- 24 3月, 2020 40 次提交
-
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
If we are going to track leaked roots we need to free them all the same way, so don't kfree() roots directly, use btrfs_put_fs_root. Reviewed-by: NNikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
We lookup the fs_root and put it in our fs_info directly, we should hold a ref on this root for the lifetime of the fs_info. Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
We're going to start freeing roots and doing other complicated things in free_fs_info, so we need to move it to disk-io.c and export it in order to use things lik btrfs_put_fs_root(). Reviewed-by: NNikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
We lookup the uuid of arbitrary subvolumes, hold a ref on the root while we're doing this. Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
We replay the log into arbitrary fs roots, hold a ref on the root while we're doing this. Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
We create the snapshot and then use it for a bunch of things, we need to hold a ref on it while we're messing with it. Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
We lookup the name of a subvol which means we'll cross into different roots. Hold a ref while we're doing the look ups in the fs_root we're searching. Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
We lookup all the clone roots and the parent root for send, so we need to hold refs on all of these roots while we're processing them. Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
We look up the root for the bytenr that is failing, so we need to hold a ref on the root for that operation. Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
We lookup roots for every orphan item we have, we need to hold a ref on the root while we're doing this work. Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
All of relocation uses read_fs_root to lookup fs roots, so push the btrfs_grab_fs_root() up into that helper and remove the individual calls. Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
We look up the fs root in various places in here when recovering from a crashed relcoation. Make sure we hold a ref on the root whenever we look them up. Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
We're creating a reloc inode in the data reloc tree, we need to hold a ref on the root while we're doing that. Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
We're looking up the data references for the bytenr in a root, we need to hold a ref on that root while we're doing that. Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
We are recording this root in the transaction, so we need to hold a ref on it until we do that. Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
We look up the corresponding root for the reloc root, we need to hold a ref while we're messing with it. Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
We look up the reloc roots corresponding root, we need to hold a ref on that root. Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
This is trickier than the previous conversions. We have backref_node's that need to hold onto their root for their lifetime. Do the read of the root and grab the ref. If at any point we don't use the root we discard it, however if we use it in our backref node we don't free it until we free the backref node. Any time we switch the root's for the backref node we need to drop our ref on the old root and grab the ref on the new root, and if we dupe a node we need to get a ref on the root there as well. Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
We look up an arbitrary fs root here, we need to hold a ref on the root for the duration. Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
We look up whatever root userspace has given us, we need to hold a ref throughout this operation. Use 'root' only for the on fs root and not as a temporary variable elsewhere. Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
We can wander into a different root, so grab a ref on the root we look up. Later on we make root = fs_info->tree_root so we need this separate out label to make sure we do the right cleanup only in the case we're looking up a different root. Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
We look up an arbitrary fs root, we need to hold a ref on it while we're doing our search. Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
We lookup a arbitrary fs root, we need to hold a ref on that root. If we're using our own inodes root then grab a ref on that as well to make the cleanup easier. Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
We're creating the new root here, but we should hold the ref until after we've initialized the inode for it. Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
Looking up the inode from an arbitrary tree means we need to hold a ref on that root. Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
We are looking up an arbitrary inode, we need to hold a ref on the root while we're doing this. Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
Looking up the inode we need to search the root, make sure we hold a reference on that root while we're doing the lookup. Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
We're looking up a random root, we need to hold a ref on it while we're using it. Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
If the root is sitting in the radix tree, we should probably have a ref for the radix tree. Grab a ref on the root when we insert it, and drop it when it gets deleted. Reviewed-by: NNikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
Add another comment to cover how the space reservation system works generally. This covers the actual reservation flow, as well as how flushing is handled. Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
delalloc space reservation is tricky because it encompasses both data and metadata. Make it clear what each side does, the general flow of how space is moved throughout the lifetime of a write, and what goes into the calculations. Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
This is a giant comment at the top of block-rsv.c describing generally how block reserves work. It is purely about the block reserves themselves, and nothing to do with how the actual reservation system works. Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
We want to use this for dropping all roots, and in some error cases we may not have a root, so handle this to make the cleanup code easier. Make btrfs_grab_fs_root the same so we can use it in cases where the root may not exist (like the quota root). Reviewed-by: NNikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
Now that the orphan cleanup stuff doesn't use this directly we can just make them static. Reviewed-by: NNikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
All this does is call btrfs_get_fs_root() with check_ref == true. Just use btrfs_get_fs_root() so we don't have a bunch of different helpers that do the same thing. Reviewed-by: NNikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
All helpers should either be using btrfs_get_fs_root() or btrfs_read_tree_root(). Reviewed-by: NNikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
Relocation has it's special roots, we don't want to save these in the root cache either, so swap it to use btrfs_read_tree_root(). However the reloc root does need REF_COWS set, so make sure we set it everywhere we use this helper, as it no longer does the REF_COWS setting. Reviewed-by: NNikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
Tree-log uses btrfs_read_fs_root to load its log, but this just calls btrfs_read_tree_root. We don't save the log roots in our root cache, so just export this helper and use it in the logging code. Reviewed-by: NNikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
btrfs_find_orphan_roots has this weird thing where it looks up the root in cache to see if it is there before just reading the root. But the read it uses just reads the root, it doesn't do any of the init work, we do that by hand here. But this is unnecessary, all we really want is to see if the root still exists and add it to the dead roots list to be cleaned up, otherwise we delete the orphan item. Fix this by just using btrfs_get_fs_root directly with check_ref set to false so we get the orphan root items. Then we just handle in cache and out of cache roots the same, add them to the dead roots list and carry on. Reviewed-by: NNikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
We have a helper for reading fs roots that just reads the fs root off the disk and then sets REF_COWS and init's the inheritable flags. Move this into btrfs_init_fs_root so we can later get rid of this helper and consolidate all of the fs root reading into one helper. Reviewed-by: NNikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-