- 22 3月, 2020 1 次提交
-
-
由 Joerg Roedel 提交于
Commit 3f8fd02b ("mm/vmalloc: Sync unmappings in __purge_vmap_area_lazy()") introduced a call to vmalloc_sync_all() in the vunmap() code-path. While this change was necessary to maintain correctness on x86-32-pae kernels, it also adds additional cycles for architectures that don't need it. Specifically on x86-64 with CONFIG_VMAP_STACK=y some people reported severe performance regressions in micro-benchmarks because it now also calls the x86-64 implementation of vmalloc_sync_all() on vunmap(). But the vmalloc_sync_all() implementation on x86-64 is only needed for newly created mappings. To avoid the unnecessary work on x86-64 and to gain the performance back, split up vmalloc_sync_all() into two functions: * vmalloc_sync_mappings(), and * vmalloc_sync_unmappings() Most call-sites to vmalloc_sync_all() only care about new mappings being synchronized. The only exception is the new call-site added in the above mentioned commit. Shile Zhang directed us to a report of an 80% regression in reaim throughput. Fixes: 3f8fd02b ("mm/vmalloc: Sync unmappings in __purge_vmap_area_lazy()") Reported-by: Nkernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com> Reported-by: NShile Zhang <shile.zhang@linux.alibaba.com> Signed-off-by: NJoerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Tested-by: NBorislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> [GHES] Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20191009124418.8286-1-joro@8bytes.org Link: https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/lkp@lists.01.org/thread/4D3JPPHBNOSPFK2KEPC6KGKS6J25AIDB/ Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20191113095530.228959-1-shile.zhang@linux.alibaba.comSigned-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 14 1月, 2020 1 次提交
-
-
由 Vlastimil Babka 提交于
Commit 96a2b03f ("mm, debug_pagelloc: use static keys to enable debugging") has introduced a static key to reduce overhead when debug_pagealloc is compiled in but not enabled. It relied on the assumption that jump_label_init() is called before parse_early_param() as in start_kernel(), so when the "debug_pagealloc=on" option is parsed, it is safe to enable the static key. However, it turns out multiple architectures call parse_early_param() earlier from their setup_arch(). x86 also calls jump_label_init() even earlier, so no issue was found while testing the commit, but same is not true for e.g. ppc64 and s390 where the kernel would not boot with debug_pagealloc=on as found by our QA. To fix this without tricky changes to init code of multiple architectures, this patch partially reverts the static key conversion from 96a2b03f. Init-time and non-fastpath calls (such as in arch code) of debug_pagealloc_enabled() will again test a simple bool variable. Fastpath mm code is converted to a new debug_pagealloc_enabled_static() variant that relies on the static key, which is enabled in a well-defined point in mm_init() where it's guaranteed that jump_label_init() has been called, regardless of architecture. [sfr@canb.auug.org.au: export _debug_pagealloc_enabled_early] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200106164944.063ac07b@canb.auug.org.au Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20191219130612.23171-1-vbabka@suse.cz Fixes: 96a2b03f ("mm, debug_pagelloc: use static keys to enable debugging") Signed-off-by: NVlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: NStephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> Cc: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: Qian Cai <cai@lca.pw> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 18 12月, 2019 2 次提交
-
-
由 Daniel Axtens 提交于
syzkaller and the fault injector showed that I was wrong to assume that we could ignore percpu shadow allocation failures. Handle failures properly. Merge all the allocated areas back into the free list and release the shadow, then clean up and return NULL. The shadow is released unconditionally, which relies upon the fact that the release function is able to tolerate pages not being present. Also clean up shadows in the recovery path - currently they are not released, which leaks a bit of memory. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20191205140407.1874-3-dja@axtens.net Fixes: 3c5c3cfb ("kasan: support backing vmalloc space with real shadow memory") Signed-off-by: NDaniel Axtens <dja@axtens.net> Reported-by: syzbot+82e323920b78d54aaed5@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Reported-by: syzbot+59b7daa4315e07a994f1@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Reviewed-by: NAndrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@virtuozzo.com> Cc: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> Cc: Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com> Cc: Qian Cai <cai@lca.pw> Cc: Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) <urezki@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
由 Andrey Ryabinin 提交于
With CONFIG_KASAN_VMALLOC=y any use of memory obtained via vm_map_ram() will crash because there is no shadow backing that memory. Instead of sprinkling additional kasan_populate_vmalloc() calls all over the vmalloc code, move it into alloc_vmap_area(). This will fix vm_map_ram() and simplify the code a bit. [aryabinin@virtuozzo.com: v2] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20191205095942.1761-1-aryabinin@virtuozzo.comLink: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20191204204534.32202-1-aryabinin@virtuozzo.com Fixes: 3c5c3cfb ("kasan: support backing vmalloc space with real shadow memory") Signed-off-by: NAndrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@virtuozzo.com> Reported-by: NDmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> Reviewed-by: NUladzislau Rezki (Sony) <urezki@gmail.com> Cc: Daniel Axtens <dja@axtens.net> Cc: Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com> Cc: Daniel Axtens <dja@axtens.net> Cc: Qian Cai <cai@lca.pw> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 10 12月, 2019 1 次提交
-
-
由 Ingo Molnar 提交于
- Untangle the somewhat incestous way of how VMALLOC_START is used all across the kernel, but is, on x86, defined deep inside one of the lowest level page table headers. It doesn't help that vmalloc.h only includes a single asm header: #include <asm/page.h> /* pgprot_t */ So there was no existing cross-arch way to decouple address layout definitions from page.h details. I used this: #ifndef VMALLOC_START # include <asm/vmalloc.h> #endif This way every architecture that wants to simplify page.h can do so. - Also on x86 we had a couple of LDT related inline functions that used the late-stage address space layout positions - but these could be uninlined without real trouble - the end result is cleaner this way as well. Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
- 02 12月, 2019 6 次提交
-
-
由 Daniel Axtens 提交于
Patch series "kasan: support backing vmalloc space with real shadow memory", v11. Currently, vmalloc space is backed by the early shadow page. This means that kasan is incompatible with VMAP_STACK. This series provides a mechanism to back vmalloc space with real, dynamically allocated memory. I have only wired up x86, because that's the only currently supported arch I can work with easily, but it's very easy to wire up other architectures, and it appears that there is some work-in-progress code to do this on arm64 and s390. This has been discussed before in the context of VMAP_STACK: - https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=202009 - https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/7/22/198 - https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/7/19/822 In terms of implementation details: Most mappings in vmalloc space are small, requiring less than a full page of shadow space. Allocating a full shadow page per mapping would therefore be wasteful. Furthermore, to ensure that different mappings use different shadow pages, mappings would have to be aligned to KASAN_SHADOW_SCALE_SIZE * PAGE_SIZE. Instead, share backing space across multiple mappings. Allocate a backing page when a mapping in vmalloc space uses a particular page of the shadow region. This page can be shared by other vmalloc mappings later on. We hook in to the vmap infrastructure to lazily clean up unused shadow memory. Testing with test_vmalloc.sh on an x86 VM with 2 vCPUs shows that: - Turning on KASAN, inline instrumentation, without vmalloc, introuduces a 4.1x-4.2x slowdown in vmalloc operations. - Turning this on introduces the following slowdowns over KASAN: * ~1.76x slower single-threaded (test_vmalloc.sh performance) * ~2.18x slower when both cpus are performing operations simultaneously (test_vmalloc.sh sequential_test_order=1) This is unfortunate but given that this is a debug feature only, not the end of the world. The benchmarks are also a stress-test for the vmalloc subsystem: they're not indicative of an overall 2x slowdown! This patch (of 4): Hook into vmalloc and vmap, and dynamically allocate real shadow memory to back the mappings. Most mappings in vmalloc space are small, requiring less than a full page of shadow space. Allocating a full shadow page per mapping would therefore be wasteful. Furthermore, to ensure that different mappings use different shadow pages, mappings would have to be aligned to KASAN_SHADOW_SCALE_SIZE * PAGE_SIZE. Instead, share backing space across multiple mappings. Allocate a backing page when a mapping in vmalloc space uses a particular page of the shadow region. This page can be shared by other vmalloc mappings later on. We hook in to the vmap infrastructure to lazily clean up unused shadow memory. To avoid the difficulties around swapping mappings around, this code expects that the part of the shadow region that covers the vmalloc space will not be covered by the early shadow page, but will be left unmapped. This will require changes in arch-specific code. This allows KASAN with VMAP_STACK, and may be helpful for architectures that do not have a separate module space (e.g. powerpc64, which I am currently working on). It also allows relaxing the module alignment back to PAGE_SIZE. Testing with test_vmalloc.sh on an x86 VM with 2 vCPUs shows that: - Turning on KASAN, inline instrumentation, without vmalloc, introuduces a 4.1x-4.2x slowdown in vmalloc operations. - Turning this on introduces the following slowdowns over KASAN: * ~1.76x slower single-threaded (test_vmalloc.sh performance) * ~2.18x slower when both cpus are performing operations simultaneously (test_vmalloc.sh sequential_test_order=3D1) This is unfortunate but given that this is a debug feature only, not the end of the world. The full benchmark results are: Performance No KASAN KASAN original x baseline KASAN vmalloc x baseline x KASAN fix_size_alloc_test 662004 11404956 17.23 19144610 28.92 1.68 full_fit_alloc_test 710950 12029752 16.92 13184651 18.55 1.10 long_busy_list_alloc_test 9431875 43990172 4.66 82970178 8.80 1.89 random_size_alloc_test 5033626 23061762 4.58 47158834 9.37 2.04 fix_align_alloc_test 1252514 15276910 12.20 31266116 24.96 2.05 random_size_align_alloc_te 1648501 14578321 8.84 25560052 15.51 1.75 align_shift_alloc_test 147 830 5.65 5692 38.72 6.86 pcpu_alloc_test 80732 125520 1.55 140864 1.74 1.12 Total Cycles 119240774314 763211341128 6.40 1390338696894 11.66 1.82 Sequential, 2 cpus No KASAN KASAN original x baseline KASAN vmalloc x baseline x KASAN fix_size_alloc_test 1423150 14276550 10.03 27733022 19.49 1.94 full_fit_alloc_test 1754219 14722640 8.39 15030786 8.57 1.02 long_busy_list_alloc_test 11451858 52154973 4.55 107016027 9.34 2.05 random_size_alloc_test 5989020 26735276 4.46 68885923 11.50 2.58 fix_align_alloc_test 2050976 20166900 9.83 50491675 24.62 2.50 random_size_align_alloc_te 2858229 17971700 6.29 38730225 13.55 2.16 align_shift_alloc_test 405 6428 15.87 26253 64.82 4.08 pcpu_alloc_test 127183 151464 1.19 216263 1.70 1.43 Total Cycles 54181269392 308723699764 5.70 650772566394 12.01 2.11 fix_size_alloc_test 1420404 14289308 10.06 27790035 19.56 1.94 full_fit_alloc_test 1736145 14806234 8.53 15274301 8.80 1.03 long_busy_list_alloc_test 11404638 52270785 4.58 107550254 9.43 2.06 random_size_alloc_test 6017006 26650625 4.43 68696127 11.42 2.58 fix_align_alloc_test 2045504 20280985 9.91 50414862 24.65 2.49 random_size_align_alloc_te 2845338 17931018 6.30 38510276 13.53 2.15 align_shift_alloc_test 472 3760 7.97 9656 20.46 2.57 pcpu_alloc_test 118643 132732 1.12 146504 1.23 1.10 Total Cycles 54040011688 309102805492 5.72 651325675652 12.05 2.11 [dja@axtens.net: fixups] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20191120052719.7201-1-dja@axtens.net Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D202009 Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20191031093909.9228-2-dja@axtens.net Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> [shadow rework] Signed-off-by: NDaniel Axtens <dja@axtens.net> Co-developed-by: NMark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Acked-by: NVasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: NAndrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@virtuozzo.com> Cc: Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com> Cc: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@c-s.fr> Cc: Qian Cai <cai@lca.pw> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
由 Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) 提交于
With the new allocation approach introduced in the 5.2 kernel, it becomes possible to get rid of one global spinlock. By doing that we can further improve the KVA from the performance point of view. Basically we can have two independent locks, one for allocation part and another one for deallocation, because of two different entities: "free data structures" and "busy data structures". As a result, allocation/deallocation operations can still interfere between each other in case of running simultaneously on different CPUs, it means there is still dependency, but with two locks it becomes lower. Summarizing: - it reduces the high lock contention - it allows to perform operations on "free" and "busy" trees in parallel on different CPUs. Please note it does not solve scalability issue. Test results: In order to evaluate this patch, we can run "vmalloc test driver" to see how many CPU cycles it takes to complete all test cases running sequentially. All online CPUs run it so it will cause a high lock contention. HiKey 960, ARM64, 8xCPUs, big.LITTLE: <snip> sudo ./test_vmalloc.sh sequential_test_order=1 <snip> <default> [ 390.950557] All test took CPU0=457126382 cycles [ 391.046690] All test took CPU1=454763452 cycles [ 391.128586] All test took CPU2=454539334 cycles [ 391.222669] All test took CPU3=455649517 cycles [ 391.313946] All test took CPU4=388272196 cycles [ 391.410425] All test took CPU5=384036264 cycles [ 391.492219] All test took CPU6=387432964 cycles [ 391.578433] All test took CPU7=387201996 cycles <default> <patched> [ 304.721224] All test took CPU0=391521310 cycles [ 304.821219] All test took CPU1=393533002 cycles [ 304.917120] All test took CPU2=392243032 cycles [ 305.008986] All test took CPU3=392353853 cycles [ 305.108944] All test took CPU4=297630721 cycles [ 305.196406] All test took CPU5=297548736 cycles [ 305.288602] All test took CPU6=297092392 cycles [ 305.381088] All test took CPU7=297293597 cycles <patched> ~14%-23% patched variant is better. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20191022155800.20468-1-urezki@gmail.comSigned-off-by: NUladzislau Rezki (Sony) <urezki@gmail.com> Acked-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Hillf Danton <hdanton@sina.com> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Oleksiy Avramchenko <oleksiy.avramchenko@sonymobile.com> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
由 Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) 提交于
When fit type is NE_FIT_TYPE there is a need in one extra object. Usually the "ne_fit_preload_node" per-CPU variable has it and there is no need in GFP_NOWAIT allocation, but there are exceptions. This commit just adds more explanations, as a result giving answers on questions like when it can occur, how often, under which conditions and what happens if GFP_NOWAIT gets failed. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20191016095438.12391-3-urezki@gmail.comSigned-off-by: NUladzislau Rezki (Sony) <urezki@gmail.com> Acked-by: NMichal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: Daniel Wagner <dwagner@suse.de> Cc: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@gmail.com> Cc: Hillf Danton <hdanton@sina.com> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Oleksiy Avramchenko <oleksiy.avramchenko@sonymobile.com> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
由 Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) 提交于
Allocation functions should comply with the given gfp_mask as much as possible. The preallocation code in alloc_vmap_area doesn't follow that pattern and it is using a hardcoded GFP_KERNEL. Although this doesn't really make much difference because vmalloc is not GFP_NOWAIT compliant in general (e.g. page table allocations are GFP_KERNEL) there is no reason to spread that bad habit and it is good to fix the antipattern. [mhocko@suse.com: rewrite changelog] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20191016095438.12391-2-urezki@gmail.comSigned-off-by: NUladzislau Rezki (Sony) <urezki@gmail.com> Acked-by: NMichal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: Daniel Wagner <dwagner@suse.de> Cc: Hillf Danton <hdanton@sina.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Oleksiy Avramchenko <oleksiy.avramchenko@sonymobile.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
由 Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) 提交于
Some background. The preemption was disabled before to guarantee that a preloaded object is available for a CPU, it was stored for. That was achieved by combining the disabling the preemption and taking the spin lock while the ne_fit_preload_node is checked. The aim was to not allocate in atomic context when spinlock is taken later, for regular vmap allocations. But that approach conflicts with CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT philosophy. It means that calling spin_lock() with disabled preemption is forbidden in the CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT kernel. Therefore, get rid of preempt_disable() and preempt_enable() when the preload is done for splitting purpose. As a result we do not guarantee now that a CPU is preloaded, instead we minimize the case when it is not, with this change, by populating the per cpu preload pointer under the vmap_area_lock. This implies that at least each caller that has done the preallocation will not fallback to an atomic allocation later. It is possible that the preallocation would be pointless or that no preallocation is done because of the race but the data shows that this is really rare. For example i run the special test case that follows the preload pattern and path. 20 "unbind" threads run it and each does 1000000 allocations. Only 3.5 times among 1000000 a CPU was not preloaded. So it can happen but the number is negligible. [mhocko@suse.com: changelog additions] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20191016095438.12391-1-urezki@gmail.com Fixes: 82dd23e8 ("mm/vmalloc.c: preload a CPU with one object for split purpose") Signed-off-by: NUladzislau Rezki (Sony) <urezki@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: NSteven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org> Acked-by: NSebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> Acked-by: NDaniel Wagner <dwagner@suse.de> Acked-by: NMichal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: Hillf Danton <hdanton@sina.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Oleksiy Avramchenko <oleksiy.avramchenko@sonymobile.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
由 Liu Xiang 提交于
gfpflags_allow_blocking() does not care about __GFP_HIGHMEM, so highmem_mask can be removed. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1568812319-3467-1-git-send-email-liuxiang_1999@126.comSigned-off-by: NLiu Xiang <liuxiang_1999@126.com> Reviewed-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 18 11月, 2019 1 次提交
-
-
由 Andrii Nakryiko 提交于
Add ability to memory-map contents of BPF array map. This is extremely useful for working with BPF global data from userspace programs. It allows to avoid typical bpf_map_{lookup,update}_elem operations, improving both performance and usability. There had to be special considerations for map freezing, to avoid having writable memory view into a frozen map. To solve this issue, map freezing and mmap-ing is happening under mutex now: - if map is already frozen, no writable mapping is allowed; - if map has writable memory mappings active (accounted in map->writecnt), map freezing will keep failing with -EBUSY; - once number of writable memory mappings drops to zero, map freezing can be performed again. Only non-per-CPU plain arrays are supported right now. Maps with spinlocks can't be memory mapped either. For BPF_F_MMAPABLE array, memory allocation has to be done through vmalloc() to be mmap()'able. We also need to make sure that array data memory is page-sized and page-aligned, so we over-allocate memory in such a way that struct bpf_array is at the end of a single page of memory with array->value being aligned with the start of the second page. On deallocation we need to accomodate this memory arrangement to free vmalloc()'ed memory correctly. One important consideration regarding how memory-mapping subsystem functions. Memory-mapping subsystem provides few optional callbacks, among them open() and close(). close() is called for each memory region that is unmapped, so that users can decrease their reference counters and free up resources, if necessary. open() is *almost* symmetrical: it's called for each memory region that is being mapped, **except** the very first one. So bpf_map_mmap does initial refcnt bump, while open() will do any extra ones after that. Thus number of close() calls is equal to number of open() calls plus one more. Signed-off-by: NAndrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: NSong Liu <songliubraving@fb.com> Acked-by: NJohn Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com> Acked-by: NJohannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20191117172806.2195367-4-andriin@fb.com
-
- 26 9月, 2019 1 次提交
-
-
由 Michel Lespinasse 提交于
Add RB_DECLARE_CALLBACKS_MAX, which generates augmented rbtree callbacks for the case where the augmented value is a scalar whose definition follows a max(f(node)) pattern. This actually covers all present uses of RB_DECLARE_CALLBACKS, and saves some (source) code duplication in the various RBCOMPUTE function definitions. [walken@google.com: fix mm/vmalloc.c] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/CANN689FXgK13wDYNh1zKxdipeTuALG4eKvKpsdZqKFJ-rvtGiQ@mail.gmail.com [walken@google.com: re-add check to check_augmented()] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190727022027.GA86863@google.com Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190703040156.56953-3-walken@google.comSigned-off-by: NMichel Lespinasse <walken@google.com> Acked-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de> Cc: Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 25 9月, 2019 3 次提交
-
-
由 Austin Kim 提交于
If !area->pages statement is true where memory allocation fails, area is freed. In this case 'area->pages = pages' should not executed. So move 'area->pages = pages' after if statement. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: give area->pages the same treatment] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190830035716.GA190684@LGEARND20B15Signed-off-by: NAustin Kim <austindh.kim@gmail.com> Acked-by: NMichal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Reviewed-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) <urezki@gmail.com> Cc: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com> Cc: Roman Penyaev <rpenyaev@suse.de> Cc: Rick Edgecombe <rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com> Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@virtuozzo.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
由 Pengfei Li 提交于
Objective --------- The current implementation of struct vmap_area wasted space. After applying this commit, sizeof(struct vmap_area) has been reduced from 11 words to 8 words. Description ----------- 1) Pack "subtree_max_size", "vm" and "purge_list". This is no problem because A) "subtree_max_size" is only used when vmap_area is in "free" tree B) "vm" is only used when vmap_area is in "busy" tree C) "purge_list" is only used when vmap_area is in vmap_purge_list 2) Eliminate "flags". ;Since only one flag VM_VM_AREA is being used, and the same thing can be done by judging whether "vm" is NULL, then the "flags" can be eliminated. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190716152656.12255-3-lpf.vector@gmail.comSigned-off-by: NPengfei Li <lpf.vector@gmail.com> Suggested-by: NUladzislau Rezki (Sony) <urezki@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: NUladzislau Rezki (Sony) <urezki@gmail.com> Cc: Hillf Danton <hdanton@sina.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: Oleksiy Avramchenko <oleksiy.avramchenko@sonymobile.com> Cc: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
由 Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) 提交于
The busy tree can be quite big, even though the area is freed or unmapped it still stays there until "purge" logic removes it. 1) Optimize and reduce the size of "busy" tree by removing a node from it right away as soon as user triggers free paths. It is possible to do so, because the allocation is done using another augmented tree. The vmalloc test driver shows the difference, for example the "fix_size_alloc_test" is ~11% better comparing with default configuration: sudo ./test_vmalloc.sh performance <default> Summary: fix_size_alloc_test loops: 1000000 avg: 993985 usec Summary: full_fit_alloc_test loops: 1000000 avg: 973554 usec Summary: long_busy_list_alloc_test loops: 1000000 avg: 12617652 usec <default> <this patch> Summary: fix_size_alloc_test loops: 1000000 avg: 882263 usec Summary: full_fit_alloc_test loops: 1000000 avg: 973407 usec Summary: long_busy_list_alloc_test loops: 1000000 avg: 12593929 usec <this patch> 2) Since the busy tree now contains allocated areas only and does not interfere with lazily free nodes, introduce the new function show_purge_info() that dumps "unpurged" areas that is propagated through "/proc/vmallocinfo". 3) Eliminate VM_LAZY_FREE flag. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190716152656.12255-2-lpf.vector@gmail.comSigned-off-by: NUladzislau Rezki (Sony) <urezki@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NPengfei Li <lpf.vector@gmail.com> Cc: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com> Cc: Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@gmail.com> Cc: Hillf Danton <hdanton@sina.com> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Oleksiy Avramchenko <oleksiy.avramchenko@sonymobile.com> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 04 9月, 2019 1 次提交
-
-
由 Christoph Hellwig 提交于
The arm architecture had a VM_ARM_DMA_CONSISTENT flag to mark DMA coherent remapping for a while. Lift this flag to common code so that we can use it generically. We also check it in the only place VM_USERMAP is directly check so that we can entirely replace that flag as well (although I'm not even sure why we'd want to allow remapping DMA appings, but I'd rather not change behavior). Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
-
- 14 8月, 2019 1 次提交
-
-
Recent changes to the vmalloc code by commit 68ad4a33 ("mm/vmalloc.c: keep track of free blocks for vmap allocation") can cause spurious percpu allocation failures. These, in turn, can result in panic()s in the slub code. One such possible panic was reported by Dave Hansen in following link https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/6/19/939. Another related panic observed is, RIP: 0033:0x7f46f7441b9b Call Trace: dump_stack+0x61/0x80 pcpu_alloc.cold.30+0x22/0x4f mem_cgroup_css_alloc+0x110/0x650 cgroup_apply_control_enable+0x133/0x330 cgroup_mkdir+0x41b/0x500 kernfs_iop_mkdir+0x5a/0x90 vfs_mkdir+0x102/0x1b0 do_mkdirat+0x7d/0xf0 do_syscall_64+0x5b/0x180 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 VMALLOC memory manager divides the entire VMALLOC space (VMALLOC_START to VMALLOC_END) into multiple VM areas (struct vm_areas), and it mainly uses two lists (vmap_area_list & free_vmap_area_list) to track the used and free VM areas in VMALLOC space. And pcpu_get_vm_areas(offsets[], sizes[], nr_vms, align) function is used for allocating congruent VM areas for percpu memory allocator. In order to not conflict with VMALLOC users, pcpu_get_vm_areas allocates VM areas near the end of the VMALLOC space. So the search for free vm_area for the given requirement starts near VMALLOC_END and moves upwards towards VMALLOC_START. Prior to commit 68ad4a33, the search for free vm_area in pcpu_get_vm_areas() involves following two main steps. Step 1: Find a aligned "base" adress near VMALLOC_END. va = free vm area near VMALLOC_END Step 2: Loop through number of requested vm_areas and check, Step 2.1: if (base < VMALLOC_START) 1. fail with error Step 2.2: // end is offsets[area] + sizes[area] if (base + end > va->vm_end) 1. Move the base downwards and repeat Step 2 Step 2.3: if (base + start < va->vm_start) 1. Move to previous free vm_area node, find aligned base address and repeat Step 2 But Commit 68ad4a33 removed Step 2.2 and modified Step 2.3 as below: Step 2.3: if (base + start < va->vm_start || base + end > va->vm_end) 1. Move to previous free vm_area node, find aligned base address and repeat Step 2 Above change is the root cause of spurious percpu memory allocation failures. For example, consider a case where a relatively large vm_area (~ 30 TB) was ignored in free vm_area search because it did not pass the base + end < vm->vm_end boundary check. Ignoring such large free vm_area's would lead to not finding free vm_area within boundary of VMALLOC_start to VMALLOC_END which in turn leads to allocation failures. So modify the search algorithm to include Step 2.2. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190729232139.91131-1-sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com Fixes: 68ad4a33 ("mm/vmalloc.c: keep track of free blocks for vmap allocation") Signed-off-by: NKuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com> Reported-by: NDave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com> Acked-by: NDennis Zhou <dennis@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: NUladzislau Rezki (Sony) <urezki@gmail.com> Cc: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com> Cc: sathyanarayanan kuppuswamy <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 22 7月, 2019 1 次提交
-
-
由 Joerg Roedel 提交于
On x86-32 with PTI enabled, parts of the kernel page-tables are not shared between processes. This can cause mappings in the vmalloc/ioremap area to persist in some page-tables after the region is unmapped and released. When the region is re-used the processes with the old mappings do not fault in the new mappings but still access the old ones. This causes undefined behavior, in reality often data corruption, kernel oopses and panics and even spontaneous reboots. Fix this problem by activly syncing unmaps in the vmalloc/ioremap area to all page-tables in the system before the regions can be re-used. References: https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1118689 Fixes: 5d72b4fb ('x86, mm: support huge I/O mapping capability I/F') Signed-off-by: NJoerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de> Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Reviewed-by: NDave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190719184652.11391-4-joro@8bytes.org
-
- 13 7月, 2019 7 次提交
-
-
由 Roman Gushchin 提交于
Vmalloc() is getting more and more used these days (kernel stacks, bpf and percpu allocator are new top users), and the total % of memory consumed by vmalloc() can be pretty significant and changes dynamically. /proc/meminfo is the best place to display this information: its top goal is to show top consumers of the memory. Since the VmallocUsed field in /proc/meminfo is not in use for quite a long time (it has been defined to 0 by a5ad88ce ("mm: get rid of 'vmalloc_info' from /proc/meminfo")), let's reuse it for showing the actual physical memory consumption of vmalloc(). Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190417194002.12369-3-guro@fb.comSigned-off-by: NRoman Gushchin <guro@fb.com> Acked-by: NJohannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Acked-by: NVlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Reviewed-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
由 Geert Uytterhoeven 提交于
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190607113509.15032-1-geert+renesas@glider.beSigned-off-by: NGeert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be> Reviewed-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Acked-by: NSouptick Joarder <jrdr.linux@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
由 Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) 提交于
Trigger a warning if an object that is about to be freed is detached. We used to have a BUG_ON(), but even though it is considered as faulty behaviour that is not a good reason to break a system. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190606120411.8298-5-urezki@gmail.comSigned-off-by: NUladzislau Rezki (Sony) <urezki@gmail.com> Cc: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com> Cc: Hillf Danton <hdanton@sina.com> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Oleksiy Avramchenko <oleksiy.avramchenko@sonymobile.com> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
由 Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) 提交于
It does not make sense to try to "unlink" the node that is definitely not linked with a list nor tree. On the first merge step VA just points to the previously disconnected busy area. On the second step, check if the node has been merged and do "unlink" if so, because now it points to an object that must be linked. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190606120411.8298-4-urezki@gmail.comSigned-off-by: NUladzislau Rezki (Sony) <urezki@gmail.com> Acked-by: NHillf Danton <hdanton@sina.com> Reviewed-by: NRoman Gushchin <guro@fb.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: Oleksiy Avramchenko <oleksiy.avramchenko@sonymobile.com> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
由 Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) 提交于
Refactor the NE_FIT_TYPE split case when it comes to an allocation of one extra object. We need it in order to build a remaining space. The preload is done per CPU in non-atomic context with GFP_KERNEL flags. More permissive parameters can be beneficial for systems which are suffer from high memory pressure or low memory condition. For example on my KVM system(4xCPUs, no swap, 256MB RAM) i can simulate the failure of page allocation with GFP_NOWAIT flags. Using "stress-ng" tool and starting N workers spinning on fork() and exit(), i can trigger below trace: <snip> [ 179.815161] stress-ng-fork: page allocation failure: order:0, mode:0x40800(GFP_NOWAIT|__GFP_COMP), nodemask=(null),cpuset=/,mems_allowed=0 [ 179.815168] CPU: 0 PID: 12612 Comm: stress-ng-fork Not tainted 5.2.0-rc3+ #1003 [ 179.815170] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.10.2-1 04/01/2014 [ 179.815171] Call Trace: [ 179.815178] dump_stack+0x5c/0x7b [ 179.815182] warn_alloc+0x108/0x190 [ 179.815187] __alloc_pages_slowpath+0xdc7/0xdf0 [ 179.815191] __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x2de/0x330 [ 179.815194] cache_grow_begin+0x77/0x420 [ 179.815197] fallback_alloc+0x161/0x200 [ 179.815200] kmem_cache_alloc+0x1c9/0x570 [ 179.815202] alloc_vmap_area+0x32c/0x990 [ 179.815206] __get_vm_area_node+0xb0/0x170 [ 179.815208] __vmalloc_node_range+0x6d/0x230 [ 179.815211] ? _do_fork+0xce/0x3d0 [ 179.815213] copy_process.part.46+0x850/0x1b90 [ 179.815215] ? _do_fork+0xce/0x3d0 [ 179.815219] _do_fork+0xce/0x3d0 [ 179.815226] ? __do_page_fault+0x2bf/0x4e0 [ 179.815229] do_syscall_64+0x55/0x130 [ 179.815231] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 [ 179.815234] RIP: 0033:0x7fedec4c738b ... [ 179.815237] RSP: 002b:00007ffda469d730 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000038 [ 179.815239] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007ffda469d730 RCX: 00007fedec4c738b [ 179.815240] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000000001200011 [ 179.815241] RBP: 00007ffda469d780 R08: 00007fededd6e300 R09: 00007ffda47f50a0 [ 179.815242] R10: 00007fededd6e5d0 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000 [ 179.815243] R13: 0000000000000020 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000000 [ 179.815245] Mem-Info: [ 179.815249] active_anon:12686 inactive_anon:14760 isolated_anon:0 active_file:502 inactive_file:61 isolated_file:70 unevictable:2 dirty:0 writeback:0 unstable:0 slab_reclaimable:2380 slab_unreclaimable:7520 mapped:15069 shmem:14813 pagetables:10833 bounce:0 free:1922 free_pcp:229 free_cma:0 <snip> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190606120411.8298-3-urezki@gmail.comSigned-off-by: NUladzislau Rezki (Sony) <urezki@gmail.com> Cc: Hillf Danton <hdanton@sina.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: Oleksiy Avramchenko <oleksiy.avramchenko@sonymobile.com> Cc: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
由 Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) 提交于
Patch series "Some cleanups for the KVA/vmalloc", v5. This patch (of 4): Remove unused argument from the __alloc_vmap_area() function. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190606120411.8298-2-urezki@gmail.comSigned-off-by: NUladzislau Rezki (Sony) <urezki@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Reviewed-by: NRoman Gushchin <guro@fb.com> Cc: Hillf Danton <hdanton@sina.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: Oleksiy Avramchenko <oleksiy.avramchenko@sonymobile.com> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
由 Anshuman Khandual 提交于
Drop the pgtable_t variable from all implementation for pte_fn_t as none of them use it. apply_to_pte_range() should stop computing it as well. Should help us save some cycles. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1556803126-26596-1-git-send-email-anshuman.khandual@arm.comSigned-off-by: NAnshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com> Acked-by: NMatthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> Cc: Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com> Cc: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> Cc: <jglisse@redhat.com> Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 29 6月, 2019 1 次提交
-
-
由 Arnd Bergmann 提交于
gcc gets confused in pcpu_get_vm_areas() because there are too many branches that affect whether 'lva' was initialized before it gets used: mm/vmalloc.c: In function 'pcpu_get_vm_areas': mm/vmalloc.c:991:4: error: 'lva' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized] insert_vmap_area_augment(lva, &va->rb_node, ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ &free_vmap_area_root, &free_vmap_area_list); ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ mm/vmalloc.c:916:20: note: 'lva' was declared here struct vmap_area *lva; ^~~ Add an intialization to NULL, and check whether this has changed before the first use. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: tweak comments] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190618092650.2943749-1-arnd@arndb.de Fixes: 68ad4a33 ("mm/vmalloc.c: keep track of free blocks for vmap allocation") Signed-off-by: NArnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Reviewed-by: NUladzislau Rezki (Sony) <urezki@gmail.com> Cc: Joel Fernandes <joelaf@google.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 25 6月, 2019 1 次提交
-
-
由 Ard Biesheuvel 提交于
Wire up the special helper functions to manipulate aliases of vmalloc regions in the linear map. Acked-by: NWill Deacon <will@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NArd Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@arm.com> Signed-off-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
-
- 03 6月, 2019 2 次提交
-
-
由 Rick Edgecombe 提交于
In a rare case, flush_tlb_kernel_range() could be called with a start higher than the end. In vm_remove_mappings(), in case page_address() returns 0 for all pages (for example they were all in highmem), _vm_unmap_aliases() will be called with start = ULONG_MAX, end = 0 and flush = 1. If at the same time, the vmalloc purge operation is triggered by something else while the current operation is between remove_vm_area() and _vm_unmap_aliases(), then the vm mapping just removed will be already purged. In this case the call of vm_unmap_aliases() may not find any other mappings to flush and so end up flushing start = ULONG_MAX, end = 0. So only set flush = true if we find something in the direct mapping that we need to flush, and this way this can't happen. Signed-off-by: NRick Edgecombe <rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com> Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Meelis Roos <mroos@linux.ee> Cc: Nadav Amit <namit@vmware.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Fixes: 868b104d ("mm/vmalloc: Add flag for freeing of special permsissions") Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190527211058.2729-3-rick.p.edgecombe@intel.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
由 Rick Edgecombe 提交于
The calculation of the direct map address range to flush was wrong. This could cause the RO direct map alias to not get flushed. Today this shouldn't be a problem because this flush is only needed on x86 right now and the spurious fault handler will fix cached RO->RW translations. In the future though, it could cause the permissions to remain RO in the TLB for the direct map alias, and then the page would return from the page allocator to some other component as RO and cause a crash. So fix fix the address range calculation so the flush will include the direct map range. Signed-off-by: NRick Edgecombe <rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com> Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Meelis Roos <mroos@linux.ee> Cc: Nadav Amit <namit@vmware.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Fixes: 868b104d ("mm/vmalloc: Add flag for freeing of special permsissions") Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190527211058.2729-2-rick.p.edgecombe@intel.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
- 02 6月, 2019 1 次提交
-
-
由 Andrew Morton 提交于
Reported-by: NNicholas Joll <najoll@posteo.net> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 21 5月, 2019 1 次提交
-
-
由 Thomas Gleixner 提交于
Add SPDX license identifiers to all files which: - Have no license information of any form - Have EXPORT_.*_SYMBOL_GPL inside which was used in the initial scan/conversion to ignore the file These files fall under the project license, GPL v2 only. The resulting SPDX license identifier is: GPL-2.0-only Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
-
- 19 5月, 2019 3 次提交
-
-
由 Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) 提交于
This macro adds some debug code to check that vmap allocations are happened in ascending order. By default this option is set to 0 and not active. It requires recompilation of the kernel to activate it. Set to 1, compile the kernel. [urezki@gmail.com: v4] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190406183508.25273-4-urezki@gmail.com Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190402162531.10888-4-urezki@gmail.comSigned-off-by: NUladzislau Rezki (Sony) <urezki@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: NRoman Gushchin <guro@fb.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Cc: Joel Fernandes <joelaf@google.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: Oleksiy Avramchenko <oleksiy.avramchenko@sonymobile.com> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Cc: Thomas Garnier <thgarnie@google.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
由 Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) 提交于
This macro adds some debug code to check that the augment tree is maintained correctly, meaning that every node contains valid subtree_max_size value. By default this option is set to 0 and not active. It requires recompilation of the kernel to activate it. Set to 1, compile the kernel. [urezki@gmail.com: v4] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190406183508.25273-3-urezki@gmail.com Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190402162531.10888-3-urezki@gmail.comSigned-off-by: NUladzislau Rezki (Sony) <urezki@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: NRoman Gushchin <guro@fb.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Cc: Joel Fernandes <joelaf@google.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: Oleksiy Avramchenko <oleksiy.avramchenko@sonymobile.com> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Cc: Thomas Garnier <thgarnie@google.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
由 Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) 提交于
Patch series "improve vmap allocation", v3. Objective --------- Please have a look for the description at: https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/10/19/786 but let me also summarize it a bit here as well. The current implementation has O(N) complexity. Requests with different permissive parameters can lead to long allocation time. When i say "long" i mean milliseconds. Description ----------- This approach organizes the KVA memory layout into free areas of the 1-ULONG_MAX range, i.e. an allocation is done over free areas lookups, instead of finding a hole between two busy blocks. It allows to have lower number of objects which represent the free space, therefore to have less fragmented memory allocator. Because free blocks are always as large as possible. It uses the augment tree where all free areas are sorted in ascending order of va->va_start address in pair with linked list that provides O(1) access to prev/next elements. Since the tree is augment, we also maintain the "subtree_max_size" of VA that reflects a maximum available free block in its left or right sub-tree. Knowing that, we can easily traversal toward the lowest (left most path) free area. Allocation: ~O(log(N)) complexity. It is sequential allocation method therefore tends to maximize locality. The search is done until a first suitable block is large enough to encompass the requested parameters. Bigger areas are split. I copy paste here the description of how the area is split, since i described it in https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/10/19/786 <snip> A free block can be split by three different ways. Their names are FL_FIT_TYPE, LE_FIT_TYPE/RE_FIT_TYPE and NE_FIT_TYPE, i.e. they correspond to how requested size and alignment fit to a free block. FL_FIT_TYPE - in this case a free block is just removed from the free list/tree because it fully fits. Comparing with current design there is an extra work with rb-tree updating. LE_FIT_TYPE/RE_FIT_TYPE - left/right edges fit. In this case what we do is just cutting a free block. It is as fast as a current design. Most of the vmalloc allocations just end up with this case, because the edge is always aligned to 1. NE_FIT_TYPE - Is much less common case. Basically it happens when requested size and alignment does not fit left nor right edges, i.e. it is between them. In this case during splitting we have to build a remaining left free area and place it back to the free list/tree. Comparing with current design there are two extra steps. First one is we have to allocate a new vmap_area structure. Second one we have to insert that remaining free block to the address sorted list/tree. In order to optimize a first case there is a cache with free_vmap objects. Instead of allocating from slab we just take an object from the cache and reuse it. Second one is pretty optimized. Since we know a start point in the tree we do not do a search from the top. Instead a traversal begins from a rb-tree node we split. <snip> De-allocation. ~O(log(N)) complexity. An area is not inserted straight away to the tree/list, instead we identify the spot first, checking if it can be merged around neighbors. The list provides O(1) access to prev/next, so it is pretty fast to check it. Summarizing. If merged then large coalesced areas are created, if not the area is just linked making more fragments. There is one more thing that i should mention here. After modification of VA node, its subtree_max_size is updated if it was/is the biggest area in its left or right sub-tree. Apart of that it can also be populated back to upper levels to fix the tree. For more details please have a look at the __augment_tree_propagate_from() function and the description. Tests and stressing ------------------- I use the "test_vmalloc.sh" test driver available under "tools/testing/selftests/vm/" since 5.1-rc1 kernel. Just trigger "sudo ./test_vmalloc.sh" to find out how to deal with it. Tested on different platforms including x86_64/i686/ARM64/x86_64_NUMA. Regarding last one, i do not have any physical access to NUMA system, therefore i emulated it. The time of stressing is days. If you run the test driver in "stress mode", you also need the patch that is in Andrew's tree but not in Linux 5.1-rc1. So, please apply it: http://git.cmpxchg.org/cgit.cgi/linux-mmotm.git/commit/?id=e0cf7749bade6da318e98e934a24d8b62fab512c After massive testing, i have not identified any problems like memory leaks, crashes or kernel panics. I find it stable, but more testing would be good. Performance analysis -------------------- I have used two systems to test. One is i5-3320M CPU @ 2.60GHz and another is HiKey960(arm64) board. i5-3320M runs on 4.20 kernel, whereas Hikey960 uses 4.15 kernel. I have both system which could run on 5.1-rc1 as well, but the results have not been ready by time i an writing this. Currently it consist of 8 tests. There are three of them which correspond to different types of splitting(to compare with default). We have 3 ones(see above). Another 5 do allocations in different conditions. a) sudo ./test_vmalloc.sh performance When the test driver is run in "performance" mode, it runs all available tests pinned to first online CPU with sequential execution test order. We do it in order to get stable and repeatable results. Take a look at time difference in "long_busy_list_alloc_test". It is not surprising because the worst case is O(N). # i5-3320M How many cycles all tests took: CPU0=646919905370(default) cycles vs CPU0=193290498550(patched) cycles # See detailed table with results here: ftp://vps418301.ovh.net/incoming/vmap_test_results_v2/i5-3320M_performance_default.txt ftp://vps418301.ovh.net/incoming/vmap_test_results_v2/i5-3320M_performance_patched.txt # Hikey960 8x CPUs How many cycles all tests took: CPU0=3478683207 cycles vs CPU0=463767978 cycles # See detailed table with results here: ftp://vps418301.ovh.net/incoming/vmap_test_results_v2/HiKey960_performance_default.txt ftp://vps418301.ovh.net/incoming/vmap_test_results_v2/HiKey960_performance_patched.txt b) time sudo ./test_vmalloc.sh test_repeat_count=1 With this configuration, all tests are run on all available online CPUs. Before running each CPU shuffles its tests execution order. It gives random allocation behaviour. So it is rough comparison, but it puts in the picture for sure. # i5-3320M <default> vs <patched> real 101m22.813s real 0m56.805s user 0m0.011s user 0m0.015s sys 0m5.076s sys 0m0.023s # See detailed table with results here: ftp://vps418301.ovh.net/incoming/vmap_test_results_v2/i5-3320M_test_repeat_count_1_default.txt ftp://vps418301.ovh.net/incoming/vmap_test_results_v2/i5-3320M_test_repeat_count_1_patched.txt # Hikey960 8x CPUs <default> vs <patched> real unknown real 4m25.214s user unknown user 0m0.011s sys unknown sys 0m0.670s I did not manage to complete this test on "default Hikey960" kernel version. After 24 hours it was still running, therefore i had to cancel it. That is why real/user/sys are "unknown". This patch (of 3): Currently an allocation of the new vmap area is done over busy list iteration(complexity O(n)) until a suitable hole is found between two busy areas. Therefore each new allocation causes the list being grown. Due to over fragmented list and different permissive parameters an allocation can take a long time. For example on embedded devices it is milliseconds. This patch organizes the KVA memory layout into free areas of the 1-ULONG_MAX range. It uses an augment red-black tree that keeps blocks sorted by their offsets in pair with linked list keeping the free space in order of increasing addresses. Nodes are augmented with the size of the maximum available free block in its left or right sub-tree. Thus, that allows to take a decision and traversal toward the block that will fit and will have the lowest start address, i.e. it is sequential allocation. Allocation: to allocate a new block a search is done over the tree until a suitable lowest(left most) block is large enough to encompass: the requested size, alignment and vstart point. If the block is bigger than requested size - it is split. De-allocation: when a busy vmap area is freed it can either be merged or inserted to the tree. Red-black tree allows efficiently find a spot whereas a linked list provides a constant-time access to previous and next blocks to check if merging can be done. In case of merging of de-allocated memory chunk a large coalesced area is created. Complexity: ~O(log(N)) [urezki@gmail.com: v3] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190402162531.10888-2-urezki@gmail.com [urezki@gmail.com: v4] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190406183508.25273-2-urezki@gmail.com Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190321190327.11813-2-urezki@gmail.comSigned-off-by: NUladzislau Rezki (Sony) <urezki@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: NRoman Gushchin <guro@fb.com> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Garnier <thgarnie@google.com> Cc: Oleksiy Avramchenko <oleksiy.avramchenko@sonymobile.com> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: Joel Fernandes <joelaf@google.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 15 5月, 2019 2 次提交
-
-
由 Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) 提交于
vmap_lazy_nr variable has atomic_t type that is 4 bytes integer value on both 32 and 64 bit systems. lazy_max_pages() deals with "unsigned long" that is 8 bytes on 64 bit system, thus vmap_lazy_nr should be 8 bytes on 64 bit as well. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190131162452.25879-1-urezki@gmail.comSigned-off-by: NUladzislau Rezki (Sony) <urezki@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Reviewed-by: NWilliam Kucharski <william.kucharski@oracle.com> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Garnier <thgarnie@google.com> Cc: Oleksiy Avramchenko <oleksiy.avramchenko@sonymobile.com> Cc: Joel Fernandes <joelaf@google.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
由 Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) 提交于
Commit 763b218d ("mm: add preempt points into __purge_vmap_area_lazy()") introduced some preempt points, one of those is making an allocation more prioritized over lazy free of vmap areas. Prioritizing an allocation over freeing does not work well all the time, i.e. it should be rather a compromise. 1) Number of lazy pages directly influences the busy list length thus on operations like: allocation, lookup, unmap, remove, etc. 2) Under heavy stress of vmalloc subsystem I run into a situation when memory usage gets increased hitting out_of_memory -> panic state due to completely blocking of logic that frees vmap areas in the __purge_vmap_area_lazy() function. Establish a threshold passing which the freeing is prioritized back over allocation creating a balance between each other. Using vmalloc test driver in "stress mode", i.e. When all available test cases are run simultaneously on all online CPUs applying a pressure on the vmalloc subsystem, my HiKey 960 board runs out of memory due to the fact that __purge_vmap_area_lazy() logic simply is not able to free pages in time. How I run it: 1) You should build your kernel with CONFIG_TEST_VMALLOC=m 2) ./tools/testing/selftests/vm/test_vmalloc.sh stress During this test "vmap_lazy_nr" pages will go far beyond acceptable lazy_max_pages() threshold, that will lead to enormous busy list size and other problems including allocation time and so on. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190124115648.9433-3-urezki@gmail.comSigned-off-by: NUladzislau Rezki (Sony) <urezki@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Garnier <thgarnie@google.com> Cc: Oleksiy Avramchenko <oleksiy.avramchenko@sonymobile.com> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: Joel Fernandes <joelaf@google.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Cc: Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 30 4月, 2019 1 次提交
-
-
由 Rick Edgecombe 提交于
Add a new flag VM_FLUSH_RESET_PERMS, for enabling vfree operations to immediately clear executable TLB entries before freeing pages, and handle resetting permissions on the directmap. This flag is useful for any kind of memory with elevated permissions, or where there can be related permissions changes on the directmap. Today this is RO+X and RO memory. Although this enables directly vfreeing non-writeable memory now, non-writable memory cannot be freed in an interrupt because the allocation itself is used as a node on deferred free list. So when RO memory needs to be freed in an interrupt the code doing the vfree needs to have its own work queue, as was the case before the deferred vfree list was added to vmalloc. For architectures with set_direct_map_ implementations this whole operation can be done with one TLB flush when centralized like this. For others with directmap permissions, currently only arm64, a backup method using set_memory functions is used to reset the directmap. When arm64 adds set_direct_map_ functions, this backup can be removed. When the TLB is flushed to both remove TLB entries for the vmalloc range mapping and the direct map permissions, the lazy purge operation could be done to try to save a TLB flush later. However today vm_unmap_aliases could flush a TLB range that does not include the directmap. So a helper is added with extra parameters that can allow both the vmalloc address and the direct mapping to be flushed during this operation. The behavior of the normal vm_unmap_aliases function is unchanged. Suggested-by: NDave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com> Suggested-by: NAndy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> Suggested-by: NWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Signed-off-by: NRick Edgecombe <rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> Cc: <deneen.t.dock@intel.com> Cc: <kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com> Cc: <kristen@linux.intel.com> Cc: <linux_dti@icloud.com> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@gmail.com> Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190426001143.4983-17-namit@vmware.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
- 06 3月, 2019 2 次提交
-
-
由 Mike Rapoport 提交于
Many kernel-doc comments in mm/ have the return value descriptions either misformatted or omitted at all which makes kernel-doc script unhappy: $ make V=1 htmldocs ... ./mm/util.c:36: info: Scanning doc for kstrdup ./mm/util.c:41: warning: No description found for return value of 'kstrdup' ./mm/util.c:57: info: Scanning doc for kstrdup_const ./mm/util.c:66: warning: No description found for return value of 'kstrdup_const' ./mm/util.c:75: info: Scanning doc for kstrndup ./mm/util.c:83: warning: No description found for return value of 'kstrndup' ... Fixing the formatting and adding the missing return value descriptions eliminates ~100 such warnings. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1549549644-4903-4-git-send-email-rppt@linux.ibm.comSigned-off-by: NMike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
由 Mike Rapoport 提交于
Some kernel-doc comments in mm/vmalloc.c have leading tab in indentation. This leads to excessive indentation in the generated HTML and to the inconsistency of its layout ([1] vs [2]). Besides, multi-line Note: sections are not handled properly with extra indentation. [1] https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v4.20/core-api/mm-api.html?#c.vm_map_ram [2] https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v4.20/core-api/mm-api.html?#c.vfree Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1549549644-4903-2-git-send-email-rppt@linux.ibm.comSigned-off-by: NMike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-