- 18 11月, 2019 4 次提交
-
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
This utilizes internal stuff to the extent_io_tree, so we need to export it before we move it. Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
extent_io.c/h are huge, encompassing a bunch of different things. The extent_io_tree code can live on its own, so separate this out. Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
We are moving extent_io_tree into it's on file, so separate out the extent_state init stuff from extent_io_tree_init(). Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
We check both extent buffer and extent state leaks in the same function, separate these two functions out so we can move them around. Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
- 24 9月, 2019 2 次提交
-
-
由 Filipe Manana 提交于
If lock_extent_buffer_for_io() fails, it returns a negative value, but its caller btree_write_cache_pages() ignores such error. This means that a call to flush_write_bio(), from lock_extent_buffer_for_io(), might have failed. We should make btree_write_cache_pages() notice such error values and stop immediatelly, making sure filemap_fdatawrite_range() returns an error to the transaction commit path. A failure from flush_write_bio() should also result in the endio callback end_bio_extent_buffer_writepage() being invoked, which sets the BTRFS_FS_*_ERR bits appropriately, so that there's no risk a transaction or log commit doesn't catch a writeback failure. Reviewed-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Dennis Zhou 提交于
Before, if a eb failed to write out, we would end up triggering a BUG_ON(). As of f4340622 ("btrfs: extent_io: Move the BUG_ON() in flush_write_bio() one level up"), we no longer BUG_ON(), so we should make life consistent and add back the unwritten bytes to dirty_metadata_bytes. Fixes: f4340622 ("btrfs: extent_io: Move the BUG_ON() in flush_write_bio() one level up") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.2+ Reviewed-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NDennis Zhou <dennis@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
- 12 9月, 2019 1 次提交
-
-
由 Filipe Manana 提交于
The lock_extent_buffer_io() returns 1 to the caller to tell it everything went fine and the callers needs to start writeback for the extent buffer (submit a bio, etc), 0 to tell the caller everything went fine but it does not need to start writeback for the extent buffer, and a negative value if some error happened. When it's about to return 1 it tries to lock all pages, and if a try lock on a page fails, and we didn't flush any existing bio in our "epd", it calls flush_write_bio(epd) and overwrites the return value of 1 to 0 or an error. The page might have been locked elsewhere, not with the goal of starting writeback of the extent buffer, and even by some code other than btrfs, like page migration for example, so it does not mean the writeback of the extent buffer was already started by some other task, so returning a 0 tells the caller (btree_write_cache_pages()) to not start writeback for the extent buffer. Note that epd might currently have either no bio, so flush_write_bio() returns 0 (success) or it might have a bio for another extent buffer with a lower index (logical address). Since we return 0 with the EXTENT_BUFFER_WRITEBACK bit set on the extent buffer and writeback is never started for the extent buffer, future attempts to writeback the extent buffer will hang forever waiting on that bit to be cleared, since it can only be cleared after writeback completes. Such hang is reported with a trace like the following: [49887.347053] INFO: task btrfs-transacti:1752 blocked for more than 122 seconds. [49887.347059] Not tainted 5.2.13-gentoo #2 [49887.347060] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message. [49887.347062] btrfs-transacti D 0 1752 2 0x80004000 [49887.347064] Call Trace: [49887.347069] ? __schedule+0x265/0x830 [49887.347071] ? bit_wait+0x50/0x50 [49887.347072] ? bit_wait+0x50/0x50 [49887.347074] schedule+0x24/0x90 [49887.347075] io_schedule+0x3c/0x60 [49887.347077] bit_wait_io+0x8/0x50 [49887.347079] __wait_on_bit+0x6c/0x80 [49887.347081] ? __lock_release.isra.29+0x155/0x2d0 [49887.347083] out_of_line_wait_on_bit+0x7b/0x80 [49887.347084] ? var_wake_function+0x20/0x20 [49887.347087] lock_extent_buffer_for_io+0x28c/0x390 [49887.347089] btree_write_cache_pages+0x18e/0x340 [49887.347091] do_writepages+0x29/0xb0 [49887.347093] ? kmem_cache_free+0x132/0x160 [49887.347095] ? convert_extent_bit+0x544/0x680 [49887.347097] filemap_fdatawrite_range+0x70/0x90 [49887.347099] btrfs_write_marked_extents+0x53/0x120 [49887.347100] btrfs_write_and_wait_transaction.isra.4+0x38/0xa0 [49887.347102] btrfs_commit_transaction+0x6bb/0x990 [49887.347103] ? start_transaction+0x33e/0x500 [49887.347105] transaction_kthread+0x139/0x15c So fix this by not overwriting the return value (ret) with the result from flush_write_bio(). We also need to clear the EXTENT_BUFFER_WRITEBACK bit in case flush_write_bio() returns an error, otherwise it will hang any future attempts to writeback the extent buffer, and undo all work done before (set back EXTENT_BUFFER_DIRTY, etc). This is a regression introduced in the 5.2 kernel. Fixes: 2e3c2513 ("btrfs: extent_io: add proper error handling to lock_extent_buffer_for_io()") Fixes: f4340622 ("btrfs: extent_io: Move the BUG_ON() in flush_write_bio() one level up") Reported-by: NZdenek Sojka <zsojka@seznam.cz> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/GpO.2yos.3WGDOLpx6t%7D.1TUDYM@seznam.cz/T/#uReported-by: NStefan Priebe - Profihost AG <s.priebe@profihost.ag> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/5c4688ac-10a7-fb07-70e8-c5d31a3fbb38@profihost.ag/T/#tReported-by: NDrazen Kacar <drazen.kacar@oradian.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/DB8PR03MB562876ECE2319B3E579590F799C80@DB8PR03MB5628.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com/ Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=204377Signed-off-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
- 09 9月, 2019 2 次提交
-
-
由 Omar Sandoval 提交于
Since commit fee187d9 ("Btrfs: do not set EXTENT_DIRTY along with EXTENT_DELALLOC"), we never set EXTENT_DIRTY in inode->io_tree, so we can simplify and stop trying to clear it. Reviewed-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: NOmar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Nikolay Borisov 提交于
It was added in ba8b04c1 ("btrfs: extend btrfs_set_extent_delalloc and its friends to support in-band dedupe and subpage size patchset") as a preparatory patch for in-band and subapge block size patchsets. However neither of those are likely to be merged anytime soon and the code has diverged significantly from the last public post of either of those patchsets. It's unlikely either of the patchests are going to use those preparatory steps so just remove the variables. Since cow_file_range also took delalloc_end to pass it to extent_clear_unlock_delalloc remove the parameter from that function as well. Signed-off-by: NNikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
- 10 7月, 2019 1 次提交
-
-
由 Tejun Heo 提交于
wbc_account_io() does a very specific job - try to see which cgroup is actually dirtying an inode and transfer its ownership to the majority dirtier if needed. The name is too generic and confusing. Let's rename it to something more specific. Reviewed-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: NTejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
-
- 06 7月, 2019 1 次提交
-
-
由 Colin Ian King 提交于
Currently if the allocation of roots or tmp_ulist fails the error handling does not free up the allocation of path causing a memory leak. Fix this and other similar leaks by moving the call of btrfs_free_path from label out to label out_free_ulist. Kudos to David Sterba for spotting the issue in my original fix and suggesting the correct way to fix the leak and Anand Jain for spotting a double free issue. Addresses-Coverity: ("Resource leak") Fixes: 5911c8fe ("btrfs: fiemap: preallocate ulists for btrfs_check_shared") Reviewed-by: NNikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NColin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
- 04 7月, 2019 1 次提交
-
-
由 Goldwyn Rodrigues 提交于
Simplification. No point passing the tree variable when it can be evaluated from inode. The tests now use the io_tree from btrfs_inode as opposed to creating one. Signed-off-by: NGoldwyn Rodrigues <rgoldwyn@suse.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
- 02 7月, 2019 5 次提交
-
-
由 David Sterba 提交于
The block device is passed around for the only purpose to set it in new bios. Move the assignment one level up. This is a preparatory patch for further bdev cleanups. Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 David Sterba 提交于
Print the error messages using the helpers that also print the filesystem identification. Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 David Sterba 提交于
The write_locks is either 0 or 1 and always updated under the lock, so we don't need the atomic_t semantics. Reviewed-by: NNikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 David Sterba 提交于
The spinning_writers is either 0 or 1 and always updated under the lock, so we don't need the atomic_t semantics. Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 David Sterba 提交于
The blocking_writers is either 0 or 1 and always updated under the lock, so we don't need the atomic_t semantics. Reviewed-by: NNikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
- 01 7月, 2019 5 次提交
-
-
由 Nikolay Borisov 提交于
The function has a lot of return values and specific conventions making it cumbersome to understand what's returned. Have a go at documenting its parameters and return values. Reviewed-by: NJohannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@suse.de> Reviewed-by: NQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NNikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Nikolay Borisov 提交于
Currently find_first_clear_extent_bit always returns a range whose starting value is >= passed 'start'. This implicit trimming behavior is somewhat subtle and an implementation detail. Instead, this patch modifies the function such that now it always returns the range which contains passed 'start' and has the given bits unset. This range could either be due to presence of existing records which contains 'start' but have the bits unset or because there are no records that contain the given starting offset. This patch also adds test cases which cover find_first_clear_extent_bit since they were missing up until now. Reviewed-by: NQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NNikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Nikolay Borisov 提交于
There several functions which open code btrfs_lock_and_flush_ordered_range, just replace them with a call to the function. No functional changes. Reviewed-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: NNikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Qu Wenruo 提交于
At the context of btrfs_run_delalloc_range(), we haven't started/joined a transaction, thus even something went wrong, we can't and won't abort transaction, thus no way to make the fs RO. Reviewed-by: NNikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 David Sterba 提交于
btrfs_check_shared looks up parents of a given extent and uses ulists for that. These are allocated and freed repeatedly. Preallocation in the caller will avoid the overhead and also allow us to use the GFP_KERNEL as it is happens before the extent locks are taken. Reviewed-by: NNikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Reviewed-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
- 30 4月, 2019 18 次提交
-
-
由 Christoph Hellwig 提交于
We only have two callers that need the integer loop iterator, and they can easily maintain it themselves. Suggested-by: NMatthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: NJohannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@suse.de> Acked-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Reviewed-by: NHannes Reinecke <hare@suse.com> Acked-by: NColy Li <colyli@suse.de> Reviewed-by: NMatthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
-
由 David Sterba 提交于
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Nikolay Borisov 提交于
None of the implementers of the submit_bio_hook use the bio_offset parameter, simply remove it. No functional changes. Reviewed-by: NJohannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@suse.de> Signed-off-by: NNikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Nikolay Borisov 提交于
This function always uses the btree inode's io_tree. Stop taking the tree as a function argument and instead access it internally from read_extent_buffer_pages. No functional changes. Reviewed-by: NJohannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@suse.de> Signed-off-by: NNikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Nikolay Borisov 提交于
This function is very similar to find_first_extent_bit except that it locates the first contiguous span of space which does not have bits set. It's intended use is in the freespace trimming code. Signed-off-by: NNikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Nikolay Borisov 提交于
It will be used in a future patch that will require modifying an extent_io_tree struct under a spinlock. Signed-off-by: NNikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Nikolay Borisov 提交于
This function is going to be used to clear out the device extent allocation information. Give it a more generic name and export it. This is in preparation to replacing the pending/pinned chunk lists with an extent tree. No functional changes. Signed-off-by: NNikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 David Sterba 提交于
We can read fs_info from extent buffer and can drop it from the parameters. Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 David Sterba 提交于
We can read fs_info from extent buffer and can drop it from the parameters. Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 David Sterba 提交于
We can read fs_info from extent buffer and can drop it from the parameters. As all callsites are updated, add the btrfs_ prefix as the function is exported. Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 David Sterba 提交于
We can read fs_info from extent buffer and can drop it from the parameters. Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Arnd Bergmann 提交于
BUG_ON(1) leads to bogus warnings from clang when CONFIG_PROFILE_ANNOTATED_BRANCHES is set: fs/btrfs/volumes.c:5041:3: error: variable 'max_chunk_size' is used uninitialized whenever 'if' condition is false [-Werror,-Wsometimes-uninitialized] BUG_ON(1); ^~~~~~~~~ include/asm-generic/bug.h:61:36: note: expanded from macro 'BUG_ON' #define BUG_ON(condition) do { if (unlikely(condition)) BUG(); } while (0) ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ include/linux/compiler.h:48:23: note: expanded from macro 'unlikely' # define unlikely(x) (__branch_check__(x, 0, __builtin_constant_p(x))) ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ fs/btrfs/volumes.c:5046:9: note: uninitialized use occurs here max_chunk_size); ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~ include/linux/kernel.h:860:36: note: expanded from macro 'min' #define min(x, y) __careful_cmp(x, y, <) ^ include/linux/kernel.h:853:17: note: expanded from macro '__careful_cmp' __cmp_once(x, y, __UNIQUE_ID(__x), __UNIQUE_ID(__y), op)) ^ include/linux/kernel.h:847:25: note: expanded from macro '__cmp_once' typeof(y) unique_y = (y); \ ^ fs/btrfs/volumes.c:5041:3: note: remove the 'if' if its condition is always true BUG_ON(1); ^ include/asm-generic/bug.h:61:32: note: expanded from macro 'BUG_ON' #define BUG_ON(condition) do { if (unlikely(condition)) BUG(); } while (0) ^ fs/btrfs/volumes.c:4993:20: note: initialize the variable 'max_chunk_size' to silence this warning u64 max_chunk_size; ^ = 0 Change it to BUG() so clang can see that this code path can never continue. Reviewed-by: NNikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NArnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 David Sterba 提交于
Long time ago (2008), the extent buffers were organized in a LRU list and switched to rb-tree in 6af118ce ("Btrfs: Index extent buffers in an rbtree"). There was one stale macro definition left. Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Qu Wenruo 提交于
We can only get <=0 from extent_write_cache_pages, add an ASSERT() for it just in case. Then instead of submitting the write bio even if we got some error, check the return value first. If we have already hit some error, just clean up the corrupted or half-baked bio, and return error. If there is no error so far, then call flush_write_bio() and return the result. Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Qu Wenruo 提交于
This function needs some extra checks on locked pages and eb. For error handling we need to unlock locked pages and the eb. There is a rare >0 return value branch, where all pages get locked while write bio is not flushed. Thankfully it's handled by the only caller, btree_write_cache_pages(), as later write_one_eb() call will trigger submit_one_bio(). So there shouldn't be any problem. Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Qu Wenruo 提交于
We can only get @ret <= 0. Add an ASSERT() for it just in case. Then, instead of submitting the write bio even we got some error, check the return value first. If we have already hit some error, just clean up the corrupted or half-baked bio, and return error. If there is no error so far, then call flush_write_bio() and return the result. Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Qu Wenruo 提交于
Since __extent_writepage() will no longer return >0 value, (ret == AOP_WRITEPAGE_ACTIVATE) will never be true. Kill that dead branch. Reviewed-by: NJohannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@suse.de> Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Qu Wenruo 提交于
In btree_write_cache_pages(), we can only get @ret <= 0. Add an ASSERT() for it just in case. Then instead of submitting the write bio even we got some error, check the return value first. If we have already hit some error, just clean up the corrupted or half-baked bio, and return error. If there is no error so far, then call flush_write_bio() and return the result. Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-