- 25 4月, 2011 2 次提交
-
-
由 Li Zefan 提交于
There's a potential problem in 32bit system when we exhaust 32bit inode numbers and start to allocate big inode numbers, because btrfs uses inode->i_ino in many places. So here we always use BTRFS_I(inode)->location.objectid, which is an u64 variable. There are 2 exceptions that BTRFS_I(inode)->location.objectid != inode->i_ino: the btree inode (0 vs 1) and empty subvol dirs (256 vs 2), and inode->i_ino will be used in those cases. Another reason to make this change is I'm going to use a special inode to save free ino cache, and the inode number must be > (u64)-256. Signed-off-by: NLi Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>
-
由 Li Zefan 提交于
So we can re-use the code to cache free inode numbers. The change is quite straightforward. Two new structures are introduced. - struct btrfs_free_space_ctl We move those variables that are used for caching free space from struct btrfs_block_group_cache to this new struct. - struct btrfs_free_space_op We do block group specific work (e.g. calculation of extents threshold) through functions registered in this struct. And then we can remove references to struct btrfs_block_group_cache. Signed-off-by: NLi Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>
-
- 16 4月, 2011 2 次提交
-
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
Everytime we try to allocate disk space we try and see if we can pre-emptively allocate a chunk, but in the common case we don't allocate anything, so there is no sense in taking the chunk_mutex at all. So instead if we are allocating a chunk, mark it in the space_info so we don't get two people trying to allocate at the same time. Thanks, Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: NLiu Bo <liubo2009@cn.fujitsu.com>
-
由 Chris Mason 提交于
find_free_extent likes to allocate in contiguous clusters, which makes writeback faster, especially on SSD storage. As the FS fragments, these clusters become harder to find and we have to decide between allocating a new chunk to make more clusters or giving up on the cluster to allocate from the free space we have. Right now it creates too many chunks, and you can end up with a whole FS that is mostly empty metadata chunks. This commit changes the allocation code to be more strict and only allocate new chunks when we've made good use of the chunks we already have. Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
-
- 28 3月, 2011 10 次提交
-
-
由 liubo 提交于
btrfs will remove unused block groups after balance. When a empty filesystem is balanced, the block group with tag "DATA" may be dropped, and after umount and mount again, it will not find "DATA" space_info and lead to OOPS. So we initial the necessary space_infos(DATA, SYSTEM, METADATA) to avoid OOPS. Reported-by: NDaniel J Blueman <daniel.blueman@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NLiu Bo <liubo2009@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
-
由 liubo 提交于
After Josef's patch(commit 3c14874a), btrfs will exclude super bytes when reading block groups(by marking a extent state UPTODATE). However, these bytes do not get freed while balance remove unused block groups, and we won't process those removed ones any more, when we do umount and unload the btrfs module, btrfs hits a memory leak. This patch add the missing free operation. Reproduce steps: $ mkfs.btrfs disk $ mount disk /mnt/btrfs -o loop $ btrfs filesystem balance /mnt/btrfs $ umount /mnt/btrfs $ rmmod btrfs Signed-off-by: NLiu Bo <liubo2009@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
-
由 Yoshinori Sano 提交于
To make Btrfs code more robust, several return value checks where memory allocation can fail are introduced. I use BUG_ON where I don't know how to handle the error properly, which increases the number of using the notorious BUG_ON, though. Signed-off-by: NYoshinori Sano <yoshinori.sano@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
-
由 Li Dongyang 提交于
We take an free extent out from allocator, trim it, then put it back, but before we trim the block group, we should make sure the block group is cached, so plus a little change to make cache_block_group() run without a transaction. Signed-off-by: NLi Dongyang <lidongyang@novell.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
-
由 Li Dongyang 提交于
Callers of btrfs_discard_extent() should check if we are mounted with -o discard, as we want to make fitrim to work even the fs is not mounted with -o discard. Also we should use REQ_DISCARD to map the free extent to get a full mapping, last we only return errors if 1. the error is not a EOPNOTSUPP 2. no device supports discard Signed-off-by: NLi Dongyang <lidongyang@novell.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
-
由 Li Dongyang 提交于
Make the function public as we should update the reserved extents calculations after taking out an extent for trimming. Signed-off-by: NLi Dongyang <lidongyang@novell.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
-
由 Miao Xie 提交于
In the filesystem context, we must allocate memory by GFP_NOFS, or we may start another filesystem operation and make kswap thread hang up. Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
-
由 Tsutomu Itoh 提交于
This patch is checking return value of read_tree_block(), and if it is NULL, error processing. Signed-off-by: NTsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
-
由 Tsutomu Itoh 提交于
This patch changes some BUG_ON() to the error return. (but, most callers still use BUG_ON()) Signed-off-by: NTsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
-
由 liubo 提交于
Tracepoints can provide insight into why btrfs hits bugs and be greatly helpful for debugging, e.g dd-7822 [000] 2121.641088: btrfs_inode_request: root = 5(FS_TREE), gen = 4, ino = 256, blocks = 8, disk_i_size = 0, last_trans = 8, logged_trans = 0 dd-7822 [000] 2121.641100: btrfs_inode_new: root = 5(FS_TREE), gen = 8, ino = 257, blocks = 0, disk_i_size = 0, last_trans = 0, logged_trans = 0 btrfs-transacti-7804 [001] 2146.935420: btrfs_cow_block: root = 2(EXTENT_TREE), refs = 2, orig_buf = 29368320 (orig_level = 0), cow_buf = 29388800 (cow_level = 0) btrfs-transacti-7804 [001] 2146.935473: btrfs_cow_block: root = 1(ROOT_TREE), refs = 2, orig_buf = 29364224 (orig_level = 0), cow_buf = 29392896 (cow_level = 0) btrfs-transacti-7804 [001] 2146.972221: btrfs_transaction_commit: root = 1(ROOT_TREE), gen = 8 flush-btrfs-2-7821 [001] 2155.824210: btrfs_chunk_alloc: root = 3(CHUNK_TREE), offset = 1103101952, size = 1073741824, num_stripes = 1, sub_stripes = 0, type = DATA flush-btrfs-2-7821 [001] 2155.824241: btrfs_cow_block: root = 2(EXTENT_TREE), refs = 2, orig_buf = 29388800 (orig_level = 0), cow_buf = 29396992 (cow_level = 0) flush-btrfs-2-7821 [001] 2155.824255: btrfs_cow_block: root = 4(DEV_TREE), refs = 2, orig_buf = 29372416 (orig_level = 0), cow_buf = 29401088 (cow_level = 0) flush-btrfs-2-7821 [000] 2155.824329: btrfs_cow_block: root = 3(CHUNK_TREE), refs = 2, orig_buf = 20971520 (orig_level = 0), cow_buf = 20975616 (cow_level = 0) btrfs-endio-wri-7800 [001] 2155.898019: btrfs_cow_block: root = 5(FS_TREE), refs = 2, orig_buf = 29384704 (orig_level = 0), cow_buf = 29405184 (cow_level = 0) btrfs-endio-wri-7800 [001] 2155.898043: btrfs_cow_block: root = 7(CSUM_TREE), refs = 2, orig_buf = 29376512 (orig_level = 0), cow_buf = 29409280 (cow_level = 0) Here is what I have added: 1) ordere_extent: btrfs_ordered_extent_add btrfs_ordered_extent_remove btrfs_ordered_extent_start btrfs_ordered_extent_put These provide critical information to understand how ordered_extents are updated. 2) extent_map: btrfs_get_extent extent_map is used in both read and write cases, and it is useful for tracking how btrfs specific IO is running. 3) writepage: __extent_writepage btrfs_writepage_end_io_hook Pages are cirtical resourses and produce a lot of corner cases during writeback, so it is valuable to know how page is written to disk. 4) inode: btrfs_inode_new btrfs_inode_request btrfs_inode_evict These can show where and when a inode is created, when a inode is evicted. 5) sync: btrfs_sync_file btrfs_sync_fs These show sync arguments. 6) transaction: btrfs_transaction_commit In transaction based filesystem, it will be useful to know the generation and who does commit. 7) back reference and cow: btrfs_delayed_tree_ref btrfs_delayed_data_ref btrfs_delayed_ref_head btrfs_cow_block Btrfs natively supports back references, these tracepoints are helpful on understanding btrfs's COW mechanism. 8) chunk: btrfs_chunk_alloc btrfs_chunk_free Chunk is a link between physical offset and logical offset, and stands for space infomation in btrfs, and these are helpful on tracing space things. 9) reserved_extent: btrfs_reserved_extent_alloc btrfs_reserved_extent_free These can show how btrfs uses its space. Signed-off-by: NLiu Bo <liubo2009@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
-
- 18 3月, 2011 3 次提交
-
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
Currently if we have corrupted items things will blow up in spectacular ways. So as we read in blocks and they are leaves, check the entire leaf to make sure all of the items are correct and point to valid parts in the leaf for the item data the are responsible for. If the item is corrupt we will kick back EIO and not read any of the copies since they are likely to not be correct either. This will catch generic corruptions, it will be up to the individual callers of btrfs_search_slot to make sure their items are right. Thanks, Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
If we cannot truncate an inode for some reason we will never delete the orphan item associated with that inode, which means that we will loop forever in btrfs_orphan_cleanup. Instead of doing this just return error so we fail to mount. It sucks, but hey it's better than hanging. Thanks, Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
We track delayed allocation per inodes via 2 counters, one is outstanding_extents and reserved_extents. Outstanding_extents is already an atomic_t, but reserved_extents is not and is protected by a spinlock. So convert this to an atomic_t and instead of using a spinlock, use atomic_cmpxchg when releasing delalloc bytes. This makes our inode 72 bytes smaller, and reduces locking overhead (albiet it was minimal to begin with). Thanks, Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
-
- 12 3月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Chris Mason 提交于
Josef had changed shrink_delalloc to exit after three shrink attempts, which wasn't quite enough because new writers could race in and steal free space. But it also fixed deadlocks and stalls as we tried to recover delalloc reservations. The code was tweaked to loop 1024 times, and would reset the counter any time a small amount of progress was made. This was too drastic, and with a lot of writers we can end up stuck in shrink_delalloc forever. The shrink_delalloc loop is fairly complex because the caller is looping too, and the caller will go ahead and force a transaction commit to make sure we reclaim space. This reworks things to exit shrink_delalloc when we've forced some writeback and the delalloc reservations have gone down. This means the writeback has not just started but has also finished at least some of the metadata changes required to reclaim delalloc space. If we've got this wrong, we're returning ENOSPC too early, which is a big improvement over the current behavior of hanging the machine. Test 224 in xfstests hammers on this nicely, and with 1000 writers trying to fill a 1GB drive we get our first ENOSPC at 93% full. The other writers are able to continue until we get 100%. This is a worst case test for btrfs because the 1000 writers are doing small IO, and the small FS size means we don't have a lot of room for metadata chunks. Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
-
- 17 2月, 2011 2 次提交
-
-
由 Chris Mason 提交于
Btrfs device shrinking and balancing ends up reallocating all the blocks in order to allow COW to move them to new destinations. It is somewhat awkward in terms of ENOSPC because most of the enospc code is built around the idea that some operation on a reference counted tree triggers allocations in the non-reference counted trees. This commit changes the balancing code to deal with enospc by trying to allocate a new chunk. If that allocation succeeds, we go ahead and retry whatever failed due to enospc. Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
-
由 Chris Mason 提交于
ENOSPC in btrfs is getting to the point where the extra debugging isn't required. I've put it under mount -o enospc_debug just in case someone is having difficult problems. Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
-
- 15 2月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Tsutomu Itoh 提交于
I add the check on the return value of alloc_extent_map() to several places. In addition, alloc_extent_map() returns only the address or NULL. Therefore, check by IS_ERR() is unnecessary. So, I remove IS_ERR() checking. Signed-off-by: NTsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
-
- 06 2月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
This has been resulting in a BUT_ON(ret) after btrfs_reserve_extent in btrfs_cow_file_range. The reason is we don't actually calculate the bytes_super for a block group until we go to cache it, which means that the space_info can hand out reservations for space that it doesn't actually have, and we can run out of data space. This is also a problem if you are using space caching since we don't ever calculate bytes_super for the block groups. So instead everytime we read a block group call exclude_super_stripes, which calculates the bytes_super for the block group so it can be left out of the space_info. Then whenever caching completes we just call free_excluded_extents so that the super excluded extents are freed up. Also if we are unmounting and we hit any block groups that haven't been cached we still need to call free_excluded_extents to make sure things are cleaned up properly. Thanks, Reported-by: NArne Jansen <sensille@gmx.net> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
-
- 01 2月, 2011 3 次提交
-
-
由 Tsutomu Itoh 提交于
The error check of btrfs_start_transaction() is added, and the mistake of the error check on several places is corrected. Signed-off-by: NTsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
-
由 Tsutomu Itoh 提交于
Because NULL is returned when the memory allocation fails, it is checked whether it is NULL. Signed-off-by: NTsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
Xfstests 224 will just sit there and spin for ever until eventually we give up flushing delalloc and exit. On my box this took several hours. I could not interrupt this process either, even though we use INTERRUPTIBLE. So do 2 things 1) Keep us from looping over and over again without reclaiming anything 2) If we get interrupted exit the loop I tested this and the test now exits in a reasonable amount of time, and can be interrupted with ctrl+c. Thanks, Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
-
- 29 1月, 2011 3 次提交
-
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
We call use_block_rsv right before we make an allocation in order to make sure we have enough space. Now normally people have called btrfs_start_transaction() with the appropriate amount of space that we need, so we just use some of that pre-reserved space and move along happily. The problem is where people use btrfs_join_transaction(), which doesn't actually reserve any space. So we try and reserve space here, but we cannot flush delalloc, so this forces us to return -ENOSPC when in reality we have plenty of space. The most common symptom is seeing a bunch of "couldn't dirty inode" messages in syslog. With xfstests 224 we end up falling back to start_transaction and then doing all the flush delalloc stuff which causes to hang for a very long time. So instead steal from the global reserve, which is what this is meant for anyway. With this patch and the other 2 I have sent xfstests 224 now passes successfully. Thanks, Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
When we do btrfs_block_rsv_release, if global_block_rsv is not full we will release all the extra bytes to global_block_rsv, even if it's only a little short of the amount of space that we need to reserve. This causes us to starve ourselves of reservable space during the transaction which will force us to shrink delalloc bytes and commit the transaction more often than we should. So instead just add the amount of bytes we need to add to the global reserve so reserved == size, and then add the rest back into the space_info for general use. Thanks, Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
-
由 Tsutomu Itoh 提交于
The error check of btrfs_join_transaction()/btrfs_join_transaction_nolock() is added, and the mistake of the error check in several places is corrected. For more stable Btrfs, I think that we should reduce BUG_ON(). But, I think that long time is necessary for this. So, I propose this patch as a short-term solution. With this patch: - To more stable Btrfs, the part that should be corrected is clarified. - The panic isn't done by the NULL pointer reference etc. (even if BUG_ON() is increased temporarily) - The error code is returned in the place where the error can be easily returned. As a long-term plan: - BUG_ON() is reduced by using the forced-readonly framework, etc. Signed-off-by: NTsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
-
- 18 1月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 liubo 提交于
This patch comes from "Forced readonly mounts on errors" ideas. As we know, this is the first step in being more fault tolerant of disk corruptions instead of just using BUG() statements. The major content: - add a framework for generating errors that should result in filesystems going readonly. - keep FS state in disk super block. - make sure that all of resource will be freed and released at umount time. - make sure that fter FS is forced readonly on error, there will be no more disk change before FS is corrected. For this, we should stop write operation. After this patch is applied, the conversion from BUG() to such a framework can happen incrementally. Signed-off-by: NLiu Bo <liubo2009@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
-
- 17 1月, 2011 4 次提交
-
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
If we run low on space we could get a bunch of warnings out of btrfs_block_rsv_check, but this is mostly just called via the transaction code to see if we need to end the transaction, it expects to see failures, so let's not WARN and freak everybody out for no reason. Thanks, Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
-
由 Miao Xie 提交于
When we store data by raid profile in btrfs with two or more different size disks, df command shows there is some free space in the filesystem, but the user can not write any data in fact, df command shows the wrong free space information of btrfs. # mkfs.btrfs -d raid1 /dev/sda9 /dev/sda10 # btrfs-show Label: none uuid: a95cd49e-6e33-45b8-8741-a36153ce4b64 Total devices 2 FS bytes used 28.00KB devid 1 size 5.01GB used 2.03GB path /dev/sda9 devid 2 size 10.00GB used 2.01GB path /dev/sda10 # btrfs device scan /dev/sda9 /dev/sda10 # mount /dev/sda9 /mnt # dd if=/dev/zero of=tmpfile0 bs=4K count=9999999999 (fill the filesystem) # sync # df -TH Filesystem Type Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on /dev/sda9 btrfs 17G 8.6G 5.4G 62% /mnt # btrfs-show Label: none uuid: a95cd49e-6e33-45b8-8741-a36153ce4b64 Total devices 2 FS bytes used 3.99GB devid 1 size 5.01GB used 5.01GB path /dev/sda9 devid 2 size 10.00GB used 4.99GB path /dev/sda10 It is because btrfs cannot allocate chunks when one of the pairing disks has no space, the free space on the other disks can not be used for ever, and should be subtracted from the total space, but btrfs doesn't subtract this space from the total. It is strange to the user. This patch fixes it by calcing the free space that can be used to allocate chunks. Implementation: 1. get all the devices free space, and align them by stripe length. 2. sort the devices by the free space. 3. check the free space of the devices, 3.1. if it is not zero, and then check the number of the devices that has more free space than this device, if the number of the devices is beyond the min stripe number, the free space can be used, and add into total free space. if the number of the devices is below the min stripe number, we can not use the free space, the check ends. 3.2. if the free space is zero, check the next devices, goto 3.1 This implementation is just likely fake chunk allocation. After appling this patch, df can show correct space information: # df -TH Filesystem Type Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on /dev/sda9 btrfs 17G 8.6G 0 100% /mnt Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
-
由 Miao Xie 提交于
- make it return the start position and length of the max free space when it can not find a suitable free space. - make it more readability Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
-
由 Miao Xie 提交于
We cannot write data into files when when there is tiny space in the filesystem. Reproduce steps: # mkfs.btrfs /dev/sda1 # mount /dev/sda1 /mnt # dd if=/dev/zero of=/mnt/tmpfile0 bs=4K count=1 # dd if=/dev/zero of=/mnt/tmpfile1 bs=4K count=99999999999999 (fill the filesystem) # umount /mnt # mount /dev/sda1 /mnt # rm -f /mnt/tmpfile0 # dd if=/dev/zero of=/mnt/tmpfile0 bs=4K count=1 (failed with nospec) But if we do the last step again, we can write data successfully. The reason of the problem is that btrfs didn't try to commit the current transaction and reclaim some space when chunk allocation failed. This patch fixes it by committing the current transaction to reclaim some space when chunk allocation fails. Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
-
- 05 1月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Chris Mason 提交于
When we read in block groups, we'll set non-redundant groups readonly if we find a raid1, DUP or raid10 group. But the ro code has an off by one bug in the math around testing to make sure out accounting doesn't go wrong. Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
-
- 14 12月, 2010 2 次提交
-
-
由 Chris Mason 提交于
The extent allocator has code that allows us to fill allocations from any available block group, even if it doesn't match the raid level we've requested. This was put in because adding a new drive to a filesystem made with the default mkfs options actually upgrades the metadata from single spindle dup to full RAID1. But, the code also allows us to allocate from a raid0 chunk when we really want a raid1 or raid10 chunk. This can cause big trouble because mkfs creates a small (4MB) raid0 chunk for data and metadata which then goes unused for raid1/raid10 installs. The allocator will happily wander in and allocate from that chunk when things get tight, which is not correct. The fix here is to make sure that we provide duplication when the caller has asked for it. It does all the dups to be any raid level, which preserves the dup->raid1 upgrade abilities. Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
-
由 Chris Mason 提交于
When we mount in RAID degraded mode without adding a new device to replace the failed one, we can end up using the wrong RAID flags for allocations. This results in strange combinations of block groups (raid1 in a raid10 filesystem) and corruptions when we try to allocate blocks from single spindle chunks on drives that are actually missing. The first device has two small 4MB chunks in it that mkfs creates and these are usually unused in a raid1 or raid10 setup. But, in -o degraded, the allocator will fall back to these because the mask of desired raid groups isn't correct. The fix here is to count the missing devices as we build up the list of devices in the system. This count is used when picking the raid level to make sure we continue using the same levels that were in place before we lost a drive. Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
-
- 11 12月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
Not being able to delete an orphan item isn't a horrible thing. The worst that happens is the next time around we try and do the orphan cleanup and we can't find the referenced object and just delete the item and move on. Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
-
- 10 12月, 2010 2 次提交
-
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
Since the fast caching uses normal tree locking, we can possibly deadlock if we get to the caching via a btrfs_search_slot() on the tree_root. So just check to see if the root we are on is the tree root, and just don't do the fast caching. Reported-by: NSage Weil <sage@newdream.net> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
Currently if the space cache inode generation number doesn't match the generation number in the space cache header we will just fail to load the space cache, but we won't mark the space cache as an error, so we'll keep getting that error each time somebody tries to cache that block group until we actually clear the thing. Fix this by marking the space cache as having an error so we only get the message once. This patch also makes it so that we don't try and setup space cache for a block group that isn't cached, since we won't be able to write it out anyway. None of these problems are actual problems, they are just annoying and sub-optimal. Thanks, Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
-
- 22 11月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 Arne Jansen 提交于
'unused' calculated with wrong sign in reserve_metadata_bytes(). This might have lead to unwanted over-reservations. Signed-off-by: NArne Jansen <sensille@gmx.net> Reviewed-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
-