- 25 8月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Liu Bo 提交于
When some critical errors occur and FS would be flipped into RO, if we have an on-going balance, we can end up with a memory leak of root->reloc_root since btrfs_drop_snapshots() bails out without freeing reloc_root at the very early start. However, we're not able to free reloc_root in btrfs_drop_snapshots() because its caller, merge_reloc_roots(), still needs to access it to cleanup reloc_root's rbtree. This makes us free reloc_root when we're going to free fs/file roots. Signed-off-by: NLiu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
- 26 7月, 2016 6 次提交
-
-
由 Jeff Mahoney 提交于
Now that we have a dummy fs_info associated with each test that uses a root, we don't need the DUMMY_ROOT bit anymore. This lets us make choices without needing an actual root like in e.g. btrfs_find_create_tree_block. Signed-off-by: NJeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Jeff Mahoney 提交于
This allows the upcoming patchset to push nodesize and sectorsize into fs_info. Signed-off-by: NJeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Jeff Mahoney 提交于
btrfs_test_opt and friends only use the root pointer to access the fs_info. Let's pass the fs_info directly in preparation to eliminate similar patterns all over btrfs. Signed-off-by: NJeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Jeff Mahoney 提交于
In order to provide an fsid for trace events, we'll need a btrfs_fs_info pointer. The most lightweight way to do that for btrfs_work structures is to associate it with the __btrfs_workqueue structure. Each queued btrfs_work structure has a workqueue associated with it, so that's a natural fit. It's a privately defined structures, so we add accessors to retrieve the fs_info pointer. Signed-off-by: NJeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Nikolay Borisov 提交于
BTRFS is using a variety of slab caches to satisfy internal needs. Those slab caches are always allocated with the SLAB_RECLAIM_ACCOUNT, meaning allocations from the caches are going to be accounted as SReclaimable. At the same time btrfs is not registering any shrinkers whatsoever, thus preventing memory from the slabs to be shrunk. This means those caches are not in fact reclaimable. To fix this remove the SLAB_RECLAIM_ACCOUNT on all caches apart from the inode cache, since this one is being freed by the generic VFS super_block shrinker. Also set the transaction related caches as SLAB_TEMPORARY, to better document the lifetime of the objects (it just translates to SLAB_RECLAIM_ACCOUNT). Signed-off-by: NNikolay Borisov <n.borisov.lkml@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Liu Bo 提交于
I got this warning while mounting a btrfs image, [ 3020.509606] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 3020.510107] WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 5581 at lib/idr.c:1051 ida_remove+0xca/0x190 [ 3020.510853] ida_remove called for id=42 which is not allocated. [ 3020.511466] Modules linked in: [ 3020.511802] CPU: 3 PID: 5581 Comm: mount Not tainted 4.7.0-rc5+ #274 [ 3020.512438] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.8.2-20150714_191134- 04/01/2014 [ 3020.513385] 0000000000000286 0000000021295d86 ffff88006c66b8f0 ffffffff8182ba5a [ 3020.514153] 0000000000000000 0000000000000009 ffff88006c66b930 ffffffff810e0ed7 [ 3020.514928] 0000041b00000000 ffffffff8289a8c0 ffff88007f437880 0000000000000000 [ 3020.515717] Call Trace: [ 3020.515965] [<ffffffff8182ba5a>] dump_stack+0xc9/0x13f [ 3020.516487] [<ffffffff810e0ed7>] __warn+0x147/0x160 [ 3020.517005] [<ffffffff810e0f4f>] warn_slowpath_fmt+0x5f/0x80 [ 3020.517572] [<ffffffff8182e6ca>] ida_remove+0xca/0x190 [ 3020.518075] [<ffffffff813a2bcc>] free_anon_bdev+0x2c/0x60 [ 3020.518609] [<ffffffff81657a9f>] free_fs_root+0x13f/0x160 [ 3020.519138] [<ffffffff8165c679>] btrfs_get_fs_root+0x379/0x3d0 [ 3020.519710] [<ffffffff81e6e975>] ? __mutex_unlock_slowpath+0x155/0x2c0 [ 3020.520366] [<ffffffff816615b1>] open_ctree+0x2e91/0x3200 [ 3020.520965] [<ffffffff8161ede2>] btrfs_mount+0x1322/0x15b0 [ 3020.521536] [<ffffffff81e60e74>] ? kmemleak_alloc_percpu+0x44/0x170 [ 3020.522167] [<ffffffff8115f5e1>] ? lockdep_init_map+0x61/0x210 [ 3020.522780] [<ffffffff813a4f59>] mount_fs+0x49/0x2c0 [ 3020.523305] [<ffffffff813d840c>] vfs_kern_mount+0xac/0x1b0 [ 3020.523872] [<ffffffff8161dee1>] btrfs_mount+0x421/0x15b0 [ 3020.524402] [<ffffffff81e60e74>] ? kmemleak_alloc_percpu+0x44/0x170 [ 3020.525045] [<ffffffff8115f5e1>] ? lockdep_init_map+0x61/0x210 [ 3020.525657] [<ffffffff8115f5e1>] ? lockdep_init_map+0x61/0x210 [ 3020.526289] [<ffffffff813a4f59>] mount_fs+0x49/0x2c0 [ 3020.526803] [<ffffffff813d840c>] vfs_kern_mount+0xac/0x1b0 [ 3020.527365] [<ffffffff813dc27a>] do_mount+0x41a/0x1770 [ 3020.527899] [<ffffffff812e800d>] ? strndup_user+0x6d/0xc0 [ 3020.528447] [<ffffffff812e7f68>] ? memdup_user+0x78/0xb0 [ 3020.528987] [<ffffffff813ddad0>] SyS_mount+0x150/0x160 [ 3020.529493] [<ffffffff81e72b7c>] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x1f/0xbd It turns out that we free fs root twice, btrfs_init_fs_root() calls free_anon_bdev(root->anon_dev) and later then btrfs_get_fs_root() cals free_fs_root which does another free_anon_bdev() and it ends up with the above warning. Instead of reset root->anon_dev to 0 after free_anon_bdev(), we can let btrfs_init_fs_root() return directly since its callers have already done the free job by calling free_fs_root(). Signed-off-by: NLiu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Reviewed-by: NChandan Rajendra <chandan@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
- 24 6月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Chandan Rajendra 提交于
Btrfs code currently assumes stripesize to be same as sectorsize. However Btrfs-progs (until commit df05c7ed455f519e6e15e46196392e4757257305) has been setting btrfs_super_block->stripesize to a value of 4096. This commit makes sure that the value of btrfs_super_block->stripesize is a power of 2. Later, it unconditionally sets btrfs_root->stripesize to sectorsize. Signed-off-by: NChandan Rajendra <chandan@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
- 18 6月, 2016 3 次提交
-
-
由 Chandan Rajendra 提交于
Older btrfs-progs/mkfs.btrfs sets 4096 as the stripesize. Hence restricting stripesize to be equal to sectorsize would cause super block validation to return an error on architectures where PAGE_SIZE is not equal to 4096. Hence as a workaround, this commit allows stripesize to be set to 4096 bytes. Signed-off-by: NChandan Rajendra <chandan@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Zygo Blaxell 提交于
This fixes a problem introduced in commit 2f3165ec "btrfs: don't force mounts to wait for cleaner_kthread to delete one or more subvolumes". open_ctree eventually calls btrfs_replay_log which in turn calls btrfs_commit_super which tries to lock the cleaner_mutex, causing a recursive mutex deadlock during mount. Instead of playing whack-a-mole trying to keep up with all the functions that may want to lock cleaner_mutex, put all the cleaner_mutex lockers back where they were, and attack the problem more directly: keep cleaner_kthread asleep until the filesystem is mounted. When filesystems are mounted read-only and later remounted read-write, open_ctree did not set fs_info->open and neither does anything else. Set this flag in btrfs_remount so that neither btrfs_delete_unused_bgs nor cleaner_kthread get confused by the common case of "/" filesystem read-only mount followed by read-write remount. Signed-off-by: NZygo Blaxell <ce3g8jdj@umail.furryterror.org> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Liu Bo 提交于
Thanks to fuzz testing, we can pass an invalid bytenr to extent buffer via alloc_extent_buffer(). An unaligned eb can have more pages than it should have, which ends up extent buffer's leak or some corrupted content in extent buffer. This adds a warning to let us quickly know what was happening. Now that alloc_extent_buffer() no more returns NULL, this changes its caller and callers of its caller to match with the new error handling. Signed-off-by: NLiu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
- 06 6月, 2016 2 次提交
-
-
由 Feifei Xu 提交于
This commit replaces numerical constants with appropriate preprocessor macros. Reviewed-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com> Signed-off-by: NChandan Rajendra <chandan@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NFeifei Xu <xufeifei@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Liu Bo 提交于
This adds validation checks for super_total_bytes, super_bytes_used and super_stripesize, super_num_devices. Reported-by: NVegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@oracle.com> Reported-by: NQuentin Casasnovas <quentin.casasnovas@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NLiu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
- 03 6月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Feifei Xu 提交于
self-tests code assumes 4k as the sectorsize and nodesize. This commit fix hardcoded 4K. Enables the self-tests code to be executed on non-4k page sized systems (e.g. ppc64). Reviewed-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com> Signed-off-by: NFeifei Xu <xufeifei@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NChandan Rajendra <chandan@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
- 26 5月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Nicholas D Steeves 提交于
Signed-off-by: NNicholas D Steeves <nsteeves@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
- 10 5月, 2016 2 次提交
-
-
由 David Sterba 提交于
Masking HIGHMEM out of NOFS does not make sense. Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 David Sterba 提交于
Currently we lack the identification of the filesystem in most if not all mount messages, done via printk/pr_* functions. We can use the btrfs_* helpers in open_ctree, as the fs_info <-> sb link is established at the beginning of the function. The messages have been updated at the same time to be more consistent: * dropped sb->s_id, as it's not available via btrfs_* * added %d for return code where appropriate * wording changed * %Lx replaced by %llx Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
- 06 5月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Zygo Blaxell 提交于
During a mount, we start the cleaner kthread first because the transaction kthread wants to wake up the cleaner kthread. We start the transaction kthread next because everything in btrfs wants transactions. We do reloc recovery in the thread that was doing the original mount call once the transaction kthread is running. This means that the cleaner kthread could already be running when reloc recovery happens (e.g. if a snapshot delete was started before a crash). Relocation does not play well with the cleaner kthread, so a mutex was added in commit 5f316481 "Btrfs: fix race between balance recovery and root deletion" to prevent both from being active at the same time. If the cleaner kthread is already holding the mutex by the time we get to btrfs_recover_relocation, the mount will be blocked until at least one deleted subvolume is cleaned (possibly more if the mount process doesn't get the lock right away). During this time (which could be an arbitrarily long time on a large/slow filesystem), the mount process is stuck and the filesystem is unnecessarily inaccessible. Fix this by locking cleaner_mutex before we start cleaner_kthread, and unlocking the mutex after mount no longer requires it. This ensures that the mounting process will not be blocked by the cleaner kthread. The cleaner kthread is already prepared for mutex contention and will just go to sleep until the mutex is available. Signed-off-by: NZygo Blaxell <ce3g8jdj@umail.furryterror.org> Reviewed-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
- 29 4月, 2016 2 次提交
-
-
由 David Sterba 提交于
Callers pass GFP_NOFS. No need to pass the flags around. Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 David Sterba 提交于
Callers pass GFP_NOFS and GFP_KERNEL. No need to pass the flags around. Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
- 28 4月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Anand Jain 提交于
btrfs_std_error() handles errors, puts FS into readonly mode (as of now). So its good idea to rename it to btrfs_handle_fs_error(). Signed-off-by: NAnand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> [ edit changelog ] Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
- 05 4月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Kirill A. Shutemov 提交于
PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} macros were introduced *long* time ago with promise that one day it will be possible to implement page cache with bigger chunks than PAGE_SIZE. This promise never materialized. And unlikely will. We have many places where PAGE_CACHE_SIZE assumed to be equal to PAGE_SIZE. And it's constant source of confusion on whether PAGE_CACHE_* or PAGE_* constant should be used in a particular case, especially on the border between fs and mm. Global switching to PAGE_CACHE_SIZE != PAGE_SIZE would cause to much breakage to be doable. Let's stop pretending that pages in page cache are special. They are not. The changes are pretty straight-forward: - <foo> << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>; - <foo> >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>; - PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} -> PAGE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN}; - page_cache_get() -> get_page(); - page_cache_release() -> put_page(); This patch contains automated changes generated with coccinelle using script below. For some reason, coccinelle doesn't patch header files. I've called spatch for them manually. The only adjustment after coccinelle is revert of changes to PAGE_CAHCE_ALIGN definition: we are going to drop it later. There are few places in the code where coccinelle didn't reach. I'll fix them manually in a separate patch. Comments and documentation also will be addressed with the separate patch. virtual patch @@ expression E; @@ - E << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) + E @@ expression E; @@ - E >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) + E @@ @@ - PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT + PAGE_SHIFT @@ @@ - PAGE_CACHE_SIZE + PAGE_SIZE @@ @@ - PAGE_CACHE_MASK + PAGE_MASK @@ expression E; @@ - PAGE_CACHE_ALIGN(E) + PAGE_ALIGN(E) @@ expression E; @@ - page_cache_get(E) + get_page(E) @@ expression E; @@ - page_cache_release(E) + put_page(E) Signed-off-by: NKirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: NMichal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 22 3月, 2016 4 次提交
-
-
由 Jiri Kosina 提交于
transaction_kthread() is calling try_to_freeze(), but that's just an expeinsive no-op given the fact that the thread is not marked freezable. After removing this, disk-io.c is now independent on freezer API. Signed-off-by: NJiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Jiri Kosina 提交于
cleaner_kthread() is not marked freezable, and therefore calling try_to_freeze() in its context is a pointless no-op. In addition to that, as has been clearly demonstrated by 80ad623e ("Revert "btrfs: clear PF_NOFREEZE in cleaner_kthread()"), it's perfectly valid / legal for cleaner_kthread() to stay scheduled out in an arbitrary place during suspend (in that particular example that was waiting for reading of extent pages), so there is no need to leave any traces of freezer in this kthread. Fixes: 80ad623e ("Revert "btrfs: clear PF_NOFREEZE in cleaner_kthread()") Fixes: 69624913 ("btrfs: clear PF_NOFREEZE in cleaner_kthread()") Signed-off-by: NJiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Alex Lyakas 提交于
csum_dirty_buffer was issuing a warning in case the extent buffer did not look alright, but was still returning success. Let's return error in this case, and also add an additional sanity check on the extent buffer header. The caller up the chain may BUG_ON on this, for example flush_epd_write_bio will, but it is better than to have a silent metadata corruption on disk. Signed-off-by: NAlex Lyakas <alex@zadarastorage.com> Reviewed-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Alex Lyakas 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAlex Lyakas <alex@zadarastorage.com> Reviewed-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
- 14 3月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Adam Buchbinder 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAdam Buchbinder <adam.buchbinder@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
- 12 3月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Anand Jain 提交于
So that its better organized. Signed-off-by: NAnand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
- 23 2月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Liu Bo 提交于
Xfstests btrfs/011 complains about a deadlock warning, [ 1226.649039] ========================================================= [ 1226.649039] [ INFO: possible irq lock inversion dependency detected ] [ 1226.649039] 4.1.0+ #270 Not tainted [ 1226.649039] --------------------------------------------------------- [ 1226.652955] kswapd0/46 just changed the state of lock: [ 1226.652955] (&delayed_node->mutex){+.+.-.}, at: [<ffffffff81458735>] __btrfs_release_delayed_node+0x45/0x1d0 [ 1226.652955] but this lock took another, RECLAIM_FS-unsafe lock in the past: [ 1226.652955] (&fs_info->dev_replace.lock){+.+.+.} and interrupts could create inverse lock ordering between them. [ 1226.652955] other info that might help us debug this: [ 1226.652955] Chain exists of: &delayed_node->mutex --> &found->groups_sem --> &fs_info->dev_replace.lock [ 1226.652955] Possible interrupt unsafe locking scenario: [ 1226.652955] CPU0 CPU1 [ 1226.652955] ---- ---- [ 1226.652955] lock(&fs_info->dev_replace.lock); [ 1226.652955] local_irq_disable(); [ 1226.652955] lock(&delayed_node->mutex); [ 1226.652955] lock(&found->groups_sem); [ 1226.652955] <Interrupt> [ 1226.652955] lock(&delayed_node->mutex); [ 1226.652955] *** DEADLOCK *** Commit 084b6e7c ("btrfs: Fix a lockdep warning when running xfstest.") tried to fix a similar one that has the exactly same warning, but with that, we still run to this. The above lock chain comes from btrfs_commit_transaction ->btrfs_run_delayed_items ... ->__btrfs_update_delayed_inode ... ->__btrfs_cow_block ... ->find_free_extent ->cache_block_group ->load_free_space_cache ->btrfs_readpages ->submit_one_bio ... ->__btrfs_map_block ->btrfs_dev_replace_lock However, with high memory pressure, tasks which hold dev_replace.lock can be interrupted by kswapd and then kswapd is intended to release memory occupied by superblock, inodes and dentries, where we may call evict_inode, and it comes to [ 1226.652955] [<ffffffff81458735>] __btrfs_release_delayed_node+0x45/0x1d0 [ 1226.652955] [<ffffffff81459e74>] btrfs_remove_delayed_node+0x24/0x30 [ 1226.652955] [<ffffffff8140c5fe>] btrfs_evict_inode+0x34e/0x700 delayed_node->mutex may be acquired in __btrfs_release_delayed_node(), and it leads to a ABBA deadlock. To fix this, we can use "blocking rwlock" used in the case of extent_buffer, but things are simpler here since we only needs read's spinlock to blocking lock. With this, btrfs/011 no more produces warnings in dmesg. Signed-off-by: NLiu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
- 18 2月, 2016 3 次提交
-
-
由 Kinglong Mee 提交于
Cleanup. kmem_cache_destroy has support NULL argument checking, so drop the double null testing before calling it. Signed-off-by: NKinglong Mee <kinglongmee@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Zhao Lei 提交于
Reada creates 2 works for each level of tree recursively. In case of a tree having many levels, the number of created works is 2^level_of_tree. Actually we don't need so many works in parallel, this patch limits max works to BTRFS_MAX_MIRRORS * 2. The per-fs works_counter will be also used for btrfs_reada_wait() to check is there are background workers. Signed-off-by: NZhao Lei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Zhao Lei 提交于
What __readahead_hook() need exactly is fs_info, no need to convert fs_info to root in caller and convert back in __readahead_hook() Signed-off-by: NZhao Lei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
- 12 2月, 2016 2 次提交
-
-
由 Qu Wenruo 提交于
Introduce a new mount option "nologreplay" to co-operate with "ro" mount option to get real readonly mount, like "norecovery" in ext* and xfs. Since the new parse_options() need to check new flags at remount time, so add a new parameter for parse_options(). Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: NChandan Rajendra <chandan@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Tested-by: NAustin S. Hemmelgarn <ahferroin7@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Qu Wenruo 提交于
Current "recovery" mount option will only try to use backup root. However the word "recovery" is too generic and may be confusing for some users. Here introduce a new and more specific mount option, "usebackuproot" to replace "recovery" mount option. "Recovery" will be kept for compatibility reason, but will be deprecated. Also, since "usebackuproot" will only affect mount behavior and after open_ctree() it has nothing to do with the filesystem, so clear the flag after mount succeeded. This provides the basis for later unified "norecovery" mount option. Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com> [ dropped usebackuproot from show_mount, added note about 'recovery' to docs ] Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
- 11 2月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 David Sterba 提交于
We don't need to use GFP_NOFS in all contexts, eg. during mount or for dummy root tree, but we might for the the log tree creation. Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
- 30 1月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Borislav Petkov 提交于
So the old one didn't work properly before alternatives had run. And it was supposed to provide an optimized JMP because the assumption was that the offset it is jumping to is within a signed byte and thus a two-byte JMP. So I did an x86_64 allyesconfig build and dumped all possible sites where static_cpu_has() was used. The optimization amounted to all in all 12(!) places where static_cpu_has() had generated a 2-byte JMP. Which has saved us a whopping 36 bytes! This clearly is not worth the trouble so we can remove it. The only place where the optimization might count - in __switch_to() - we will handle differently. But that's not subject of this patch. Signed-off-by: NBorislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com> Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1453842730-28463-6-git-send-email-bp@alien8.deSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
- 26 1月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 David Sterba 提交于
This reverts commit 69624913. The cleaner thread can block freezing when there's a snapshot cleaning in progress and the other threads get suspended first. From the logs provided by Martin we're waiting for reading extent pages: kernel: PM: Syncing filesystems ... done. kernel: Freezing user space processes ... (elapsed 0.015 seconds) done. kernel: Freezing remaining freezable tasks ... kernel: Freezing of tasks failed after 20.003 seconds (1 tasks refusing to freeze, wq_busy=0): kernel: btrfs-cleaner D ffff88033dd13bc0 0 152 2 0x00000000 kernel: ffff88032ebc2e00 ffff88032e750000 ffff88032e74fa50 7fffffffffffffff kernel: ffffffff814a58df 0000000000000002 ffffea000934d580 ffffffff814a5451 kernel: 7fffffffffffffff ffffffff814a6e8f 0000000000000000 0000000000000020 kernel: Call Trace: kernel: [<ffffffff814a58df>] ? bit_wait+0x2c/0x2c kernel: [<ffffffff814a5451>] ? schedule+0x6f/0x7c kernel: [<ffffffff814a6e8f>] ? schedule_timeout+0x2f/0xd8 kernel: [<ffffffff81076f94>] ? timekeeping_get_ns+0xa/0x2e kernel: [<ffffffff81077603>] ? ktime_get+0x36/0x44 kernel: [<ffffffff814a4f6c>] ? io_schedule_timeout+0x94/0xf2 kernel: [<ffffffff814a4f6c>] ? io_schedule_timeout+0x94/0xf2 kernel: [<ffffffff814a590b>] ? bit_wait_io+0x2c/0x30 kernel: [<ffffffff814a5694>] ? __wait_on_bit+0x41/0x73 kernel: [<ffffffff8109eba8>] ? wait_on_page_bit+0x6d/0x72 kernel: [<ffffffff8105d718>] ? autoremove_wake_function+0x2a/0x2a kernel: [<ffffffff811a02d7>] ? read_extent_buffer_pages+0x1bd/0x203 kernel: [<ffffffff8117d9e9>] ? free_root_pointers+0x4c/0x4c kernel: [<ffffffff8117e831>] ? btree_read_extent_buffer_pages.constprop.57+0x5a/0xe9 kernel: [<ffffffff8117f4f3>] ? read_tree_block+0x2d/0x45 kernel: [<ffffffff8116782a>] ? read_block_for_search.isra.34+0x22a/0x26b kernel: [<ffffffff811656c3>] ? btrfs_set_path_blocking+0x1e/0x4a kernel: [<ffffffff8116919b>] ? btrfs_search_slot+0x648/0x736 kernel: [<ffffffff81170559>] ? btrfs_lookup_extent_info+0xb7/0x2c7 kernel: [<ffffffff81170ee5>] ? walk_down_proc+0x9c/0x1ae kernel: [<ffffffff81171c9d>] ? walk_down_tree+0x40/0xa4 kernel: [<ffffffff8117375f>] ? btrfs_drop_snapshot+0x2da/0x664 kernel: [<ffffffff8104ff21>] ? finish_task_switch+0x126/0x167 kernel: [<ffffffff811850f8>] ? btrfs_clean_one_deleted_snapshot+0xa6/0xb0 kernel: [<ffffffff8117eaba>] ? cleaner_kthread+0x13e/0x17b kernel: [<ffffffff8117e97c>] ? btrfs_item_end+0x33/0x33 kernel: [<ffffffff8104d256>] ? kthread+0x95/0x9d kernel: [<ffffffff8104d1c1>] ? kthread_parkme+0x16/0x16 kernel: [<ffffffff814a7b5f>] ? ret_from_fork+0x3f/0x70 kernel: [<ffffffff8104d1c1>] ? kthread_parkme+0x16/0x16 As this affects a released kernel (4.4) we need a minimal fix for stable kernels. Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=108361Reported-by: NMartin Ziegler <ziegler@uni-freiburg.de> CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4 CC: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
- 25 1月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 David Sterba 提交于
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
- 20 1月, 2016 2 次提交
-
-
由 Qu Wenruo 提交于
Enhance btrfs_check_super_valid() function by the following points: 1) Restrict sector/node size check Not the old max/min valid check, but also check if it's a power of 2. So some bogus number like 12K node size won't pass now. 2) Super flag check For now, there is still some inconsistency between kernel and btrfs-progs super flags. And considering btrfs-progs may add new flags for super block, this check will only output warning. 3) Better root alignment check Now root bytenr is checked against sector size. 4) Move some check into btrfs_check_super_valid(). Like node size vs leaf size check, and PAGESIZE vs sectorsize check. And magic number check. Reported-by: NVegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
由 Filipe Manana 提交于
While running a stress test I ran into a deadlock when running the delayed iputs at transaction time, which produced the following report and trace: [ 886.399989] ============================================= [ 886.400871] [ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ] [ 886.401663] 4.4.0-rc6-btrfs-next-18+ #1 Not tainted [ 886.402384] --------------------------------------------- [ 886.403182] fio/8277 is trying to acquire lock: [ 886.403568] (&fs_info->delayed_iput_sem){++++..}, at: [<ffffffffa0538823>] btrfs_run_delayed_iputs+0x36/0xbf [btrfs] [ 886.403568] [ 886.403568] but task is already holding lock: [ 886.403568] (&fs_info->delayed_iput_sem){++++..}, at: [<ffffffffa0538823>] btrfs_run_delayed_iputs+0x36/0xbf [btrfs] [ 886.403568] [ 886.403568] other info that might help us debug this: [ 886.403568] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 886.403568] [ 886.403568] CPU0 [ 886.403568] ---- [ 886.403568] lock(&fs_info->delayed_iput_sem); [ 886.403568] lock(&fs_info->delayed_iput_sem); [ 886.403568] [ 886.403568] *** DEADLOCK *** [ 886.403568] [ 886.403568] May be due to missing lock nesting notation [ 886.403568] [ 886.403568] 3 locks held by fio/8277: [ 886.403568] #0: (sb_writers#11){.+.+.+}, at: [<ffffffff81174c4c>] __sb_start_write+0x5f/0xb0 [ 886.403568] #1: (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#15){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffffa054620d>] btrfs_file_write_iter+0x73/0x408 [btrfs] [ 886.403568] #2: (&fs_info->delayed_iput_sem){++++..}, at: [<ffffffffa0538823>] btrfs_run_delayed_iputs+0x36/0xbf [btrfs] [ 886.403568] [ 886.403568] stack backtrace: [ 886.403568] CPU: 6 PID: 8277 Comm: fio Not tainted 4.4.0-rc6-btrfs-next-18+ #1 [ 886.403568] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS by qemu-project.org 04/01/2014 [ 886.403568] 0000000000000000 ffff88009f80f770 ffffffff8125d4fd ffffffff82af1fc0 [ 886.403568] ffff88009f80f830 ffffffff8108e5f9 0000000200000000 ffff88009fd92290 [ 886.403568] 0000000000000000 ffffffff82af1fc0 ffffffff829cfb01 00042b216d008804 [ 886.403568] Call Trace: [ 886.403568] [<ffffffff8125d4fd>] dump_stack+0x4e/0x79 [ 886.403568] [<ffffffff8108e5f9>] __lock_acquire+0xd42/0xf0b [ 886.403568] [<ffffffff810c22db>] ? __module_address+0xdf/0x108 [ 886.403568] [<ffffffff8108eb77>] lock_acquire+0x10d/0x194 [ 886.403568] [<ffffffff8108eb77>] ? lock_acquire+0x10d/0x194 [ 886.403568] [<ffffffffa0538823>] ? btrfs_run_delayed_iputs+0x36/0xbf [btrfs] [ 886.489542] [<ffffffff8148556b>] down_read+0x3e/0x4d [ 886.489542] [<ffffffffa0538823>] ? btrfs_run_delayed_iputs+0x36/0xbf [btrfs] [ 886.489542] [<ffffffffa0538823>] btrfs_run_delayed_iputs+0x36/0xbf [btrfs] [ 886.489542] [<ffffffffa0533953>] btrfs_commit_transaction+0x8f5/0x96e [btrfs] [ 886.489542] [<ffffffffa0521d7a>] flush_space+0x435/0x44a [btrfs] [ 886.489542] [<ffffffffa052218b>] ? reserve_metadata_bytes+0x26a/0x384 [btrfs] [ 886.489542] [<ffffffffa05221ae>] reserve_metadata_bytes+0x28d/0x384 [btrfs] [ 886.489542] [<ffffffffa052256c>] ? btrfs_block_rsv_refill+0x58/0x96 [btrfs] [ 886.489542] [<ffffffffa0522584>] btrfs_block_rsv_refill+0x70/0x96 [btrfs] [ 886.489542] [<ffffffffa053d747>] btrfs_evict_inode+0x394/0x55a [btrfs] [ 886.489542] [<ffffffff81188e31>] evict+0xa7/0x15c [ 886.489542] [<ffffffff81189878>] iput+0x1d3/0x266 [ 886.489542] [<ffffffffa053887c>] btrfs_run_delayed_iputs+0x8f/0xbf [btrfs] [ 886.489542] [<ffffffffa0533953>] btrfs_commit_transaction+0x8f5/0x96e [btrfs] [ 886.489542] [<ffffffff81085096>] ? signal_pending_state+0x31/0x31 [ 886.489542] [<ffffffffa0521191>] btrfs_alloc_data_chunk_ondemand+0x1d7/0x288 [btrfs] [ 886.489542] [<ffffffffa0521282>] btrfs_check_data_free_space+0x40/0x59 [btrfs] [ 886.489542] [<ffffffffa05228f5>] btrfs_delalloc_reserve_space+0x1e/0x4e [btrfs] [ 886.489542] [<ffffffffa053620a>] btrfs_direct_IO+0x10c/0x27e [btrfs] [ 886.489542] [<ffffffff8111d9a1>] generic_file_direct_write+0xb3/0x128 [ 886.489542] [<ffffffffa05463c3>] btrfs_file_write_iter+0x229/0x408 [btrfs] [ 886.489542] [<ffffffff8108ae38>] ? __lock_is_held+0x38/0x50 [ 886.489542] [<ffffffff8117279e>] __vfs_write+0x7c/0xa5 [ 886.489542] [<ffffffff81172cda>] vfs_write+0xa0/0xe4 [ 886.489542] [<ffffffff811734cc>] SyS_write+0x50/0x7e [ 886.489542] [<ffffffff814872d7>] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x12/0x6f [ 1081.852335] INFO: task fio:8244 blocked for more than 120 seconds. [ 1081.854348] Not tainted 4.4.0-rc6-btrfs-next-18+ #1 [ 1081.857560] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message. [ 1081.863227] fio D ffff880213f9bb28 0 8244 8240 0x00000000 [ 1081.868719] ffff880213f9bb28 00ffffff810fc6b0 ffffffff0000000a ffff88023ed55240 [ 1081.872499] ffff880206b5d400 ffff880213f9c000 ffff88020a4d5318 ffff880206b5d400 [ 1081.876834] ffffffff00000001 ffff880206b5d400 ffff880213f9bb40 ffffffff81482ba4 [ 1081.880782] Call Trace: [ 1081.881793] [<ffffffff81482ba4>] schedule+0x7f/0x97 [ 1081.883340] [<ffffffff81485eb5>] rwsem_down_write_failed+0x2d5/0x325 [ 1081.895525] [<ffffffff8108d48d>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0x16/0x1ab [ 1081.897419] [<ffffffff81269723>] call_rwsem_down_write_failed+0x13/0x20 [ 1081.899251] [<ffffffff81269723>] ? call_rwsem_down_write_failed+0x13/0x20 [ 1081.901063] [<ffffffff81089fae>] ? __down_write_nested.isra.0+0x1f/0x21 [ 1081.902365] [<ffffffff814855bd>] down_write+0x43/0x57 [ 1081.903846] [<ffffffffa05211b0>] ? btrfs_alloc_data_chunk_ondemand+0x1f6/0x288 [btrfs] [ 1081.906078] [<ffffffffa05211b0>] btrfs_alloc_data_chunk_ondemand+0x1f6/0x288 [btrfs] [ 1081.908846] [<ffffffff8108d461>] ? mark_held_locks+0x56/0x6c [ 1081.910409] [<ffffffffa0521282>] btrfs_check_data_free_space+0x40/0x59 [btrfs] [ 1081.912482] [<ffffffffa05228f5>] btrfs_delalloc_reserve_space+0x1e/0x4e [btrfs] [ 1081.914597] [<ffffffffa053620a>] btrfs_direct_IO+0x10c/0x27e [btrfs] [ 1081.919037] [<ffffffff8111d9a1>] generic_file_direct_write+0xb3/0x128 [ 1081.920754] [<ffffffffa05463c3>] btrfs_file_write_iter+0x229/0x408 [btrfs] [ 1081.922496] [<ffffffff8108ae38>] ? __lock_is_held+0x38/0x50 [ 1081.923922] [<ffffffff8117279e>] __vfs_write+0x7c/0xa5 [ 1081.925275] [<ffffffff81172cda>] vfs_write+0xa0/0xe4 [ 1081.926584] [<ffffffff811734cc>] SyS_write+0x50/0x7e [ 1081.927968] [<ffffffff814872d7>] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x12/0x6f [ 1081.985293] INFO: lockdep is turned off. [ 1081.986132] INFO: task fio:8249 blocked for more than 120 seconds. [ 1081.987434] Not tainted 4.4.0-rc6-btrfs-next-18+ #1 [ 1081.988534] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message. [ 1081.990147] fio D ffff880218febbb8 0 8249 8240 0x00000000 [ 1081.991626] ffff880218febbb8 00ffffff81486b8e ffff88020000000b ffff88023ed75240 [ 1081.993258] ffff8802120a9a00 ffff880218fec000 ffff88020a4d5318 ffff8802120a9a00 [ 1081.994850] ffffffff00000001 ffff8802120a9a00 ffff880218febbd0 ffffffff81482ba4 [ 1081.996485] Call Trace: [ 1081.997037] [<ffffffff81482ba4>] schedule+0x7f/0x97 [ 1081.998017] [<ffffffff81485eb5>] rwsem_down_write_failed+0x2d5/0x325 [ 1081.999241] [<ffffffff810852a5>] ? finish_wait+0x6d/0x76 [ 1082.000306] [<ffffffff81269723>] call_rwsem_down_write_failed+0x13/0x20 [ 1082.001533] [<ffffffff81269723>] ? call_rwsem_down_write_failed+0x13/0x20 [ 1082.002776] [<ffffffff81089fae>] ? __down_write_nested.isra.0+0x1f/0x21 [ 1082.003995] [<ffffffff814855bd>] down_write+0x43/0x57 [ 1082.005000] [<ffffffffa05211b0>] ? btrfs_alloc_data_chunk_ondemand+0x1f6/0x288 [btrfs] [ 1082.007403] [<ffffffffa05211b0>] btrfs_alloc_data_chunk_ondemand+0x1f6/0x288 [btrfs] [ 1082.008988] [<ffffffffa0545064>] btrfs_fallocate+0x7c1/0xc2f [btrfs] [ 1082.010193] [<ffffffff8108a1ba>] ? percpu_down_read+0x4e/0x77 [ 1082.011280] [<ffffffff81174c4c>] ? __sb_start_write+0x5f/0xb0 [ 1082.012265] [<ffffffff81174c4c>] ? __sb_start_write+0x5f/0xb0 [ 1082.013021] [<ffffffff811712e4>] vfs_fallocate+0x170/0x1ff [ 1082.013738] [<ffffffff81181ebb>] ioctl_preallocate+0x89/0x9b [ 1082.014778] [<ffffffff811822d7>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x40a/0x4ea [ 1082.015778] [<ffffffff81176ea7>] ? SYSC_newfstat+0x25/0x2e [ 1082.016806] [<ffffffff8118b4de>] ? __fget_light+0x4d/0x71 [ 1082.017789] [<ffffffff8118240e>] SyS_ioctl+0x57/0x79 [ 1082.018706] [<ffffffff814872d7>] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x12/0x6f This happens because we can recursively acquire the semaphore fs_info->delayed_iput_sem when attempting to allocate space to satisfy a file write request as shown in the first trace above - when committing a transaction we acquire (down_read) the semaphore before running the delayed iputs, and when running a delayed iput() we can end up calling an inode's eviction handler, which in turn commits another transaction and attempts to acquire (down_read) again the semaphore to run more delayed iput operations. This results in a deadlock because if a task acquires multiple times a semaphore it should invoke down_read_nested() with a different lockdep class for each level of recursion. Fix this by simplifying the implementation and use a mutex instead that is acquired by the cleaner kthread before it runs the delayed iputs instead of always acquiring a semaphore before delayed references are run from anywhere. Fixes: d7c15171 (btrfs: Fix NO_SPACE bug caused by delayed-iput) Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.1+ Signed-off-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-