- 11 3月, 2014 5 次提交
-
-
由 Miao Xie 提交于
generic/074 in xfstests failed sometimes because of the enospc error, the reason of this problem is that we just reclaimed the space we need from the reserved space for delalloc, and then tried to reserve the space, but if some task did no-flush reservation between the above reclamation and reservation, Task1 Task2 shrink_delalloc() reclaim 1 block (The space that can be reserved now is 1 block) do no-flush reservation reserve 1 block (The space that can be reserved now is 0 block) reserving 1 block failed the reservation of Task1 failed, but in fact, there was enough space to reserve if we could reclaim more space before. Fix this problem by the aggressive reclamation of the reserved delalloc metadata space. Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
-
由 Miao Xie 提交于
The reason is: - The per-cpu counter has its own lock to protect itself. - Here we needn't get a exact value. Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
-
由 Miao Xie 提交于
If the snapshot creation happened after the nocow write but before the dirty data flush, we would fail to flush the dirty data because of no space. So we must keep track of when those nocow write operations start and when they end, if there are nocow writers, the snapshot creators must wait. In order to implement this function, I introduce btrfs_{start, end}_nocow_write(), which is similar to mnt_{want,drop}_write(). These two functions are only used for nocow file write operations. Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
-
由 Qu Wenruo 提交于
Since the "_struct" suffix is mainly used for distinguish the differnt btrfs_work between the original and the newly created one, there is no need using the suffix since all btrfs_workers are changed into btrfs_workqueue. Also this patch fixed some codes whose code style is changed due to the too long "_struct" suffix. Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
-
由 Qu Wenruo 提交于
Replace the fs_info->cache_workers with the newly created btrfs_workqueue. Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
-
- 09 2月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
A user reported a 100% cpu hang with my new delayed ref code. Turns out I forgot to increase the count check when we can't run a delayed ref because of the tree mod log. If we can't run any delayed refs during this there is no point in continuing to look, and we need to break out. Thanks, Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
- 29 1月, 2014 16 次提交
-
-
由 Chris Mason 提交于
Our goto out should have gone a little farther. Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
由 Miao Xie 提交于
We allocate the free space from the former block group, not the current one, so should use the former one to output the trace information. Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
由 Miao Xie 提交于
used_block_group is just used for the space cluster which doesn't belong to the current block group, the other place needn't use it. Or the logic of code seems unclear. Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
由 Miao Xie 提交于
Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
After the change titled "Btrfs: add support for inode properties", if btrfs was built-in the kernel (i.e. not as a module), it would cause a kernel panic, as reported recently by Fengguang: [ 2.024722] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at (null) [ 2.027814] IP: [<ffffffff81501594>] crc32c+0xc/0x6b [ 2.028684] PGD 0 [ 2.028684] Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP [ 2.028684] Modules linked in: [ 2.028684] CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 3.13.0-rc7-04795-ga7b57c2 #1 [ 2.028684] Hardware name: Bochs Bochs, BIOS Bochs 01/01/2011 [ 2.028684] task: ffff88000edba100 ti: ffff88000edd6000 task.ti: ffff88000edd6000 [ 2.028684] RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff81501594>] [<ffffffff81501594>] crc32c+0xc/0x6b [ 2.028684] RSP: 0000:ffff88000edd7e58 EFLAGS: 00010246 [ 2.028684] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffffffff82295550 RCX: 0000000000000000 [ 2.028684] RDX: 0000000000000011 RSI: ffffffff81efe393 RDI: 00000000fffffffe [ 2.028684] RBP: ffff88000edd7e60 R08: 0000000000000003 R09: 0000000000015d20 [ 2.028684] R10: ffffffff81ef225e R11: ffffffff811b0222 R12: ffffffffffffffff [ 2.028684] R13: 0000000000000239 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000000 [ 2.028684] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88000fa00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [ 2.028684] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 000000008005003b [ 2.028684] CR2: 0000000000000000 CR3: 000000000220c000 CR4: 00000000000006f0 [ 2.028684] Stack: [ 2.028684] ffffffff82295550 ffff88000edd7e80 ffffffff8238af62 ffffffff8238ac05 [ 2.028684] 0000000000000000 ffff88000edd7e98 ffffffff8238ac0f ffffffff8238ac05 [ 2.028684] ffff88000edd7f08 ffffffff810002ba ffff88000edd7f00 ffffffff810e2404 [ 2.028684] Call Trace: [ 2.028684] [<ffffffff8238af62>] btrfs_props_init+0x4f/0x96 [ 2.028684] [<ffffffff8238ac05>] ? ftrace_define_fields_btrfs_space_reservation+0x145/0x145 [ 2.028684] [<ffffffff8238ac0f>] init_btrfs_fs+0xa/0xf0 [ 2.028684] [<ffffffff8238ac05>] ? ftrace_define_fields_btrfs_space_reservation+0x145/0x145 [ 2.028684] [<ffffffff810002ba>] do_one_initcall+0xa4/0x13a [ 2.028684] [<ffffffff810e2404>] ? parse_args+0x25f/0x33d [ 2.028684] [<ffffffff8234cf75>] kernel_init_freeable+0x1aa/0x230 [ 2.028684] [<ffffffff8234c785>] ? do_early_param+0x88/0x88 [ 2.028684] [<ffffffff819f61b5>] ? rest_init+0x89/0x89 [ 2.028684] [<ffffffff819f61c3>] kernel_init+0xe/0x109 The issue here is that the initialization function of btrfs (super.c:init_btrfs_fs) started using crc32c (from lib/libcrc32c.c). But when it needs to call crc32c (as part of the properties initialization routine), the libcrc32c is not yet initialized, so crc32c derreferenced a NULL pointer (lib/libcrc32c.c:tfm), causing the kernel panic on boot. The approach to fix this is to use crypto component directly to use its crc32c (which is basically what lib/libcrc32c.c is, a wrapper around crypto). This is what ext4 is doing as well, it uses crypto directly to get crc32c functionality. Verified this works both when btrfs is built-in and when it's loadable kernel module. Signed-off-by: NFilipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
On one of our gluster clusters we noticed some pretty big lag spikes. This turned out to be because our transaction commit was taking like 3 minutes to complete. This is because we have like 30 gigs of metadata, so our global reserve would end up being the max which is like 512 mb. So our throttling code would allow a ridiculous amount of delayed refs to build up and then they'd all get run at transaction commit time, and for a cold mounted file system that could take up to 3 minutes to run. So fix the throttling to be based on both the size of the global reserve and how long it takes us to run delayed refs. This patch tracks the time it takes to run delayed refs and then only allows 1 seconds worth of outstanding delayed refs at a time. This way it will auto-tune itself from cold cache up to when everything is in memory and it no longer has to go to disk. This makes our transaction commits take much less time to run. Thanks, Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
Currently we have two rb-trees, one for delayed ref heads and one for all of the delayed refs, including the delayed ref heads. When we process the delayed refs we have to hold onto the delayed ref lock for all of the selecting and merging and such, which results in quite a bit of lock contention. This was solved by having a waitqueue and only one flusher at a time, however this hurts if we get a lot of delayed refs queued up. So instead just have an rb tree for the delayed ref heads, and then attach the delayed ref updates to an rb tree that is per delayed ref head. Then we only need to take the delayed ref lock when adding new delayed refs and when selecting a delayed ref head to process, all the rest of the time we deal with a per delayed ref head lock which will be much less contentious. The locking rules for this get a little more complicated since we have to lock up to 3 things to properly process delayed refs, but I will address that problem later. For now this passes all of xfstests and my overnight stress tests. Thanks, Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
由 Wang Shilong 提交于
We may return early in btrfs_drop_snapshot(), we shouldn't call btrfs_std_err() for this case, fix it. Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: NWang Shilong <wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
由 Liu Bo 提交于
@full is not protected within global_rsv.lock, so we may think global_rsv is already full but in fact it's not, so we miss the opportunity to return free space to global_rsv directly when we release other block_rsvs. Signed-off-by: NLiu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
We can starve out the transaction commit with a bunch of caching threads all running at the same time. This is because we will only drop the extent_commit_sem if we need_resched(), which isn't likely to happen since we will be reading a lot from the disk so have already schedule()'ed plenty. Alex observed that he could starve out a transaction commit for up to a minute with 32 caching threads all running at once. This will allow us to drop the extent_commit_sem to allow the transaction commit to swap the commit_root out and then all the cachers will start back up. Here is an explanation provided by Igno So, just to fill in what happens in this loop: mutex_unlock(&caching_ctl->mutex); cond_resched(); goto again; where 'again:' takes caching_ctl->mutex and fs_info->extent_commit_sem again: again: mutex_lock(&caching_ctl->mutex); /* need to make sure the commit_root doesn't disappear */ down_read(&fs_info->extent_commit_sem); So, if I'm reading the code correct, there can be a fair amount of concurrency here: there may be multiple 'caching kthreads' per filesystem active, while there's one fs_info->extent_commit_sem per filesystem AFAICS. So, what happens if there are a lot of CPUs all busy holding the ->extent_commit_sem rwsem read-locked and a writer arrives? They'd all rush to try to release the fs_info->extent_commit_sem, and they'd block in the down_read() because there's a writer waiting. So there's a guarantee of forward progress. This should answer akpm's concern I think. Thanks, Acked-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
由 Frank Holton 提交于
Convert all applicable cases of printk and pr_* to the btrfs_* macros. Fix all uses of the BTRFS prefix. Signed-off-by: NFrank Holton <fholton@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
由 Miao Xie 提交于
We met the following oops when doing space balance: kobject (ffff88081b590278): tried to init an initialized object, something is seriously wrong. ... Call Trace: [<ffffffff81937262>] dump_stack+0x49/0x5f [<ffffffff8137d259>] kobject_init+0x89/0xa0 [<ffffffff8137d36a>] kobject_init_and_add+0x2a/0x70 [<ffffffffa009bd79>] ? clear_extent_bit+0x199/0x470 [btrfs] [<ffffffffa005e82c>] __link_block_group+0xfc/0x120 [btrfs] [<ffffffffa006b9db>] btrfs_make_block_group+0x24b/0x370 [btrfs] [<ffffffffa00a899b>] __btrfs_alloc_chunk+0x54b/0x7e0 [btrfs] [<ffffffffa00a8c6f>] btrfs_alloc_chunk+0x3f/0x50 [btrfs] [<ffffffffa0060123>] do_chunk_alloc+0x363/0x440 [btrfs] [<ffffffffa00633d4>] btrfs_check_data_free_space+0x104/0x310 [btrfs] [<ffffffffa0069f4d>] btrfs_write_dirty_block_groups+0x48d/0x600 [btrfs] [<ffffffffa007aad4>] commit_cowonly_roots+0x184/0x250 [btrfs] ... Steps to reproduce: # mkfs.btrfs -f <dev> # mount -o nospace_cache <dev> <mnt> # btrfs balance start <mnt> # dd if=/dev/zero of=<mnt>/tmpfile bs=1M count=1 The reason of this problem is that we initialized the raid kobject when we added a block group into a empty raid list. As we know, when we mounted a btrfs filesystem, the raid list was empty, we would initialize the raid kobject when we added the first block group. But if there was not data stored in the block group, the block group would be freed when doing balance, and the raid list would be empty. And then if we allocated a new block group and added it into the raid list, we would initialize the raid kobject again, the oops happened. Fix this problem by initializing the raid kobject just when mounting the fs. Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reported-by: NWang Shilong <wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
由 Jeff Mahoney 提交于
This patch fixes the following warnings: fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:6201:12: sparse: symbol 'get_raid_name' was not declared. Should it be static? fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:8430:9: error: format not a string literal and no format arguments [-Werror=format-security] get_raid_name(index)); Signed-off-by: NJeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com> Reviewed-by: NKees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
由 Valentina Giusti 提交于
The variable found_uncached_bg in find_free_extent is not used since commit 285ff5af (Btrfs: remove the ideal caching code) Signed-off-by: NValentina Giusti <valentina.giusti@microon.de> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
由 Jeff Mahoney 提交于
While trying to debug ENOSPC issues, it's helpful to understand what the kernel's view of the available space is. We export this information via ioctl, but sysfs files are more easily used. Signed-off-by: NJeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
由 Liu Bo 提交于
The way how we process delayed refs is 1) get a bunch of head refs, 2) pick up one head ref, 3) go one node back for any delayed ref updates. The head ref is also linked in the same rbtree as the delayed ref is, so in 1) stage, we have to walk one by one including not only head refs, but delayed refs. When we have a great number of delayed refs pending to process, this'll cost time a lot. Here we introduce a head ref specific rbtree, it only has head refs, so troubles go away. Signed-off-by: NLiu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
- 12 12月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
Currently extent-tree.c:btrfs_lookup_extent_info() can miss the lookup of skinny extent items. This can happen when the execution flow is the following: * We do an extent tree lookup and fail to find a skinny extent item; * As a result, we attempt to see if a non-skinny extent item exists, either by looking at previous item in the leaf or by doing another full extent tree search; * We have a transaction and then we check for a matching delayed ref head in the transaction's delayed refs rbtree; * We find such delayed ref head and then we try to lock it with a call to mutex_trylock(); * The lock was contended so we jump to the label "again", which repeats the extent tree search but for a non-skinny extent item, because we set previously metadata variable to 0 and the search key to look for a non-skinny extent-item; * After the jump (and after releasing the transaction's delayed refs lock), a skinny extent item might have been added to the extent tree but we will miss it because metadata is set to 0 and the search key is set for a non-skinny extent-item. The fix here is to not reset metadata to 0 and to jump to the initial search key setup if the delayed ref head is contended, instead of jumping directly to the extent tree search label ("again"). This issue was found while investigating the issue reported at Bugzilla 64961. David Sterba suspected this function was missing extent items, and that this could be caused by the last change to this function, which was made in the following patch: [PATCH] Btrfs: optimize btrfs_lookup_extent_info() (commit 74be9510) But in fact this issue already existed before, because after failing to find a skinny extent item, the code set the search key for a non-skinny extent item, and on contention of a matching delayed ref head it would not search the extent tree for a skinny extent item anymore. Signed-off-by: NFilipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: NLiu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
- 12 11月, 2013 17 次提交
-
-
由 Miao Xie 提交于
rename the function -- btrfs_start_all_delalloc_inodes(), and make its name be compatible to btrfs_wait_ordered_roots(), since they are always used at the same place. Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
-
由 Miao Xie 提交于
It is very likely that there are lots of ordered extents in the filesytem, if we wait for the completion of all of them when we want to reclaim some space for the metadata space reservation, we would be blocked for a long time. The performance would drop down suddenly for a long time. Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
-
由 Miao Xie 提交于
It was very likely that there were lots of async delalloc pages in the filesystem, if we waited until all the pages were flushed, we would be blocked for a long time, and the performance would also drop down. Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
-
由 Miao Xie 提交于
In shrink_delalloc(), what we need reclaim is the metadata space, so flushing pages by to_reclaim is not reasonable, it is very likely that the pages we flush are not enough. And then we had to invoke the flush function for several times, at the worst, we need call flush_space for several times. It wasted time. We improve this problem by converting the metadata space size we need reserve to the delalloc bytes, By this way, we can flush the pages by a reasonable number. (Now we use a fixed number to do conversion, it is not flexible, maybe we can find a good way to improve it in the future.) Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
-
由 Miao Xie 提交于
This patch picked up the code that was used to calculate the number of the items for which we need reserve space, and we will use it in the next patch. Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
-
由 Miao Xie 提交于
Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
-
由 Miao Xie 提交于
Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
-
由 Dulshani Gunawardhana 提交于
Fix spacing issues detected via checkpatch.pl in accordance with the kernel style guidelines. Signed-off-by: NDulshani Gunawardhana <dulshani.gunawardhana89@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
-
由 Dulshani Gunawardhana 提交于
Use WARN_ON()'s return value in place of WARN_ON(1) for cleaner source code that outputs a more descriptive warnings. Also fix the styling warning of redundant braces that came up as a result of this fix. Signed-off-by: NDulshani Gunawardhana <dulshani.gunawardhana89@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: NZach Brown <zab@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
-
由 Miao Xie 提交于
After running space balance on a new fs, the fs check program outputed the following warning message: free space inode generation (0) did not match free space cache generation (20) Steps to reproduce: # mkfs.btrfs -f <dev> # mount <dev> <mnt> # btrfs balance start <mnt> # umount <mnt> # btrfs check <dev> It was because there was no data space after the space balance, and the free space write out task didn't try to allocate a new data chunk for the free space inode when doing the reservation. So the data space reservation failed, and in order to tell the free space loader that this free space inode could not be trusted, the generation of the free space inode wasn't updated. Then the check program found this problem and outputed the above message. But in fact, it is safe that we try to allocate a new data chunk when we find the data space is not enough. The patch fixes the above problem by this way. Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
-
Instead of doing another extent tree search if the first search failed to find a metadata item, check if the previous item in the leaf is an extent item and use it if it is, otherwise do the second tree search for an extent item. Signed-off-by: NFilipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
-
由 Jeff Mahoney 提交于
When debugging ENOSPC issues, it's nice to be able to see which reservations failed as well as the ones which succeeded. Signed-off-by: NJeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
-
由 Zach Brown 提交于
fs/btrfs/compat.h only contained trivial macro wrappers of drop_nlink() and inc_nlink(). This doesn't belong in mainline. Signed-off-by: NZach Brown <zab@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
-
由 Liu Bo 提交于
When we fail to add a reference after a non-inline insertion by some reasons, eg. ENOSPC, we'll abort the transaction, but we don't return this error to the caller who has to walk around again to find something wrong, that's unnecessary. Also fixup other error paths to keep it simple. Signed-off-by: NLiu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
While trying to track down a reserved space leak I noticed a few places where we won't properly clean up reserved space if we have an error, this patch fixes those up. Thanks, Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
In trying to track down where we were leaking reserved space I noticed our reserve extent tracepoints are a little off. First we were saying that the reserved space had been alloced in btrfs_reserve_extent, which isn't the case, this needs to be triggered when we actually allocate the space when we run the delayed ref. We were also missing a few places where we should have been tracing the btrfs_reserve_extent_free tracepoint. With these in place I was able to put together where we were leaking reserved space. Thanks, Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
-
In extent-tree.c:btrfs_write_dirty_block_groups(), if the call to write_one_cache_group() failed, we would return without putting the block group first. Signed-off-by: NFilipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
-