From 00239acf36d3bba8e7c0609e6c473d6e408a2135 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Christoph Hellwig Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 15:04:08 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] xfs: do not use unchecked extent indices in xfs_bunmapi Make sure to only call xfs_iext_get_ext after we've validate the extent index when moving on to the next index in xfs_bunmapi. Also remove the old workaround for too large indices that has been superceeded by the proper fix in xfs_bmap_del_extent. Based on an earlier patch from Lachlan McIlroy. Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig Reviewed-by: Lachlan McIlroy Signed-off-by: Alex Elder --- fs/xfs/xfs_bmap.c | 16 ++++++++-------- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_bmap.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_bmap.c index af655c1d460d..ebcd45203c3d 100644 --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_bmap.c +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_bmap.c @@ -5242,17 +5242,17 @@ xfs_bunmapi( nodelete: /* * If not done go on to the next (previous) record. - * Reset ep in case the extents array was re-alloced. */ - ep = xfs_iext_get_ext(ifp, lastx); if (bno != (xfs_fileoff_t)-1 && bno >= start) { - if (lastx >= XFS_IFORK_NEXTENTS(ip, whichfork) || - xfs_bmbt_get_startoff(ep) > bno) { - if (--lastx >= 0) - ep = xfs_iext_get_ext(ifp, lastx); - } - if (lastx >= 0) + if (lastx >= 0) { + ep = xfs_iext_get_ext(ifp, lastx); + if (xfs_bmbt_get_startoff(ep) > bno) { + if (--lastx >= 0) + ep = xfs_iext_get_ext(ifp, + lastx); + } xfs_bmbt_get_all(ep, &got); + } extno++; } } -- GitLab