Skip to content

cloud-kernel
cloud-kernel

openanolis / cloud-kernel
1 年多 前同步成功

通知 160
Star 36
Fork 7
cloud-kernel
cloud-kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 24 9月, 2014 2 次提交
  3. 10 9月, 2014 1 次提交
  5. 15 8月, 2014 1 次提交
  7. 11 8月, 2014 1 次提交
    • C
      drm/radeon: add userptr support v8 · f72a113a
      由 Christian König 提交于 
      This patch adds an IOCTL for turning a pointer supplied by
userspace into a buffer object.

It imposes several restrictions upon the memory being mapped:

1. It must be page aligned (both start/end addresses, i.e ptr and size).

2. It must be normal system memory, not a pointer into another map of IO
space (e.g. it must not be a GTT mmapping of another object).

3. The BO is mapped into GTT, so the maximum amount of memory mapped at
all times is still the GTT limit.

4. The BO is only mapped readonly for now, so no write support.

5. List of backing pages is only acquired once, so they represent a
snapshot of the first use.

Exporting and sharing as well as mapping of buffer objects created by
this function is forbidden and results in an -EPERM.

v2: squash all previous changes into first public version
v3: fix tabs, map readonly, don't use MM callback any more
v4: set TTM_PAGE_FLAG_SG so that TTM never messes with the pages,
    pin/unpin pages on bind/unbind instead of populate/unpopulate
v5: rebased on 3.17-wip, IOCTL renamed to userptr, reject any unknown
    flags, better handle READONLY flag, improve permission check
v6: fix ptr cast warning, use set_page_dirty/mark_page_accessed on unpin
v7: add warning about it's availability in the API definition
v8: drop access_ok check, fix VM mapping bits
Signed-off-by: NChristian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> (v4)
Reviewed-by: Jérôme Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com> (v4)
Signed-off-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
      f72a113a
  9. 05 8月, 2014 3 次提交
  11. 22 7月, 2014 1 次提交
  13. 09 7月, 2014 1 次提交
  15. 01 7月, 2014 1 次提交
  17. 10 6月, 2014 3 次提交
  19. 23 4月, 2014 1 次提交
  21. 17 4月, 2014 1 次提交
  23. 08 4月, 2014 1 次提交
  25. 03 4月, 2014 1 次提交
  27. 28 3月, 2014 1 次提交
  29. 25 3月, 2014 1 次提交
  31. 03 3月, 2014 1 次提交
  33. 06 2月, 2014 1 次提交
  35. 30 1月, 2014 1 次提交
  37. 20 1月, 2014 1 次提交
  39. 09 1月, 2014 1 次提交
  41. 24 12月, 2013 1 次提交
  43. 18 12月, 2013 1 次提交
  45. 13 12月, 2013 1 次提交
  47. 18 11月, 2013 1 次提交
  49. 06 11月, 2013 1 次提交
  51. 02 11月, 2013 3 次提交
  53. 19 10月, 2013 1 次提交
    • A
      drm/radeon: rework audio option · 108dc8e8
      由 Alex Deucher 提交于 
      In 3.12 I changed audio to be enabled by default,
but you still had to turn it on via xrandr.  This
was confusing to users so change it to minic the
previous behavior:

- audio option is set to -1 (auto) by default which is
  the current 3.12 behavior (audio is enabled but requires
  xrandr to turn it on).
- if audio = 1, the audio is enabled without needing
  to mess with xrandr (previous behavior)
- audio = 0 disables audio

It retains the new feature of allowing the user to enable
audio on the fly with xrandr, but turns audio on
automatically if radeon.audio=1 is set which is what
most users expect.
Signed-off-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: NChristian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
      108dc8e8
  55. 09 10月, 2013 1 次提交
    • D
      drm: kill ->gem_init_object() and friends · 16eb5f43
      由 David Herrmann 提交于 
      All drivers embed gem-objects into their own buffer objects. There is no
reason to keep drm_gem_object_alloc(), gem->driver_private and
->gem_init_object() anymore.

New drivers are highly encouraged to do the same. There is no benefit in
allocating gem-objects separately.

Cc: Dave Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>
Cc: Alex Deucher <alexdeucher@gmail.com>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
Cc: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com>
Cc: Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com>
Cc: Inki Dae <inki.dae@samsung.com>
Cc: Ben Skeggs <skeggsb@gmail.com>
Cc: Patrik Jakobsson <patrik.r.jakobsson@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Herrmann <dh.herrmann@gmail.com>
Acked-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: NDave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
      16eb5f43
  57. 11 9月, 2013 1 次提交
  59. 02 9月, 2013 1 次提交
  61. 31 8月, 2013 1 次提交
  63. 19 8月, 2013 2 次提交
    • D
      drm: rip out drm_core_has_MTRR checks · 28185647
      由 Daniel Vetter 提交于 
      The new arch_phys_wc_add/del functions do the right thing both with
and without MTRR support in the kernel. So we can drop these
additional checks.

David Herrmann suggest to also kill the DRIVER_USE_MTRR flag since
it's now unused, which spurred me to do a bit a better audit of the
affected drivers. David helped a lot in that. Quoting our mail
discussion:

On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 5:41 PM, David Herrmann <dh.herrmann@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 5:22 PM, Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 3:51 PM, David Herrmann <dh.herrmann@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> -#if __OS_HAS_MTRR
>>>> -static inline int drm_core_has_MTRR(struct drm_device *dev)
>>>> -{
>>>> -       return drm_core_check_feature(dev, DRIVER_USE_MTRR);
>>>> -}
>>>> -#else
>>>> -#define drm_core_has_MTRR(dev) (0)
>>>> -#endif
>>>> -
>>>
>>> That was the last user of DRIVER_USE_MTRR (apart from drivers setting
>>> it in .driver_features). Any reason to keep it around?
>>
>> Yeah, I guess we could rip things out. Which will also force me to
>> properly audit drivers for the eventual behaviour change this could
>> entail (in case there's an x86 driver which did not ask for an mtrr,
>> but iirc there isn't).
>
> david@david-mb ~/dev/kernel/linux $ for i in drivers/gpu/drm/* ; do if
> test -d "$i" ; then if ! grep -q USE_MTRR -r $i ; then echo $i ; fi ;
> fi ; done
> drivers/gpu/drm/exynos
> drivers/gpu/drm/gma500
> drivers/gpu/drm/i2c
> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau
> drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm
> drivers/gpu/drm/qxl
> drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du
> drivers/gpu/drm/shmobile
> drivers/gpu/drm/tilcdc
> drivers/gpu/drm/ttm
> drivers/gpu/drm/udl
> drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx
> david@david-mb ~/dev/kernel/linux $
>
> So for x86 gma500,nouveau,qxl,udl,vmwgfx don't set DRIVER_USE_MTRR.
> But I cannot tell whether they break if we call arch_phys_wc_add/del,
> anyway. At least nouveau seemed to work here, but it doesn't use AGP
> or drm_bufs, I guess.

Cool, thanks a lot for stitching together the list of drivers to look
at. So for real KMS drivers it's the drives responsibility to add an
mtrr if it needs one. nouvea, radeon, mgag200, i915 and vmwgfx do that
already. Somehow the savage driver also ends up doing that, I have no
idea why.

Note that gma500 as a pure KMS driver doesn't need MTRR setup since
the platforms that it supports all support PAT. So no MTRRs needed to
get wc iomappings.

The mtrr support in the drm core is all for legacy mappings of garts,
framebuffers and registers. All legacy drivers set the USE_MTRR flag,
so we're good there.

All in all I think we can really just ditch this

/endquote

v2: Also kill DRIVER_USE_MTRR as suggested by David Herrmann

v3: Rebase on top of David Herrmann's agp setup/cleanup changes.

Cc: David Herrmann <dh.herrmann@gmail.com>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Acked-by: NAndy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Reviewed-by: NDavid Herrmann <dh.herrmann@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NDave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
      28185647
    • D
      drm: remove FASYNC support · b0e898ac
      由 Daniel Vetter 提交于 
      So I've stumbled over drm_fasync and wondered what it does. Digging
that up is quite a story.

First I've had to read up on what this does and ended up being rather
bewildered why peopled loved signals so much back in the days that
they've created SIGIO just for that ...

Then I wondered how this ever works, and what that strange "No-op."
comment right above it should mean. After all calling the core fasync
helper is pretty obviously not a noop. After reading through the
kernels FASYNC implementation I've noticed that signals are only sent
out to the processes attached with FASYNC by calling kill_fasync.

No merged drm driver has ever done that.

After more digging I've found out that the only driver that ever used
this is the so called GAMMA driver. I've frankly never heard of such a
gpu brand ever before. Now FASYNC seems to not have been the only bad
thing with that driver, since Dave Airlie removed it from the drm
driver with prejudice:

commit 1430163b4bbf7b00367ea1066c1c5fe85dbeefed
Author: Dave Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>
Date:   Sun Aug 29 12:04:35 2004 +0000

    Drop GAMMA DRM from a great height ...

Long story short, the drm fasync support seems to be doing absolutely
nothing. And the only user of it was never merged into the upstream
kernel. And we don't need any fops->fasync callback since the fcntl
implementation in the kernel already implements the noop case
correctly.

So stop this particular cargo-cult and rip it all out.

v2: Kill drm_fasync assignments in rcar (newly added) and imx drivers
(somehow I've missed that one in staging). Also drop the reference in
the drm DocBook. ARM compile-fail reported by Rob Clark.

v3: Move the removal of dev->buf_asnyc assignment in drm_setup to this
patch here.

v4: Actually git add ... tsk.

Cc: Dave Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>
Cc: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
Cc: Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com>
Acked-by: NLaurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Reviewed-by: NDavid Herrmann <dh.herrmann@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NDave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
      b0e898ac