To cope with the changes in:

  12c89130 ("x86/asm/memcpy_mcsafe: Add write-protection-fault handling")
  60622d68 ("x86/asm/memcpy_mcsafe: Return bytes remaining")
  bd131544 ("x86/asm/memcpy_mcsafe: Add labels for __memcpy_mcsafe() write fault handling")
  da7bc9c5 ("x86/asm/memcpy_mcsafe: Remove loop unrolling")

This needed introducing a file with a copy of the mcsafe_handle_tail()
function, that is used in the new memcpy_64.S file, as well as a dummy
mcsafe_test.h header.

Testing it:

  $ nm ~/bin/perf | grep mcsafe
  0000000000484130 T mcsafe_handle_tail
  0000000000484300 T __memcpy_mcsafe
  $
  $ perf bench mem memcpy
  # Running 'mem/memcpy' benchmark:
  # function 'default' (Default memcpy() provided by glibc)
  # Copying 1MB bytes ...

      44.389205 GB/sec
  # function 'x86-64-unrolled' (unrolled memcpy() in arch/x86/lib/memcpy_64.S)
  # Copying 1MB bytes ...

      22.710756 GB/sec
  # function 'x86-64-movsq' (movsq-based memcpy() in arch/x86/lib/memcpy_64.S)
  # Copying 1MB bytes ...

      42.459239 GB/sec
  # function 'x86-64-movsb' (movsb-based memcpy() in arch/x86/lib/memcpy_64.S)
  # Copying 1MB bytes ...

      42.459239 GB/sec
  $

This silences this perf tools build warning:

  Warning: Kernel ABI header at 'tools/arch/x86/lib/memcpy_64.S' differs from latest version at 'arch/x86/lib/memcpy_64.S'

Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Cc: Mika Penttilä <mika.penttila@nextfour.com>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Cc: Wang Nan <wangnan0@huawei.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/n/tip-igdpciheradk3gb3qqal52d0@git.kernel.orgSigned-off-by: NArnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>

So mem-memcpy.c started out as a simple memcpy() benchmark, then it grew
memset() functionality and now I plan to add string copy benchmarks as
well.

This makes the file name a misnomer: rename it to the more generic
mem-functions.c name.
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>
Cc: Hitoshi Mitake <mitake@dcl.info.waseda.ac.jp>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1445241870-24854-5-git-send-email-mingo@kernel.org
[ The "rename" was introducing __unused, wasn't removing the old file,
  and didn't update tools/perf/bench/Build, fix it ]
Signed-off-by: NArnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>

Allows a way of measuring low level kernel implementation of FUTEX_LOCK_PI and
FUTEX_UNLOCK_PI.

The program comes in two flavors:

(i) single futex (default), all threads contend on the same uaddr.  For the
sake of the benchmark, we call into kernel space even when the lock is
uncontended.  The kernel will set it to TID, any waters that come in and
contend for the pi futex will be handled respectively by the kernel.

(ii) -M option for multiple futexes, each thread deals with its own futex. This
is a trivial scenario and only measures kernel handling of 0->TID transition.
Signed-off-by: NDavidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1436259353.12255.78.camel@stgolabs.netSigned-off-by: NArnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>

The futex-wake benchmark only measures wakeups done within a single
process. While this has value in its own, it does not really generate
any hb->lock contention.

A new benchmark 'wake-parallel' is added, by extending the futex-wake
code such that we can measure parallel waker threads. The program output
shows the avg per-thread latency in order to complete its share of
wakeups:

Run summary [PID 13474]: blocking on 512 threads (at [private] futex 0xa88668), 8 threads waking up 64 at a time.

[Run 1]: Avg per-thread latency (waking 64/512 threads) in 0.6230 ms (+-15.31%)
[Run 2]: Avg per-thread latency (waking 64/512 threads) in 0.5175 ms (+-29.95%)
[Run 3]: Avg per-thread latency (waking 64/512 threads) in 0.7578 ms (+-18.03%)
[Run 4]: Avg per-thread latency (waking 64/512 threads) in 0.8944 ms (+-12.54%)
[Run 5]: Avg per-thread latency (waking 64/512 threads) in 1.1204 ms (+-23.85%)
Avg per-thread latency (waking 64/512 threads) in 0.7826 ms (+-9.91%)

Naturally, different combinations of numbers of blocking and waker
threads will exhibit different information.
Signed-off-by: NDavidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de>
Tested-by: NArnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1431110280-20231-1-git-send-email-dave@stgolabs.netSigned-off-by: NArnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>

Move bench objects building under build framework and enable perf-in.o
rule.
Signed-off-by: NJiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Tested-by: NSukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Tested-by: NWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Cc: Alexis Berlemont <alexis.berlemont@gmail.com>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Corey Ashford <cjashfor@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/n/tip-b0gxubmn3qjabaq0lune53y3@git.kernel.orgSigned-off-by: NArnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>