- 30 4月, 2019 40 次提交
-
-
由 Anand Jain 提交于
Previous patch made sure that btrfs_setxattr_trans() is called only when transaction NULL. Clean up btrfs_setxattr_trans() and drop the parameter. Signed-off-by: NAnand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Anand Jain 提交于
When the caller has already created the transaction handle, btrfs_setxattr() will use it. Also adds assert in btrfs_setxattr(). Signed-off-by: NAnand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Anand Jain 提交于
btrfs_setxattr_trans() is called by 5 functions as below and all of them do updates. None of them would be roun on a read-only root. So its ok to remove the readonly root check here as it's a high-level conditon. 1. __btrfs_set_acl() btrfs_init_acl() btrfs_init_inode_security() 2. __btrfs_set_acl() btrfs_set_acl() 3. btrfs_set_prop() btrfs_set_prop_trans() / \ btrfs_ioctl_setflags() btrfs_xattr_handler_set_prop() 4. btrfs_xattr_handler_set() 5. btrfs_initxattrs() btrfs_xattr_security_init() btrfs_init_inode_security() Signed-off-by: NAnand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Anand Jain 提交于
Preparatory patch, as we are going split the calls with and without transaction to use the respective btrfs_setxattr() and btrfs_setxattr_trans() functions. Export btrfs_setxattr() for calls outside of xattr.c. Signed-off-by: NAnand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Anand Jain 提交于
When trans is not NULL btrfs_setxattr() calls do_setxattr() directly with a check for readonly root. Rename do_setxattr() btrfs_setxattr() in preparation to call do_setxattr() directly instead. Preparatory patch, no functional changes. Signed-off-by: NAnand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Anand Jain 提交于
Rename btrfs_setxattr() to btrfs_setxattr_trans(), so that do_setxattr() can be renamed to btrfs_setxattr(). Preparatory patch, no functional changes. Signed-off-by: NAnand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Qu Wenruo 提交于
Unlike btrfs_tree_lock() and btrfs_tree_read_lock(), the remaining functions in locking.c will not sleep, thus doesn't make much sense to record their execution time. Those events are introduced mainly for user space tool to audit and detect lock leakage or dead lock. Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Qu Wenruo 提交于
There are two tree lock events which can sleep: - btrfs_tree_read_lock() - btrfs_tree_lock() Sometimes we may need to look into the concurrency picture of the fs. For that case, we need the execution time of above two functions and the owner of @eb. Here we introduce a trace events for user space tools like bcc, to get the execution time of above two functions, and get detailed owner info where eBPF code can't. All the overhead is hidden behind the trace events, so if events are not enabled, there is no overhead. These trace events also output bytenr and generation, allow them to be pared with unlock events to pin down deadlock. Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Filipe Manana 提交于
The member num_dirty_bgs of struct btrfs_transaction is not used anymore, it is set and incremented but nothing reads its value anymore. Its last read use was removed by commit 64403612 ("btrfs: rework btrfs_check_space_for_delayed_refs"). So just remove that member. Signed-off-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 David Sterba 提交于
We can read fs_info from the transaction and can drop it from the parameters. Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 David Sterba 提交于
We can read fs_info from the transaction and can drop it from the parameters. Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 David Sterba 提交于
We can read fs_info from the transaction and can drop it from the parameters. Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 David Sterba 提交于
We can read fs_info from the transaction and can drop it from the parameters. Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 David Sterba 提交于
We can read fs_info from the transaction and can drop it from the parameters. Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 David Sterba 提交于
We can read fs_info from the transaction and can drop it from the parameters. Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 David Sterba 提交于
We can read fs_info from the transaction and can drop it from the parameters. Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 David Sterba 提交于
We can read fs_info from the transaction and can drop it from the parameters. Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 David Sterba 提交于
We can read fs_info from the transaction and can drop it from the parameters. Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 David Sterba 提交于
We can read fs_info from the transaction and can drop it from the parameters. Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 David Sterba 提交于
We can read fs_info from the transaction and can drop it from the parameters. Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 David Sterba 提交于
We can read fs_info from the transaction and can drop it from the parameters. Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 David Sterba 提交于
We can read fs_info from the transaction and can drop it from the parameters. Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 David Sterba 提交于
We can read fs_info from the transaction and can drop it from the parameters. Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 David Sterba 提交于
We can read fs_info from the transaction and can drop it from the parameters. Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 David Sterba 提交于
We can read fs_info from the transaction and can drop it from the parameters. Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 David Sterba 提交于
We can read fs_info from the transaction and can drop it from the parameters. Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Nikolay Borisov 提交于
Ordered csums are keyed off of a btrfs_ordered_extent, which already has a reference to the inode. This implies that an explicit inode argument is redundant. So remove it. Reviewed-by: NJohannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@suse.de> Signed-off-by: NNikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Qu Wenruo 提交于
There are at least 2 reports about a memory bit flip sneaking into on-disk data. Currently we only have a relaxed check triggered at btrfs_mark_buffer_dirty() time, as it's not mandatory and only for CONFIG_BTRFS_FS_CHECK_INTEGRITY enabled build, it doesn't help users to detect such problem. This patch will address the hole by triggering comprehensive check on tree blocks before writing it back to disk. The design points are: - Timing of the check: Tree block write hook This timing is chosen to reduce the overhead. The comprehensive check should be as expensive as a checksum calculation. Doing full check at btrfs_mark_buffer_dirty() is too expensive for end user. - Loose empty leaf check Originally for an empty leaf, tree-checker will report error if it's not a tree root. The problem for such check at write time is: * False alert for tree root created in current transaction In that case, the commit root still needs to be written to disk. And since current root can differ from commit root, then it will cause false alert. This happens for log tree. * False alert for relocated tree block Relocated tree block can be written to disk due to memory pressure, in that case an empty csum tree root can be written to disk and cause false alert, since csum root node hasn't been updated. Previous patch of removing comprehensive empty leaf owner check has paved the way for this patch. The example error output will be something like: BTRFS critical (device dm-3): corrupt leaf: root=2 block=1350630375424 slot=68, bad key order, prev (10510212874240 169 0) current (1714119868416 169 0) BTRFS error (device dm-3): block=1350630375424 write time tree block corruption detected BTRFS: error (device dm-3) in btrfs_commit_transaction:2220: errno=-5 IO failure (Error while writing out transaction) BTRFS info (device dm-3): forced readonly BTRFS warning (device dm-3): Skipping commit of aborted transaction. BTRFS: error (device dm-3) in cleanup_transaction:1839: errno=-5 IO failure BTRFS info (device dm-3): delayed_refs has NO entry Reported-by: NLeonard Lausen <leonard@lausen.nl> Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Qu Wenruo 提交于
Commit 1ba98d08 ("Btrfs: detect corruption when non-root leaf has zero item") introduced comprehensive root owner checker. However it's pretty expensive tree search to locate the owner root, especially when it get reused by mandatory read and write time tree-checker. This patch will remove that check, and completely rely on owner based empty leaf check, which is much faster and still works fine for most case. And since we skip the old root owner check, now write time tree check can be merged with btrfs_check_leaf_full(). Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Robbie Ko 提交于
When doing fallocate, we first add the range to the reserve_list and then reserve the quota. If quota reservation fails, we'll release all reserved parts of reserve_list. However, cur_offset is not updated to indicate that this range is already been inserted into the list. Therefore, the same range is freed twice. Once at list_for_each_entry loop, and once at the end of the function. This will result in WARN_ON on bytes_may_use when we free the remaining space. At the end, under the 'out' label we have a call to: btrfs_free_reserved_data_space(inode, data_reserved, alloc_start, alloc_end - cur_offset); The start offset, third argument, should be cur_offset. Everything from alloc_start to cur_offset was freed by the list_for_each_entry_safe_loop. Fixes: 18513091 ("btrfs: update btrfs_space_info's bytes_may_use timely") Reviewed-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NRobbie Ko <robbieko@synology.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 David Sterba 提交于
We can read fs_info from extent buffer and can drop it from the parameters. Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 David Sterba 提交于
We can read fs_info from extent buffer and can drop it from the parameters. Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 David Sterba 提交于
We can read fs_info from extent buffer and can drop it from the parameters. Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 David Sterba 提交于
We can read fs_info from extent buffer and can drop it from the parameters. Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 David Sterba 提交于
We can read fs_info from extent buffer and can drop it from the parameters. Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 David Sterba 提交于
We can read fs_info from extent buffer and can drop it from the parameters. Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 David Sterba 提交于
We can read fs_info from extent buffer and can drop it from the parameters. Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Nikolay Borisov 提交于
Instead of always calling the allocator to search for a free extent, that satisfies the input criteria, switch btrfs_trim_free_extents to using find_first_clear_extent_bit. With this change it's no longer necessary to read the device tree in order to figure out holes in the devices. Now the code always searches in-memory data structure to figure out the space range which contains the requested which should result in speed improvements. Signed-off-by: NNikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Nikolay Borisov 提交于
This function is very similar to find_first_extent_bit except that it locates the first contiguous span of space which does not have bits set. It's intended use is in the freespace trimming code. Signed-off-by: NNikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Nikolay Borisov 提交于
Currently unallocated chunks are always trimmed. For example 2 consecutive trims on large storage would trim freespace twice irrespective of whether the space was actually allocated or not between those trims. Optimise this behavior by exploiting the newly introduced alloc_state tree of btrfs_device. A new CHUNK_TRIMMED bit is used to mark those unallocated chunks which have been trimmed and have not been allocated afterwards. On chunk allocation the respective underlying devices' physical space will have its CHUNK_TRIMMED flag cleared. This avoids submitting discards for space which hasn't been changed since the last time discard was issued. This applies to the single mount period of the filesystem as the information is not stored permanently. Signed-off-by: NNikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-