- 09 5月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Noam Camus 提交于
Adding EZchip NPS400 support. Internal interrupts are handled by Multi Thread Manager (MTM) Once interrupt is serviced MTM is acked for deactivating the interrupt. External interrupts are handled by MTM as well as at Global Interrupt Controller (GIC) e.g. serial and network devices. Signed-off-by: NNoam Camus <noamc@ezchip.com> Acked-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> Acked-by: NVineet Gupta <vgupta@synopsys.com> Acked-by: NJason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
-
- 14 3月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Maxime Ripard 提交于
The Allwinner A10 compatibles were following a slightly different compatible patterns than the rest of the SoCs for historical reasons. Change the compatibles to match the other pattern in the irq controller driver for consistency. Signed-off-by: NMaxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
-
- 12 12月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Baruch Siach 提交于
The documented value of #interrupt-cells is 1. Signed-off-by: NBaruch Siach <baruch@tkos.co.il> Signed-off-by: NMaxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
-
- 12 10月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Maxime Ripard 提交于
That documentation was mostly useful when we didn't have any documentation for those SoCs, which is not the case anymore. Remove this, since it should live in the DT anyway. Signed-off-by: NMaxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
-
- 29 5月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Maxime Ripard 提交于
A10 and A13 have a different set of available interrupt sources, reflect this in the documentation. Signed-off-by: NMaxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
-
- 09 4月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Maxime Ripard 提交于
During the introduction of the Allwinner SoC platforms, sunxi was initially meant as a generic name for all the variants of the Allwinner SoC. It was ok at the time of the support of only the A10 and A13 that looks pretty much the same, but it's beginning to be troublesome with the future addition of the Allwinner A31 (sun6i) that is quite different, and would introduce some weird logic, where sunxi would actually mean in some case sun4i and sun5i but without sun6i... Moreover, it makes the compatible strings naming scheme not consistent with other architectures, where usually for this kind of compability, we just use the oldest SoC name that has this IP, so let's do just this. Signed-off-by: NMaxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
-
- 17 11月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Maxime Ripard 提交于
Signed-off-by: NMaxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> CC: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
-