- 14 9月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Daniel Beck 提交于
-
- 13 9月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Daniel Beck 提交于
-
- 08 9月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Daniel Beck 提交于
-
- 07 9月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Kohsuke Kawaguchi 提交于
-
- 06 9月, 2014 4 次提交
-
-
由 Kohsuke Kawaguchi 提交于
-
由 Daniel Beck 提交于
-
由 Daniel Beck 提交于
-
由 Daniel Beck 提交于
-
- 01 9月, 2014 2 次提交
-
-
由 Kohsuke Kawaguchi 提交于
-
由 Kohsuke Kawaguchi 提交于
-
- 30 8月, 2014 2 次提交
-
-
由 Kohsuke Kawaguchi 提交于
Ubuntu (at least as of 12.04) has the default umask 022, which made some users nervous. Quoting its /etc/login.defs below, which explains its historical origin: UMASK is the default umask value for pam_umask and is used by useradd and newusers to set the mode of the new home directories. 022 is the "historical" value in Debian for UMASK 027, or even 077, could be considered better for privacy There is no One True Answer here : each sysadmin must make up his/her mind. It does seem to me that a bit more restrictive default is sensible, so this change introduces /etc/default/jenkins parameter that sets the default umask to 027 to prevent "others" from seeing files. Not that keys and other sensitive files are protected anyway, so it is not the case that the privacy of Jenkins data files have been vulnerable prior to this change.
-
由 Jesse Glick 提交于
[FIXED JENKINS-23522] Defend against stack overflows when a listener (unnecessarily) called super from a deprecated method. Fixes #1295 a little differently.
-
- 29 8月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Daniel Beck 提交于
-
- 27 8月, 2014 2 次提交
-
-
由 Jesse Glick 提交于
-
由 Daniel Beck 提交于
-
- 25 8月, 2014 3 次提交
-
-
由 Jesse Glick 提交于
-
由 Kohsuke Kawaguchi 提交于
-
由 Kohsuke Kawaguchi 提交于
-
- 23 8月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Daniel Beck 提交于
-
- 21 8月, 2014 4 次提交
-
-
由 Daniel Beck 提交于
-
由 Jesse Glick 提交于
Adapted from #1375 by @daniel-beck: omitting change to User construction, and adding test. (cherry picked from commit 088edabb) Conflicts: changelog.html
-
由 Jesse Glick 提交于
Adapted from #1375 by @daniel-beck: omitting change to User construction, and adding test.
-
由 Jesse Glick 提交于
[FIXED JENKINS-24358] RunSaveableReference.get can acquire locks, so avoid calling it while holding a lock on ourselves.
-
- 20 8月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Kohsuke Kawaguchi 提交于
Added no-store to the Cache-Contorl header Reference: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/866822/why-both-no-cache-and-no-store-should-be-used-in-http-response Reference: http://www.w3.org/Protocols/rfc2616/rfc2616-sec14.html#sec14.9.2
-
- 19 8月, 2014 5 次提交
-
-
由 Kohsuke Kawaguchi 提交于
-
由 Kohsuke Kawaguchi 提交于
-
由 Jesse Glick 提交于
-
由 Jesse Glick 提交于
-
由 Kohsuke Kawaguchi 提交于
Integrated new dom4j
-
- 18 8月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Harald Albers 提交于
-
- 14 8月, 2014 2 次提交
-
-
由 Daniel Beck 提交于
-
由 Oliver Gondža 提交于
-
- 12 8月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jesse Glick 提交于
-
- 11 8月, 2014 2 次提交
-
-
由 Kohsuke Kawaguchi 提交于
-
由 Kohsuke Kawaguchi 提交于
-
- 09 8月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jesse Glick 提交于
-
- 08 8月, 2014 2 次提交
-
-
由 Jesse Glick 提交于
-
由 Jesse Glick 提交于
-
- 07 8月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Daniel Beck 提交于
-
- 05 8月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 tfennelly 提交于
-