We should do that, since we do the LRU manipulation ourselves now. Suggested
by Nick Piggin.
Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>

Originally from Nick Piggin, just adapted to the newer branch.

You can't check PageLRU without holding zone->lru_lock.  The page
release code can get away with it only because the page refcount is 0 at
that point. Also, you can't reliably remove pages from the LRU unless
the refcount is 0. Ever.
Signed-off-by: NNick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>
Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>

Thanks to Andrew for the good explanation of why this is so. akpm writes:

If a page is under writeback and we remove it from pagecache, it's still
going to get written to disk.  But the VFS no longer knows about that page,
nor that this page is about to modify disk blocks.

So there might be scenarios in which those
blocks-which-are-about-to-be-written-to get reused for something else.
When writeback completes, it'll scribble on those blocks.

This won't happen in ext2/ext3-style filesystems in normal mode because the
page has buffers and try_to_release_page() will fail.

But ext2 in nobh mode doesn't attach buffers at all - it just sticks the
page in a BIO, finds some new blocks, points the BIO at those blocks and
lets it rip.

While that write IO's in flight, someone could truncate the file.  Truncate
won't block on the writeout because the page isn't in pagecache any more.
So truncate will the free the blocks from the file under the page's feet.
Then something else can reallocate those blocks.  Then write data to them.

Now, the original write completes, corrupting the filesystem.
Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>

Forgot that one, thanks Jeff. Also move the other EXPORT_SYMBOL
to right below the functions.
Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>

This lets userspace indicate whether more data will be coming in a
subsequent splice call.
Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>

Hopefully this will make Andrew a little more happy.
Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>

By cleaning up the writeback logic (killing write_one_page() and the manual
set_page_dirty()), we can get rid of ->stolen inside the pipe_buffer and
just keep it local in pipe_to_file().

This also adds dirty page balancing logic and O_SYNC handling.
Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>

Clear the entire range, and don't increment pidx or we keep filling
the same position again and again.

Thanks to KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki.
Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>

It doesn't make the splice itself necessarily nonblocking (because the
actual file descriptors that are spliced from/to may block unless they
have the O_NONBLOCK flag set), but it makes the splice pipe operations
nonblocking.
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>

Woe be unto he who builds their filesystems as modules.
Signed-off-by: NJeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>
[ Obscure quote from the infamous geek bible? ]
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>

This enables the caller to migrate pages from one address space page
cache to another.  In buzz word marketing, you can do zero-copy file
copies!
Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>

This adds support for the sys_splice system call. Using a pipe as a
transport, it can connect to files or sockets (latter as output only).

From the splice.c comments:

   "splice": joining two ropes together by interweaving their strands.

   This is the "extended pipe" functionality, where a pipe is used as
   an arbitrary in-memory buffer. Think of a pipe as a small kernel
   buffer that you can use to transfer data from one end to the other.

   The traditional unix read/write is extended with a "splice()" operation
   that transfers data buffers to or from a pipe buffer.

   Named by Larry McVoy, original implementation from Linus, extended by
   Jens to support splicing to files and fixing the initial implementation
   bugs.
Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>