Skip to content

L
linux

xiphi1978 / linux

通知 2
Star 0
Fork 0
L
linux

体验新版 GitCode，发现更多精彩内容 >>

切换分支/标签
  1. 01 7月, 2008 2 次提交
    • J
      Properly notify block layer of sync writes · 18ce3751
      由 Jens Axboe 提交于 
      fsync_buffers_list() and sync_dirty_buffer() both issue async writes and
then immediately wait on them. Conceptually, that makes them sync writes
and we should treat them as such so that the IO schedulers can handle
them appropriately.

This patch fixes a write starvation issue that Lin Ming reported, where
xx is stuck for more than 2 minutes because of a large number of
synchronous IO in the system:

INFO: task kjournald:20558 blocked for more than 120 seconds.
"echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this
message.
kjournald     D ffff810010820978  6712 20558      2
ffff81022ddb1d10 0000000000000046 ffff81022e7baa10 ffffffff803ba6f2
ffff81022ecd0000 ffff8101e6dc9160 ffff81022ecd0348 000000008048b6cb
0000000000000086 ffff81022c4e8d30 0000000000000000 ffffffff80247537
Call Trace:
[<ffffffff803ba6f2>] kobject_get+0x12/0x17
[<ffffffff80247537>] getnstimeofday+0x2f/0x83
[<ffffffff8029c1ac>] sync_buffer+0x0/0x3f
[<ffffffff8066d195>] io_schedule+0x5d/0x9f
[<ffffffff8029c1e7>] sync_buffer+0x3b/0x3f
[<ffffffff8066d3f0>] __wait_on_bit+0x40/0x6f
[<ffffffff8029c1ac>] sync_buffer+0x0/0x3f
[<ffffffff8066d48b>] out_of_line_wait_on_bit+0x6c/0x78
[<ffffffff80243909>] wake_bit_function+0x0/0x23
[<ffffffff8029e3ad>] sync_dirty_buffer+0x98/0xcb
[<ffffffff8030056b>] journal_commit_transaction+0x97d/0xcb6
[<ffffffff8023a676>] lock_timer_base+0x26/0x4b
[<ffffffff8030300a>] kjournald+0xc1/0x1fb
[<ffffffff802438db>] autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x2e
[<ffffffff80302f49>] kjournald+0x0/0x1fb
[<ffffffff802437bb>] kthread+0x47/0x74
[<ffffffff8022de51>] schedule_tail+0x28/0x5d
[<ffffffff8020cac8>] child_rip+0xa/0x12
[<ffffffff80243774>] kthread+0x0/0x74
[<ffffffff8020cabe>] child_rip+0x0/0x12

Lin Ming confirms that this patch fixes the issue. I've run tests with
it for the past week and no ill effects have been observed, so I'm
proposing it for inclusion into 2.6.26.
Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
      18ce3751
    • D
      block: Fix the starving writes bug in the anticipatory IO scheduler · d585d0b9
      由 Divyesh Shah 提交于 
      AS scheduler alternates between issuing read and write batches. It does
the batch switch only after all requests from the previous batch are
completed.

When switching to a write batch, if there is an on-going read request,
it waits for its completion and indicates its intention of switching by
setting ad->changed_batch and the new direction but does not update the
batch_expire_time for the new write batch which it does in the case of
no previous pending requests.
On completion of the read request, it sees that we were waiting for the
switch and schedules work for kblockd right away and resets the
ad->changed_data flag.
Now when kblockd enters dispatch_request where it is expected to pick
up a write request, it in turn ends the write batch because the
batch_expire_timer was not updated and shows the expire timestamp for
the previous batch.

This results in the write starvation for all the cases where there is
the intention for switching to a write batch, but there is a previous
in-flight read request and the batch gets reverted to a read_batch
right away.

This also holds true in the reverse case (switching from a write batch
to a read batch with an in-flight write request).

I've checked that this bug exists on 2.6.11, 2.6.18, 2.6.24 and
linux-2.6-block git HEAD. I've tested the fix on x86 platforms with
SCSI drives where the driver asks for the next request while a current
request is in-flight.

This patch is based off linux-2.6-block git HEAD.

Bug reproduction:
A simple scenario which reproduces this bug is:
- dd if=/dev/hda3 of=/dev/null &
- lilo
   The lilo takes forever to complete.

This can also be reproduced fairly easily with the earlier dd and
another test
program doing msync().

The example test program below should print out a message after every
iteration
but it simply hangs forever. With this bugfix it makes forward progress.

====
Example test program using msync() (thanks to suleiman AT google DOT
com)

inline uint64_t
rdtsc(void)
{
         int64_t tsc;

         __asm __volatile("rdtsc" : "=A" (tsc));
         return (tsc);
}

int
main(int argc, char **argv)
{
         struct stat st;
         uint64_t e, s, t;
         char *p, q;
         long i;
         int fd;

         if (argc < 2) {
                 printf("Usage: %s <file>\n", argv[0]);
                 return (1);
         }

         if ((fd = open(argv[1], O_RDWR | O_NOATIME)) < 0)
                 err(1, "open");

         if (fstat(fd, &st) < 0)
                 err(1, "fstat");

         p = mmap(NULL, st.st_size, PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE,
MAP_SHARED, fd, 0);

         t = 0;
         for (i = 0; i < 1000; i++) {
                 *p = 0;
                 msync(p, 4096, MS_SYNC);
                 s = rdtsc();
                *p = 0;
                 __asm __volatile(""::: "memory");
                 e = rdtsc();
                 if (argc > 2)
                         printf("%d: %lld cycles %jd %jd\n",
                                i, e - s, (intmax_t)s, (intmax_t)e);
                 t += e - s;
         }
         printf("average time: %lld cycles\n", t / 1000);
         return (0);
}

Cc: <stable@kernel.org>
Acked-by: NNick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
      d585d0b9
  3. 30 6月, 2008 9 次提交
  5. 28 6月, 2008 2 次提交
  7. 27 6月, 2008 27 次提交