- 04 2月, 2010 2 次提交
-
-
由 Nick Pelly 提交于
When processing a RFCOMM UA frame when the socket is closed and we were not the RFCOMM initiator would cause rfcomm_session_put() to be called twice during rfcomm_process_rx(). This would cause a kernel panic in rfcomm_session_close() then. This could be easily reproduced during disconnect with devices such as Motorola H270 that send RFCOMM UA followed quickly by L2CAP disconnect request. This trace for this looks like: 2009-09-21 17:22:37.788895 < ACL data: handle 1 flags 0x02 dlen 8 L2CAP(d): cid 0x0041 len 4 [psm 3] RFCOMM(s): DISC: cr 0 dlci 20 pf 1 ilen 0 fcs 0x7d 2009-09-21 17:22:37.906204 > HCI Event: Number of Completed Packets (0x13) plen 5 handle 1 packets 1 2009-09-21 17:22:37.933090 > ACL data: handle 1 flags 0x02 dlen 8 L2CAP(d): cid 0x0040 len 4 [psm 3] RFCOMM(s): UA: cr 0 dlci 20 pf 1 ilen 0 fcs 0x57 2009-09-21 17:22:38.636764 < ACL data: handle 1 flags 0x02 dlen 8 L2CAP(d): cid 0x0041 len 4 [psm 3] RFCOMM(s): DISC: cr 0 dlci 0 pf 1 ilen 0 fcs 0x9c 2009-09-21 17:22:38.744125 > HCI Event: Number of Completed Packets (0x13) plen 5 handle 1 packets 1 2009-09-21 17:22:38.763687 > ACL data: handle 1 flags 0x02 dlen 8 L2CAP(d): cid 0x0040 len 4 [psm 3] RFCOMM(s): UA: cr 0 dlci 0 pf 1 ilen 0 fcs 0xb6 2009-09-21 17:22:38.783554 > ACL data: handle 1 flags 0x02 dlen 12 L2CAP(s): Disconn req: dcid 0x0040 scid 0x0041 Avoid calling rfcomm_session_put() twice by skipping this call in rfcomm_recv_ua() if the socket is closed. Signed-off-by: NNick Pelly <npelly@google.com> Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
-
由 Marcel Holtmann 提交于
With the commit 9e726b17 the rfcomm_session_put() gets accidentially called from a timeout callback and results in this: BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at net/core/sock.c:1897 in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 0, pid: 0, name: swapper Pid: 0, comm: swapper Tainted: P 2.6.32 #31 Call Trace: <IRQ> [<ffffffff81036455>] __might_sleep+0xf8/0xfa [<ffffffff8138ef1d>] lock_sock_nested+0x29/0xc4 [<ffffffffa03921b3>] lock_sock+0xb/0xd [l2cap] [<ffffffffa03948e6>] l2cap_sock_shutdown+0x1c/0x76 [l2cap] [<ffffffff8106adea>] ? clockevents_program_event+0x75/0x7e [<ffffffff8106bea2>] ? tick_dev_program_event+0x37/0xa5 [<ffffffffa0394967>] l2cap_sock_release+0x27/0x67 [l2cap] [<ffffffff8138c971>] sock_release+0x1a/0x67 [<ffffffffa03d2492>] rfcomm_session_del+0x34/0x53 [rfcomm] [<ffffffffa03d24c5>] rfcomm_session_put+0x14/0x16 [rfcomm] [<ffffffffa03d28b4>] rfcomm_session_timeout+0xe/0x1a [rfcomm] [<ffffffff810554a8>] run_timer_softirq+0x1e2/0x29a [<ffffffffa03d28a6>] ? rfcomm_session_timeout+0x0/0x1a [rfcomm] [<ffffffff8104e0f6>] __do_softirq+0xfe/0x1c5 [<ffffffff8100e8ce>] ? timer_interrupt+0x1a/0x21 [<ffffffff8100cc4c>] call_softirq+0x1c/0x28 [<ffffffff8100e05b>] do_softirq+0x33/0x6b [<ffffffff8104daf6>] irq_exit+0x36/0x85 [<ffffffff8100d7a9>] do_IRQ+0xa6/0xbd [<ffffffff8100c493>] ret_from_intr+0x0/0xa <EOI> [<ffffffff812585b3>] ? acpi_idle_enter_bm+0x269/0x294 [<ffffffff812585a9>] ? acpi_idle_enter_bm+0x25f/0x294 [<ffffffff81373ddc>] ? cpuidle_idle_call+0x97/0x107 [<ffffffff8100aca0>] ? cpu_idle+0x53/0xaa [<ffffffff81429006>] ? rest_init+0x7a/0x7c [<ffffffff8177bc8c>] ? start_kernel+0x389/0x394 [<ffffffff8177b29c>] ? x86_64_start_reservations+0xac/0xb0 [<ffffffff8177b384>] ? x86_64_start_kernel+0xe4/0xeb To fix this, the rfcomm_session_put() needs to be moved out of rfcomm_session_timeout() into rfcomm_process_sessions(). In that context it is perfectly fine to sleep and disconnect the socket. Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org> Tested-by: NDavid John <davidjon@xenontk.org>
-
- 04 12月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Marcel Holtmann 提交于
By default the RFCOMM layer would still use L2CAP basic mode. For testing purposes this option enables RFCOMM to select enhanced retransmission mode. Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
-
- 23 8月, 2009 2 次提交
-
-
由 Luiz Augusto von Dentz 提交于
When using DEFER_SETUP on a RFCOMM socket, a SABM frame triggers authorization which when rejected send a DM response. This is fine according to the RFCOMM spec: the responding implementation may replace the "proper" response on the Multiplexer Control channel with a DM frame, sent on the referenced DLCI to indicate that the DLCI is not open, and that the responder would not grant a request to open it later either. But some stacks doesn't seems to cope with this leaving DLCI 0 open after receiving DM frame. To fix it properly a timer was introduced to rfcomm_session which is used to set a timeout when the last active DLC of a session is unlinked, this will give the remote stack some time to reply with a proper DISC frame on DLCI 0 avoiding both sides sending DISC to each other on stacks that follow the specification and taking care of those who don't by taking down DLCI 0. Signed-off-by: NLuiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.dentz@openbossa.org> Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
-
由 Marcel Holtmann 提交于
The rfcomm_init bug fix went into the kernel premature before it got fully reviewed and acknowledged by the Bluetooth maintainer. So fix up the coding style now. Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
-
- 04 8月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Dave Young 提交于
rfcomm tty may be used before rfcomm_tty_driver initilized, The problem is that now socket layer init before tty layer, if userspace program do socket callback right here then oops will happen. reporting in: http://marc.info/?l=linux-bluetooth&m=124404919324542&w=2 make 3 changes: 1. remove #ifdef in rfcomm/core.c, make it blank function when rfcomm tty not selected in rfcomm.h 2. tune the rfcomm_init error patch to ensure tty driver initilized before rfcomm socket usage. 3. remove __exit for rfcomm_cleanup_sockets because above change need call it in a __init function. Reported-by: NOliver Hartkopp <oliver@hartkopp.net> Tested-by: NOliver Hartkopp <oliver@hartkopp.net> Signed-off-by: NDave Young <hidave.darkstar@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 08 6月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Marcel Holtmann 提交于
The Bluetooth source uses some endian conversion helpers, that in the end translate to kernel standard routines. So remove this obfuscation since it is fully pointless. Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
-
- 20 4月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Johan Hedberg 提交于
There is a missing call to rfcomm_dlc_clear_timer in the case that DEFER_SETUP is used and so the connection gets disconnected after the timeout even if it was successfully accepted previously. This patch adds a call to rfcomm_dlc_clear_timer to rfcomm_dlc_accept which will get called when the user accepts the connection by calling read() on the socket. Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@nokia.com> Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
-
- 27 2月, 2009 9 次提交
-
-
由 Marcel Holtmann 提交于
The CID value of L2CAP sockets need to be set to zero. All userspace applications do this via memset() on the sockaddr_l2 structure. The RFCOMM implementation uses in-kernel L2CAP sockets and so it has to make sure that l2_cid is set to zero. Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
-
由 Marcel Holtmann 提交于
When BT_DEFER_SETUP is enabled on a RFCOMM socket, then switch its current state from BT_OPEN to BT_CONNECT2. This gives the Bluetooth core a unified way to handle L2CAP and RFCOMM sockets. The BT_CONNECT2 state is designated for incoming connections. Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
-
由 Marcel Holtmann 提交于
When receiving incoming connection to specific services, always use general bonding. This ensures that the link key gets stored and can be used for further authentications. Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
-
由 Jaikumar Ganesh 提交于
During a role change with pre-Bluetooth 2.1 devices, the remote side drops the encryption of the RFCOMM connection. We allow a grace period for the encryption to be re-established, before dropping the connection. During this grace period, the RFCOMM_SEC_PENDING flag is set. Check this flag before sending RFCOMM packets. Signed-off-by: NJaikumar Ganesh <jaikumar@google.com> Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
-
由 Marcel Holtmann 提交于
With the support for the enhanced security model and the support for deferring connection setup, it is a good idea to increase various version numbers. This is purely cosmetic and has no effect on the behavior, but can be really helpful when debugging problems in different kernel versions. Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
-
由 Marcel Holtmann 提交于
A role switch with devices following the Bluetooth pre-2.1 standards or without Encryption Pause and Resume support is not possible if encryption is enabled. Most newer headsets require the role switch, but also require that the connection is encrypted. For connections with a high security mode setting, the link will be immediately dropped. When the connection uses medium security mode setting, then a grace period is introduced where the TX is halted and the remote device gets a change to re-enable encryption after the role switch. If not re-enabled the link will be dropped. Based on initial work by Ville Tervo <ville.tervo@nokia.com> Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
-
由 Marcel Holtmann 提交于
Change the RFCOMM internals to use the new security levels and remove the link mode details. Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
-
由 Marcel Holtmann 提交于
The current security model is based around the flags AUTH, ENCRYPT and SECURE. Starting with support for the Bluetooth 2.1 specification this is no longer sufficient. The different security levels are now defined as SDP, LOW, MEDIUM and SECURE. Previously it was possible to set each security independently, but this actually doesn't make a lot of sense. For Bluetooth the encryption depends on a previous successful authentication. Also you can only update your existing link key if you successfully created at least one before. And of course the update of link keys without having proper encryption in place is a security issue. The new security levels from the Bluetooth 2.1 specification are now used internally. All old settings are mapped to the new values and this way it ensures that old applications still work. The only limitation is that it is no longer possible to set authentication without also enabling encryption. No application should have done this anyway since this is actually a security issue. Without encryption the integrity of the authentication can't be guaranteed. As default for a new L2CAP or RFCOMM connection, the LOW security level is used. The only exception here are the service discovery sessions on PSM 1 where SDP level is used. To have similar security strength as with a Bluetooth 2.0 and before combination key, the MEDIUM level should be used. This is according to the Bluetooth specification. The MEDIUM level will not require any kind of man-in-the-middle (MITM) protection. Only the HIGH security level will require this. Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
-
由 Marcel Holtmann 提交于
In order to decide if listening RFCOMM sockets should be accept()ed the BD_ADDR of the remote device needs to be known. This patch adds a socket option which defines a timeout for deferring the actual connection setup. The connection setup is done after reading from the socket for the first time. Until then writing to the socket returns ENOTCONN. Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
-
- 19 12月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Wei Yongjun 提交于
The kernel_accept() does not hold the module refcount of newsock->ops->owner, so we need __module_get(newsock->ops->owner) code after call kernel_accept() by hand. In sunrpc, the module refcount is missing to hold. So this cause kernel panic. Used following script to reproduct: while [ 1 ]; do mount -t nfs4 192.168.0.19:/ /mnt touch /mnt/file umount /mnt lsmod | grep ipv6 done This patch fixed the problem by add __module_get(newsock->ops->owner) to kernel_accept(). So we do not need to used __module_get(newsock->ops->owner) in every place when used kernel_accept(). Signed-off-by: NWei Yongjun <yjwei@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 30 11月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Marcel Holtmann 提交于
With the introduction of CONFIG_DYNAMIC_PRINTK_DEBUG it is possible to allow debugging without having to recompile the kernel. This patch turns all BT_DBG() calls into pr_debug() to support dynamic debug messages. As a side effect all CONFIG_BT_*_DEBUG statements are now removed and some broken debug entries have been fixed. Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
-
- 18 8月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Marcel Holtmann 提交于
The Bluetooth entries for the MAINTAINERS file are a little bit too much. Consolidate them into two entries. One for Bluetooth drivers and another one for the Bluetooth subsystem. Also the MODULE_AUTHOR should indicate the current maintainer of the module and actually not the original author. Fix all Bluetooth modules to provide current maintainer information. Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
-
- 15 7月, 2008 5 次提交
-
-
由 Marcel Holtmann 提交于
When an incoming RFCOMM socket connection gets converted into a TTY, it can happen that packets are lost. This mainly happens with the Handsfree profile where the remote side starts sending data right away. The problem is that these packets are in the socket receive queue. So when creating the TTY make sure to copy all pending packets from the socket receive queue to a private queue inside the TTY. To make this actually work, the flow control on the newly created TTY will be disabled and only enabled again when the TTY is opened by an application. And right before that, the pending packets will be put into the TTY flip buffer. Signed-off-by: NDenis Kenzior <denis.kenzior@trolltech.com> Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
-
由 Marcel Holtmann 提交于
When switching a RFCOMM socket to a TTY, the remote modem status might be needed later. Currently it is lost since the original configuration is done via the socket interface. So store the modem status and reply it when the socket has been converted to a TTY. Signed-off-by: NDenis Kenzior <denis.kenzior@trolltech.com> Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
-
由 Marcel Holtmann 提交于
With the Simple Pairing support, the authentication requirements are an explicit setting during the bonding process. Track and enforce the requirements and allow higher layers like L2CAP and RFCOMM to increase them if needed. This patch introduces a new IOCTL that allows to query the current authentication requirements. It is also possible to detect Simple Pairing support in the kernel this way. Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
-
由 Marcel Holtmann 提交于
The Bluetooth specification allows to enable or disable the encryption of an ACL link at any time by either the peer or the remote device. If a L2CAP or RFCOMM connection requested an encrypted link, they will now disconnect that link if the encryption gets disabled. Higher protocols that don't care about encryption (like SDP) are not affected. Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
-
由 Marcel Holtmann 提交于
Recent tests with various Bluetooth headsets have shown that some of them don't enforce authentication and encryption when connecting. All of them leave it up to the host stack to enforce it. Non of them should allow unencrypted connections, but that is how it is. So in case the link mode settings require authentication and/or encryption it will now also be enforced on outgoing RFCOMM connections. Previously this was only done for incoming connections. This support has a small drawback from a protocol level point of view since the host stack can't really tell with 100% certainty if a remote side is already authenticated or not. So if both sides are configured to enforce authentication it will be requested twice. Most Bluetooth chips are caching this information and thus no extra authentication procedure has to be triggered over-the-air, but it can happen. Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
-
- 12 6月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Adrian Bunk 提交于
This patch removes CVS keywords that weren't updated for a long time from comments. Signed-off-by: NAdrian Bunk <bunk@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 29 5月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Arjan van de Ven 提交于
in net/bluetooth/rfcomm/sock.c, rfcomm_sk_state_change() does the following operation: if (parent && sock_flag(sk, SOCK_ZAPPED)) { /* We have to drop DLC lock here, otherwise * rfcomm_sock_destruct() will dead lock. */ rfcomm_dlc_unlock(d); rfcomm_sock_kill(sk); rfcomm_dlc_lock(d); } } which is fine, since rfcomm_sock_kill() will call sk_free() which will call rfcomm_sock_destruct() which takes the rfcomm_dlc_lock()... so far so good. HOWEVER, this assumes that the rfcomm_sk_state_change() function always gets called with the rfcomm_dlc_lock() taken. This is the case for all but one case, and in that case where we don't have the lock, we do a double unlock followed by an attempt to take the lock, which due to underflow isn't going anywhere fast. This patch fixes this by moving the stragling case inside the lock, like the other usages of the same call are doing in this code. This was found with the help of the www.kerneloops.org project, where this deadlock was observed 51 times at this point in time: http://www.kerneloops.org/search.php?search=rfcomm_sock_destructSigned-off-by: NArjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 02 4月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Dave Young 提交于
Lockdep warning will be trigged while rfcomm connection closing. The locks taken in rfcomm_dev_add: rfcomm_dev_lock --> d->lock In __rfcomm_dlc_close: d->lock --> rfcomm_dev_lock (in rfcomm_dev_state_change) There's two way to fix it, one is in rfcomm_dev_add we first locking d->lock then the rfcomm_dev_lock The other (in this patch), remove the locking of d->lock for rfcomm_dev_state_change because just locking "d->state = BT_CLOSED;" is enough. [ 295.002046] ======================================================= [ 295.002046] [ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ] [ 295.002046] 2.6.25-rc7 #1 [ 295.002046] ------------------------------------------------------- [ 295.002046] krfcommd/2705 is trying to acquire lock: [ 295.002046] (rfcomm_dev_lock){-.--}, at: [<f89a090a>] rfcomm_dev_state_change+0x6a/0xd0 [rfcomm] [ 295.002046] [ 295.002046] but task is already holding lock: [ 295.002046] (&d->lock){--..}, at: [<f899c533>] __rfcomm_dlc_close+0x43/0xd0 [rfcomm] [ 295.002046] [ 295.002046] which lock already depends on the new lock. [ 295.002046] [ 295.002046] [ 295.002046] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: [ 295.002046] [ 295.002046] -> #1 (&d->lock){--..}: [ 295.002046] [<c0149b23>] check_prev_add+0xd3/0x200 [ 295.002046] [<c0149ce5>] check_prevs_add+0x95/0xe0 [ 295.002046] [<c0149f6f>] validate_chain+0x23f/0x320 [ 295.002046] [<c014b7b1>] __lock_acquire+0x1c1/0x760 [ 295.002046] [<c014c349>] lock_acquire+0x79/0xb0 [ 295.002046] [<c03d6b99>] _spin_lock+0x39/0x80 [ 295.002046] [<f89a01c0>] rfcomm_dev_add+0x240/0x360 [rfcomm] [ 295.002046] [<f89a047e>] rfcomm_create_dev+0x6e/0xe0 [rfcomm] [ 295.002046] [<f89a0823>] rfcomm_dev_ioctl+0x33/0x60 [rfcomm] [ 295.002046] [<f899facc>] rfcomm_sock_ioctl+0x2c/0x50 [rfcomm] [ 295.002046] [<c0363d38>] sock_ioctl+0x118/0x240 [ 295.002046] [<c0194196>] vfs_ioctl+0x76/0x90 [ 295.002046] [<c0194446>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x56/0x140 [ 295.002046] [<c0194569>] sys_ioctl+0x39/0x60 [ 295.002046] [<c0104faa>] syscall_call+0x7/0xb [ 295.002046] [<ffffffff>] 0xffffffff [ 295.002046] [ 295.002046] -> #0 (rfcomm_dev_lock){-.--}: [ 295.002046] [<c0149a84>] check_prev_add+0x34/0x200 [ 295.002046] [<c0149ce5>] check_prevs_add+0x95/0xe0 [ 295.002046] [<c0149f6f>] validate_chain+0x23f/0x320 [ 295.002046] [<c014b7b1>] __lock_acquire+0x1c1/0x760 [ 295.002046] [<c014c349>] lock_acquire+0x79/0xb0 [ 295.002046] [<c03d6639>] _read_lock+0x39/0x80 [ 295.002046] [<f89a090a>] rfcomm_dev_state_change+0x6a/0xd0 [rfcomm] [ 295.002046] [<f899c548>] __rfcomm_dlc_close+0x58/0xd0 [rfcomm] [ 295.002046] [<f899d44f>] rfcomm_recv_ua+0x6f/0x120 [rfcomm] [ 295.002046] [<f899e061>] rfcomm_recv_frame+0x171/0x1e0 [rfcomm] [ 295.002046] [<f899e357>] rfcomm_run+0xe7/0x550 [rfcomm] [ 295.002046] [<c013c18c>] kthread+0x5c/0xa0 [ 295.002046] [<c0105c07>] kernel_thread_helper+0x7/0x10 [ 295.002046] [<ffffffff>] 0xffffffff [ 295.002046] [ 295.002046] other info that might help us debug this: [ 295.002046] [ 295.002046] 2 locks held by krfcommd/2705: [ 295.002046] #0: (rfcomm_mutex){--..}, at: [<f899e2eb>] rfcomm_run+0x7b/0x550 [rfcomm] [ 295.002046] #1: (&d->lock){--..}, at: [<f899c533>] __rfcomm_dlc_close+0x43/0xd0 [rfcomm] [ 295.002046] [ 295.002046] stack backtrace: [ 295.002046] Pid: 2705, comm: krfcommd Not tainted 2.6.25-rc7 #1 [ 295.002046] [<c0128a38>] ? printk+0x18/0x20 [ 295.002046] [<c014927f>] print_circular_bug_tail+0x6f/0x80 [ 295.002046] [<c0149a84>] check_prev_add+0x34/0x200 [ 295.002046] [<c0149ce5>] check_prevs_add+0x95/0xe0 [ 295.002046] [<c0149f6f>] validate_chain+0x23f/0x320 [ 295.002046] [<c014b7b1>] __lock_acquire+0x1c1/0x760 [ 295.002046] [<c014c349>] lock_acquire+0x79/0xb0 [ 295.002046] [<f89a090a>] ? rfcomm_dev_state_change+0x6a/0xd0 [rfcomm] [ 295.002046] [<c03d6639>] _read_lock+0x39/0x80 [ 295.002046] [<f89a090a>] ? rfcomm_dev_state_change+0x6a/0xd0 [rfcomm] [ 295.002046] [<f89a090a>] rfcomm_dev_state_change+0x6a/0xd0 [rfcomm] [ 295.002046] [<f899c548>] __rfcomm_dlc_close+0x58/0xd0 [rfcomm] [ 295.002046] [<f899d44f>] rfcomm_recv_ua+0x6f/0x120 [rfcomm] [ 295.002046] [<f899e061>] rfcomm_recv_frame+0x171/0x1e0 [rfcomm] [ 295.002046] [<c014abd9>] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xb9/0x130 [ 295.002046] [<c03d6e89>] ? _spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x39/0x70 [ 295.002046] [<f899e357>] rfcomm_run+0xe7/0x550 [rfcomm] [ 295.002046] [<c03d4559>] ? __sched_text_start+0x229/0x4c0 [ 295.002046] [<c0120000>] ? cpu_avg_load_per_task+0x20/0x30 [ 295.002046] [<f899e270>] ? rfcomm_run+0x0/0x550 [rfcomm] [ 295.002046] [<c013c18c>] kthread+0x5c/0xa0 [ 295.002046] [<c013c130>] ? kthread+0x0/0xa0 [ 295.002046] [<c0105c07>] kernel_thread_helper+0x7/0x10 [ 295.002046] ======================= Signed-off-by: NDave Young <hidave.darkstar@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 14 2月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Harvey Harrison 提交于
fastcall always expands to empty, remove it. Signed-off-by: NHarvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 29 1月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Pavel Emelyanov 提交于
Many-many code in the kernel initialized the timer->function and timer->data together with calling init_timer(timer). There is already a helper for this. Use it for networking code. The patch is HUGE, but makes the code 130 lines shorter (98 insertions(+), 228 deletions(-)). Signed-off-by: NPavel Emelyanov <xemul@openvz.org> Acked-by: NArnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 22 10月, 2007 1 次提交
-
-
由 Marcel Holtmann 提交于
This patch does the full kthread conversion for the RFCOMM protocol. It makes the code slightly simpler and more maintainable. Based on a patch from Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
-
- 18 7月, 2007 1 次提交
-
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
Currently, the freezer treats all tasks as freezable, except for the kernel threads that explicitly set the PF_NOFREEZE flag for themselves. This approach is problematic, since it requires every kernel thread to either set PF_NOFREEZE explicitly, or call try_to_freeze(), even if it doesn't care for the freezing of tasks at all. It seems better to only require the kernel threads that want to or need to be frozen to use some freezer-related code and to remove any freezer-related code from the other (nonfreezable) kernel threads, which is done in this patch. The patch causes all kernel threads to be nonfreezable by default (ie. to have PF_NOFREEZE set by default) and introduces the set_freezable() function that should be called by the freezable kernel threads in order to unset PF_NOFREEZE. It also makes all of the currently freezable kernel threads call set_freezable(), so it shouldn't cause any (intentional) change of behaviour to appear. Additionally, it updates documentation to describe the freezing of tasks more accurately. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: build fixes] Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Acked-by: NNigel Cunningham <nigel@nigel.suspend2.net> Cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@tv-sign.ru> Cc: Gautham R Shenoy <ego@in.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 05 5月, 2007 2 次提交
-
-
由 Marcel Holtmann 提交于
The RFCOMM specification says that the device closing the last DLC on a particular session is responsible for closing the multiplexer by closing the corresponding L2CAP channel. Signed-off-by: NVille Tervo <ville.tervo@nokia.com> Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
-
由 Marcel Holtmann 提交于
The kernel provides a new convenient way to access the sockets API for in-kernel users. It is a good idea to actually use it. Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
-
- 26 4月, 2007 2 次提交
-
-
由 Andrew Morton 提交于
Set TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE prior to testing the flag to avoid missed wakeups. Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Acked-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo 提交于
So that it is also an offset from skb->head, reduces its size from 8 to 4 bytes on 64bit architectures, allowing us to combine the 4 bytes hole left by the layer headers conversion, reducing struct sk_buff size to 256 bytes, i.e. 4 64byte cachelines, and since the sk_buff slab cache is SLAB_HWCACHE_ALIGN... :-) Many calculations that previously required that skb->{transport,network, mac}_header be first converted to a pointer now can be done directly, being meaningful as offsets or pointers. Signed-off-by: NArnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 11 2月, 2007 1 次提交
-
-
由 YOSHIFUJI Hideaki 提交于
Signed-off-by: NYOSHIFUJI Hideaki <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 03 12月, 2006 2 次提交
-
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 16 10月, 2006 1 次提交
-
-
由 Marcel Holtmann 提交于
Some return values of the driver core register and create functions are not handled and so might cause unexpected problems. Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
-