Skip to content

L
linux

xiphi1978 / linux

通知 2
Star 0
Fork 0
L
linux

体验新版 GitCode，发现更多精彩内容 >>

切换分支/标签
  1. 29 10月, 2006 9 次提交
    • D
      [PATCH] VFS: Fix an error in unused dentry counting · f8713576
      由 David Howells 提交于 
      With Vasily Averin <vvs@sw.ru>

Fix an error in unused dentry counting in shrink_dcache_for_umount_subtree()
in which the count is modified without the dcache_lock held.
Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Cc: Vasily Averin <vvs@sw.ru>
Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
      f8713576
    • V
      [PATCH] missing unused dentry in prune_dcache()? · 6eac3f93
      由 Vasily Averin 提交于 
      On the the following patch:
http://linux.bkbits.net:8080/linux-2.6/gnupatch@449b144ecSF1rYskg3q-SeR2vf88zg

# ChangeSet
#   2006/06/22 15:05:57-07:00 neilb@suse.de
#   [PATCH] Fix dcache race during umount

#   If prune_dcache finds a dentry that it cannot free, it leaves it where it
#   is (at the tail of the list) and exits, on the assumption that some other
#   thread will be removing that dentry soon.

However as far as I see this comment is not correct: when we cannot take
s_umount rw_semaphore (for example because it was taken in do_remount) this
dentry is already extracted from dentry_unused list and we do not add it
into the list again.  Therefore dentry will not be found by prune_dcache()
and shrink_dcache_sb() and will leave in memory very long time until the
partition will be unmounted.

The patch adds this dentry into tail of the dentry_unused list.
Signed-off-by: NVasily Averin <vvs@sw.ru>
Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
Acked-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
      6eac3f93
    • H
      [PATCH] hugetlb: fix prio_tree unit · 856fc295
      由 Hugh Dickins 提交于 
      hugetlb_vmtruncate_list was misconverted to prio_tree: its prio_tree is in
units of PAGE_SIZE (PAGE_CACHE_SIZE) like any other, not HPAGE_SIZE (whereas
its radix_tree is kept in units of HPAGE_SIZE, otherwise slots would be
absurdly sparse).

At first I thought the error benign, just calling __unmap_hugepage_range on
more vmas than necessary; but on 32-bit machines, when the prio_tree is
searched correctly, it happens to ensure the v_offset calculation won't
overflow.  As it stood, when truncating at or beyond 4GB, it was liable to
discard pages COWed from lower offsets; or even to clear pmd entries of
preceding vmas, triggering exit_mmap's BUG_ON(nr_ptes).
Signed-off-by: NHugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>
Cc: Adam Litke <agl@us.ibm.com>
Cc: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Cc: "Chen, Kenneth W" <kenneth.w.chen@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
      856fc295
    • H
      [PATCH] hugetlb: fix size=4G parsing · b9d7e6ae
      由 Hugh Dickins 提交于 
      On 32-bit machines, mount -t hugetlbfs -o size=4G gave a 0GB filesystem,
size=5G gave a 1GB filesystem etc: there's no point in masking size with
HPAGE_MASK just before shifting its lower bits away, and since HPAGE_MASK is a
UL, that removed all the higher bits of the unsigned long long size.
Signed-off-by: NHugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>
Cc: Adam Litke <agl@us.ibm.com>
Cc: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Cc: "Chen, Kenneth W" <kenneth.w.chen@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
      b9d7e6ae
    • P
      [PATCH] Fix potential OOPs in blkdev_open() · 6a2aae06
      由 Pavel Emelianov 提交于 
      blkdev_open() calls bc_acquire() to get a struct block_device.  Since
bc_acquire() may return NULL when system is out of memory an appropriate
check is required.
Signed-off-by: NPavel Emelianov <xemul@openvz.org>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
      6a2aae06
    • E
      [PATCH] jbd2: journal_dirty_data re-check for unmapped buffers · 9b57988d
      由 Eric Sandeen 提交于 
      When running several fsx's and other filesystem stress tests, we found
cases where an unmapped buffer was still being sent to submit_bh by the
ext3 dirty data journaling code.

I saw this happen in two ways, both related to another thread doing a
truncate which would unmap the buffer in question.

Either we would get into journal_dirty_data with a bh which was already
unmapped (although journal_dirty_data_fn had checked for this earlier, the
state was not locked at that point), or it would get unmapped in the middle
of journal_dirty_data when we dropped locks to call sync_dirty_buffer.

By re-checking for mapped state after we've acquired the bh state lock, we
should avoid these races.  If we find a buffer which is no longer mapped,
we essentially ignore it, because journal_unmap_buffer has already decided
that this buffer can go away.

I've also added tracepoints in these two cases, and made a couple other
tracepoint changes that I found useful in debugging this.
Signed-off-by: NEric Sandeen <esandeen@redhat.com>
Cc: <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
      9b57988d
    • E
      [PATCH] jbd: journal_dirty_data re-check for unmapped buffers · f58a74dc
      由 Eric Sandeen 提交于 
      When running several fsx's and other filesystem stress tests, we found
cases where an unmapped buffer was still being sent to submit_bh by the
ext3 dirty data journaling code.

I saw this happen in two ways, both related to another thread doing a
truncate which would unmap the buffer in question.

Either we would get into journal_dirty_data with a bh which was already
unmapped (although journal_dirty_data_fn had checked for this earlier, the
state was not locked at that point), or it would get unmapped in the middle
of journal_dirty_data when we dropped locks to call sync_dirty_buffer.

By re-checking for mapped state after we've acquired the bh state lock, we
should avoid these races.  If we find a buffer which is no longer mapped,
we essentially ignore it, because journal_unmap_buffer has already decided
that this buffer can go away.

I've also added tracepoints in these two cases, and made a couple other
tracepoint changes that I found useful in debugging this.
Signed-off-by: NEric Sandeen <esandeen@redhat.com>
Cc: <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
      f58a74dc
    • R
      [PATCH] ext4: fix printk format warnings · 1939e49a
      由 Randy Dunlap 提交于 
      fs/ext4/resize.c:72: warning: long long unsigned int format, __u64 arg (arg 4)
fs/ext4/resize.c:76: warning: long long unsigned int format, __u64 arg (arg 4)
fs/ext4/resize.c:81: warning: long long unsigned int format, __u64 arg (arg 4)
fs/ext4/resize.c:85: warning: long long unsigned int format, __u64 arg (arg 4)
fs/ext4/resize.c:89: warning: long long unsigned int format, __u64 arg (arg 4)
fs/ext4/resize.c:89: warning: long long unsigned int format, __u64 arg (arg 5)
fs/ext4/resize.c:93: warning: long long unsigned int format, __u64 arg (arg 4)
fs/ext4/resize.c:93: warning: long long unsigned int format, __u64 arg (arg 5)
fs/ext4/resize.c:98: warning: long long unsigned int format, __u64 arg (arg 4)
fs/ext4/resize.c:103: warning: long long unsigned int format, __u64 arg (arg 4)
fs/ext4/resize.c:109: warning: long long unsigned int format, __u64 arg (arg 4)
Signed-off-by: NRandy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
      1939e49a
    • N
      [PATCH] mm: clean up pagecache allocation · 2ae88149
      由 Nick Piggin 提交于 
      - Consolidate page_cache_alloc

- Fix splice: only the pagecache pages and filesystem data need to use
  mapping_gfp_mask.

- Fix grab_cache_page_nowait: same as splice, also honour NUMA placement.
Signed-off-by: NNick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>
Cc: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
      2ae88149
  3. 25 10月, 2006 1 次提交
  5. 22 10月, 2006 2 次提交
  7. 21 10月, 2006 28 次提交