Skip to content

L
linux

xiphi1978 / linux

通知 2
Star 0
Fork 0
L
linux

体验新版 GitCode，发现更多精彩内容 >>

切换分支/标签
  1. 11 11月, 2015 2 次提交
    • E
      fs/pipe.c: return error code rather than 0 in pipe_write() · 6ae08069
      由 Eric Biggers 提交于 
      pipe_write() would return 0 if it failed to merge the beginning of the
data to write with the last, partially filled pipe buffer.  It should
return an error code instead.  Userspace programs could be confused by
write() returning 0 when called with a nonzero 'count'.

The EFAULT error case was a regression from f0d1bec9 ("new helper:
copy_page_from_iter()"), while the ops->confirm() error case was a much
older bug.

Test program:

	#include <assert.h>
	#include <errno.h>
	#include <unistd.h>

	int main(void)
	{
		int fd[2];
		char data[1] = {0};

		assert(0 == pipe(fd));
		assert(1 == write(fd[1], data, 1));

		/* prior to this patch, write() returned 0 here  */
		assert(-1 == write(fd[1], NULL, 1));
		assert(errno == EFAULT);
	}

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # at least v3.15+
Signed-off-by: NEric Biggers <ebiggers3@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
      6ae08069
    • E
      fs/pipe.c: preserve alloc_file() error code · e9bb1f9b
      由 Eric Biggers 提交于 
      If sys_pipe() was unable to allocate a 'struct file', it always failed
with ENFILE, which means "The number of simultaneously open files in the
system would exceed a system-imposed limit." However, alloc_file()
actually returns an ERR_PTR value and might fail with other error codes.
Currently, in addition to ENFILE, it can fail with ENOMEM, potentially
when there are few open files in the system.  Update sys_pipe() to
preserve this error code.

In a prior submission of a similar patch (1) some concern was raised
about introducing a new error code for sys_pipe().  However, for most
system calls, programs cannot assume that new error codes will never be
introduced.  In addition, ENOMEM was, in fact, already a possible error
code for sys_pipe(), in the case where the file descriptor table could
not be expanded due to insufficient memory.

	(1) http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1357942Signed-off-by: NEric Biggers <ebiggers3@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
      e9bb1f9b
  3. 16 4月, 2015 1 次提交
  5. 12 4月, 2015 1 次提交
  7. 26 3月, 2015 1 次提交
  9. 07 5月, 2014 3 次提交
  11. 02 4月, 2014 2 次提交
  13. 24 1月, 2014 1 次提交
  15. 03 12月, 2013 1 次提交
    • L
      vfs: fix subtle use-after-free of pipe_inode_info · b0d8d229
      由 Linus Torvalds 提交于 
      The pipe code was trying (and failing) to be very careful about freeing
the pipe info only after the last access, with a pattern like:

        spin_lock(&inode->i_lock);
        if (!--pipe->files) {
                inode->i_pipe = NULL;
                kill = 1;
        }
        spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);
        __pipe_unlock(pipe);
        if (kill)
                free_pipe_info(pipe);

where the final freeing is done last.

HOWEVER.  The above is actually broken, because while the freeing is
done at the end, if we have two racing processes releasing the pipe
inode info, the one that *doesn't* free it will decrement the ->files
count, and unlock the inode i_lock, but then still use the
"pipe_inode_info" afterwards when it does the "__pipe_unlock(pipe)".

This is *very* hard to trigger in practice, since the race window is
very small, and adding debug options seems to just hide it by slowing
things down.

Simon originally reported this way back in July as an Oops in
kmem_cache_allocate due to a single bit corruption (due to the final
"spin_unlock(pipe->mutex.wait_lock)" incrementing a field in a different
allocation that had re-used the free'd pipe-info), it's taken this long
to figure out.

Since the 'pipe->files' accesses aren't even protected by the pipe lock
(we very much use the inode lock for that), the simple solution is to
just drop the pipe lock early.  And since there were two users of this
pattern, create a helper function for it.

Introduced commit ba5bb147 ("pipe: take allocation and freeing of
pipe_inode_info out of ->i_mutex").
Reported-by: NSimon Kirby <sim@hostway.ca>
Reported-by: NIan Applegate <ia@cloudflare.com>
Acked-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: stable@kernel.org   # v3.10+
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      b0d8d229
  17. 08 5月, 2013 1 次提交
  19. 10 4月, 2013 11 次提交
  21. 12 3月, 2013 1 次提交
    • A
      vfs: fix pipe counter breakage · a930d879
      由 Al Viro 提交于 
      If you open a pipe for neither read nor write, the pipe code will not
add any usage counters to the pipe, causing the 'struct pipe_inode_info"
to be potentially released early.

That doesn't normally matter, since you cannot actually use the pipe,
but the pipe release code - particularly fasync handling - still expects
the actual pipe infrastructure to all be there.  And rather than adding
NULL pointer checks, let's just disallow this case, the same way we
already do for the named pipe ("fifo") case.

This is ancient going back to pre-2.4 days, and until trinity, nobody
naver noticed.
Reported-by: NDave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      a930d879
  23. 23 2月, 2013 2 次提交
  25. 27 9月, 2012 1 次提交
  27. 30 7月, 2012 1 次提交
  29. 24 7月, 2012 1 次提交
  31. 02 6月, 2012 1 次提交
    • J
      fs: introduce inode operation ->update_time · c3b2da31
      由 Josef Bacik 提交于 
      Btrfs has to make sure we have space to allocate new blocks in order to modify
the inode, so updating time can fail.  We've gotten around this by having our
own file_update_time but this is kind of a pain, and Christoph has indicated he
would like to make xfs do something different with atime updates.  So introduce
->update_time, where we will deal with i_version an a/m/c time updates and
indicate which changes need to be made.  The normal version just does what it
has always done, updates the time and marks the inode dirty, and then
filesystems can choose to do something different.

I've gone through all of the users of file_update_time and made them check for
errors with the exception of the fault code since it's complicated and I wasn't
quite sure what to do there, also Jan is going to be pushing the file time
updates into page_mkwrite for those who have it so that should satisfy btrfs and
make it not a big deal to check the file_update_time() return code in the
generic fault path. Thanks,
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
      c3b2da31
  33. 01 6月, 2012 1 次提交
  35. 31 5月, 2012 1 次提交
    • W
      pipe: return -ENOIOCTLCMD instead of -EINVAL on unknown ioctl command · 46ce341b
      由 Will Deacon 提交于 
      As described in commit 07d106d0 ("vfs: fix up ENOIOCTLCMD error
handling"), drivers should return -ENOIOCTLCMD if they receive an ioctl
command which they don't understand. Doing so will result in -ENOTTY
being returned to userspace, which matches the behaviour of the compat
layer if it fails to translate an ioctl command.

This patch fixes the pipe ioctl to return -ENOIOCTLCMD instead of
-EINVAL when passed an unknown ioctl command.

Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
      46ce341b
  37. 30 4月, 2012 1 次提交
    • L
      pipes: add a "packetized pipe" mode for writing · 9883035a
      由 Linus Torvalds 提交于 
      The actual internal pipe implementation is already really about
individual packets (called "pipe buffers"), and this simply exposes that
as a special packetized mode.

When we are in the packetized mode (marked by O_DIRECT as suggested by
Alan Cox), a write() on a pipe will not merge the new data with previous
writes, so each write will get a pipe buffer of its own.  The pipe
buffer is then marked with the PIPE_BUF_FLAG_PACKET flag, which in turn
will tell the reader side to break the read at that boundary (and throw
away any partial packet contents that do not fit in the read buffer).

End result: as long as you do writes less than PIPE_BUF in size (so that
the pipe doesn't have to split them up), you can now treat the pipe as a
packet interface, where each read() system call will read one packet at
a time.  You can just use a sufficiently big read buffer (PIPE_BUF is
sufficient, since bigger than that doesn't guarantee atomicity anyway),
and the return value of the read() will naturally give you the size of
the packet.

NOTE! We do not support zero-sized packets, and zero-sized reads and
writes to a pipe continue to be no-ops.  Also note that big packets will
currently be split at write time, but that the size at which that
happens is not really specified (except that it's bigger than PIPE_BUF).
Currently that limit is the system page size, but we might want to
explicitly support bigger packets some day.

The main user for this is going to be the autofs packet interface,
allowing us to stop having to care so deeply about exact packet sizes
(which have had bugs with 32/64-bit compatibility modes).  But user
space can create packetized pipes with "pipe2(fd, O_DIRECT)", which will
fail with an EINVAL on kernels that do not support this interface.
Tested-by: NMichael Tokarev <mjt@tls.msk.ru>
Cc: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Ian Kent <raven@themaw.net>
Cc: Thomas Meyer <thomas@m3y3r.de>
Cc: stable@kernel.org  # needed for systemd/autofs interaction fix
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      9883035a
  39. 24 3月, 2012 1 次提交
  41. 20 3月, 2012 1 次提交
  43. 13 1月, 2012 1 次提交
    • S
      pipe: fail cleanly when root tries F_SETPIPE_SZ with big size · 2ccd4f4d
      由 Sasha Levin 提交于 
      When a user with the CAP_SYS_RESOURCE cap tries to F_SETPIPE_SZ a pipe
with size bigger than kmalloc() can alloc it spits out an ugly warning:

  ------------[ cut here ]------------
  WARNING: at mm/page_alloc.c:2095 __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x5d3/0x7a0()
  Pid: 733, comm: a.out Not tainted 3.2.0-rc1+ #4
  Call Trace:
     warn_slowpath_common+0x75/0xb0
     warn_slowpath_null+0x15/0x20
     __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x5d3/0x7a0
     __get_free_pages+0x12/0x50
     __kmalloc+0x12b/0x150
     pipe_set_size+0x75/0x120
     pipe_fcntl+0xf8/0x140
     do_fcntl+0x2d4/0x410
     sys_fcntl+0x66/0xa0
     system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
  ---[ end trace 432f702e6db7b5ee ]---

Instead, make kcalloc() handle the overflow case and fail quietly.

[akpm@linux-foundation.org: switch to sizeof(*bufs) for 80-column niceness]
Signed-off-by: NSasha Levin <levinsasha928@gmail.com>
Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Acked-by: NPekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      2ccd4f4d
  45. 04 1月, 2012 1 次提交
  47. 01 11月, 2011 1 次提交
  49. 27 7月, 2011 1 次提交