Skip to content

cloud-kernel
cloud-kernel

openanolis / cloud-kernel
接近 2 年 前同步成功

通知 170
Star 36
Fork 7
cloud-kernel
cloud-kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 03 8月, 2018 3 次提交
    • T
      x86/intel_rdt: Disable PMU access · 4a7a54a5
      由 Thomas Gleixner 提交于 
      Peter is objecting to the direct PMU access in RDT. Right now the PMU usage
is broken anyway as it is not coordinated with perf.

Until this discussion settled, disable the PMU mechanics by simply
rejecting the type '2' measurement in the resctrl file.
Reported-by: NPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
Cc: fenghua.yu@intel.com
Cc: tony.luck@intel.com
Cc: vikas.shivappa@linux.intel.com
CC: gavin.hindman@intel.com
Cc: jithu.joseph@intel.com
Cc: hpa@zytor.com
      4a7a54a5
    • S
      x86/speculation: Support Enhanced IBRS on future CPUs · 706d5168
      由 Sai Praneeth 提交于 
      Future Intel processors will support "Enhanced IBRS" which is an "always
on" mode i.e. IBRS bit in SPEC_CTRL MSR is enabled once and never
disabled.

From the specification [1]:

 "With enhanced IBRS, the predicted targets of indirect branches
  executed cannot be controlled by software that was executed in a less
  privileged predictor mode or on another logical processor. As a
  result, software operating on a processor with enhanced IBRS need not
  use WRMSR to set IA32_SPEC_CTRL.IBRS after every transition to a more
  privileged predictor mode. Software can isolate predictor modes
  effectively simply by setting the bit once. Software need not disable
  enhanced IBRS prior to entering a sleep state such as MWAIT or HLT."

If Enhanced IBRS is supported by the processor then use it as the
preferred spectre v2 mitigation mechanism instead of Retpoline. Intel's
Retpoline white paper [2] states:

 "Retpoline is known to be an effective branch target injection (Spectre
  variant 2) mitigation on Intel processors belonging to family 6
  (enumerated by the CPUID instruction) that do not have support for
  enhanced IBRS. On processors that support enhanced IBRS, it should be
  used for mitigation instead of retpoline."

The reason why Enhanced IBRS is the recommended mitigation on processors
which support it is that these processors also support CET which
provides a defense against ROP attacks. Retpoline is very similar to ROP
techniques and might trigger false positives in the CET defense.

If Enhanced IBRS is selected as the mitigation technique for spectre v2,
the IBRS bit in SPEC_CTRL MSR is set once at boot time and never
cleared. Kernel also has to make sure that IBRS bit remains set after
VMEXIT because the guest might have cleared the bit. This is already
covered by the existing x86_spec_ctrl_set_guest() and
x86_spec_ctrl_restore_host() speculation control functions.

Enhanced IBRS still requires IBPB for full mitigation.

[1] Speculative-Execution-Side-Channel-Mitigations.pdf
[2] Retpoline-A-Branch-Target-Injection-Mitigation.pdf
Both documents are available at:
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=199511Originally-by: NDavid Woodhouse <dwmw@amazon.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: NSai Praneeth Prakhya <sai.praneeth.prakhya@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Tim C Chen <tim.c.chen@intel.com>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
Cc: Ravi Shankar <ravi.v.shankar@intel.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1533148945-24095-1-git-send-email-sai.praneeth.prakhya@intel.com
      706d5168
    • P
      x86/cpufeatures: Add EPT_AD feature bit · 301d328a
      由 Peter Feiner 提交于 
      Some Intel processors have an EPT feature whereby the accessed & dirty bits
in EPT entries can be updated by HW. MSR IA32_VMX_EPT_VPID_CAP exposes the
presence of this capability.

There is no point in trying to use that new feature bit in the VMX code as
VMX needs to read the MSR anyway to access other bits, but having the
feature bit for EPT_AD in place helps virtualization management as it
exposes "ept_ad" in /proc/cpuinfo/$proc/flags if the feature is present.

[ tglx: Amended changelog ]
Signed-off-by: NPeter Feiner <pfeiner@google.com>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Shier <pshier@google.com>
Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: NJim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Cc: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
Cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw@amazon.co.uk>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180801180657.138051-1-pshier@google.com
      301d328a
  3. 31 7月, 2018 1 次提交
  5. 20 7月, 2018 3 次提交
    • J
      x86/entry/32: Enter the kernel via trampoline stack · 45d7b255
      由 Joerg Roedel 提交于 
      Use the entry-stack as a trampoline to enter the kernel. The entry-stack is
already in the cpu_entry_area and will be mapped to userspace when PTI is
enabled.
Signed-off-by: NJoerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Tested-by: NPavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Cc: "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
Cc: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
Cc: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>
Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>
Cc: David Laight <David.Laight@aculab.com>
Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>
Cc: Eduardo Valentin <eduval@amazon.com>
Cc: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Cc: aliguori@amazon.com
Cc: daniel.gruss@iaik.tugraz.at
Cc: hughd@google.com
Cc: keescook@google.com
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
Cc: Waiman Long <llong@redhat.com>
Cc: "David H . Gutteridge" <dhgutteridge@sympatico.ca>
Cc: joro@8bytes.org
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1531906876-13451-8-git-send-email-joro@8bytes.org
      45d7b255
    • B
      x86/CPU: Call detect_nopl() only on the BSP · 9b3661cd
      由 Borislav Petkov 提交于 
      Make it use the setup_* variants and have it be called only on the BSP and
drop the call in generic_identify() - X86_FEATURE_NOPL will be replicated
to the APs through the forced caps. Helps to keep the mess at a manageable
level.
Signed-off-by: NBorislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: NPavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: steven.sistare@oracle.com
Cc: daniel.m.jordan@oracle.com
Cc: linux@armlinux.org.uk
Cc: schwidefsky@de.ibm.com
Cc: heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com
Cc: john.stultz@linaro.org
Cc: sboyd@codeaurora.org
Cc: hpa@zytor.com
Cc: douly.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com
Cc: peterz@infradead.org
Cc: prarit@redhat.com
Cc: feng.tang@intel.com
Cc: pmladek@suse.com
Cc: gnomes@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk
Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
Cc: boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com
Cc: jgross@suse.com
Cc: pbonzini@redhat.com
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180719205545.16512-11-pasha.tatashin@oracle.com
      9b3661cd
    • P
      x86/jump_label: Initialize static branching early · 8990cac6
      由 Pavel Tatashin 提交于 
      Static branching is useful to runtime patch branches that are used in hot
path, but are infrequently changed.

The x86 clock framework is one example that uses static branches to setup
the best clock during boot and never changes it again.

It is desired to enable the TSC based sched clock early to allow fine
grained boot time analysis early on. That requires the static branching
functionality to be functional early as well.

Static branching requires patching nop instructions, thus,
arch_init_ideal_nops() must be called prior to jump_label_init().

Do all the necessary steps to call arch_init_ideal_nops() right after
early_cpu_init(), which also allows to insert a call to jump_label_init()
right after that. jump_label_init() will be called again from the generic
init code, but the code is protected against reinitialization already.

[ tglx: Massaged changelog ]
Suggested-by: NPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: NPavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: NBorislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Cc: steven.sistare@oracle.com
Cc: daniel.m.jordan@oracle.com
Cc: linux@armlinux.org.uk
Cc: schwidefsky@de.ibm.com
Cc: heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com
Cc: john.stultz@linaro.org
Cc: sboyd@codeaurora.org
Cc: hpa@zytor.com
Cc: douly.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com
Cc: prarit@redhat.com
Cc: feng.tang@intel.com
Cc: pmladek@suse.com
Cc: gnomes@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk
Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
Cc: boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com
Cc: jgross@suse.com
Cc: pbonzini@redhat.com
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180719205545.16512-10-pasha.tatashin@oracle.com
      8990cac6
  7. 17 7月, 2018 1 次提交
  9. 13 7月, 2018 1 次提交
    • R
      x86/intel_rdt: Fix possible circular lock dependency · 2989360d
      由 Reinette Chatre 提交于 
      Lockdep is reporting a possible circular locking dependency:

 ======================================================
 WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
 4.18.0-rc1-test-test+ #4 Not tainted
 ------------------------------------------------------
 user_example/766 is trying to acquire lock:
 0000000073479a0f (rdtgroup_mutex){+.+.}, at: pseudo_lock_dev_mmap

 but task is already holding lock:
 000000001ef7a35b (&mm->mmap_sem){++++}, at: vm_mmap_pgoff+0x9f/0x

 which lock already depends on the new lock.

 the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:

 -> #2 (&mm->mmap_sem){++++}:
        _copy_to_user+0x1e/0x70
        filldir+0x91/0x100
        dcache_readdir+0x54/0x160
        iterate_dir+0x142/0x190
        __x64_sys_getdents+0xb9/0x170
        do_syscall_64+0x86/0x200
        entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe

 -> #1 (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#3){++++}:
        start_creating+0x60/0x100
        debugfs_create_dir+0xc/0xc0
        rdtgroup_pseudo_lock_create+0x217/0x4d0
        rdtgroup_schemata_write+0x313/0x3d0
        kernfs_fop_write+0xf0/0x1a0
        __vfs_write+0x36/0x190
        vfs_write+0xb7/0x190
        ksys_write+0x52/0xc0
        do_syscall_64+0x86/0x200
        entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe

 -> #0 (rdtgroup_mutex){+.+.}:
        __mutex_lock+0x80/0x9b0
        pseudo_lock_dev_mmap+0x2f/0x170
        mmap_region+0x3d6/0x610
        do_mmap+0x387/0x580
        vm_mmap_pgoff+0xcf/0x110
        ksys_mmap_pgoff+0x170/0x1f0
        do_syscall_64+0x86/0x200
        entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe

 other info that might help us debug this:

 Chain exists of:
   rdtgroup_mutex --> &sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#3 --> &mm->mmap_sem

  Possible unsafe locking scenario:

        CPU0                    CPU1
        ----                    ----
   lock(&mm->mmap_sem);
                                lock(&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#3);
                                lock(&mm->mmap_sem);
   lock(rdtgroup_mutex);

  *** DEADLOCK ***

 1 lock held by user_example/766:
  #0: 000000001ef7a35b (&mm->mmap_sem){++++}, at: vm_mmap_pgoff+0x9f/0x110

rdtgroup_mutex is already being released temporarily during pseudo-lock
region creation to prevent the potential deadlock between rdtgroup_mutex
and mm->mmap_sem that is obtained during device_create(). Move the
debugfs creation into this area to avoid the same circular dependency.
Signed-off-by: NReinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: fenghua.yu@intel.com
Cc: tony.luck@intel.com
Cc: vikas.shivappa@linux.intel.com
Cc: gavin.hindman@intel.com
Cc: jithu.joseph@intel.com
Cc: hpa@zytor.com
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/fffb57f9c6b8285904c9a60cc91ce21591af17fe.1531332480.git.reinette.chatre@intel.com
      2989360d
  11. 08 7月, 2018 1 次提交
  13. 03 7月, 2018 6 次提交
  15. 24 6月, 2018 4 次提交
  17. 23 6月, 2018 20 次提交