1. 28 7月, 2011 1 次提交
  2. 27 7月, 2011 7 次提交
  3. 21 3月, 2011 1 次提交
  4. 22 2月, 2011 1 次提交
    • T
      ext4: fix compile warnings with EXT4FS_DEBUG enabled · da488945
      Theodore Ts'o 提交于
      Compile 2.6.38-rc1 with turning EXT4FS_DEBUG on,
      we get following compile warnings. This patch fixes them.
      
        CC      fs/ext4/hash.o
        CC      fs/ext4/resize.o
      fs/ext4/resize.c: In function 'setup_new_group_blocks':
      fs/ext4/resize.c:233:2: warning: format '%#04llx' expects type 'long long
      unsigned int', but argument 3 has type 'long unsigned int'
      fs/ext4/resize.c:251:2: warning: format '%#04llx' expects type 'long long
      unsigned int', but argument 3 has type 'long unsigned int'
        CC      fs/ext4/extents.o
        CC      fs/ext4/ext4_jbd2.o
        CC      fs/ext4/migrate.o
      Reported-by: NAkira Fujita <a-fujita@rs.jp.nec.com>
      Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
      da488945
  5. 11 1月, 2011 1 次提交
  6. 24 12月, 2010 1 次提交
  7. 28 10月, 2010 2 次提交
  8. 15 6月, 2010 1 次提交
  9. 12 6月, 2010 1 次提交
    • T
      ext4: Clean up s_dirt handling · a0375156
      Theodore Ts'o 提交于
      We don't need to set s_dirt in most of the ext4 code when journaling
      is enabled.  In ext3/4 some of the summary statistics for # of free
      inodes, blocks, and directories are calculated from the per-block
      group statistics when the file system is mounted or unmounted.  As a
      result the superblock doesn't have to be updated, either via the
      journal or by setting s_dirt.  There are a few exceptions, most
      notably when resizing the file system, where the superblock needs to
      be modified --- and in that case it should be done as a journalled
      operation if possible, and s_dirt set only in no-journal mode.
      
      This patch will optimize out some unneeded disk writes when using ext4
      with a journal.
      Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
      a0375156
  10. 16 5月, 2010 1 次提交
  11. 16 2月, 2010 1 次提交
  12. 07 12月, 2009 1 次提交
  13. 10 9月, 2009 1 次提交
  14. 19 6月, 2009 1 次提交
  15. 02 5月, 2009 1 次提交
  16. 26 4月, 2009 1 次提交
  17. 05 3月, 2009 1 次提交
  18. 27 1月, 2009 1 次提交
  19. 06 1月, 2009 6 次提交
  20. 07 1月, 2009 1 次提交
    • F
      ext4: Allow ext4 to run without a journal · 0390131b
      Frank Mayhar 提交于
      A few weeks ago I posted a patch for discussion that allowed ext4 to run
      without a journal.  Since that time I've integrated the excellent
      comments from Andreas and fixed several serious bugs.  We're currently
      running with this patch and generating some performance numbers against
      both ext2 (with backported reservations code) and ext4 with and without
      a journal.  It just so happens that running without a journal is
      slightly faster for most everything.
      
      We did
      	iozone -T -t 4 s 2g -r 256k -T -I -i0 -i1 -i2
      
      which creates 4 threads, each of which create and do reads and writes on
      a 2G file, with a buffer size of 256K, using O_DIRECT for all file opens
      to bypass the page cache.  Results:
      
                           ext2        ext4, default   ext4, no journal
        initial writes   13.0 MB/s        15.4 MB/s          15.7 MB/s
        rewrites         13.1 MB/s        15.6 MB/s          15.9 MB/s
        reads            15.2 MB/s        16.9 MB/s          17.2 MB/s
        re-reads         15.3 MB/s        16.9 MB/s          17.2 MB/s
        random readers    5.6 MB/s         5.6 MB/s           5.7 MB/s
        random writers    5.1 MB/s         5.3 MB/s           5.4 MB/s 
      
      So it seems that, so far, this was a useful exercise.
      Signed-off-by: NFrank Mayhar <fmayhar@google.com>
      Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
      0390131b
  21. 27 11月, 2008 1 次提交
  22. 10 10月, 2008 1 次提交
  23. 08 9月, 2008 1 次提交
  24. 09 9月, 2008 1 次提交
  25. 20 8月, 2008 1 次提交
  26. 27 7月, 2008 1 次提交
  27. 12 7月, 2008 1 次提交
  28. 20 6月, 2008 1 次提交