- 22 7月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Alan Jenkins 提交于
Some drivers don't need the return value of rfkill_set_hw_state(), so it should not be marked as __must_check. Signed-off-by: NAlan Jenkins <alan-jenkins@tuffmail.co.uk> Acked-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net> Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
- 09 7月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jaswinder Singh Rajput 提交于
fix the following 'make includecheck' warning: include/linux/rfkill.h: linux/types.h is included more than once. Signed-off-by: NJaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinderrajput@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
- 19 6月, 2009 2 次提交
-
-
由 Alan Jenkins 提交于
This information allows userspace to implement a hybrid policy where it can store the rfkill soft-blocked state in platform non-volatile storage if available, and if not then file-based storage can be used. Some users prefer platform non-volatile storage because of the behaviour when dual-booting multiple versions of Linux, or if the rfkill setting is changed in the BIOS setting screens, or if the BIOS responds to wireless-toggle hotkeys itself before the relevant platform driver has been loaded. Signed-off-by: NAlan Jenkins <alan-jenkins@tuffmail.co.uk> Acked-by: NHenrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@hmh.eng.br> Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
由 Alan Jenkins 提交于
The setting of the "persistent" flag is also made more explicit using a new rfkill_init_sw_state() function, instead of special-casing rfkill_set_sw_state() when it is called before registration. Suspend is a bit of a corner case so we try to get away without adding another hack to rfkill-input - it's going to be removed soon. If the state does change over suspend, users will simply have to prod rfkill-input twice in order to toggle the state. Userspace policy agents will be able to implement a more consistent user experience. For example, they can avoid the above problem if they toggle devices individually. Then there would be no "global state" to get out of sync. Currently there are only two rfkill drivers with persistent soft-blocked state. thinkpad-acpi already checks the software state on resume. eeepc-laptop will require modification. Signed-off-by: NAlan Jenkins <alan-jenkins@tuffmail.co.uk> CC: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org> Acked-by: NHenrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@hmh.eng.br> Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
- 11 6月, 2009 2 次提交
-
-
由 Alan Jenkins 提交于
Once rfkill-input is disabled, the "global" states will only be used as default initial states. Since the states will always be the same after resume, we shouldn't generate events on resume. Signed-off-by: NAlan Jenkins <alan-jenkins@tuffmail.co.uk> Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
由 Alan Jenkins 提交于
rfkill_set_global_sw_state() (previously rfkill_set_default()) will no longer be exported by the rewritten rfkill core. Instead, platform drivers which can provide persistent soft-rfkill state across power-down/reboot should indicate their initial state by calling rfkill_set_sw_state() before registration. Otherwise, they will be initialized to a default value during registration by a set_block call. We remove existing calls to rfkill_set_sw_state() which happen before registration, since these had no effect in the old model. If these drivers do have persistent state, the calls can be put back (subject to testing :-). This affects hp-wmi and acer-wmi. Drivers with persistent state will affect the global state only if rfkill-input is enabled. This is required, otherwise booting with wireless soft-blocked and pressing the wireless-toggle key once would have no apparent effect. This special case will be removed in future along with rfkill-input, in favour of a more flexible userspace daemon (see Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt). Now rfkill_global_states[n].def is only used to preserve global states over EPO, it is renamed to ".sav". Signed-off-by: NAlan Jenkins <alan-jenkins@tuffmail.co.uk> Acked-by: NHenrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@hmh.eng.br> Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
- 10 6月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Johannes Berg 提交于
Since we use ERR_PTR and similar macros, we need to include linux/err.h. Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 04 6月, 2009 3 次提交
-
-
由 Johannes Berg 提交于
Sometimes it is necessary to know how the state is, and it is easier to query rfkill than keep track of it somewhere else, so add a function for that. This could later be expanded to return hard/soft block, but so far that isn't necessary. Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net> Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
由 Johannes Berg 提交于
The new code added by this patch will make rfkill create a misc character device /dev/rfkill that userspace can use to control rfkill soft blocks and get status of devices as well as events when the status changes. Using it is very simple -- when you open it you can read a number of times to get the initial state, and every further read blocks (you can poll) on getting the next event from the kernel. The same structure you read is also used when writing to it to change the soft block of a given device, all devices of a given type, or all devices. This also makes CONFIG_RFKILL_INPUT selectable again in order to be able to test without it present since its functionality can now be replaced by userspace entirely and distros and users may not want the input part of rfkill interfering with their userspace code. We will also write a userspace daemon to handle all that and consequently add the input code to the feature removal schedule. In order to have rfkilld support both kernels with and without CONFIG_RFKILL_INPUT (or new kernels after its eventual removal) we also add an ioctl (that only exists if rfkill-input is present) to disable rfkill-input. It is not very efficient, but at least gives the correct behaviour in all cases. Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net> Acked-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org> Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
由 Johannes Berg 提交于
This patch completely rewrites the rfkill core to address the following deficiencies: * all rfkill drivers need to implement polling where necessary rather than having one central implementation * updating the rfkill state cannot be done from arbitrary contexts, forcing drivers to use schedule_work and requiring lots of code * rfkill drivers need to keep track of soft/hard blocked internally -- the core should do this * the rfkill API has many unexpected quirks, for example being asymmetric wrt. alloc/free and register/unregister * rfkill can call back into a driver from within a function the driver called -- this is prone to deadlocks and generally should be avoided * rfkill-input pointlessly is a separate module * drivers need to #ifdef rfkill functions (unless they want to depend on or select RFKILL) -- rfkill should provide inlines that do nothing if it isn't compiled in * the rfkill structure is not opaque -- drivers need to initialise it correctly (lots of sanity checking code required) -- instead force drivers to pass the right variables to rfkill_alloc() * the documentation is hard to read because it always assumes the reader is completely clueless and contains way TOO MANY CAPS * the rfkill code needlessly uses a lot of locks and atomic operations in locked sections * fix LED trigger to actually change the LED when the radio state changes -- this wasn't done before Tested-by: NAlan Jenkins <alan-jenkins@tuffmail.co.uk> Signed-off-by: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@hmh.eng.br> [thinkpad] Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net> Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
- 23 4月, 2009 2 次提交
-
-
由 Johannes Berg 提交于
Almost all drivers do not support user_claim, so remove it completely and always report -EOPNOTSUPP to userspace. Since userspace cannot really drive rfkill _anyway_ (due to the odd restrictions imposed by the documentation) having this code is just pointless. Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net> Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
由 Johannes Berg 提交于
I only did superficial review, but these constants are stupid to have and without proper warnings nobody will review the code anyway, no amount of shouting will help. Also fix wimax to use correct states. Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net> Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
- 13 12月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Johannes Berg 提交于
No users, so no reason to have it. Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net> Acked-by: NIvo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
- 26 11月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
The rfkill class API requires that the driver connected to a class call rfkill_force_state() on resume to update the real state of the rfkill controller, OR that it provides a get_state() hook. This means there is potentially a hidden call in the resume code flow that changes rfkill->state (i.e. rfkill_force_state()), so the previous state of the transmitter was being lost. The simplest and most future-proof way to fix this is to explicitly store the pre-sleep state on the rfkill structure, and restore from that on resume. Signed-off-by: NHenrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@hmh.eng.br> Acked-by: NIvo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com> Cc: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org> Cc: Alan Jenkins <alan-jenkins@tuffmail.co.uk> Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
- 23 8月, 2008 3 次提交
-
-
While it is interesting to not add last-enum-markers because it allows gcc to warn us of switch() statements missing a valid state, we really should be handling memory corruption on a rfkill state with default clauses, anyway. So add RFKILL_STATE_MAX and use it where applicable. It makes for safer code in the long run. Signed-off-by: NHenrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@hmh.eng.br> Acked-by: NIvo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
rfkill is not a small, mere detail in wireless support. Once it starts supporting rfkill and users start counting on that support, a wireless device is at risk of operating in dangerous conditions should rfkill support fail to properly activate. Therefore, add the required __must_check annotations on some key functions of the rfkill API, for which the wireless drivers absolutely MUST handle the failure mode safely in order to avoid a potentially dangerous situation where the wireless transmitter is left enabled when the user don't want it to. Signed-off-by: NHenrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@hmh.eng.br> Acked-by: NIvo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com> Cc: Matthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
Add a second set of global states, "rfkill_default_states", to track the state that will be used when the first rfkill class of a given type is registered, and also to save "undo" information when rfkill_epo is called. Add a new exported function, rfkill_set_default(), which can be used by platform drivers to restore radio state saved by the platform across reboots or shutdown. Also, fix rfkill_epo to properly update rfkill_states, but still preserve a copy of the state so that we can undo the effect of rfkill_epo later if we want to. Add rfkill_restore_states() to restore rfkill_states from the copy. Signed-off-by: NHenrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@hmh.eng.br> Acked-by: NIvo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
- 30 7月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
Reorder fields in struct rfkill and add comments to make it clear which fields are protected by rfkill->mutex. Signed-off-by: NHenrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@hmh.eng.br> Acked-by: NIvo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
- 27 6月, 2008 5 次提交
-
-
The current naming of rfkill_state causes a lot of confusion: not only the "kill" in rfkill suggests negative logic, but also the fact that rfkill cannot turn anything on (it can just force something off or stop forcing something off) is often forgotten. Rename RFKILL_STATE_OFF to RFKILL_STATE_SOFT_BLOCKED (transmitter is blocked and will not operate; state can be changed by a toggle_radio request), and RFKILL_STATE_ON to RFKILL_STATE_UNBLOCKED (transmitter is not blocked, and may operate). Also, add a new third state, RFKILL_STATE_HARD_BLOCKED (transmitter is blocked and will not operate; state cannot be changed through a toggle_radio request), which is used by drivers to indicate a wireless transmiter was blocked by a hardware rfkill line that accepts no overrides. Keep the old names as #defines, but document them as deprecated. This way, drivers can be converted to the new names *and* verified to actually use rfkill correctly one by one. Signed-off-by: NHenrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@hmh.eng.br> Acked-by: NIvo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
Add a notifier chain for use by the rfkill class. This notifier chain signals the following events (more to be added when needed): 1. rfkill: rfkill device state has changed A pointer to the rfkill struct will be passed as a parameter. The notifier message types have been added to include/linux/rfkill.h instead of to include/linux/notifier.h in order to avoid the madness of modifying a header used globally (and that triggers an almost full tree rebuild every time it is touched) with information that is of interest only to code that includes the rfkill.h header. Signed-off-by: NHenrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@hmh.eng.br> Acked-by: NIvo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
Unfortunately, instead of adding a generic Wireless WAN type, a technology- specific type (WiMAX) was added. That's useless for other WWAN devices, such as EDGE, UMTS, X-RTT and other such radios. Add a WWAN rfkill type for generic wireless WAN devices. No keys are added as most devices really want to use KEY_WLAN for WWAN control (in a cycle of none, WLAN, WWAN, WLAN+WWAN) and need no specific keycode added. Signed-off-by: NHenrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@hmh.eng.br> Acked-by: NIvo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com> Cc: Iñaky Pérez-González <inaky.perez-gonzalez@intel.com> Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
Currently, rfkill support for read/write rfkill switches is hacked through a round-trip over the input layer and rfkill-input to let a driver sync rfkill->state to hardware changes. This is buggy and sub-optimal. It causes real problems. It is best to think of the rfkill class as supporting only write-only switches at the moment. In order to implement the read/write functionality properly: Add a get_state() hook that is called by the class every time it needs to fetch the current state of the switch. Add a call to this hook every time the *current* state of the radio plays a role in a decision. Also add a force_state() method that can be used to forcefully syncronize the class' idea of the current state of the switch. This allows for a faster implementation of the read/write functionality, as a driver which get events on switch changes can avoid the need for a get_state() hook. If the get_state() hook is left as NULL, current behaviour is maintained, so this change is fully backwards compatible with the current rfkill drivers. For hardware that issues events when the rfkill state changes, leave get_state() NULL in the rfkill struct, set the initial state properly before registering with the rfkill class, and use the force_state() method in the driver to keep the rfkill interface up-to-date. get_state() can be called by the class from atomic context. It must not sleep. Signed-off-by: NHenrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@hmh.eng.br> Acked-by: NIvo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com> Cc: Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@mail.ru> Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
rfkill really should have been named rfswitch. As it is, one can get confused whether RFKILL_STATE_ON means the KILL switch is on (and therefore, the radio is being *blocked* from operating), or whether it means the RADIO rf output is on. Clearly state that RFKILL_STATE_ON means the radio is *unblocked* from operating (i.e. there is no rf killing going on). Signed-off-by: NHenrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@hmh.eng.br> Acked-by: NIvo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com> Cc: Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@mail.ru> Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
- 01 2月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Iñaky Pérez-González 提交于
Teach rfkill about wimax radios. Had to define a KEY_WIMAX as a 'key for disabling only wimax radios', as other radio technologies have. This makes sense as hardware has specific keys for disabling specific radios. The RFKILL enabling part is, otherwise, a copy and paste of any other radio technology. Signed-off-by: NInaky Perez-Gonzalez <inaky@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NIvo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 11 10月, 2007 6 次提交
-
-
由 Michael Buesch 提交于
Buttons that work directly on hardware cannot support the "user_claim" functionality. Add a flag to signal this and return -EOPNOTSUPP in this case. b43 is such a device. Signed-off-by: NMichael Buesch <mb@bu3sch.de> Acked-by: NIvo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Michael Buesch 提交于
This adds a LED trigger. Signed-off-by: NMichael Buesch <mb@bu3sch.de> Acked-by: NIvo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Ivo van Doorn 提交于
rfkill_switch_all shouldn't be called by drivers directly, instead they should send a signal over the input device. To prevent confusion for driver developers, move the function into a rfkill private header. Signed-off-by: NIvo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Michael Buesch 提交于
Signed-off-by: NMichael Buesch <mb@bu3sch.de> Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
由 Ivo van Doorn 提交于
This patch will add support for UWB keys to rfkill, support for this has been requested by Inaky. Signed-off-by: NIvo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Ivo van Doorn 提交于
As Dmitry pointed out earlier, rfkill-input.c doesn't support irda because there are no users and we shouldn't add unrequired KEY_ defines. However, RFKILL_TYPE_IRDA was defined in the rfkill.h header file and would confuse people about whether it is implemented or not. This patch removes IRDA support completely, so it can be added whenever a driver wants the feature. Signed-off-by: NIvo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 08 6月, 2007 1 次提交
-
-
由 Ivo van Doorn 提交于
The rfkill name can be made const safely, this makes the compiler happy when drivers make it point to some const string used elsewhere. Signed-off-by: NIvo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 07 5月, 2007 1 次提交
-
-
由 Ivo van Doorn 提交于
The RF kill patch that provides infrastructure for implementing switches controlling radio states on various network and other cards. [dtor@insightbb.com: address review comments] [akpm@linux-foundation.org: cleanups, build fixes] Signed-off-by: NIvo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NDmitry Torokhov <dtor@mail.ru> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-