提交 00239acf 编写于 作者: C Christoph Hellwig 提交者: Alex Elder

xfs: do not use unchecked extent indices in xfs_bunmapi

Make sure to only call xfs_iext_get_ext after we've validate the
extent index when moving on to the next index in xfs_bunmapi.  Also
remove the old workaround for too large indices that has been
superceeded by the proper fix in xfs_bmap_del_extent.

Based on an earlier patch from Lachlan McIlroy.
Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: NLachlan McIlroy <lmcilroy@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <aelder@sgi.com>
上级 5690f921
......@@ -5242,17 +5242,17 @@ xfs_bunmapi(
nodelete:
/*
* If not done go on to the next (previous) record.
* Reset ep in case the extents array was re-alloced.
*/
ep = xfs_iext_get_ext(ifp, lastx);
if (bno != (xfs_fileoff_t)-1 && bno >= start) {
if (lastx >= XFS_IFORK_NEXTENTS(ip, whichfork) ||
xfs_bmbt_get_startoff(ep) > bno) {
if (--lastx >= 0)
ep = xfs_iext_get_ext(ifp, lastx);
}
if (lastx >= 0)
if (lastx >= 0) {
ep = xfs_iext_get_ext(ifp, lastx);
if (xfs_bmbt_get_startoff(ep) > bno) {
if (--lastx >= 0)
ep = xfs_iext_get_ext(ifp,
lastx);
}
xfs_bmbt_get_all(ep, &got);
}
extno++;
}
}
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册