- 09 11月, 2018 3 次提交
-
-
由 HeeJae Chang 提交于
-
由 HeeJae Chang 提交于
-
由 HeeJae Chang 提交于
-
- 08 11月, 2018 2 次提交
-
-
由 HeeJae Chang 提交于
-
由 HeeJae Chang 提交于
-
- 06 11月, 2018 1 次提交
-
-
由 Sam Harwell 提交于
Fixes #30271
-
- 02 11月, 2018 4 次提交
-
-
由 Tomas Matousek 提交于
-
由 Tomas Matousek 提交于
-
由 Tomas Matousek 提交于
-
由 Tomas Matousek 提交于
-
- 01 11月, 2018 8 次提交
-
-
-
由 HeeJae Chang 提交于
-
由 HeeJae Chang 提交于
-
由 HeeJae Chang 提交于
-
由 HeeJae Chang 提交于
-
由 HeeJae Chang 提交于
-
由 HeeJae Chang 提交于
-
由 HeeJae Chang 提交于
-
- 28 10月, 2018 1 次提交
-
-
由 Sam Harwell 提交于
See #30819
-
- 27 10月, 2018 2 次提交
-
-
由 Sam Harwell 提交于
-
由 Sam Harwell 提交于
-
- 20 10月, 2018 11 次提交
-
-
由 Jason Malinowski 提交于
-
由 Jason Malinowski 提交于
-
由 Jason Malinowski 提交于
We support dangling project references in the workspace API, and the ProjectDependencyGraph is only supposed to return references that exist within the project. Therefore, if we add a project, we have to check to make sure we didn't have a dangling reference becoming a real reference, and give inconsistent results. I expect this to be a rare situation in reality so don't want to spend a lot of time optimizing for it, but if it happens this will keep everything in sync.
-
由 Jason Malinowski 提交于
-
由 Jason Malinowski 提交于
-
由 Jason Malinowski 提交于
It's unclear to me why we have another implementation of computing transitive project references; we'll just call our existing implementation.
-
由 Jason Malinowski 提交于
-
由 Jason Malinowski 提交于
Any time we made a change to the dependency structure of a solution, we threw away the dependency graph entirely and recomputed it. This was pretty wasteful, since we'd promptly recompute parts of it as a part of the workspace solution forking. The allocations were quite high, often to recompute the (almost) exact same immutable data as before. This adds the abilty to take an existing ProjectDependencyGraph and update it to produce a new graph with project references added, which reuses whatever data was easily available.
-
由 Jason Malinowski 提交于
We already have an API for adding multiple project references; let's just use that at the public entrypoints than trying to maintain near-duplicate code.
-
由 Jason Malinowski 提交于
-
由 Jason Malinowski 提交于
These methods do not return topologically sorted results; not only is that not something that really makes sense, but they return IImmutableSets anyways so they have no way to guarantee ordering at all.
-
- 18 10月, 2018 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jason Malinowski 提交于
Two bugs being fixed here: 1. When we remove a document in a non-batch scenario, we close any information related to the open document. If we were in a batch scenario, the SetCurrentSolution we do to apply the new Solution snapshot didn't go through that. Now we do. 2. UpdateSolutionForBatch wasn't calling the delegates given; this would have meant that additional files being added in a batch would have been added a regular source files.
-
- 17 10月, 2018 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jason Malinowski 提交于
The underlying process of removing a document already handled this, this was an unnecessary block. It was already the case that you could call OnProjectRemoved to remove the entire project that had open files, so this didn't really avoid badness in the first place.
-
- 13 10月, 2018 1 次提交
-
-
由 Joey Robichaud 提交于
Added AddMissingImport CodeRefactoring driven by PasteTrackingService Added PasteTrackingService that handles the paste command and track paste information for documents. This paste information can be used by refactorings to make suggestions based on what was pasted. Fixes #10272
-
- 10 10月, 2018 1 次提交
-
-
由 Omar Tawfik 提交于
* Move Index from unary operators to a stand alone node * Remove indexer hack * Remove prototype comments * Testing/fixing IDE services * Added EE tests * Rename "Index" nodes to "FromEndIndex" * More comments * Some minor fixups and test fixes
-
- 09 10月, 2018 2 次提交
-
-
由 Sam Harwell 提交于
-
由 Manish Vasani 提交于
-
- 06 10月, 2018 2 次提交
-
-
由 Heejae Chang 提交于
-
由 Jason Malinowski 提交于
This produces a new free-threaded, well factored API for adding projects to the VisualStudioWorkspace. The core type is the VisualStudioProject which is a free-threaded API that you can use to push information over. CSharpProjectShim, VisualBasicProject and CPSProject each have an instance of VisualStudioProject that they push things through. The inheritence model here is now smaller. CSharpProjectShim and VisualBasicProject inherit from AbstractLegacyProject, but that's it. CPSProject now inherits nothing, and AbstractProject is here purely for TypeScript back-compat until they're moved onto the new APIs. The expectation is F# and TypeScript both move to VisualStudioProject, which we make public in some form. Then that type will go away.
-