- 07 8月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Adam Niedzielski 提交于
-
- 29 7月, 2016 2 次提交
-
-
由 Timothy Andrew 提交于
1. It makes sense to reuse these constants since we had them duplicated in the previous enum implementation. This also simplifies our `check_access` implementation, because we can use `project.team.max_member_access` directly. 2. Use `accepts_nested_attributes_for` to create push/merge access levels. This was a bit fiddly to set up, but this simplifies our code by quite a large amount. We can even get rid of `ProtectedBranches::BaseService`. 3. Move API handling back into the API (previously in `ProtectedBranches::BaseService#translate_api_params`. 4. The protected branch services now return a `ProtectedBranch` rather than `true/false`. 5. Run `load_protected_branches` on-demand in the `create` action, to prevent it being called unneccessarily. 6. "Masters" is pre-selected as the default option for "Allowed to Push" and "Allowed to Merge". 7. These changes were based on a review from @rymai in !5081.
-
由 Timothy Andrew 提交于
1. The new data model moves from `developers_can_{push,merge}` to `allowed_to_{push,merge}`. 2. The API interface has not been changed. It still accepts `developers_can_push` and `developers_can_merge` as options. These attributes are inferred from the new data model. 3. Modify the protected branch create/update services to translate from the API interface to our current data model.
-
- 28 7月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 dixpac 提交于
-
- 27 7月, 2016 4 次提交
-
-
由 Patricio Cano 提交于
Refactor spam validation to a concern that can be easily reused and improve legibility in `SpamCheckService`
-
由 Patricio Cano 提交于
-
由 Patricio Cano 提交于
-
由 Patricio Cano 提交于
-
- 21 7月, 2016 3 次提交
-
-
由 Lin Jen-Shin 提交于
-
由 Alejandro Rodríguez 提交于
-
由 Alejandro Rodríguez 提交于
Also, in favour of consistency, deprecate `/projects/:id/keys/...` routes in favour of `/projects/:id/deploy_keys/...`
-
- 20 7月, 2016 3 次提交
-
-
由 Lin Jen-Shin 提交于
-
由 Robert Schilling 提交于
-
- 19 7月, 2016 8 次提交
-
-
由 Lin Jen-Shin 提交于
This was extracted from !5142 and implementing part of #4255. We split it from !5142 because we want to ship it in 8.10 while !5142 was not ready yet.
-
由 Robert Schilling 提交于
-
由 Robert Schilling 提交于
-
由 Robert Schilling 提交于
-
由 Robert Schilling 提交于
-
由 Robert Schilling 提交于
-
由 Patricio Cano 提交于
Refactor and rename `restricted_signup_domains` to `domain_whitelist` to better conform to its behavior and newly introduced behavior.
-
由 Patricio Cano 提交于
-
- 18 7月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Rémy Coutable 提交于
This reverts commit 530f5158. See !4892. Signed-off-by: NRémy Coutable <remy@rymai.me>
-
- 16 7月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Alejandro Rodríguez 提交于
-
- 15 7月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Kamil Trzcinski 提交于
-
- 14 7月, 2016 2 次提交
-
-
由 dixpac 提交于
* There where path where +1 was stored as +1 not as thumbsup that was causing problems such as showing thumbsup icon 2 time. I fixed this to always normalize and store +1 as tumbsup
-
由 Robert Speicher 提交于
This reverts commit 9ca633eb, reversing changes made to fb229bbf.
-
- 13 7月, 2016 4 次提交
-
-
由 tiagonbotelho 提交于
-
由 Timothy Andrew 提交于
1. Don't use case statements for dispatch anymore. This leads to a lot of duplication, and makes the logic harder to follow. 2. Remove duplicated logic. - For example, the `can_push_to_branch?` exists, but we also have a different way of checking the same condition within `change_access_check`. - This kind of duplication is removed, and the `can_push_to_branch?` method is used in both places. 3. Move checks returning true/false to `UserAccess`. - All public methods in `GitAccess` now return an instance of `GitAccessStatus`. Previously, some methods would return true/false as well, which was confusing. - It makes sense for these kinds of checks to be at the level of a user, so the `UserAccess` class was repurposed for this. The prior `UserAccess.allowed?` classmethod is converted into an instance method. - All external uses of these checks have been migrated to use the `UserAccess` class 4. Move the "change_access_check" into a separate class. - Create the `GitAccess::ChangeAccessCheck` class to run these checks, which are quite substantial. - `ChangeAccessCheck` returns an instance of `GitAccessStatus` as well. 5. Break out the boolean logic in `ChangeAccessCheck` into `if/else` chains - this seems more readable. 6. I can understand that this might look like overkill for !4892, but I think this is a good opportunity to clean it up. - http://martinfowler.com/bliki/OpportunisticRefactoring.html
-
由 tiagonbotelho 提交于
-
由 tiagonbotelho 提交于
-
- 12 7月, 2016 9 次提交
-
-
由 Robert Schilling 提交于
-
由 tiagonbotelho 提交于
changes the usage of simpleprojectdetails to already implemented basicprojectsdetails and changes the url to a more reader friendly format
-
由 tiagonbotelho 提交于
-
由 tiagonbotelho 提交于
-
由 tiagonbotelho 提交于
-
由 tiagonbotelho 提交于
-
由 tiagonbotelho 提交于
-
由 tiagonbotelho 提交于
changes the usage of simpleprojectdetails to already implemented basicprojectsdetails and changes the url to a more reader friendly format
-
由 tiagonbotelho 提交于
-