1. 13 8月, 2021 1 次提交
  2. 11 8月, 2021 1 次提交
  3. 10 8月, 2021 1 次提交
  4. 28 7月, 2021 1 次提交
  5. 24 7月, 2021 1 次提交
  6. 20 7月, 2021 1 次提交
  7. 13 7月, 2021 3 次提交
  8. 09 7月, 2021 1 次提交
  9. 24 6月, 2021 1 次提交
  10. 23 6月, 2021 2 次提交
  11. 17 6月, 2021 1 次提交
  12. 16 6月, 2021 1 次提交
  13. 10 6月, 2021 1 次提交
  14. 08 6月, 2021 1 次提交
  15. 05 6月, 2021 1 次提交
  16. 04 6月, 2021 3 次提交
  17. 25 5月, 2021 1 次提交
  18. 20 5月, 2021 2 次提交
  19. 08 5月, 2021 1 次提交
  20. 05 5月, 2021 1 次提交
  21. 03 5月, 2021 1 次提交
    • A
      Do not remove ci:run label from the sync PRs. (#59) · 8e08d32b
      Advait Jain 提交于
      Since we trigger the CI workflow on any label change, when the cla:yes
      label is applied the CI workflow will be run, and there is no way around
      that with the current setup.
      
      If the sync PR does not have the ci:run label, the checks will be
      skipped but will still need to be run again prior to merge since
      skipping the checks invalidates the previous completion of the required checks.
      
      As a result, we are keeping the ci:run label. What this means is that
      the reviewer can manually apply the cla:yes label and then start
      auto-merge (which will wait for another round of the required checks to
      be run).
      8e08d32b
  22. 01 5月, 2021 4 次提交
  23. 30 4月, 2021 9 次提交