ext4: don't lock buffer in ext4_commit_super if holding spinlock · 1566a48a
      Theodore Ts'o 提交于
      If there is an error reported in mballoc via ext4_grp_locked_error(),
      the code is holding a spinlock, so ext4_commit_super() must not try to
      lock the buffer head, or else it will trigger a BUG:
      
        BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at ./include/linux/buffer_head.h:358
        in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 0, pid: 993, name: mount
        CPU: 0 PID: 993 Comm: mount Not tainted 4.9.0-rc1-clouder1 #62
        Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.8.1-0-g4adadbd-20150316_085822-nilsson.home.kraxel.org 04/01/2014
         ffff880006423548 ffffffff81318c89 ffffffff819ecdd0 0000000000000166
         ffff880006423558 ffffffff810810b0 ffff880006423580 ffffffff81081153
         ffff880006e5a1a0 ffff88000690e400 0000000000000000 ffff8800064235c0
        Call Trace:
          [<ffffffff81318c89>] dump_stack+0x67/0x9e
          [<ffffffff810810b0>] ___might_sleep+0xf0/0x140
          [<ffffffff81081153>] __might_sleep+0x53/0xb0
          [<ffffffff8126c1dc>] ext4_commit_super+0x19c/0x290
          [<ffffffff8126e61a>] __ext4_grp_locked_error+0x14a/0x230
          [<ffffffff81081153>] ? __might_sleep+0x53/0xb0
          [<ffffffff812822be>] ext4_mb_generate_buddy+0x1de/0x320
      
      Since ext4_grp_locked_error() calls ext4_commit_super with sync == 0
      (and it is the only caller which does so), avoid locking and unlocking
      the buffer in this case.
      
      This can result in races with ext4_commit_super() if there are other
      problems (which is what commit 4743f839 was trying to address),
      but a Warning is better than BUG.
      
      Fixes: 4743f839
      Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.9
      Reported-by: NNikolay Borisov <kernel@kyup.com>
      Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
      Reviewed-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
      1566a48a
    • T
      ext4: allow ext4_truncate() to return an error · 2c98eb5e
      Theodore Ts'o 提交于
      This allows us to properly propagate errors back up to
      ext4_truncate()'s callers.  This also means we no longer have to
      silently ignore some errors (e.g., when trying to add the inode to the
      orphan inode list).
      Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
      Reviewed-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
      2c98eb5e
  20. 01 11月, 2016 1 次提交
  21. 13 10月, 2016 1 次提交
  22. 30 9月, 2016 2 次提交
  23. 06 9月, 2016 2 次提交
    • D
      ext4: improve ext4lazyinit scalability · e22834f0
      Dmitry Monakhov 提交于
      ext4lazyinit is a global thread. This thread performs itable
      initalization under li_list_mtx mutex.
      
      It basically does the following:
      ext4_lazyinit_thread
        ->mutex_lock(&eli->li_list_mtx);
        ->ext4_run_li_request(elr)
          ->ext4_init_inode_table-> Do a lot of IO if the list is large
      
      And when new mount/umount arrive they have to block on ->li_list_mtx
      because  lazy_thread holds it during full walk procedure.
      ext4_fill_super
       ->ext4_register_li_request
         ->mutex_lock(&ext4_li_info->li_list_mtx);
         ->list_add(&elr->lr_request, &ext4_li_info >li_request_list);
      In my case mount takes 40minutes on server with 36 * 4Tb HDD.
      Common user may face this in case of very slow dev ( /dev/mmcblkXXX)
      Even more. If one of filesystems was frozen lazyinit_thread will simply
      block on sb_start_write() so other mount/umount will be stuck forever.
      
      This patch changes logic like follows:
      - grab ->s_umount read sem before processing new li_request.
        After that it is safe to drop li_list_mtx because all callers of
        li_remove_request are holding ->s_umount for write.
      - li_thread skips frozen SB's
      
      Locking order:
      Mh KOrder is asserted by umount path like follows: s_umount ->li_list_mtx so
      the only way to to grab ->s_mount inside li_thread is via down_read_trylock
      
      xfstests:ext4/023
      #PSBM-49658
      Signed-off-by: NDmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@openvz.org>
      Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
      e22834f0
    • J
      ext4: enable quota enforcement based on mount options · 49da9392
      Jan Kara 提交于
      When quota information is stored in quota files, we enable only quota
      accounting on mount and enforcement is enabled only in response to
      Q_QUOTAON quotactl. To make ext4 behavior consistent with XFS, we add a
      possibility to enable quota enforcement on mount by specifying
      corresponding quota mount option (usrquota, grpquota, prjquota).
      Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
      Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
      49da9392
  24. 01 8月, 2016 1 次提交
  25. 15 7月, 2016 1 次提交
    • V
      ext4: short-cut orphan cleanup on error · c65d5c6c
      Vegard Nossum 提交于
      If we encounter a filesystem error during orphan cleanup, we should stop.
      Otherwise, we may end up in an infinite loop where the same inode is
      processed again and again.
      
          EXT4-fs (loop0): warning: checktime reached, running e2fsck is recommended
          EXT4-fs error (device loop0): ext4_mb_generate_buddy:758: group 2, block bitmap and bg descriptor inconsistent: 6117 vs 0 free clusters
          Aborting journal on device loop0-8.
          EXT4-fs (loop0): Remounting filesystem read-only
          EXT4-fs error (device loop0) in ext4_free_blocks:4895: Journal has aborted
          EXT4-fs error (device loop0) in ext4_do_update_inode:4893: Journal has aborted
          EXT4-fs error (device loop0) in ext4_do_update_inode:4893: Journal has aborted
          EXT4-fs error (device loop0) in ext4_ext_remove_space:3068: IO failure
          EXT4-fs error (device loop0) in ext4_ext_truncate:4667: Journal has aborted
          EXT4-fs error (device loop0) in ext4_orphan_del:2927: Journal has aborted
          EXT4-fs error (device loop0) in ext4_do_update_inode:4893: Journal has aborted
          EXT4-fs (loop0): Inode 16 (00000000618192a0): orphan list check failed!
          [...]
          EXT4-fs (loop0): Inode 16 (0000000061819748): orphan list check failed!
          [...]
          EXT4-fs (loop0): Inode 16 (0000000061819bf0): orphan list check failed!
          [...]
      
      See-also: c9eb13a9 ("ext4: fix hang when processing corrupted orphaned inode list")
      Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
      Signed-off-by: NVegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@oracle.com>
      Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
      Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
      c65d5c6c
  26. 11 7月, 2016 1 次提交
  27. 06 7月, 2016 1 次提交
    • T
      ext4: validate s_reserved_gdt_blocks on mount · 5b9554dc
      Theodore Ts'o 提交于
      If s_reserved_gdt_blocks is extremely large, it's possible for
      ext4_init_block_bitmap(), which is called when ext4 sets up an
      uninitialized block bitmap, to corrupt random kernel memory.  Add the
      same checks which e2fsck has --- it must never be larger than
      blocksize / sizeof(__u32) --- and then add a backup check in
      ext4_init_block_bitmap() in case the superblock gets modified after
      the file system is mounted.
      Reported-by: NVegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@oracle.com>
      Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
      Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
      5b9554dc
  28. 04 7月, 2016 2 次提交
  29. 08 6月, 2016 1 次提交
  30. 17 5月, 2016 1 次提交
  31. 26 4月, 2016 1 次提交