Skip to content

L
linux

xiphi1978 / linux

通知 2
Star 0
Fork 0
L
linux

体验新版 GitCode，发现更多精彩内容 >>

切换分支/标签
  1. 06 11月, 2018 6 次提交
    • F
      Btrfs: fix deadlock on tree root leaf when finding free extent · 4222ea71
      由 Filipe Manana 提交于 
      When we are writing out a free space cache, during the transaction commit
phase, we can end up in a deadlock which results in a stack trace like the
following:

 schedule+0x28/0x80
 btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x8e/0x120 [btrfs]
 ? finish_wait+0x80/0x80
 btrfs_read_lock_root_node+0x2f/0x40 [btrfs]
 btrfs_search_slot+0xf6/0x9f0 [btrfs]
 ? evict_refill_and_join+0xd0/0xd0 [btrfs]
 ? inode_insert5+0x119/0x190
 btrfs_lookup_inode+0x3a/0xc0 [btrfs]
 ? kmem_cache_alloc+0x166/0x1d0
 btrfs_iget+0x113/0x690 [btrfs]
 __lookup_free_space_inode+0xd8/0x150 [btrfs]
 lookup_free_space_inode+0x5b/0xb0 [btrfs]
 load_free_space_cache+0x7c/0x170 [btrfs]
 ? cache_block_group+0x72/0x3b0 [btrfs]
 cache_block_group+0x1b3/0x3b0 [btrfs]
 ? finish_wait+0x80/0x80
 find_free_extent+0x799/0x1010 [btrfs]
 btrfs_reserve_extent+0x9b/0x180 [btrfs]
 btrfs_alloc_tree_block+0x1b3/0x4f0 [btrfs]
 __btrfs_cow_block+0x11d/0x500 [btrfs]
 btrfs_cow_block+0xdc/0x180 [btrfs]
 btrfs_search_slot+0x3bd/0x9f0 [btrfs]
 btrfs_lookup_inode+0x3a/0xc0 [btrfs]
 ? kmem_cache_alloc+0x166/0x1d0
 btrfs_update_inode_item+0x46/0x100 [btrfs]
 cache_save_setup+0xe4/0x3a0 [btrfs]
 btrfs_start_dirty_block_groups+0x1be/0x480 [btrfs]
 btrfs_commit_transaction+0xcb/0x8b0 [btrfs]

At cache_save_setup() we need to update the inode item of a block group's
cache which is located in the tree root (fs_info->tree_root), which means
that it may result in COWing a leaf from that tree. If that happens we
need to find a free metadata extent and while looking for one, if we find
a block group which was not cached yet we attempt to load its cache by
calling cache_block_group(). However this function will try to load the
inode of the free space cache, which requires finding the matching inode
item in the tree root - if that inode item is located in the same leaf as
the inode item of the space cache we are updating at cache_save_setup(),
we end up in a deadlock, since we try to obtain a read lock on the same
extent buffer that we previously write locked.

So fix this by using the tree root's commit root when searching for a
block group's free space cache inode item when we are attempting to load
a free space cache. This is safe since block groups once loaded stay in
memory forever, as well as their caches, so after they are first loaded
we will never need to read their inode items again. For new block groups,
once they are created they get their ->cached field set to
BTRFS_CACHE_FINISHED meaning we will not need to read their inode item.
Reported-by: NAndrew Nelson <andrew.s.nelson@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/CAPTELenq9x5KOWuQ+fa7h1r3nsJG8vyiTH8+ifjURc_duHh2Wg@mail.gmail.com/
Fixes: 9d66e233 ("Btrfs: load free space cache if it exists")
Tested-by: NAndrew Nelson <andrew.s.nelson@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      4222ea71
    • A
      btrfs: avoid link error with CONFIG_NO_AUTO_INLINE · 7e17916b
      由 Arnd Bergmann 提交于 
      Note: this patch fixes a problem in a feature outside of btrfs ("kernel
hacking: add a config option to disable compiler auto-inlining") and is
applied ahead of time due to cross-subsystem dependencies.

On 32-bit ARM with gcc-8, I see a link error with the addition of the
CONFIG_NO_AUTO_INLINE option:

fs/btrfs/super.o: In function `btrfs_statfs':
super.c:(.text+0x67b8): undefined reference to `__aeabi_uldivmod'
super.c:(.text+0x67fc): undefined reference to `__aeabi_uldivmod'
super.c:(.text+0x6858): undefined reference to `__aeabi_uldivmod'
super.c:(.text+0x6920): undefined reference to `__aeabi_uldivmod'
super.c:(.text+0x693c): undefined reference to `__aeabi_uldivmod'
fs/btrfs/super.o:super.c:(.text+0x6958): more undefined references to `__aeabi_uldivmod' follow

So far this is the only file that shows the behavior, so I'd propose
to just work around it by marking the functions as 'static inline'
that normally get inlined here.

The reference to __aeabi_uldivmod comes from a div_u64() which has an
optimization for a constant division that uses a straight '/' operator
when the result should be known to the compiler. My interpretation is
that as we turn off inlining, gcc still expects the result to be constant
but fails to use that constant value.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20181103153941.1881966-1-arnd@arndb.deReviewed-by: NNikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: NChangbin Du <changbin.du@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NArnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
[ add the note ]
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      7e17916b
    • S
      btrfs: tree-checker: Fix misleading group system information · 761333f2
      由 Shaokun Zhang 提交于 
      block_group_err shows the group system as a decimal value with a '0x'
prefix, which is somewhat misleading.

Fix it to print hexadecimal, as was intended.

Fixes: fce466ea ("btrfs: tree-checker: Verify block_group_item")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.19+
Reviewed-by: NNikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: NQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NShaokun Zhang <zhangshaokun@hisilicon.com>
Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      761333f2
    • F
      Btrfs: fix missing data checksums after a ranged fsync (msync) · 008c6753
      由 Filipe Manana 提交于 
      Recently we got a massive simplification for fsync, where for the fast
path we no longer log new extents while their respective ordered extents
are still running.

However that simplification introduced a subtle regression for the case
where we use a ranged fsync (msync). Consider the following example:

               CPU 0                                    CPU 1

                                            mmap write to range [2Mb, 4Mb[
  mmap write to range [512Kb, 1Mb[
  msync range [512K, 1Mb[
    --> triggers fast fsync
        (BTRFS_INODE_NEEDS_FULL_SYNC
         not set)
    --> creates extent map A for this
        range and adds it to list of
        modified extents
    --> starts ordered extent A for
        this range
    --> waits for it to complete

                                            writeback triggered for range
                                            [2Mb, 4Mb[
                                              --> create extent map B and
                                                  adds it to the list of
                                                  modified extents
                                              --> creates ordered extent B

    --> start looking for and logging
        modified extents
    --> logs extent maps A and B
    --> finds checksums for extent A
        in the csum tree, but not for
        extent B
  fsync (msync) finishes

                                              --> ordered extent B
                                                  finishes and its
                                                  checksums are added
                                                  to the csum tree

                                <power cut>

After replaying the log, we have the extent covering the range [2Mb, 4Mb[
but do not have the data checksum items covering that file range.

This happens because at the very beginning of an fsync (btrfs_sync_file())
we start and wait for IO in the given range [512Kb, 1Mb[ and therefore
wait for any ordered extents in that range to complete before we start
logging the extents. However if right before we start logging the extent
in our range [512Kb, 1Mb[, writeback is started for any other dirty range,
such as the range [2Mb, 4Mb[ due to memory pressure or a concurrent fsync
or msync (btrfs_sync_file() starts writeback before acquiring the inode's
lock), an ordered extent is created for that other range and a new extent
map is created to represent that range and added to the inode's list of
modified extents.

That means that we will see that other extent in that list when collecting
extents for logging (done at btrfs_log_changed_extents()) and log the
extent before the respective ordered extent finishes - namely before the
checksum items are added to the checksums tree, which is where
log_extent_csums() looks for the checksums, therefore making us log an
extent without logging its checksums. Before that massive simplification
of fsync, this wasn't a problem because besides looking for checkums in
the checksums tree, we also looked for them in any ordered extent still
running.

The consequence of data checksums missing for a file range is that users
attempting to read the affected file range will get -EIO errors and dmesg
reports the following:

 [10188.358136] BTRFS info (device sdc): no csum found for inode 297 start 57344
 [10188.359278] BTRFS warning (device sdc): csum failed root 5 ino 297 off 57344 csum 0x98f94189 expected csum 0x00000000 mirror 1

So fix this by skipping extents outside of our logging range at
btrfs_log_changed_extents() and leaving them on the list of modified
extents so that any subsequent ranged fsync may collect them if needed.
Also, if we find a hole extent outside of the range still log it, just
to prevent having gaps between extent items after replaying the log,
otherwise fsck will complain when we are not using the NO_HOLES feature
(fstest btrfs/056 triggers such case).

Fixes: e7175a69 ("btrfs: remove the wait ordered logic in the log_one_extent path")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.19+
Reviewed-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      008c6753
    • L
      btrfs: fix pinned underflow after transaction aborted · fcd5e742
      由 Lu Fengqi 提交于 
      When running generic/475, we may get the following warning in dmesg:

[ 6902.102154] WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 18013 at fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:9776 btrfs_free_block_groups+0x2af/0x3b0 [btrfs]
[ 6902.109160] CPU: 3 PID: 18013 Comm: umount Tainted: G        W  O      4.19.0-rc8+ #8
[ 6902.110971] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 0.0.0 02/06/2015
[ 6902.112857] RIP: 0010:btrfs_free_block_groups+0x2af/0x3b0 [btrfs]
[ 6902.118921] RSP: 0018:ffffc9000459bdb0 EFLAGS: 00010286
[ 6902.120315] RAX: ffff880175050bb0 RBX: ffff8801124a8000 RCX: 0000000000170007
[ 6902.121969] RDX: 0000000000000002 RSI: 0000000000170007 RDI: ffffffff8125fb74
[ 6902.123716] RBP: ffff880175055d10 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
[ 6902.125417] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffff880175055d88
[ 6902.127129] R13: ffff880175050bb0 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: dead000000000100
[ 6902.129060] FS:  00007f4507223780(0000) GS:ffff88017ba00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
[ 6902.130996] CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
[ 6902.132558] CR2: 00005623599cac78 CR3: 000000014b700001 CR4: 00000000003606e0
[ 6902.134270] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
[ 6902.135981] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
[ 6902.137836] Call Trace:
[ 6902.138939]  close_ctree+0x171/0x330 [btrfs]
[ 6902.140181]  ? kthread_stop+0x146/0x1f0
[ 6902.141277]  generic_shutdown_super+0x6c/0x100
[ 6902.142517]  kill_anon_super+0x14/0x30
[ 6902.143554]  btrfs_kill_super+0x13/0x100 [btrfs]
[ 6902.144790]  deactivate_locked_super+0x2f/0x70
[ 6902.146014]  cleanup_mnt+0x3b/0x70
[ 6902.147020]  task_work_run+0x9e/0xd0
[ 6902.148036]  do_syscall_64+0x470/0x600
[ 6902.149142]  ? trace_hardirqs_off_thunk+0x1a/0x1c
[ 6902.150375]  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe
[ 6902.151640] RIP: 0033:0x7f45077a6a7b
[ 6902.157324] RSP: 002b:00007ffd589f3e68 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 00000000000000a6
[ 6902.159187] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 000055e8eec732b0 RCX: 00007f45077a6a7b
[ 6902.160834] RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 000055e8eec73490
[ 6902.162526] RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 000055e8eec734b0 R09: 00007ffd589f26c0
[ 6902.164141] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 000055e8eec73490
[ 6902.165815] R13: 00007f4507ac61a4 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 00007ffd589f40d8
[ 6902.167553] irq event stamp: 0
[ 6902.168998] hardirqs last  enabled at (0): [<0000000000000000>]           (null)
[ 6902.170731] hardirqs last disabled at (0): [<ffffffff810cd810>] copy_process.part.55+0x3b0/0x1f00
[ 6902.172773] softirqs last  enabled at (0): [<ffffffff810cd810>] copy_process.part.55+0x3b0/0x1f00
[ 6902.174671] softirqs last disabled at (0): [<0000000000000000>]           (null)
[ 6902.176407] ---[ end trace 463138c2986b275c ]---
[ 6902.177636] BTRFS info (device dm-3): space_info 4 has 273465344 free, is not full
[ 6902.179453] BTRFS info (device dm-3): space_info total=276824064, used=4685824, pinned=18446744073708158976, reserved=0, may_use=0, readonly=65536

In the above line there's "pinned=18446744073708158976" which is an
unsigned u64 value of -1392640, an obvious underflow.

When transaction_kthread is running cleanup_transaction(), another
fsstress is running btrfs_commit_transaction(). The
btrfs_finish_extent_commit() may get the same range as
btrfs_destroy_pinned_extent() got, which causes the pinned underflow.

Fixes: d4b450cd ("Btrfs: fix race between transaction commit and empty block group removal")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+
Reviewed-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: NLu Fengqi <lufq.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      fcd5e742
    • R
      Btrfs: fix cur_offset in the error case for nocow · 506481b2
      由 Robbie Ko 提交于 
      When the cow_file_range fails, the related resources are unlocked
according to the range [start..end), so the unlock cannot be repeated in
run_delalloc_nocow.

In some cases (e.g. cur_offset <= end && cow_start != -1), cur_offset is
not updated correctly, so move the cur_offset update before
cow_file_range.

  kernel BUG at mm/page-writeback.c:2663!
  Internal error: Oops - BUG: 0 [#1] SMP
  CPU: 3 PID: 31525 Comm: kworker/u8:7 Tainted: P O
  Hardware name: Realtek_RTD1296 (DT)
  Workqueue: writeback wb_workfn (flush-btrfs-1)
  task: ffffffc076db3380 ti: ffffffc02e9ac000 task.ti: ffffffc02e9ac000
  PC is at clear_page_dirty_for_io+0x1bc/0x1e8
  LR is at clear_page_dirty_for_io+0x14/0x1e8
  pc : [<ffffffc00033c91c>] lr : [<ffffffc00033c774>] pstate: 40000145
  sp : ffffffc02e9af4f0
  Process kworker/u8:7 (pid: 31525, stack limit = 0xffffffc02e9ac020)
  Call trace:
  [<ffffffc00033c91c>] clear_page_dirty_for_io+0x1bc/0x1e8
  [<ffffffbffc514674>] extent_clear_unlock_delalloc+0x1e4/0x210 [btrfs]
  [<ffffffbffc4fb168>] run_delalloc_nocow+0x3b8/0x948 [btrfs]
  [<ffffffbffc4fb948>] run_delalloc_range+0x250/0x3a8 [btrfs]
  [<ffffffbffc514c0c>] writepage_delalloc.isra.21+0xbc/0x1d8 [btrfs]
  [<ffffffbffc516048>] __extent_writepage+0xe8/0x248 [btrfs]
  [<ffffffbffc51630c>] extent_write_cache_pages.isra.17+0x164/0x378 [btrfs]
  [<ffffffbffc5185a8>] extent_writepages+0x48/0x68 [btrfs]
  [<ffffffbffc4f5828>] btrfs_writepages+0x20/0x30 [btrfs]
  [<ffffffc00033d758>] do_writepages+0x30/0x88
  [<ffffffc0003ba0f4>] __writeback_single_inode+0x34/0x198
  [<ffffffc0003ba6c4>] writeback_sb_inodes+0x184/0x3c0
  [<ffffffc0003ba96c>] __writeback_inodes_wb+0x6c/0xc0
  [<ffffffc0003bac20>] wb_writeback+0x1b8/0x1c0
  [<ffffffc0003bb0f0>] wb_workfn+0x150/0x250
  [<ffffffc0002b0014>] process_one_work+0x1dc/0x388
  [<ffffffc0002b02f0>] worker_thread+0x130/0x500
  [<ffffffc0002b6344>] kthread+0x10c/0x110
  [<ffffffc000284590>] ret_from_fork+0x10/0x40
  Code: d503201f a9025bb5 a90363b7 f90023b9 (d4210000)

CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+
Reviewed-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NRobbie Ko <robbieko@synology.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      506481b2
  3. 23 10月, 2018 1 次提交
    • F
      Btrfs: fix use-after-free when dumping free space · 9084cb6a
      由 Filipe Manana 提交于 
      We were iterating a block group's free space cache rbtree without locking
first the lock that protects it (the free_space_ctl->free_space_offset
rbtree is protected by the free_space_ctl->tree_lock spinlock).

KASAN reported an use-after-free problem when iterating such a rbtree due
to a concurrent rbtree delete:

[ 9520.359168] ==================================================================
[ 9520.359656] BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in rb_next+0x13/0x90
[ 9520.359949] Read of size 8 at addr ffff8800b7ada500 by task btrfs-transacti/1721
[ 9520.360357]
[ 9520.360530] CPU: 4 PID: 1721 Comm: btrfs-transacti Tainted: G             L    4.19.0-rc8-nbor #555
[ 9520.360990] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.10.2-1ubuntu1 04/01/2014
[ 9520.362682] Call Trace:
[ 9520.362887]  dump_stack+0xa4/0xf5
[ 9520.363146]  print_address_description+0x78/0x280
[ 9520.363412]  kasan_report+0x263/0x390
[ 9520.363650]  ? rb_next+0x13/0x90
[ 9520.363873]  __asan_load8+0x54/0x90
[ 9520.364102]  rb_next+0x13/0x90
[ 9520.364380]  btrfs_dump_free_space+0x146/0x160 [btrfs]
[ 9520.364697]  dump_space_info+0x2cd/0x310 [btrfs]
[ 9520.364997]  btrfs_reserve_extent+0x1ee/0x1f0 [btrfs]
[ 9520.365310]  __btrfs_prealloc_file_range+0x1cc/0x620 [btrfs]
[ 9520.365646]  ? btrfs_update_time+0x180/0x180 [btrfs]
[ 9520.365923]  ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x27/0x40
[ 9520.366204]  ? btrfs_alloc_data_chunk_ondemand+0x2c0/0x5c0 [btrfs]
[ 9520.366549]  btrfs_prealloc_file_range_trans+0x23/0x30 [btrfs]
[ 9520.366880]  cache_save_setup+0x42e/0x580 [btrfs]
[ 9520.367220]  ? btrfs_check_data_free_space+0xd0/0xd0 [btrfs]
[ 9520.367518]  ? lock_downgrade+0x2f0/0x2f0
[ 9520.367799]  ? btrfs_write_dirty_block_groups+0x11f/0x6e0 [btrfs]
[ 9520.368104]  ? kasan_check_read+0x11/0x20
[ 9520.368349]  ? do_raw_spin_unlock+0xa8/0x140
[ 9520.368638]  btrfs_write_dirty_block_groups+0x2af/0x6e0 [btrfs]
[ 9520.368978]  ? btrfs_start_dirty_block_groups+0x870/0x870 [btrfs]
[ 9520.369282]  ? do_raw_spin_unlock+0xa8/0x140
[ 9520.369534]  ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x27/0x40
[ 9520.369811]  ? btrfs_run_delayed_refs+0x1b8/0x230 [btrfs]
[ 9520.370137]  commit_cowonly_roots+0x4b9/0x610 [btrfs]
[ 9520.370560]  ? commit_fs_roots+0x350/0x350 [btrfs]
[ 9520.370926]  ? btrfs_run_delayed_refs+0x1b8/0x230 [btrfs]
[ 9520.371285]  btrfs_commit_transaction+0x5e5/0x10e0 [btrfs]
[ 9520.371612]  ? btrfs_apply_pending_changes+0x90/0x90 [btrfs]
[ 9520.371943]  ? start_transaction+0x168/0x6c0 [btrfs]
[ 9520.372257]  transaction_kthread+0x21c/0x240 [btrfs]
[ 9520.372537]  kthread+0x1d2/0x1f0
[ 9520.372793]  ? btrfs_cleanup_transaction+0xb50/0xb50 [btrfs]
[ 9520.373090]  ? kthread_park+0xb0/0xb0
[ 9520.373329]  ret_from_fork+0x3a/0x50
[ 9520.373567]
[ 9520.373738] Allocated by task 1804:
[ 9520.373974]  kasan_kmalloc+0xff/0x180
[ 9520.374208]  kasan_slab_alloc+0x11/0x20
[ 9520.374447]  kmem_cache_alloc+0xfc/0x2d0
[ 9520.374731]  __btrfs_add_free_space+0x40/0x580 [btrfs]
[ 9520.375044]  unpin_extent_range+0x4f7/0x7a0 [btrfs]
[ 9520.375383]  btrfs_finish_extent_commit+0x15f/0x4d0 [btrfs]
[ 9520.375707]  btrfs_commit_transaction+0xb06/0x10e0 [btrfs]
[ 9520.376027]  btrfs_alloc_data_chunk_ondemand+0x237/0x5c0 [btrfs]
[ 9520.376365]  btrfs_check_data_free_space+0x81/0xd0 [btrfs]
[ 9520.376689]  btrfs_delalloc_reserve_space+0x25/0x80 [btrfs]
[ 9520.377018]  btrfs_direct_IO+0x42e/0x6d0 [btrfs]
[ 9520.377284]  generic_file_direct_write+0x11e/0x220
[ 9520.377587]  btrfs_file_write_iter+0x472/0xac0 [btrfs]
[ 9520.377875]  aio_write+0x25c/0x360
[ 9520.378106]  io_submit_one+0xaa0/0xdc0
[ 9520.378343]  __se_sys_io_submit+0xfa/0x2f0
[ 9520.378589]  __x64_sys_io_submit+0x43/0x50
[ 9520.378840]  do_syscall_64+0x7d/0x240
[ 9520.379081]  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe
[ 9520.379387]
[ 9520.379557] Freed by task 1802:
[ 9520.379782]  __kasan_slab_free+0x173/0x260
[ 9520.380028]  kasan_slab_free+0xe/0x10
[ 9520.380262]  kmem_cache_free+0xc1/0x2c0
[ 9520.380544]  btrfs_find_space_for_alloc+0x4cd/0x4e0 [btrfs]
[ 9520.380866]  find_free_extent+0xa99/0x17e0 [btrfs]
[ 9520.381166]  btrfs_reserve_extent+0xd5/0x1f0 [btrfs]
[ 9520.381474]  btrfs_get_blocks_direct+0x60b/0xbd0 [btrfs]
[ 9520.381761]  __blockdev_direct_IO+0x10ee/0x58a1
[ 9520.382059]  btrfs_direct_IO+0x25a/0x6d0 [btrfs]
[ 9520.382321]  generic_file_direct_write+0x11e/0x220
[ 9520.382623]  btrfs_file_write_iter+0x472/0xac0 [btrfs]
[ 9520.382904]  aio_write+0x25c/0x360
[ 9520.383172]  io_submit_one+0xaa0/0xdc0
[ 9520.383416]  __se_sys_io_submit+0xfa/0x2f0
[ 9520.383678]  __x64_sys_io_submit+0x43/0x50
[ 9520.383927]  do_syscall_64+0x7d/0x240
[ 9520.384165]  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe
[ 9520.384439]
[ 9520.384610] The buggy address belongs to the object at ffff8800b7ada500
                which belongs to the cache btrfs_free_space of size 72
[ 9520.385175] The buggy address is located 0 bytes inside of
                72-byte region [ffff8800b7ada500, ffff8800b7ada548)
[ 9520.385691] The buggy address belongs to the page:
[ 9520.385957] page:ffffea0002deb680 count:1 mapcount:0 mapping:ffff880108a1d700 index:0x0 compound_mapcount: 0
[ 9520.388030] flags: 0x8100(slab|head)
[ 9520.388281] raw: 0000000000008100 ffffea0002deb608 ffffea0002728808 ffff880108a1d700
[ 9520.388722] raw: 0000000000000000 0000000000130013 00000001ffffffff 0000000000000000
[ 9520.389169] page dumped because: kasan: bad access detected
[ 9520.389473]
[ 9520.389658] Memory state around the buggy address:
[ 9520.389943]  ffff8800b7ada400: fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc
[ 9520.390368]  ffff8800b7ada480: fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc
[ 9520.390796] >ffff8800b7ada500: fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fc fc fc fc fc fc fc
[ 9520.391223]                    ^
[ 9520.391461]  ffff8800b7ada580: fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc
[ 9520.391885]  ffff8800b7ada600: fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc
[ 9520.392313] ==================================================================
[ 9520.392772] BTRFS critical (device vdc): entry offset 2258497536, bytes 131072, bitmap no
[ 9520.393247] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000011
[ 9520.393705] PGD 800000010dbab067 P4D 800000010dbab067 PUD 107551067 PMD 0
[ 9520.394059] Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP DEBUG_PAGEALLOC KASAN PTI
[ 9520.394378] CPU: 4 PID: 1721 Comm: btrfs-transacti Tainted: G    B        L    4.19.0-rc8-nbor #555
[ 9520.394858] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.10.2-1ubuntu1 04/01/2014
[ 9520.395350] RIP: 0010:rb_next+0x3c/0x90
[ 9520.396461] RSP: 0018:ffff8801074ff780 EFLAGS: 00010292
[ 9520.396762] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000000000001 RCX: ffffffff81b5ac4c
[ 9520.397115] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000008 RDI: 0000000000000011
[ 9520.397468] RBP: ffff8801074ff7a0 R08: ffffed0021d64ccc R09: ffffed0021d64ccc
[ 9520.397821] R10: 0000000000000001 R11: ffffed0021d64ccb R12: ffff8800b91e0000
[ 9520.398188] R13: ffff8800a3ceba48 R14: ffff8800b627bf80 R15: 0000000000020000
[ 9520.398555] FS:  0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88010eb00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
[ 9520.399007] CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
[ 9520.399335] CR2: 0000000000000011 CR3: 0000000106b52000 CR4: 00000000000006a0
[ 9520.399679] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
[ 9520.400023] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
[ 9520.400400] Call Trace:
[ 9520.400648]  btrfs_dump_free_space+0x146/0x160 [btrfs]
[ 9520.400974]  dump_space_info+0x2cd/0x310 [btrfs]
[ 9520.401287]  btrfs_reserve_extent+0x1ee/0x1f0 [btrfs]
[ 9520.401609]  __btrfs_prealloc_file_range+0x1cc/0x620 [btrfs]
[ 9520.401952]  ? btrfs_update_time+0x180/0x180 [btrfs]
[ 9520.402232]  ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x27/0x40
[ 9520.402522]  ? btrfs_alloc_data_chunk_ondemand+0x2c0/0x5c0 [btrfs]
[ 9520.402882]  btrfs_prealloc_file_range_trans+0x23/0x30 [btrfs]
[ 9520.403261]  cache_save_setup+0x42e/0x580 [btrfs]
[ 9520.403570]  ? btrfs_check_data_free_space+0xd0/0xd0 [btrfs]
[ 9520.403871]  ? lock_downgrade+0x2f0/0x2f0
[ 9520.404161]  ? btrfs_write_dirty_block_groups+0x11f/0x6e0 [btrfs]
[ 9520.404481]  ? kasan_check_read+0x11/0x20
[ 9520.404732]  ? do_raw_spin_unlock+0xa8/0x140
[ 9520.405026]  btrfs_write_dirty_block_groups+0x2af/0x6e0 [btrfs]
[ 9520.405375]  ? btrfs_start_dirty_block_groups+0x870/0x870 [btrfs]
[ 9520.405694]  ? do_raw_spin_unlock+0xa8/0x140
[ 9520.405958]  ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x27/0x40
[ 9520.406243]  ? btrfs_run_delayed_refs+0x1b8/0x230 [btrfs]
[ 9520.406574]  commit_cowonly_roots+0x4b9/0x610 [btrfs]
[ 9520.406899]  ? commit_fs_roots+0x350/0x350 [btrfs]
[ 9520.407253]  ? btrfs_run_delayed_refs+0x1b8/0x230 [btrfs]
[ 9520.407589]  btrfs_commit_transaction+0x5e5/0x10e0 [btrfs]
[ 9520.407925]  ? btrfs_apply_pending_changes+0x90/0x90 [btrfs]
[ 9520.408262]  ? start_transaction+0x168/0x6c0 [btrfs]
[ 9520.408582]  transaction_kthread+0x21c/0x240 [btrfs]
[ 9520.408870]  kthread+0x1d2/0x1f0
[ 9520.409138]  ? btrfs_cleanup_transaction+0xb50/0xb50 [btrfs]
[ 9520.409440]  ? kthread_park+0xb0/0xb0
[ 9520.409682]  ret_from_fork+0x3a/0x50
[ 9520.410508] Dumping ftrace buffer:
[ 9520.410764]    (ftrace buffer empty)
[ 9520.411007] CR2: 0000000000000011
[ 9520.411297] ---[ end trace 01a0863445cf360a ]---
[ 9520.411568] RIP: 0010:rb_next+0x3c/0x90
[ 9520.412644] RSP: 0018:ffff8801074ff780 EFLAGS: 00010292
[ 9520.412932] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000000000001 RCX: ffffffff81b5ac4c
[ 9520.413274] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000008 RDI: 0000000000000011
[ 9520.413616] RBP: ffff8801074ff7a0 R08: ffffed0021d64ccc R09: ffffed0021d64ccc
[ 9520.414007] R10: 0000000000000001 R11: ffffed0021d64ccb R12: ffff8800b91e0000
[ 9520.414349] R13: ffff8800a3ceba48 R14: ffff8800b627bf80 R15: 0000000000020000
[ 9520.416074] FS:  0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88010eb00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
[ 9520.416536] CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
[ 9520.416848] CR2: 0000000000000011 CR3: 0000000106b52000 CR4: 00000000000006a0
[ 9520.418477] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
[ 9520.418846] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
[ 9520.419204] Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception
[ 9520.419666] Dumping ftrace buffer:
[ 9520.419930]    (ftrace buffer empty)
[ 9520.420168] Kernel Offset: disabled
[ 9520.420406] ---[ end Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception ]---

Fix this by acquiring the respective lock before iterating the rbtree.
Reported-by: NNikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+
Reviewed-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      9084cb6a
  5. 19 10月, 2018 9 次提交
    • F
      Btrfs: fix use-after-free during inode eviction · 421f0922
      由 Filipe Manana 提交于 
      At inode.c:evict_inode_truncate_pages(), when we iterate over the
inode's extent states, we access an extent state record's "state" field
after we unlocked the inode's io tree lock. This can lead to a
use-after-free issue because after we unlock the io tree that extent
state record might have been freed due to being merged into another
adjacent extent state record (a previous inflight bio for a read
operation finished in the meanwhile which unlocked a range in the io
tree and cause a merge of extent state records, as explained in the
comment before the while loop added in commit 6ca07097 ("Btrfs: fix
hang during inode eviction due to concurrent readahead")).

Fix this by keeping a copy of the extent state's flags in a local
variable and using it after unlocking the io tree.

Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=201189
Fixes: b9d0b389 ("btrfs: Add handler for invalidate page")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+
Reviewed-by: NQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      421f0922
    • J
      btrfs: move the dio_sem higher up the callchain · c495144b
      由 Josef Bacik 提交于 
      We're getting a lockdep splat because we take the dio_sem under the
log_mutex.  What we really need is to protect fsync() from logging an
extent map for an extent we never waited on higher up, so just guard the
whole thing with dio_sem.

======================================================
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
4.18.0-rc4-xfstests-00025-g5de5edbaf1d4 #411 Not tainted
------------------------------------------------------
aio-dio-invalid/30928 is trying to acquire lock:
0000000092621cfd (&mm->mmap_sem){++++}, at: get_user_pages_unlocked+0x5a/0x1e0

but task is already holding lock:
00000000cefe6b35 (&ei->dio_sem){++++}, at: btrfs_direct_IO+0x3be/0x400

which lock already depends on the new lock.

the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:

-> #5 (&ei->dio_sem){++++}:
       lock_acquire+0xbd/0x220
       down_write+0x51/0xb0
       btrfs_log_changed_extents+0x80/0xa40
       btrfs_log_inode+0xbaf/0x1000
       btrfs_log_inode_parent+0x26f/0xa80
       btrfs_log_dentry_safe+0x50/0x70
       btrfs_sync_file+0x357/0x540
       do_fsync+0x38/0x60
       __ia32_sys_fdatasync+0x12/0x20
       do_fast_syscall_32+0x9a/0x2f0
       entry_SYSENTER_compat+0x84/0x96

-> #4 (&ei->log_mutex){+.+.}:
       lock_acquire+0xbd/0x220
       __mutex_lock+0x86/0xa10
       btrfs_record_unlink_dir+0x2a/0xa0
       btrfs_unlink+0x5a/0xc0
       vfs_unlink+0xb1/0x1a0
       do_unlinkat+0x264/0x2b0
       do_fast_syscall_32+0x9a/0x2f0
       entry_SYSENTER_compat+0x84/0x96

-> #3 (sb_internal#2){.+.+}:
       lock_acquire+0xbd/0x220
       __sb_start_write+0x14d/0x230
       start_transaction+0x3e6/0x590
       btrfs_evict_inode+0x475/0x640
       evict+0xbf/0x1b0
       btrfs_run_delayed_iputs+0x6c/0x90
       cleaner_kthread+0x124/0x1a0
       kthread+0x106/0x140
       ret_from_fork+0x3a/0x50

-> #2 (&fs_info->cleaner_delayed_iput_mutex){+.+.}:
       lock_acquire+0xbd/0x220
       __mutex_lock+0x86/0xa10
       btrfs_alloc_data_chunk_ondemand+0x197/0x530
       btrfs_check_data_free_space+0x4c/0x90
       btrfs_delalloc_reserve_space+0x20/0x60
       btrfs_page_mkwrite+0x87/0x520
       do_page_mkwrite+0x31/0xa0
       __handle_mm_fault+0x799/0xb00
       handle_mm_fault+0x7c/0xe0
       __do_page_fault+0x1d3/0x4a0
       async_page_fault+0x1e/0x30

-> #1 (sb_pagefaults){.+.+}:
       lock_acquire+0xbd/0x220
       __sb_start_write+0x14d/0x230
       btrfs_page_mkwrite+0x6a/0x520
       do_page_mkwrite+0x31/0xa0
       __handle_mm_fault+0x799/0xb00
       handle_mm_fault+0x7c/0xe0
       __do_page_fault+0x1d3/0x4a0
       async_page_fault+0x1e/0x30

-> #0 (&mm->mmap_sem){++++}:
       __lock_acquire+0x42e/0x7a0
       lock_acquire+0xbd/0x220
       down_read+0x48/0xb0
       get_user_pages_unlocked+0x5a/0x1e0
       get_user_pages_fast+0xa4/0x150
       iov_iter_get_pages+0xc3/0x340
       do_direct_IO+0xf93/0x1d70
       __blockdev_direct_IO+0x32d/0x1c20
       btrfs_direct_IO+0x227/0x400
       generic_file_direct_write+0xcf/0x180
       btrfs_file_write_iter+0x308/0x58c
       aio_write+0xf8/0x1d0
       io_submit_one+0x3a9/0x620
       __ia32_compat_sys_io_submit+0xb2/0x270
       do_int80_syscall_32+0x5b/0x1a0
       entry_INT80_compat+0x88/0xa0

other info that might help us debug this:

Chain exists of:
  &mm->mmap_sem --> &ei->log_mutex --> &ei->dio_sem

 Possible unsafe locking scenario:

       CPU0                    CPU1
       ----                    ----
  lock(&ei->dio_sem);
                               lock(&ei->log_mutex);
                               lock(&ei->dio_sem);
  lock(&mm->mmap_sem);

 *** DEADLOCK ***

1 lock held by aio-dio-invalid/30928:
 #0: 00000000cefe6b35 (&ei->dio_sem){++++}, at: btrfs_direct_IO+0x3be/0x400

stack backtrace:
CPU: 0 PID: 30928 Comm: aio-dio-invalid Not tainted 4.18.0-rc4-xfstests-00025-g5de5edbaf1d4 #411
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.11.0-2.el7 04/01/2014
Call Trace:
 dump_stack+0x7c/0xbb
 print_circular_bug.isra.37+0x297/0x2a4
 check_prev_add.constprop.45+0x781/0x7a0
 ? __lock_acquire+0x42e/0x7a0
 validate_chain.isra.41+0x7f0/0xb00
 __lock_acquire+0x42e/0x7a0
 lock_acquire+0xbd/0x220
 ? get_user_pages_unlocked+0x5a/0x1e0
 down_read+0x48/0xb0
 ? get_user_pages_unlocked+0x5a/0x1e0
 get_user_pages_unlocked+0x5a/0x1e0
 get_user_pages_fast+0xa4/0x150
 iov_iter_get_pages+0xc3/0x340
 do_direct_IO+0xf93/0x1d70
 ? __alloc_workqueue_key+0x358/0x490
 ? __blockdev_direct_IO+0x14b/0x1c20
 __blockdev_direct_IO+0x32d/0x1c20
 ? btrfs_run_delalloc_work+0x40/0x40
 ? can_nocow_extent+0x490/0x490
 ? kvm_clock_read+0x1f/0x30
 ? can_nocow_extent+0x490/0x490
 ? btrfs_run_delalloc_work+0x40/0x40
 btrfs_direct_IO+0x227/0x400
 ? btrfs_run_delalloc_work+0x40/0x40
 generic_file_direct_write+0xcf/0x180
 btrfs_file_write_iter+0x308/0x58c
 aio_write+0xf8/0x1d0
 ? kvm_clock_read+0x1f/0x30
 ? __might_fault+0x3e/0x90
 io_submit_one+0x3a9/0x620
 ? io_submit_one+0xe5/0x620
 __ia32_compat_sys_io_submit+0xb2/0x270
 do_int80_syscall_32+0x5b/0x1a0
 entry_INT80_compat+0x88/0xa0

CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.14+
Reviewed-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      c495144b
    • J
      btrfs: don't run delayed_iputs in commit · 30928e9b
      由 Josef Bacik 提交于 
      This could result in a really bad case where we do something like

evict
  evict_refill_and_join
    btrfs_commit_transaction
      btrfs_run_delayed_iputs
        evict
          evict_refill_and_join
            btrfs_commit_transaction
... forever

We have plenty of other places where we run delayed iputs that are much
safer, let those do the work.

CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+
Reviewed-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      30928e9b
    • J
      btrfs: fix insert_reserved error handling · 80ee54bf
      由 Josef Bacik 提交于 
      We were not handling the reserved byte accounting properly for data
references.  Metadata was fine, if it errored out the error paths would
free the bytes_reserved count and pin the extent, but it even missed one
of the error cases.  So instead move this handling up into
run_one_delayed_ref so we are sure that both cases are properly cleaned
up in case of a transaction abort.

CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.18+
Reviewed-by: NNikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      80ee54bf
    • J
      btrfs: only free reserved extent if we didn't insert it · 49940bdd
      由 Josef Bacik 提交于 
      When we insert the file extent once the ordered extent completes we free
the reserved extent reservation as it'll have been migrated to the
bytes_used counter.  However if we error out after this step we'll still
clear the reserved extent reservation, resulting in a negative
accounting of the reserved bytes for the block group and space info.
Fix this by only doing the free if we didn't successfully insert a file
extent for this extent.

CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.14+
Reviewed-by: NOmar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com>
Reviewed-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      49940bdd
    • J
      btrfs: don't use ctl->free_space for max_extent_size · fb5c39d7
      由 Josef Bacik 提交于 
      max_extent_size is supposed to be the largest contiguous range for the
space info, and ctl->free_space is the total free space in the block
group.  We need to keep track of these separately and _only_ use the
max_free_space if we don't have a max_extent_size, as that means our
original request was too large to search any of the block groups for and
therefore wouldn't have a max_extent_size set.

CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.14+
Reviewed-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      fb5c39d7
    • J
      btrfs: set max_extent_size properly · ad22cf6e
      由 Josef Bacik 提交于 
      We can't use entry->bytes if our entry is a bitmap entry, we need to use
entry->max_extent_size in that case.  Fix up all the logic to make this
consistent.

CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      ad22cf6e
    • J
      btrfs: reset max_extent_size properly · 21a94f7a
      由 Josef Bacik 提交于 
      If we use up our block group before allocating a new one we'll easily
get a max_extent_size that's set really really low, which will result in
a lot of fragmentation.  We need to make sure we're resetting the
max_extent_size when we add a new chunk or add new space.

CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+
Reviewed-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      21a94f7a
    • J
      MAINTAINERS: update my email address for btrfs · b2b5b650
      由 Josef Bacik 提交于 
      My work email is completely useless, switch it to my personal address so
I get emails on a account I actually pay attention to.
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      b2b5b650
  7. 18 10月, 2018 1 次提交
  9. 17 10月, 2018 3 次提交
    • F
      Btrfs: fix deadlock when writing out free space caches · 5ce55557
      由 Filipe Manana 提交于 
      When writing out a block group free space cache we can end deadlocking
with ourselves on an extent buffer lock resulting in a warning like the
following:

  [245043.379979] WARNING: CPU: 4 PID: 2608 at fs/btrfs/locking.c:251 btrfs_tree_lock+0x1be/0x1d0 [btrfs]
  [245043.392792] CPU: 4 PID: 2608 Comm: btrfs-transacti Tainted: G
    W I      4.16.8 #1
  [245043.395489] RIP: 0010:btrfs_tree_lock+0x1be/0x1d0 [btrfs]
  [245043.396791] RSP: 0018:ffffc9000424b840 EFLAGS: 00010246
  [245043.398093] RAX: 0000000000000a30 RBX: ffff8807e20a3d20 RCX: 0000000000000001
  [245043.399414] RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: 0000000000000002 RDI: ffff8807e20a3d20
  [245043.400732] RBP: 0000000000000001 R08: ffff88041f39a700 R09: ffff880000000000
  [245043.402021] R10: 0000000000000040 R11: ffff8807e20a3d20 R12: ffff8807cb220630
  [245043.403296] R13: 0000000000000001 R14: ffff8807cb220628 R15: ffff88041fbdf000
  [245043.404780] FS:  0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88082fc80000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
  [245043.406050] CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
  [245043.407321] CR2: 00007fffdbdb9f10 CR3: 0000000001c09005 CR4: 00000000000206e0
  [245043.408670] Call Trace:
  [245043.409977]  btrfs_search_slot+0x761/0xa60 [btrfs]
  [245043.411278]  btrfs_insert_empty_items+0x62/0xb0 [btrfs]
  [245043.412572]  btrfs_insert_item+0x5b/0xc0 [btrfs]
  [245043.413922]  btrfs_create_pending_block_groups+0xfb/0x1e0 [btrfs]
  [245043.415216]  do_chunk_alloc+0x1e5/0x2a0 [btrfs]
  [245043.416487]  find_free_extent+0xcd0/0xf60 [btrfs]
  [245043.417813]  btrfs_reserve_extent+0x96/0x1e0 [btrfs]
  [245043.419105]  btrfs_alloc_tree_block+0xfb/0x4a0 [btrfs]
  [245043.420378]  __btrfs_cow_block+0x127/0x550 [btrfs]
  [245043.421652]  btrfs_cow_block+0xee/0x190 [btrfs]
  [245043.422979]  btrfs_search_slot+0x227/0xa60 [btrfs]
  [245043.424279]  ? btrfs_update_inode_item+0x59/0x100 [btrfs]
  [245043.425538]  ? iput+0x72/0x1e0
  [245043.426798]  write_one_cache_group.isra.49+0x20/0x90 [btrfs]
  [245043.428131]  btrfs_start_dirty_block_groups+0x102/0x420 [btrfs]
  [245043.429419]  btrfs_commit_transaction+0x11b/0x880 [btrfs]
  [245043.430712]  ? start_transaction+0x8e/0x410 [btrfs]
  [245043.432006]  transaction_kthread+0x184/0x1a0 [btrfs]
  [245043.433341]  kthread+0xf0/0x130
  [245043.434628]  ? btrfs_cleanup_transaction+0x4e0/0x4e0 [btrfs]
  [245043.435928]  ? kthread_create_worker_on_cpu+0x40/0x40
  [245043.437236]  ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30
  [245043.441054] ---[ end trace 15abaa2aaf36827f ]---

This is because at write_one_cache_group() when we are COWing a leaf from
the extent tree we end up allocating a new block group (chunk) and,
because we have hit a threshold on the number of bytes reserved for system
chunks, we attempt to finalize the creation of new block groups from the
current transaction, by calling btrfs_create_pending_block_groups().
However here we also need to modify the extent tree in order to insert
a block group item, and if the location for this new block group item
happens to be in the same leaf that we were COWing earlier, we deadlock
since btrfs_search_slot() tries to write lock the extent buffer that we
locked before at write_one_cache_group().

We have already hit similar cases in the past and commit d9a0540a
("Btrfs: fix deadlock when finalizing block group creation") fixed some
of those cases by delaying the creation of pending block groups at the
known specific spots that could lead to a deadlock. This change reworks
that commit to be more generic so that we don't have to add similar logic
to every possible path that can lead to a deadlock. This is done by
making __btrfs_cow_block() disallowing the creation of new block groups
(setting the transaction's can_flush_pending_bgs to false) before it
attempts to allocate a new extent buffer for either the extent, chunk or
device trees, since those are the trees that pending block creation
modifies. Once the new extent buffer is allocated, it allows creation of
pending block groups to happen again.

This change depends on a recent patch from Josef which is not yet in
Linus' tree, named "btrfs: make sure we create all new block groups" in
order to avoid occasional warnings at btrfs_trans_release_chunk_metadata().

Fixes: d9a0540a ("Btrfs: fix deadlock when finalizing block group creation")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+
Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=199753
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/CAJtFHUTHna09ST-_EEiyWmDH6gAqS6wa=zMNMBsifj8ABu99cw@mail.gmail.com/Reported-by: NE V <eliventer@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      5ce55557
    • F
      Btrfs: fix assertion on fsync of regular file when using no-holes feature · 7ed586d0
      由 Filipe Manana 提交于 
      When using the NO_HOLES feature and logging a regular file, we were
expecting that if we find an inline extent, that either its size in RAM
(uncompressed and unenconded) matches the size of the file or if it does
not, that it matches the sector size and it represents compressed data.
This assertion does not cover a case where the length of the inline extent
is smaller than the sector size and also smaller the file's size, such
case is possible through fallocate. Example:

  $ mkfs.btrfs -f -O no-holes /dev/sdb
  $ mount /dev/sdb /mnt

  $ xfs_io -f -c "pwrite -S 0xb60 0 21" /mnt/foobar
  $ xfs_io -c "falloc 40 40" /mnt/foobar
  $ xfs_io -c "fsync" /mnt/foobar

In the above example we trigger the assertion because the inline extent's
length is 21 bytes while the file size is 80 bytes. The fallocate() call
merely updated the file's size and did not touch the existing inline
extent, as expected.

So fix this by adjusting the assertion so that an inline extent length
smaller than the file size is valid if the file size is smaller than the
filesystem's sector size.

A test case for fstests follows soon.
Reported-by: NAnatoly Trosinenko <anatoly.trosinenko@gmail.com>
Fixes: a89ca6f2 ("Btrfs: fix fsync after truncate when no_holes feature is enabled")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.14+
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/CAE5jQCfRSBC7n4pUTFJcmHh109=gwyT9mFkCOL+NKfzswmR=_Q@mail.gmail.com/Signed-off-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      7ed586d0
    • F
      Btrfs: fix null pointer dereference on compressed write path error · 3527a018
      由 Filipe Manana 提交于 
      At inode.c:compress_file_range(), under the "free_pages_out" label, we can
end up dereferencing the "pages" pointer when it has a NULL value. This
case happens when "start" has a value of 0 and we fail to allocate memory
for the "pages" pointer. When that happens we jump to the "cont" label and
then enter the "if (start == 0)" branch where we immediately call the
cow_file_range_inline() function. If that function returns 0 (success
creating an inline extent) or an error (like -ENOMEM for example) we jump
to the "free_pages_out" label and then access "pages[i]" leading to a NULL
pointer dereference, since "nr_pages" has a value greater than zero at
that point.

Fix this by setting "nr_pages" to 0 when we fail to allocate memory for
the "pages" pointer.

Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=201119
Fixes: 771ed689 ("Btrfs: Optimize compressed writeback and reads")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+
Reviewed-by: NLiu Bo <bo.liu@linux.alibaba.com>
Signed-off-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      3527a018
  11. 15 10月, 2018 20 次提交